Channel migrants who claim to be children given benefit of the doubt despite over HALF turning out to be adults
MIGRANT 'KID' BLUNDERS Channel migrants who claim to be children given benefit of the doubt despite over HALF turning out to be adults
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
SMALL boat migrants who claim to be children are being given the benefit of the doubt by immigration staff - despite more than half turning out to actually be adults.
A report has found that workers show a 'lack of curiosity' about the real age of asylum seekers arriving across the Channel.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
2
Dame Angela Eagle, Minister for Border Security and Asylum, said: 'Accurately assessing the age of individuals is an incredibly complex and difficult task'
Credit: Richard Townshend Photography
AI tech is set to be rolled out in 2026 which can accurately assess how old a person really is.
Currently, anyone who says they are under 18 are treated as minors unless they look 'significantly' older.
In one case highlighted by Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration David Bolt, an Iranian national who had grey hairs was treated as a child despite assessors thinking he was probably around 22.
In 2024, over half - 56 per cent - of the individuals who claimed on arrival to be children were either later assessed to be adults or admitted that they were 18 or over.
READ MORE ON IMMIGRATION
RULING FEARS Palestinian gran wins right to come to UK for medical treatment sparking fears
The two-day training given to assessors 'instructs officers that they should always give the benefit of the doubt to the individual where they are not sure about someone's claimed age and do not judge them to be significantly over 18'.
The report states that a Vietnamese national was 'initially given the benefit of the doubt' as a child because workers said he had a 'soft face'.
Another officer then raised concerns about his age because of his 'developed shoulders', 'huge hands' and a 'tiny bit of stubble'.
In other assessments 'arrogance' was used as a sign that a migrant was an adult.
One Iranian national presented with some grey hairs and black stubble on his face and claimed to be 17.
Despite being assessed as actually 22 years old, he was 'given the benefit of the doubt' and treated as a child pending further assessment.
Man believed to be running meet and greet service arrested in dawn raid as part of Channel crackdown
It is acknowledged by the report that it is not always possible to assess the age of a young person through their physical appearance or demeanour, because different life experiences can stunt growth or change behaviours.
David Bolt made eight key recommendations to the Home Office on the age assessment process, including reviewing the training given to officers by the end of year.
In response, the Government accepted all recommendations and pointed out that they are rolling out Facial Age Estimation technology next year pending a trial.
It has been trained on millions of images where an individual's age is known.
Dame Angela Eagle, Minister for Border Security and Asylum, said in a written statement: 'Accurately assessing the age of individuals is an incredibly complex and difficult task, and the Home Office has spent a number of years analysing which scientific and technological methods would best assist the current process, including looking at the role that Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology can play.
'In a situation where those involved in the age assessment process are unsure whether an individual is aged over or under 18, or do not accept the age an individual is claiming to be, Facial Age Estimation offers a potentially rapid and simple means to test their judgements against the estimates produced by the technology.'
A procurement process is currently underway with the new tech set to be integrated into the current system 'over the course of 2026'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
37 minutes ago
- The Sun
Migrants who refuse to leave luxury tax-payer funded hotels for cheaper digs will have ALL support pulled in crackdown
ILLEGAL migrants who refuse to move from hotels into cheaper digs will lose all financial support, the Home Office has announced. Ministers launched the 'firm but fair' crackdown amid rising public anger at the billions being spent on asylum accommodation and the strain on communities. 3 3 They have vowed to close migrant hotels by 2029 and save £1billion in part by transferring people into less expensive sites such as private housing. But many asylum seekers have been refusing to move, resulting in many of them just staying put in costly hotels as the Home Office has a duty not to make them destitute. A new Failure to Travel policy will attempt to end this 'gaming of the system" by withdrawing all support for those who do not take up the cheaper offer. Borders Minister Dame Angela Eagle said: 'We are working to close hotels, restore order, and put fairness and value for money at the heart of our asylum system. 'This government is making those necessary decisions to protect the taxpayer and uphold the integrity of our borders. 'These reforms to the Failure to Travel policy are another example of this government's action to transform the asylum accommodation system and crack down on those who abuse our system, so it operates fairly and saves the taxpayer money.' Currently 106,771 asylum seekers in Britain are receiving some sort of taxpayer-funded support. Some 32,345 were in hotels as of March 2025, down from 38,079 in December but up from 29,585 at the time of the last election. The cost of hotels has been cut from a peak of around £9million each day under the Tories to £5.77million a day presently. But fury at the situation appears to be intensifying, with more protests outside hotels in recent weeks. It includes the Bell Hotel in Epping after an asylum seeker allegedly sexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl. Ethiopian asylum seeker Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu was charged with the assault days after arriving in the UK on a small boat. Kebatu, 38, denied the charge when he appeared at Chelmsford magistrates' court. A four-star hotel in Canary Wharf in London has also been hit by protests in a row over the taxpayer-funded asylum seeker hotels. Immigration has now leapfrogged the economy and health to become the number one issue for the electorate. A recent YouGov poll 55 per cent of Brits thought the government was handling immigration 'very badly', and 22 per cent 'fairly badly'. Small boat crossings are up 50 per cent under Labour, with more than 20,000 arriving this year already. Since 2018 more than 174,000 migrants have crossed the Channel, with only a fraction returned to their home country. 3 After years watching Channel migrant crisis unfold Brits have just about snapped By Jack Elsom, Political Editor CAST your mind back to the Christmas of 2018 when a few dozen migrants clambered into rickety dinghies off the French coast and headed for Britain. Then Home Secretary Sajid Javid flew back early from his family holiday to declare a 'major incident', MPs called for the Navy to be deployed, and the public rightly demanded action. You don't need me to tell you what happened next: over the next seven years 174,000 more asylum seekers crossed the English Channel. Billions of pounds of taxpayer cash have been ploughed into snapping up hotels for them to live free bed and board. Lives of vulnerable men, women and children have been tragically lost. And families feeling the pinch have watched on agog as successive governments throw good money after bad. Yesterday's revelation that thousands of asylum seekers have been gambling with taxpayer funded credit cards was shocking. But in many ways what is more depressing is that nobody is even really surprised anymore. After years of hollow promises from politicians vowing to get a grip, voter patience is at breaking point - and the evidence backs it up. Immigration has now leapfrogged the economy and health to become the number one issue for the electorate. According to the pollster Scarlett Maguire, the public mood has taken a turn even in the last few months. When trying to take the nation's temperature in focus groups, it seems that all roads lead to migration. 'Even when I ask people's views about housing or the NHS, almost always the voters will bring the conversation back to migration,' she tells me. After years watching the Channel crisis unfold, it appears Brits have just about snapped. This does not bode well for Sir Keir Starmer. A recent YouGov poll 55 per cent of Brits thought the government was handling immigration 'very badly', and 22 per cent 'fairly badly'. Just 14 per cent thought he was doing a good job - a dismal verdict of his attempts so far to get a handle on the scandal. Ministers like to crow about statistics they insist proves the opposite. They point to an increase in the number of deportations, or that spending on asylum is down by a third. All credible achievements, but, as one Starmer aide puts it: 'It's the visibility which is killing us. People see the boats, they see the migrant hotels and they just can't believe it.' It is a point Labour MPs - once terrified to touch illegal migration for fear of upsetting their base - are starting to make. Even those on the soft left of the party are becoming more vocal because the impact on their constituents is impossible to ignore. That senior backbencher Meg Hillier publicly took Starmer to task on homeless families having to compete for housing with asylum seekers reflects the shifting public mood. Or as one Labour MP tells me: 'You are always going to get a few left-wing backbenchers that see controlling our borders as a right-wing concept, which is clearly mental. 'But the party is waking up to the fact that the public are losing patience. The fact that many of my colleagues are talking about ECHR reform is quite something, it would have been unimaginable even a few years ago.' Figures around Starmer say he is finally recognising the scale of anger simmering through the population. As protesters have rallied outside migrant hotels in recent weeks, Downing Street has been at pains to stress they understand their concerns. One insider says: 'Keir has become alive to the rage. A year ago he was calling people far-right. You don't hear him say that anymore.' Some in the Labour tribe hope this is the moment the PM finally grasps the nettle and gets radical. Yes, he has signed a returns deal with France and inked various other agreements aimed at flushing out the smuggling gangs. But to quench the public's thirst for action, there is a sense among many Labour figures that none of this cuts the mustard. One loyalist MP tells me: 'They do get how bad it is. But that now needs to feed into radical policy, with urgency. 'The French deal is genuinely very impressive but will take time to come through. And we don't have that much time.' The clock is ticking because currently it is Nigel Farage who is laughing all the way to the ballot box. The Reform leader's hardline stance on migration has earned him a commanding lead in the polls. Some 36 per cent of voters say he is best placed to slash migration, compared to 11 per cent for Labour and a mere 6 per cent for the Tories. His uncompromising promise to tow the boats back to France has gone down a storm with his supporters, but met with mocking derision by his detractors. They mock him at their peril. As one down-to-earth Labour figure put it: 'We're idiots if we think the way to beat Farage is by saying his ideas are too radical - we need to understand, the public WANTS radical.' Some of the hardliners in the party want a Thatcher-style 'purge of the wets' - with Attorney General Lord Hermer top of their list. For decades much of the country has felt their concerns about immigration have been suppressed by politicians in Westminster. Many are now finding their voice for the first time. And even for the ones who are not speaking publicly, they will make their feelings known at the ballot box.
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Over 250 dodgy apps uncovered that steal private photos and threaten to leak them to family unless victims pay up
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) RESEARCHERS have uncovered an 'emotionally manipulative' extortion campaign putting users at risk. Over 250 dodgy apps have been uncovered, which are forcing victims of the scam to pay up. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 More than 250 dodgy apps have been uncovered, making people pay scammers Credit: Alamy Dodgy apps uncovered Security researchers Zimperium zLabs claimed to have found more than 250 Android apps, all pretending to be dating and romance apps. Zimperium calls the campaign SarangTrap, as it has mostly targeted people living in South Korea. On the surface, the apps look slick and well-designed, hiding the usual telltale signs of scam pages. 4 There are simple ways to protect yourself from scams Credit: Alamy However, behind the scenes, the apps work as info-stealers, taking user contact information, photos and data from their devices. READ MORE TECH SCAM FEARS Brits face losing £100m in ticket scams this summer, experts warn Due to the nature of the apps, the victims were lured in with 'emotionally charged interactions'. If the threat actors find any incriminating information on the compromised devices, they reach out to the victim and threaten to share it with their family, friends, and partners, unless a payment is made. Ways to stay safe Out of the 80 domains used in this campaign, many were allegedly indexed by popular search engines. This means that for victims who tend to be scam-savvy, they appear legitimate. The zLabs research team said: 'This is more than just a malware outbreak; it's a digital weaponisation of trust and emotion. 'Users seeking connection are being manipulated into granting access to some of their most personal data.' 4 Threat actors find any incriminating information on the compromised devices. Credit: Alamy The zLabs team have provided advice on how to avoid falling victim to the scam. Users should avoid downloading apps from unfamiliar links or unofficial app stores. This is because the more than 250 apps, a part of SarangTrap could not be found on Playstore or App Store. Malware can sometimes find its way onto these well now app stores, but Google and Apple are diligent with protecting their users. As a result, it is a lot harder to pick up malware on the official store rather than a third-party system. The zLabs researchers also recommended that users should be careful of apps requiring unusual permissions or an invitation code. Other advice to users includes regularly reviewing the permissions they granted and installed profiles they operate, and they should install on-device mobile security solutions that can help detect and block malware. Advice for dating app users While this particular scam came from users downloading malware from third-party app stores, there are always ways for users to protect themselves on dating apps. Advice service Brook tell users to always check the person you are speaking to is who they say they are. 4 Users need to be careful not to fall victims to scams on dating apps Credit: AFP This may involve taking time with a person, and don't feel pressured to do anything before the user feels ready. For more common apps which are trusted, ensure to stay in the app rather than giving the person the user's number. They also recommend not sharing any private information or imagery.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Albanese's TOUGHEST talk yet on Gaza - but he's slammed by some for not being tough enough on the REAL culprits
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has given his harshest assessment yet of Israel during the ongoing conflict in Gaza, but the Coalition has slammed him for not holding Hamas accountable. The comments, which were issued on Friday, followed increasing concerns about the blockade of aid to the region after the release of photos showing children starving. 'Israel's denial of aid and the killing of civilians, including children, seeking access to water and food cannot be defended or ignored,' Albanese said. 'Every innocent life matters. Every Israeli. Every Palestinian. 'We call on Israel to comply immediately with its obligations under international law. This includes allowing the United Nations and NGOs to carry out their lifesaving work safely and without hindrance.' His comments were echoed by Foreign Minister Penny Wong, who called the situation a 'humanitarian catastrophe' that has left Australians distressed. Albanese also said Israel should abandon any further plans that would lead to permanently displacing Palestinian people. But he stopped short of saying Australia would join France in recognising Palestinian statehood after the European nation became the largest Western power to signal it would make the announcement. The Prime Minister instead said recognising the 'legitimate aspirations of Palestinian people for a state of their own' was a bipartisan position. 'Australia is committed to a future where both the Israeli and Palestinian peoples can live in peace and safety, within internationally recognised borders,' he said. 'Until that day, every effort must be made here and now to safeguard innocent life and end the suffering and starvation of the people of Gaza.' But on Friday afternoon, the Coalition lashed Albanese, with shadow foreign affairs minister Michaelia Cash claiming he had missed an opportunity to name Hamas as the primary obstacle. 'The Coalition has strong concerns about the worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza,' she said. 'It is disappointing that Prime Minister Albanese's statement about Gaza once again fails to place any blame on Hamas, a listed terrorist organisation, for the delays in aid reaching the people of Gaza.' She said outrage over the crisis should be directed squarely at Hamas: 'Hamas and its allies have tried to disrupt the flow of aid into Gaza and have stolen humanitarian aid for their own purposes.' 'This war began because of Hamas's abhorrent attack on Israeli civilians, where over 1,200 were murdered in cold blood, and they bear responsibility for the continuation of this conflict.' Cash also criticised Hamas for refusing to recognise Israel's right to exist. 'They could end the suffering of the people of Gaza by freeing the remaining Israeli hostages and laying down their weapons,' she said. Ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas have recently collapsed, with both Israel and the United States reportedly withdrawing from talks. With aid being throttled at the border and all entry points to Gaza controlled by Israel, former USAID official Jeremy Konyndyk said Australia and other nations must do more. 'Nothing about this is natural or organic - it's 100 per cent man-made,' the Refugees International president told ABC Radio. 'We are at - if not past - a tipping point.' The Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which began operations in May, has been accused of obstructing operations by the United Nations and other aid groups, and putting starving Palestinians in danger. According to Mr Konyndyk, its aid packages were small and insufficient and the foundation's facilities were located far from population centres. Israel, which began letting in only a trickle of supplies to Gaza in recent months, has previously blamed Hamas for disrupting food distribution and accused it of using stolen aid to fund its war effort. Israel has enforced a complete embargo on humanitarian aid and medical supplies for almost three months after a ceasefire deal collapsed earlier in 2025. In recent months, more than 800 Palestinians have been killed while seeking aid, many of them shot by the Israeli military, UN sources have found. Israel's military campaign was launched after Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1200 people and taking 251 hostages. Albanese also condemned the 'terror and brutality' of Hamas and repeated calls for the release of the remaining hostages.
