logo
Why Google's ChromeOS merging with Android make sense

Why Google's ChromeOS merging with Android make sense

Indian Express2 days ago
Google announced this week that it will merge ChromeOS with Android in an effort to streamline its operating systems. The confirmation came from Android Ecosystem President Sameer Samat, who first made the announcement in an interview with TechRadar and later posted it on X.
Android and ChromeOS were developed in parallel, but now both operating systems are merging. The merger was originally expected to happen in 2015, so it has been a long time coming. Google had been hinting at the merger for some time, including last year when it announced that ChromeOS would be built on the Android tech stack, including the Android kernel.
For years, ChromeOS has been centered on laptops, while Android has dominated the mobile ecosystem. ChromeOS, for its part, has been a semi-successful operating system, but it has often been described as a 'barebones' OS. Essentially, it's built on Linux and stripped down to the bare essentials. One of ChromeOS's advantages is its ease of use. While it offers a desktop environment similar to what you would find on a Windows laptop or Mac, it mainly includes basic tools like a file browser, video/image viewer, Settings app, and the Chrome web browser. ChromeOS run web apps, Android apps and Linux apps, but not the best-in-class apps.
One of the advantages of ChromeOS is that it can run smoothly on low-end hardware. Google has partnered with major OEMs to launch Chromebooks, and in fact, ChromeOS has received major updates in recent years. These include improved desktop management, Phone Hub integration, AI features, and the Chromebook Plus certification for high-end devices, among others.
Google merging ChromeOS and Android makes a lot of sense. While Chromebooks have been a popular choice for students, these devices have struggled to compete with Apple's iPad and Windows computers, despite improvements in Chromebook hardware in recent years. At the same time, Google has faced an uphill battle in making its Android tablets as capable as the iPad, even though features like multitasking and desktop-like functionality have been added.
To date, despite Google's promises, Android still doesn't feel desktop-ready. Most Android apps don't look great on larger screens. Sure, Android has improved support for keyboards and mice, and even includes features like multiple desktop support, already present in ChromeOS but the operating system still feels best suited for mobile, not for larger-screen devices like tablets and laptops. It's no surprise, then, that Google previously experimented with ChromeOS tablets, an idea that failed to gain traction.
In fact, ChromeOS has started to feel directionless in recent years. Honestly, Android does everything ChromeOS does but much better; meanwhile, ChromeOS can do what Android does, but actually worse.
At one point, ChromeOS was a frequent topic of discussion, but lately, Google has barely mentioned it during its annual developer conferences. Chromebooks have also become less visible in the marketplace, raising questions about the future of ChromeOS.
While Google continues to highlight Android and its new features, ChromeOS has largely been pushed to the sidelines. In fact, Android is becoming more like ChromeOS, thanks to the upcoming addition of desktop multitasking support. With Google turning Android into a more capable desktop operating system while ChromeOS remains largely unchanged, it suggests that Android may eventually take over the role of ChromeOS.
Now that Google is merging ChromeOS and Android into a single unified operating system, although how Google plans to do this still remains unclear, a single platform could bring complete cross-functionality, which would be a major change. In fact, it could be the beginning of Google's personal computing efforts, which the company has struggled to compete with both Apple and Microsoft.
Right now, there is some level of cross-functionality between ChromeOS and Android, but it feels half-baked. ChromeOS already supports Android apps, and the Google Play Store somewhat bridges the gap. A merger between ChromeOS and Android would allow developers to focus on a single platform, enabling consumers to access apps seamlessly whether they are on a phone, tablet, or laptop. A unified operating system could solve this fragmentation, especially if Google develops a desktop version of Android. This would open the door to an Android-based platform that retains the familiarity of Android while offering the flexibility to run just as well on tablets as on laptops.
However, a key challenge for Google is deciding whether to retain Chromebooks or move away from them entirely. Chromebooks run on reference platforms and currently benefit from up to 10 years of software updates, as promised by Google. Achieving that same level of long-term support with a unified operating system may be difficult, especially since traditional laptops typically receive far less software support than Chromebooks.
The US Department of Justice has been calling for Google to divest its Chrome browser, following an August ruling that the company holds a monopoly in the search market. Chrome, the browser Google launched in 2008, is at the center of the controversy. It provides Google with user data that is then used for ad targeting, generating billions in revenue.
With the DOJ now considering the idea of forcing Google to sell Chrome, the outcome could be disastrous for the tech giant. Google will almost certainly fight the case and present counterarguments as to why Chrome should remain under its control. However, one possible way for Google to protect ChromeOS while mitigating the risk of losing both users and revenue could be to merge ChromeOS with Android.
If Google is forced to sell off its Chrome browser, the future of the Chromium codebase becomes uncertain, as Google is its largest financial supporter and technical contributor. This could further complicate the future of ChromeOS. Therefore, merging the two platforms may ultimately be in Google's best interest.
Anuj Bhatia is a personal technology writer at indianexpress.com who has been covering smartphones, personal computers, gaming, apps, and lifestyle tech actively since 2011. He specialises in writing longer-form feature articles and explainers on trending tech topics. His unique interests encompass delving into vintage tech, retro gaming and composing in-depth narratives on the intersection of history, technology, and popular culture. He covers major international tech conferences and product launches from the world's biggest and most valuable tech brands including Apple, Google and others. At the same time, he also extensively covers indie, home-grown tech startups. Prior to joining The Indian Express in late 2016, he served as a senior tech writer at My Mobile magazine and previously held roles as a reviewer and tech writer at Gizbot. Anuj holds a postgraduate degree from Banaras Hindu University. You can find Anuj on Linkedin.
Email: anuj.bhatia@indianexpress.com ... Read More
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas on why Comet browser can beat Google's Project Mariner: ‘Expect them to copy…'
Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas on why Comet browser can beat Google's Project Mariner: ‘Expect them to copy…'

Mint

time31 minutes ago

  • Mint

Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas on why Comet browser can beat Google's Project Mariner: ‘Expect them to copy…'

Perplexity AI CEO Aravind Srinivas has shared how the company's Comet browser plans to take on competition from Google's Project Mariner. Notably, Project Mariner is currently available only to Google's paying customers and brings many of the AI functionalities offered by new-generation generative AI browsers. Asked about the competition between Google and Perplexity during a Reddit AMA, Srinivas said, 'They have something called Project Mariner (behind a $250/mo plan, I believe) – similar but quite limited compared to the capabilities of Comet.' 'I expect them to pay close attention and copy/adopt stuff,' he added. Srinivas confirmed that Comet is built on Chromium and expressed that he is 'grateful' to Google for keeping it open-source. However, he criticised the company for being too bureaucratic and disjointed. 'It's a giant bureaucratic organisation right now with too many decision-makers and disjointed teams, and they have business model constraints on letting agents do the clicks and work for you while continuing to charge advertisers enormous money to keep bidding for clicks and conversions. At some point, they need to embrace one path and suffer, in order to come out stronger, rather than hedging and playing both ways,' Srinivas said. Perplexity launched the Comet browser earlier this month, and it is currently available only to paying users, while free users are being given access gradually via invites. Srinivas was also asked about when Perplexity plans to launch iOS and Android versions of the Comet browser. While he remained non-committal about the exact timeline for Android, he stated that iPhone users could see the new browser in the next two to three months. When asked if Comet will be available to free users, Srinivas said, 'Comet will be accessible for free users definitely. But the agentic search and personal/memory searches might be either rate-limited or exclusive to Pro/Max users. We haven't made any decisions yet. We need to first understand what's the spend per user in the initial cohort.'

Google opens Veo 3 AI video model to developers, price tag will surprise you
Google opens Veo 3 AI video model to developers, price tag will surprise you

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Google opens Veo 3 AI video model to developers, price tag will surprise you

During I/O 2025, Google gave us a sneak peek at its upcoming advanced video generative model, Veo 3. Google highlighted that this new AI model is more advanced from VEO 2 and is capable of creating cinematic content, immersive experiences, and production-ready animations with single prompts. Now, the company has just opened the gates for access to Veo 3 to developers. They can get access to this model through a paid preview via the Gemini API and Vertex around the world have already generated tens of millions of high-quality videos with Veo 3. It is our first video model to incorporate high-fidelity video outputs and native audio, first with text-to-video and soon with image-to-video,' writes Google in its official blog post. What Veo 3 offersSo, what exactly is Veo 3? Well, Google describes it as the company's first video model capable of generating super realistic videos with built-in, synced audio like sound effects, dialogue, and ambient noise all generated together. Right now, the model is capable of turning text prompts into video, but soon it will also allow users to give prompts with images. Users can use the Veo 3 for creating animated shorts, film scenes, storyboards, or game of the core features that set Veo 3 apart from current video generation AI models include:Synchronised Sound: Veo 3 can natively generate audio, including dialogue, music, and sound effects, all timed precisely with the Quality: The model also supports high-definition video output with rich textures, lighting effects, and creative Physics: Veo 3 can simulate real-world physics for believable animation, enabling users to create videos with elements like flowing water, shadow casting, and natural character 3 open for developersGoogle reveals that animation studios like Cartwheel and Volley are already using Veo 3 to boost their creative work. Cartwheel is using Veo 3 to convert 2D human motion videos into fully rigged 3D animations. Meanwhile, Volley is generating game cut-scenes for an upcoming RPG titled Wit's End, using Veo 3 to rapidly iterate story-driven sequences with high 3 pricingWhile Veo 3 looks cutting-edge and impressive, using it comes at a cost. Google has currently priced Veo 3 at $0.75 per second of video with synchronised audio output. In Indian terms, that's roughly Rs 64.50 per Google has also announced a faster, more affordable version called Veo 3 Fast. Google says this model will arrive soon. This budget-friendly model is for users who need a powerful yet cost-effective AI tool for quick video to use Veo 3advertisementTo get started, developers can use Google AI Studio, which includes a starter app, SDK templates, and integration with the Gemini maintain transparency, Google highlights that Veo 3 embeds a digital SynthID watermark in all its outputs to ensure responsible AI usage.- Ends

No Free Lunches: Why You Should Tread With Caution About Google And Perplexity AI Offers
No Free Lunches: Why You Should Tread With Caution About Google And Perplexity AI Offers

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

No Free Lunches: Why You Should Tread With Caution About Google And Perplexity AI Offers

Last Updated: Perplexity Pro and Gemini AI Pro models are available free of charge in India for select users but is there a catch in using these AI versions? People in India love freebies, in fact, anybody would do. This week we have seen Google and Perplexity bring their AI platforms for free to different users in the country. AI is the talk of the town, so it was obviously going to gather traction, especially since you are getting features worth up to Rs 19,000 per month for free. And it seems their pitch has worked to a good effect with many students signing up for the free Gemini AI Pro version with the college ID, while Airtel partners with Perplexity to bring its Pro subscription for its users. But when it comes to AI, free lunches always have a big price attached to them, and in this case, you have got data that is valuable to these companies. AI For Free But Is There A Catch? Over the years, we have seen platforms entice people into sharing their facial data, or personal information. For instance, ChatGPT started the Studio Ghibli anime style that became viral and got people to share their photos to try out the feature on the AI chatbot. OpenAI was happy to collect the data, and experts had even warned about giving them permission to train their AI systems using their information. The new Airtel and Google plans feel like Deja vu and in this situation the data can be more complex and diverse for these companies to feast on. Students will be using AI tools to sharpen their skills and upskill to become eligible for jobs in the evolving industry. While Airtel users try out Perplexity Pro using their email ID, and give the AI chatbot access to their files, camera and other tools to effectively give you results. These are obviously big privacy red flags and the 'Free' stamp shouldn't hide these concerns away for people. Google is a tech giant and has plenty of avenues to make money but Perplexity needs the AI division to tick and adding over 360 million users to its kitty, even for 12 months is a big jump for the company. If they manage even 1 percent of these Airtel users to eventually start paying for its Pro version, the business model turns out to be a win for the company. It even has a web browser with AI-powered features that work like AI agents and handle your tasks. If you've already signed up for the Gemini AI Pro or Perplexity Pro free plans in India, just be careful of how you use these platforms. Learn the trades and gradually see which one of these is worth the big money, and if not, look for other alternatives over the next 12 months. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store