
From Iraq to Iran: the US quest for Israeli military dominance
As Israeli jets and American bombers streaked across Iranian skies earlier this month, the world watched a familiar game plan unfold – one that had its origins in secret meetings, veiled ambitions and the relentless logic of regional dominance that has haunted the
Middle East for generations.
The process began decades earlier, in the smoke of American air strikes on Iraq and the calculations of US policymakers determined to keep
Israel unrivalled.
It was the late 1990s when a small, bipartisan delegation of senior US senators touched down in the
United Arab Emirates . Their visit coincided with the American strikes, part of a legacy of US intervention in the Gulf that had left the region in a state of perpetual unease since the guns of Operation Desert Storm fell silent in
Kuwait at the start of the decade.
One ranking Emirati official, exasperated by the endless cycle of violence, posed the question that had been whispered in the corridors of power throughout the Gulf: why didn't Washington simply topple Saddam Hussein and be done with it?
A US senator, unmoved by the query, offered a response with chilling candour. The objective, he told the official, was not regime change, but rather to 'reduce any regional state on a military and technological par with Israel to a pre-industrial society'. The official later shared that exchange with this reporter.
A US F-18 fighter jet flies over gas flares at an oil well in northern Kuwait in 1995. Photo: AFP
Such an agenda – once the preserve of neoconservative ideologues – soon became official US policy in the wake of the September 11 attacks.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Seaborne scare: how Israel-Iran war put global shipping on alert
Sometime in early 1988, while the nine-year war between Iran and Iraq was still raging, veteran British publisher Abdullah Jonathan Wallace paid a visit to his old friend, Bahrain's information minister Tariq Almoayed. As they drove out of Manama to Tariq's home on another island in Bahrain 's archipelago, Wallace looked seaward and was shocked to see a task force of US Navy ships moored in the Persian Gulf. 'Tariq! Look! Ships!' Wallace excitedly said to the Bahraini minister. Almoayed, who was driving, kept his eyes firmly fixed on the road. 'Ships? I see no ships,' he replied, giving Wallace an unforgettable anecdote to later relate to his Middle East team at the United Press International news agency, which included this reporter. That unprecedented deployment of US Navy ships in the territorial waters of a Gulf monarchy was in preparation for Operation Praying Mantis against Iranian naval assets.


South China Morning Post
7 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Are migrant workers the real glue cementing Asean-GCC ties?
The second Asean -Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Summit and the inaugural Asean-GCC-China Summit, held in Malaysia from May 26 to 27, marked a significant step towards deepening ties between Southeast Asia and the Gulf. Advertisement While interregional cooperation is often framed in terms of energy, trade and investment, the bedrock of this relationship is increasingly shaped by people-to-people connectivity, anchored in labour migration, religious devotion and growing financial linkages. As fast-growing regions, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and the GCC are forming bonds as much through daily human interaction as through strategic interests. In 2022, the combined workforce of the six GCC countries – Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) – was estimated at 32 million. Of these, Gulf nationals accounted for just 5.8 million, or 18 per cent, while more than 26 million were foreign workers. Although comprehensive and up-to-date data on the total number of Asean citizens working in the GCC is limited, available figures highlight the Gulf's significance as a destination for Asean labour migrants and a key source of remittances. 01:47 Chinese Premier Li Qiang hails first-ever three-way talks with SE Asia, Gulf nations Chinese Premier Li Qiang hails first-ever three-way talks with SE Asia, Gulf nations Saudi Arabia , the largest country in the GCC, employed about 726,000 Filipinos, 175,000 Indonesians and 164,000 Myanmar nationals, according to its 2022 census. The UAE , the second largest country in the region, hosted about 780,000 Filipinos last year. Kuwait, though smaller in size, is still a popular destination for migrant workers, with more than 223,000 Filipinos living there as of 2024. Most of these migrant workers are employed in sectors such as domestic work, healthcare and construction. Recognising the structural importance of these labour flows, Asean and GCC member states have increasingly sought to institutionalise protection mechanisms through bilateral agreements. For example, the 2017 labour agreement between Saudi Arabia and the Philippines set standards for recruitment and employment practices to ensure the rights and welfare of Filipino workers. Advertisement Indonesia , which imposed a moratorium in 2015 on sending workers to Saudi Arabia amid frequent cases of abuse, is now preparing to lift the ban by the end of this month. This development follows a renewed agreement to strengthen worker protection, including a minimum wage, health and life insurance, and digital integration of recruitment data to monitor irregular practices and improve oversight. These moves point to a clear trend: labour governance is becoming central to Asean-GCC cooperation. Both sides are shifting from ad hoc arrangements to a more structured approach focused on rights, protections and shared responsibility – a sign of a more mature and balanced partnership.


South China Morning Post
8 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
From Iraq to Iran: the US quest for Israeli military dominance
As Israeli jets and American bombers streaked across Iranian skies earlier this month, the world watched a familiar game plan unfold – one that had its origins in secret meetings, veiled ambitions and the relentless logic of regional dominance that has haunted the Middle East for generations. The process began decades earlier, in the smoke of American air strikes on Iraq and the calculations of US policymakers determined to keep Israel unrivalled. It was the late 1990s when a small, bipartisan delegation of senior US senators touched down in the United Arab Emirates . Their visit coincided with the American strikes, part of a legacy of US intervention in the Gulf that had left the region in a state of perpetual unease since the guns of Operation Desert Storm fell silent in Kuwait at the start of the decade. One ranking Emirati official, exasperated by the endless cycle of violence, posed the question that had been whispered in the corridors of power throughout the Gulf: why didn't Washington simply topple Saddam Hussein and be done with it? A US senator, unmoved by the query, offered a response with chilling candour. The objective, he told the official, was not regime change, but rather to 'reduce any regional state on a military and technological par with Israel to a pre-industrial society'. The official later shared that exchange with this reporter. A US F-18 fighter jet flies over gas flares at an oil well in northern Kuwait in 1995. Photo: AFP Such an agenda – once the preserve of neoconservative ideologues – soon became official US policy in the wake of the September 11 attacks.