When Lena met Megan: How a DM blossomed into ‘Too Much'
LOS ANGELES - Sliding into someone's DMs - even with the purest intentions - can be a daunting move. Will they see it? Is it weird? Will they respond? Lena Dunham, the creator of HBO's "Girls," saw it as a shot for her latest creative collaboration.
It began with a shout-out. It was 2022 and Dunham was fangirling over images of Megan Stalter, who was attending her first Emmys as part of the cast of "Hacks," in a sheer red lace slip dress. Dunham posted one to her Instagram stories, calling Stalter one of the best-dressed women in Hollywood.
Stalter responded and before long, the exchange led to a message from Dunham about a project she wanted to discuss with her. Stalter didn't see the message right away. Not that Dunham was keeping tabs herself - she enlists someone to handle her social media footprint because, as she says, "I don't shop in that aisle."
"I kept saying to my friend, who runs my social media, 'Anything from Meg? Any word from Meg?'" Dunham says while seated next to Stalter recently. "It's the first time I really shot my shot that way. But I thought, you miss 100% of the shots you don't make."
Now, they're joining forces in "Too Much," Dunham's big return to television since her semi-autobiographical creation "Girls" drew both praise and criticism more than a decade ago with its intimate glimpse at the messy friendships, ambitions and sexual misadventures of four 20-something white women in New York.
But "Too Much" isn't a story about friendship or sex. It's about love - Dunham's version. It's loosely inspired by her move to London and eventual marriage to musician Luis Felber, who co-created the series with Dunham.
In the series, which premiered Thursday, Stalter stars as Jessica, an eccentric and complacent but capable producer at a commercial agency who moves to London from New York - her pint-size scraggly dog in tow - after her seven-year relationship blows up. Her over-romanticized vision of life across the pond, fueled by love stories like "Sense and Sensibility" set in pastoral England, starts out more bedraggled than charmed.
But on her first night there, she meets Felix (Will Sharpe), a wayward punk musician who takes an interest in her fish-out-of-water vibe. After a bathroom meet-cute with confusing results - he walks her home, she makes the first move on her couch, he reveals he's seeing someone and leaves, then she accidentally sets herself on fire while making a TikTok video - they quickly form an attachment that turns into a swift and tender, albeit complicated, romance of two people trying not to let their personal baggage get in the way.
It brings Stalter - whose profile has risen precipitously since her run of making viral character sketches on Twitter and TikTok led to her turn on "Hacks" as Kayla, the seemingly hapless assistant-turned-Hollywood manager who is actually good at the job despite her daffy persona - sharply into focus as a quirky and relatable leading woman. Dunham saw that potential.
"I watched the show where she was hosting people making snacks," says Dunham, referring to Netflix's "Snack vs. Chef," a snack-making competition.
"My nephew watched it by himself," Stalter interjects with a laugh that turns wistful.
"He watched it by himself?"
"Yes, my sister said recently she found out he watched it by himself. He's 7. He's just an amazing angel."
"I watched it and thought: 'She's a genius,'" Dunham continues. "I just felt that she had amazing range that was - I'm not even going to say she wasn't tapping into it because it was there, even in her comedy. The biggest thing with centering someone in a show is, you have to want to watch them. You have to sort of be addicted to watching them. And that's how I feel about her. I just knew that she would inspire me as a writer and as a director."
Stalter and Dunham, both in trendy suit attire, are nestled on a couch at Netflix's office in New York City like two friends about to settle in for a night of "Love Island" after work - except they're just video conferencing into this interview. Their bond and banter reveals itself early. Stalter says she is not someone who worships celebrities - "I don't even know actors' names sometimes" - but stresses that she is a "mega, mega, mega Lena/'Girls' fan" and is still processing their collaboration.
"It was always going to be Meg, it was written for Meg," Dunham says.
Stalter imbues Jess with equal measures of absurdity and charm, making the character as easy to rally behind as Bridget Jones or Sally Albright - whether she is waddling to the bathroom post-coitus or accidentally posting a series of TikTok videos, meant to stay in drafts, that take aim at her ex's new girlfriend. But the show illuminates how she is at her most alluring when vulnerability is in reserve.
Midway through "Too Much," a flashback episode unravels Jessica's pain: It tracks the rise and fall of her previous relationship with Zev (Michael Zegen), from the sweet early days, to the growing pains and then brutal emotional withdrawal. Jess' attempt to discuss their troubles - after learning she's pregnant - leads to a devastating exchange and the end of their relationship. The epilogue to their union is a brokenhearted Jess having an abortion.
"It was important to me that we feel that they [Jess and Felix] have a past and that's the thing they're wrestling with - they're not wrestling with whether they like the other one or understand the other one or are attracted to the other; it's not external forces that are keeping them apart," Dunham says. "It's what we're all up against, which is our own pain and our own trauma and our own inability to move past it because it's hard."
The episode was also an opportunity to show a realistic and nuanced portrayal of abortion, Dunham says, where Jess wrestles with the decision but not because she feels guilty or believes she's doing the wrong thing: "She's just sad because oftentimes when a person has to terminate a pregnancy, there's a lot of factors around them that are challenging - just because something is an emotional decision doesn't mean it's wrong."
Dunham says she considered the Jess-Zev breakup the central mystery of the show.
"It's funny because I acted like what happened between Jess and Zev was like me keeping a plot point from 'Lost' secret," she says. "And it's just that they broke up. It's a totally normal breakup, but to her, it's like her rosebud, it's her 'Citizen Kane.'"
Stalter found it refreshing that Dunham wanted to show someone in their mid-30s still grappling with the pains of a past relationship while falling in love - and learning that love is not always the magical cure.
"I actually think that being in love is bringing up everything that's ever happened to you because you're finally with someone that's safe," Stalter says. "You're like, 'Wait, what if you knew this about me? Would you still make me feel safe? OK - what if you knew this about me? We still safe?"
While "Too Much" is another narrative inspired by her life, Dunham knew from its inception that she was not interested in being the face of the series. Even before "Girls" premiered in 2012, the attention on Dunham, whose prior work was the 2010 indie film "Tiny Furniture," was intense. Over its six-season run, the buzz around "Girls" - a series she wrote, sometimes directed and played the central character in - also opened it up to criticisms and commentary about representation, the privileged and self-absorbed behavior of its millennial characters and Dunham's prolific nudity.
She largely retreated from television when "Girls" ended - she co-created HBO's short-lived comedy "Camping" and directed the network's pilot of "Industry." Dunham says the experience of "Girls" - and the time away - gave her a clearer sense of who she is and her limitations as she approached this new series in her late 30s.
"There was a moment where it seemed like her [Meg's] schedule might not work and I remember saying, 'I don't know if I want to make this show if that's the case.' I wasn't like, 'I don't want to put myself through this, therefore it's Meg.' But separately, I don't really want to put myself through it."
In the beginning, with "Girls," Dunham says she was able to brush off the criticism. But the commentary was relentless, even in her day-to-day life.
"I was in a recovery room at a hospital and a nurse said, 'Why do you get naked on television all the time?'" she recalls. "We live in a strange time where people act like they don't have power over what they're viewing. They act like you held their eyeballs open with a weird eyeball machine and force them to watch your show and they are living a trauma as a result.
"It created a lot of anger in me and I don't like to be angry. I think because I don't like to be angry, I really suppressed that. And suppressed anger has to come out somewhere," she adds. "And because I deal with chronic illness, it made it harder to bear that. I was swallowing down so much rage."
There isn't as much sex and nudity in "Too Much." But there's some. As someone whose success began online, where trolls are in high supply, Stalter has learned to navigate unsolicited feedback about her appearance.
"I haven't been on TV that long, but I have been a comedian that posts online for a long time," she says. "I love the way I look and I love my brain and my heart so much that someone calling me fat online, I'm like, 'Honey, there's a lot of Reddit threads about that. Who cares?' If you're not attracted to me, good thing we're not dating, I guess. I'm almost 35 - I'm so happy that I feel this way about myself."
While Stalter is the beating heart of the show, Dunham is among the memorable supporting players as Jessica's sister Nora. The character, who has moved in with her grandmother (Rhea Perlman) and mother (Rita Wilson), is confronting her own crossroads after her husband, played by former "Girls" co-star Andrew Rannells, decides he wants freedom to explore his sexuality. The split leaves her bedbound, hardly attentive to the teenage son they share.
"Nora is proud of her sister, but she's also jealous - she is trapped in the very space Jessica deemed tragic and pathetic, at home with their family," Dunham says. "Even her son seems to find it fairly pathetic, and his father gets to be the hero, despite having left. I'm not a mother, but I can relate to feeling stuck because of obligation and also to wondering when it's going to be your turn to make the decision that's right for you. She doesn't get her 'next act' and has to live with the one she's got. If we get to make a second season, I have a lot to mine here."
It's unclear how much of "Too Much" there will be. The season closes in romantic-comedy fashion, with its main couple, despite the road bumps, choosing each other and getting married. But Dunham has more to say.
"We don't always have control of how much we get to make," Dunham says. "I thought about this with the first season of 'Girls' - if this show never comes back, then I want to end with Hannah eating cake on the beach after her boyfriend got hit by a truck. That's what needs to happen. And we know how we wanted this to end. But as in life, a happy ending is just the beginning of a different life with someone. And so - "
"Twenty more seasons!" Stalter cheerily interjects.
"It's going to run for seasons upon seasons," Dunham continues. "But I do think about marriage comedies. I'm really obsessed with 'Mr. Mom,' with Michael Keaton. And I love 'Mad About You.' I love a comedy that lets us see what's behind keeping a marriage going. I would love the chance to see them being parents."
"Having triplets," Stalter adds.
"I'd love to film Meg getting a C-section for the triplets," Dunham says.
Stalter quips: "A whole episode is the whole C-section."
While "Too Much" puts Dunham fully in her romantic comedy era, it wasn't originally intended to be a show about love. Before she met Felber, Dunham was mulling tapping into her experience of spending extended periods in England for work and the culture clash of a brassy American coming to the U.K. Then she met Felber, and "it was the first time I ever felt like I was living in a romantic comedy," she says. "I always felt like I was living in a sad, gritty romantic drama where they don't end up together in the end, and someone falls asleep in a puddle."
"Too Much" features episode titles that pay homage to romance films like "Notting Hill," "Pretty Woman" and "Love Actually." Dunham says the rom-com genre was the first she ever loved, but developed internalized snobbery around it as she got older.
"I felt like I was having this innocent romantic forced out of me," she says. "By the time I was in my 20s, I felt embarrassed to be that romantic person. I felt as though to even feel that way was sort of naive and silly. I didn't feel like I was allowed to want the things that I wanted or ask for the things that I really needed."
As she got older and started dating again after a period of being single in her early 30s, that began to change.
"When I met my husband, I was kind of back in that place in my 20s, where I thought, 'This is not something that's going to happen for me,'" she says. "And as a result, I was very honest and I was very blunt, and I think it ended up having a really interesting effect, which is that it actually made it possible for us to get to know each other, and in turn, created something that was more romantic than anything I'd experienced before."
Enough to approach him with a proposal about a month into their relationship: Will you make this show with me?
He said yes. In the time since, they've collaborated on other projects - she worked on two of Felber's music videos and he helped score her 2022 film "Sharp Stick." Working on a TV show, though, was a big commitment early into their relationship. But it turns out it wasn't too much.
"I remember thinking we could make something really cool if all the universe and all the Tetris pieces of life fall into place," he says in a separate video call. "When you're at the beginning of a relationship and you feel like someone's taste matches yours, improves yours - that was Lena. I didn't understand what it meant - 'Hey, do you want to make a TV show with me?' I was like, 'What does that entail? Do I walk up and down the room just cracking jokes and you write them down?' She's like, 'Basically.' I was like, 'I could do that.'"
It's not their story directly, but the show was a way for them to put their experiences together.
"Our love was the germ of this, or the nucleus of it; we always wanted to make something joyful. But when you're going on set every day with your partner, you learn a lot about them quickly," he says. "Most couples get home from work and are like, 'How was your day, my love?' We had that down. I think it was a catalyst to our relationship, in a way. To be able to see Lena direct, act and write was like, 'Wow.' It was so inspiring to be around someone like that."
Dunham's mark on the rom-com genre is still in progress. She's currently in production on the upcoming film "Good Sex," also for Netflix, about a 40-something couples therapist who reenters the dating scene: "The film is very much an examination of what it is to exit your 30s and wonder if your exploration decades have come to a close," Dunham says. "It's a question we are always asking ourselves because the 30s were the new 20s, but what are the 40s, especially if you haven't chosen to, or been able to be, a parent?"
The film boasts Natalie Portman, Rashida Jones, Mark Ruffalo and '90s rom-com queen Meg Ryan. There isn't an Instagram backstory involved with the casting of that Meg. Dunham says she approached Ryan while at Taylor Swift's Eras tour stop in London.
"I tend to let icons have their space, but she and I shared Nora Ephron as a guiding force in our lives, and so I really just wanted to talk about Nora because remembering her makes me happy," Dunham shared in a follow-up email. "It led to a lovely, nonwork lunch and burgeoning friendship and I wrote with her in mind. But I was still stunned and honored when she said yes. Watching her at the table read, Natalie and Rashida and I were just pinching ourselves. Afterwards, we all texted 'Meg f-ing Ryan!' What can I say - I may be long sober, but I'm addicted to Megs."
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'I Pretty Much Spent Everything I Earned,' Admits 'Harry Potter' Star Jason Isaacs on His Money Habits
"I pretty much spent everything I earned," actor Jason Isaacs recently admitted, acknowledging that decades of Hollywood paychecks never swelled his savings. The 62‑year‑old, who played Lucius Malfoy in the "Harry Potter" film series and Timothy Ratliff in HBO's "The White Lotus," spoke candidly in an interview with New York magazine about how he matched each raise with equal spending. His candor throws fresh light on lifestyle creep—the silent budget siphon now dogging households even as wages climb and prices cool. Lifestyle Creep Bites Even Wizards Isaacs told New York magazine he earned about $40,000 for every "White Lotus" episode—modest by prestige‑TV standards—yet still "expanded my outgoings to match my incomings." Don't Miss: Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart & Target – Many are rushing to grab $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. Producer David Bernad told The Hollywood Reporter that the cast is paid one equal rate. That flat structure, according to Bernad, values art over earnings and keeps budgets trim. Isaacs' confession echoes past stars who vaulted from indie stages to franchise fame only to watch wealth slip away. "Many feel as though they have to spend more as they progress through career milestones," certified financial planner Matt Saneholtz of Tobias Financial Advisors told CNBC for a story on Isaacs' habits, warning the approach "goes against everything" he teaches about building lasting wealth. Saneholtz says that what begins with a few upgraded purchases—like nicer hotels or premium subscriptions—can quietly grow into a steady habit of overspending. Trending: Named a TIME Best Invention and Backed by 5,000+ Users, Kara's Air-to-Water Pod Cuts Plastic and Costs — Planner Urges Automatic Investing Saneholtz advises routing a slice of every raise straight into an investment account before it reaches checking. "You won't miss what you don't see," he said, urging quarterly budget reviews and subscription audits. Fellow planner Robert Persichitte expanded the point, telling Business Insider that high‑ticket items like larger homes lock people into lifestyles that are hard to unwind, making it crucial to distinguish between being rich and being wealthy. Both advisers frame investing as an antidote: every dollar diverted to index funds today can snowball through compounding rather than vanish on fleeting luxuries. Automatic transfers also blunt decision fatigue, Saneholtz said, because savings grow untouched while discretionary funds remain visible for daily needs. Persichitte added that visibility matters: "If your net pay doesn't go up, you don't feel rich, and you don't feel the need to spend." Their shared blueprint—save first, spend later—mirrors guidance in Vanguard's long‑running "pay yourself first" Show Thin Safety Nets Federal Reserve data underline the stakes. Its latest Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking found just 63 % of adults could cover a $400 emergency with cash, matching 2024 levels yet below the pandemic peak. The Fed has noted rising living‑cost worries despite steady employment gains. Meanwhile a Bankrate poll released last month showed 26% of U.S. adults believe they must earn at least $150,000 a year to feel financially secure, up from 25 % last year. Saneholtz links the numbers, saying lifestyle creep quietly widens the gap between perceived comfort and real financial cushions. Once higher paychecks become the norm, cutting back can feel like failure. He urges clients to automate raises toward retirement goals before lifestyle inflation takes hold. Read Next: Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Image: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article 'I Pretty Much Spent Everything I Earned,' Admits 'Harry Potter' Star Jason Isaacs on His Money Habits originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.


New York Post
26 minutes ago
- New York Post
Billy Joel tells Bill Maher he's over what ‘woke' people think of him and his music
Legendary musician Billy Joel told Bill Maher he doesn't care if the far left complains about his statements or music anymore. During the latest episode of Maher's 'Club Random' podcast released Monday, the two discussed the 'woke' left's reaction to anything it disagrees with, with Joel admitting he is over being concerned about what that group thinks of him. Advertisement 'At this point… I'm inured to it,' Joel said in reply to Maher asking if he doesn't care if woke people criticize him any longer. Maher brought up woke outrage while talking to Joel about his 1976 song, 'Angry Young Man.' In the song, Joel sings, 'I believe I've passed the age, of consciousness and righteous rage, I found that just surviving was a noble fight. I once believed in causes too, I had my pointless point of view, and life went on no matter who was wrong or right.' 4 During an episode of Maher's 'Club Random' podcast, the two discussed the 'woke' left's reaction to anything it disagrees with. Getty Images Advertisement With help from Joel, Maher recited the lyrics and commented, 'I feel like that is the message of the age, even though some people will hear that and say, 'Look at these two a——-!'' 'Boomers,' Joel chimed in, mocking an insult often lobbed online at older generations. The host continued, noting how mad leftists get when people don't declare, ''Trump's the worst.'' 4 Maher brought up woke outrage while talking to Joel about his 1976 song, 'Angry Young Man.' Youtube / Club Random w/ Bill Maher Advertisement The HBO host then brought up Joel's Vietnam War-era song, 'Goodnight Saigon' and its lyrics, 'And who was wrong? And who was right? It didn't matter in the thick of the fight.' 'Do you still feel that way?' he asked the singer, regarding the lyrics. 'Yes,' he replied. 'And you don't care what they say about you – the woke?' Maher asked. Advertisement 4 The host continued, noting how mad leftists get when people don't declare, ''Trump's the worst.'' Youtube / Club Random w/ Bill Maher 'At this point, no,' the musician replied, though he noted how he tries to understand the point of view of people who disagree with him. 'On the other hand, I'm always trying to find out the other point of view. What's, you know, not my point of view – somebody else's point of view. Okay, I'd like to understand why they think that way.' 'It's so difficult in this day and age,' Maher replied. 4 'At this point, no,' the musician replied, though he noted how he tries to understand the point of view of people who disagree with him. Youtube / Club Random w/ Bill Maher Maher continued, 'I mean it is what I am always trying to do on my show. It is, look, this is one safe space for everybody and I will take the heat from either – both sides. I mean I do feel like the left, who, ironically I'm more actually aligned with, is more snippy about it, and has a worse attitude about it, and makes me viscerally not like them more sometimes.' Elsewhere, the two discussed how social media makes political outrage worse. Advertisement 'People say things all the time on [social media] they would never say, if they had to say it to your face,' Maher said. 'It just always surprises me how people, they express this hatred,' Joel responded. 'It's like, you hate a musician because he wrote something?'
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fact Check: Investigating rumor that 3 missing girls were found alive in hollow tree 10 days after Texas floods
Claim: Three girls were found alive inside a hollow tree more than a week after the July 2025 Texas flash floods. Rating: A story that spread on social media in July 2025 claimed three girls were found alive in a hollow tree more than a week after floods devastated the area around Texas' Guadalupe River in July 2025. The floods, which took place during the Fourth of July weekend, killed at least 135 people and, as of this writing, three people were still missing. For example, one Facebook post (archived) with the claim read: "3 Missing Texas Girls Found Alive in a Hollow Tree 1 Mile From Camp — They Survived Nearly 10 Days Thanks to These 2 Things...," reaching over 5,800 reactions. The post displayed three pictures seemingly showing scenes from the 2025 Texas floods. Many commenters on the post expressed joy and gratitude, celebrating the story as a miracle and thanking God for the girls' alleged survival. One Snopes reader asked over email, "Wondering if the article about three girls surviving the Texas flood by staying in a hollowed out tree is true." Another wrote, "This post has been going around Christian socials and I can't find any news stories on it." Google reverse image search results showed that the collage spread via multiple Facebook posts, but the rumor also spread on other social media platforms including Threads and X. However, the story of three missing girls surviving in a hollow tree after the 2025 Texas floods was a work of fiction, part of a growing trend of stories generated using artificial intelligence (AI) and designed to attract clicks and advertising revenue on unreliable websites. Searches of Bing, DuckDuckGo, Google and Yahoo found no news media outlets reporting about such events. Prominent news media outlets would have widely reported this rumor, if true. Because there were no credible reports or evidence to support this narrative, we have rated this claim false. From Facebook posts to ad-filled blogs The false story spread widely through social media posts that redirected users to ad-saturated blog sites designed to generate clicks and revenue. The blog articles often lacked sources, bylines or any verifiable details, and many appeared to be copy-pasted or lightly reworded versions of each other. One such article, titled, "3 Missing Texas Girls Found Alive in a Hollow Tree 1 Mile From Camp — They Survived Nearly 10 Days Thanks to These 2 Things…," began: In what's being called one of the most miraculous survival stories in American history, three girls who vanished during the Texas flood disaster have been found alive — tucked inside the hollow of an ancient oak tree just one mile from the ravaged Camp Wrenwood. The girls — Emily Rivera, Zoey Nash, and Hope Lin, ages 8 to 10 — survived for nearly 10 days with no food, using only rainwater and lessons from a wilderness safety drill they had completed days before the storm. The story claimed the girls survived on rainwater alone, using skills from a wilderness safety drill completed days before the floods — a highly improbable scenario for children aged 8 to 10. Notably, none of the girls' names — Emily Rivera, Zoey Nash or Hope Lin — appeared in any credible reports of missing or rescued children from the floods. What's more, some of the articles ended with a vague mention of likely an attempt to add legitimacy, reading: "This story will continue to be updated as more details become available. For support, donations, or volunteer opportunities in the ongoing Texas flood recovery, visit Another article, titled, "The Hollow Tree Miracle: How Three Missing Texas Girls Survived 10 Days Alone Using Only Rainwater, Instinct—and One Unbelievable Lesson," featured a nearly identical narrative: In the aftermath of the devastating Texas flood that swept through Camp Wrenwood and left 27 children unaccounted for, a discovery stunned the nation: three missing girls were found alive after nearly 10 days, hidden inside a hollow oak tree less than a mile from the campgrounds. Their survival—against all odds, without food, shelter, or adult guidance—is now being called one of the most remarkable child survival stories in modern American history. What saved them? Not just luck. But something far more powerful: memory, improvisation, and an unbreakable bond. None of these articles cited or linked to any credible sources, official statements or news reports. They also repeatedly referenced "Camp Wrenwood" as the location tied to the girls' survival, but we found no evidence that any such camp exists in Texas. In reality, the camp most impacted by the flooding was Camp Mystic, a riverside Christian camp for girls in Hunt, Texas. (Another nearby camp, Heart O' the Hills, was also significantly affected by the floods, though it did not experience the same scale of loss as Camp Mystic.) Additionally, AI-detection websites such as and all flagged the text of the blog articles as at least partially generated using AI tools. ( Overall, the story contained multiple warning signs, and the combination of AI-generated text published via profit-driven blog sites helped the rumor spread online — even in the absence of any credible news coverage. Similar story about 2 missing girls The fabricated story about three girls surviving in a hollow tree appears to have been inspired by an earlier false claim that rescuers had saved two girls clinging to a tree during the Texas floods. The now-retracted article stated, "Two girls were rescued alive from a tree nearly 30 feet high Sunday in the flood zone between Comfort and Homillus Road in Center Point, according to multiple sources, as search teams also recovered four bodies in the area." Though some rescuers initially repeated the claim, the Kerr County Sheriff Larry Leitha ultimately confirmed it was "100% inaccurate." Kerr County Flood Event Joint Information Center warned that such misinformation often spreads during disasters. In fact, we have investigated numerous rumors related to the Texas floods — from fabricated rescue stories to false celebrity donation claims — many of which were fueled by AI-generated content. "AI Detector - Free AI Checker for ChatGPT, GPT-4, Gemini & More." Copyleaks, Accessed 21 Jul. 2025. AI Detector - Trusted AI Checker for ChatGPT, GPT4 & Gemini. Accessed 21 Jul. 2025. Christensen, Laerke. "Watch out for Story about Rescuers Saving 2 Young Girls Clinging to Tree in Texas Floods." Snopes, 7 Jul. 2025, "Floods Turned Beloved Texas Camp into a Nightmare. At Least 27 Girls Remain Missing." AP News, 4 Jul. 2025, Liles, Jordan. "Caitlin Clark Offered to Pay Texas Flood Victims' Funeral Expenses?" Snopes, 11 Jul. 2025, ---. "Toddler Girl Lost in Texas Floods Rescued by 'guardian Angel' Dog?" Snopes, 14 Jul. 2025, Rescuers Find 2 Girls in Tree, 30-Feet up, near Comfort – The Kerr County Lead. 6 Jul. 2025, Texas Floods Articles | Accessed 21 Jul. 2025. Solve the daily Crossword