logo
‘I had no idea about some of the issues': The Aussies finding the downsides to downsizing

‘I had no idea about some of the issues': The Aussies finding the downsides to downsizing

The Age18-07-2025
This story is part of the July 19 edition of Good Weekend. See all 16 stories.
Retired businessman Alan Hall gazes out from the floor-to-ceiling glass of his sleek Melbourne apartment at the glorious panorama of the city skyline before him, and his cheery countenance crumples into a frown.
By rights, he should now be enjoying the best days of a new cashed-up, carefree chapter of his life, spending all his time on family, friends and fun. At least that's what he imagined downsizing from a large, labour-
intensive family house in the suburbs to a smaller Docklands unit would mean for him. But it hasn't quite worked out that way.
'Whenever I work from home, I can look at all of the city through the window, and it's beautiful,' he says. 'We love the views and do like this apartment and the kind of lifestyle it affords us, but …' He pauses to consider his words. 'The whole downsizing experience hasn't been as smooth or as enjoyable as we'd hoped. Moving from a large home to here was a big decision, and it took my wife considerable time to come on board. But it's been soured by a lot of things that happened along the way.'
Hall, 68, and his wife Susan Shaw, 59, sold their two-storey, four-bedroom family house in Williamstown in Melbourne's south-west in 2020 to move into a two-bedroom apartment they bought off the plan as a way of shrinking their real estate footprint and spending less time on mowing lawns and home maintenance. He ended up, however, ploughing even more time in trying to sort out some of the issues that absolutely confounded him about his new home, which they moved into in 2021 following delays in construction.
'I just wasn't expecting things like defects that seem to be very slow to be rectified,' says Hall who, after a stellar career in sales, was hardly naïve in his expectations. He sighs in exasperation. 'There's been flooding that's been so bad, the guy in the apartment down the corridor to us had to vacate his apartment on at least two occasions, while I still have a problem with one of my external windows. Then there was the discovery that to get access to the gym and pool in the building, you have to pay extra. We weren't aware of that; nobody mentions you have to pay over and above the price of the property. In a way we all miss our old house. My wife misses it a lot and probably our little dog does, too. She loved the open space and the dog liked to run straight out into the backyard. But I was the one always working on it with DIY and gardening.'
State governments across Australia are all busily trying to persuade empty nesters to free up their big family houses for the next generation and move into apartments or smaller town homes, terraces and villas to make space for higher-density developments. The Australian Taxation Office offers generous superannuation concessions to sweeten the deal while there are also stamp duty concessions available, at times, for buying off the plan. Politicians, developers and real estate agents alike regularly portray downsizing as
the delectable lifestyle dream. Think no lawns to mow, no jobs around the house every weekend, the chance to pay off the mortgage with cash left over after the new purchase, better security and usually living closer to cities in all their magnificent amenity.
Yet more and more Baby Boomers are discovering it's not a generational shift that suits everyone. Yes, there's all the time and money it can free up, but there's also a full package of potential negatives that can turn a transfer to a smaller home into a claustrophobic nightmare, or a move into a luxury high-rise into pie-in-the-sky. And when downsizing doesn't play out as planned, there's a darker underbelly of festering fury and regret.
In Sydney, retired high school teacher Peter Moor moved from a spacious two-level house on a large block in Chatswood on the north shore to a two-bedroom apartment in Neutral Bay, closer to the harbour. A tall, craggy, silver-haired 78-year-old with a brisk, businesslike manner, he pulls no punches either in his assessment of his downsize. 'It's an absolute frigging nightmare,' he says. 'I downsized from a nice four-bedroom house on a very nice block into a two-bedroom apartment and it's been a disaster. It's the worst decision I ever made, and I feel quite embittered about it all.'
Meanwhile, former surgical nurse Felicity Jacobs, who downsized further away from the city, also feels she acted in haste and is repenting at
leisure. She has a faraway look in her pale blue eyes as she recalls her last home in Sydney's inner west, in lively, multicultural Enmore. There, she lived a full life meeting up with friends of all ages, eating at the area's diverse restaurants and attending art and cultural events. Now, she has a smaller, cheaper villa in a retirement village in Bathurst, in the NSW Central Tablelands.
'But I hadn't really thought about how much I might miss my old community,' says Jacobs, 72, pushing her fashionable white bob behind her ears in irritation. 'I hardly know anyone here, and have to drive a long way all the time to see my old friends, or they have to travel to see me.' She purses her lips. 'I know it sounds bad, but it's all old people living here, and it's stressful hearing about their medical problems, and seeing them not doing so well. It's not like living in a normal community where you have people of all ages and interests, and kids around.'
Small is beautiful
The last major survey to sample downsizing trends was done in 2020 by Curtin University and Swinburne University of Technology, when there were around 6.5 million Australians aged 55 or over (research is underway to update their findings). It suggested that downsizing could be relevant to 2.5 million of their 4.3 million households. When 2400 households were questioned in 2018, 26 per cent had already downsized and another third had thought about it. Overall, the findings pointed to a strong appetite among older Australians to downsize their dwellings, concluded the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
In addition, the ARC Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR) estimated that around 36 per cent of homeowners still had a mortgage when they retired in 2016, up from 23 per cent a decade prior. (Analysis by CEPAR's Rafal Chomik puts the 2021-11 equivalents higher at 39 per cent and 30 per cent, but he warned subsequent large interest rate increases meant this trend might not have continued.) Downsizing, it suggests, could extinguish remaining debt, free up money for holidays, restaurants and the good life, and enable a move to a more age-friendly, single-level home or apartment.
A 2019 CEPAR working paper with Sydney's Macquarie University and the University of NSW found, however, that of 352 55-plus participants in an online survey who'd downsized over the preceding five years, one in six expressed regret about moving.
There are certainly downsides to downsizing. People may feel a strong emotional attachment to the houses where they brought up their children, and might find it hard to declutter and then confine their lives – and guests – to smaller spaces. Older Boomers may find it hard to overcome feelings of dislocation and loss.
Others can be shocked by the discovery that apartments, especially new ones, can be just as expensive as the houses they sell. It's sometimes also difficult to find suitable smaller homes to relocate into, and there's
a national shortage of quality three-bedroom apartments that might appeal to empty nesters who often like to turn one bedroom into a study or workroom and have a spare bedroom where their grandchildren can stay. The 2021 census reported that only 16 per cent of new apartments in Sydney had three or more bedrooms, compared to 60 per cent with two bedrooms.
Stuart Ayres, CEO at the Urban Development Institute of Australia NSW, says the difficulty is that downsizers want to live in the best locations, which are also the most expensive. 'Then when you take the cost of that land and add on build costs, taxes, charges and high-quality design elements and fit-outs, that can mount up very easily,' he says. 'Then the sums often don't make the projects feasible for developers and can outpace the buyers' ability to pay.'
As a result, some downsizers end up further away from their old neighbourhoods, family, friends and support networks. Even if there are available options nearby, the price, plus real estate fees and stamp duty, can be prohibitive. Selling a house for a tidy sum before buying smaller can also affect pension entitlements. Then, with two- or three-bed downsizer units, strata levies can cost anything from $1500 a quarter to more than $20,000 a quarter.
Alan Hall, with the jovial demeanour of an assistant football coach who shares in all the team's successes but can shrug off its failures, agrees. Yet it's not always possible to remain so easy-going. 'Probably one of the best things about downsizing is becoming mortgage-free,' he says. 'That's a big landmark in your life. But then you have to realise you pay levies. We pay $10,000 to $12,000 a year, which can be just like paying a mortgage.' In addition, when his new home didn't meet his expectations, downsizer discontent began to rankle.
'We owners have no say in how the building is run, we receive no information and see no tenders.'
Alan Hall
One of the hardest things, he says, is the block's strata committee being dominated by the developer and his associated companies. Even the initial relocation was problematic. The couple bought all new furniture but then discovered the dimensions in the original plan weren't correct and some of their pieces wouldn't fit. When they complained, they were told the plans were 'for illustrative purposes only'.
'There are lots of things about the lifestyle we like and really enjoy, such as the views, the location and the weekends without having to do repairs and gardening,' Hall says. 'But there are also lots of things about which I'd say, 'Buyer beware.' If we had that time again, we'd buy something established rather than off the plan. Then you can read meeting minutes, talk to other
people who live there, look at the local Facebook groups and find out what people think. You'd then know what you were getting into.
'But we have things here like a building management contract that lasts for 24 years – locked away just prior to the government changing the rules to make the contracts last for a maximum of three years. And we owners have no say in how the building is run, we receive no information and see no tenders. There are advantages with stamp duty for buying off the plan
but no one has been able to recoup that money with sales since. No apartments have sold for a higher price. I was all for downsizing, but I had no idea about some of the issues.'
For some, downsizing is nothing like the nirvana they hoped for. Peter Moor, clad in check shirt and blue jeans, perches on the end of a chair at the dining table in his Neutral Bay penthouse he shares with his wife, and his face darkens behind his tortoiseshell glasses. Fit and active, he once did all his own maintenance on their old house, but that's obviously not an option with an apartment. And while there are plenty of things he likes about where he now lives, there are many more he does not.
'We do have a nice private apartment, and it has shops and 100 restaurants within walking distance, and it's low maintenance,' he says. 'But we have
four strata schemes here with residential and retail, with an overarching building management committee, and we pay so much in strata levies. I led a coup on the committee because there was such a lack of oversight over contracts and quotes and spending, and I've been on a relentless crusade ever since to reduce costs.
'On average, I now spend two hours a day, seven days a week, on strata business; it's like another job. And I cop a lot of abuse from other owners. Unfortunately, more than 50 per cent of the apartments here are tenanted, and a lot of the owners just don't want to know, so I end up liaising with the part-time building manager about everything. I wanted a break from mowing lawns but, in retrospect, I should just have paid someone else to do them.'
The thing that galls Moor most, however, is that he's horrified by how much his old house has increased in value, while his apartment has appreciated barely at all. 'From a financial point of view, it's absolutely disastrous,' he says. 'If I'd have kept that lovely house on a beautiful block with a big workshop and garage, I'd be sitting on a goldmine. My son and his wife – who have three children but who spent years qualifying for medical careers and can't afford a house – could have moved in and I could have built a granny flat out the back for us. Selling the house and moving to an apartment is a real regret. Sometimes we go back to the house and just look at it.'
Lamenting the loss
Often those who are clouded by such regret over downsizing go under the radar. A number of people approached by Good Weekend admitted they wished they'd never moved from their comfortable houses into smaller homes or strata, but declined to comment on the record as they didn't want to be seen as having made what they now feel is a bad decision, and are trying to make the best of things. This was set to be their forever home and it can be excruciating to mourn the move and lament what they've lost.
Ellen, 65, for example, agreed to speak on condition her real name wasn't used. She has been in a painful limbo for the last 18 months. Deciding to leave her big house after she split with her husband and their two adult children left home, she took out a contract for a much smaller home to be built within the same Brisbane outer suburb. But delays from bad weather have plagued the build. 'I am absolutely trapped now, with a house that's not finished and another one that's costing me a fortune,' she says, her voice thick with emotion. 'It's draining my savings and I'm drawing down on my pension and the builders seem in no rush at all to finish it. Who knows where this will end? I dearly wish I'd never even started.'
Sydney real estate agent Ben Collier of The Agency is familiar with downsizer distress. 'You sometimes come across people downsizing too far,' he says. 'Then they sell and come back to the market to upsize to somewhere bigger. Or I have seen people downsize to apartments and not enjoy the body corporate experience. Then they'll buy again to move into a terrace house. They want the apartment lifestyle but don't want to live in an apartment.'
Even villas can be problematic, as Felicity Jacobs, an energetic, sprightly retiree who spends a lot of her time ferrying around neighbours to medical appointments, attests. 'I just miss the diversity of having people from all over the world, and of all ages and interests,' she says. 'It was so multicultural and a really creative community I came from.
'These people here are quite suburban and conventional. I don't feel I have anything in common with them. Also, with a retirement village, you don't own your home, you're leasing like a tenant and can't make the decisions about your home you used to. I really wish I was back there and hadn't left.'
Loading
Multiple factors account for a successful move, says Janette Corcoran, the Victorian director of the peak apartment-owners body, the Owners Corporation Network, and chair of her 42-level tower in Docklands, Victoria Point, which has more than 1000 residents, as well as serviced apartments, offices and retail outlets. 'Whether downsizing works or not depends on the push and pull factors,' she says. 'One family were feeling unsafe in their house in one area and love now living in an apartment building with security, a concierge and people around all the time.
'Personally speaking, I love it that others are invested in decision-making – so it's not just you making decisions about your home – and bring all different skills to running a building. And while you do lose some things, like your garden or your garage where you can do odd jobs, you can make substitutes for the things you may lose. You could become part of a communal garden if you liked your own garden, or if you like pottering around with project, join a local Men's Shed.'
Size doesn't matter
Of course, there are plenty of people who really love their downsized lifestyle. In Victoria, Linda Dugan adored the experience so much, she ended up doing it twice. She first moved from her big house in Monbulk in the Yarra Ranges into a three-bedroom apartment in South Yarra, and then again into a much squeezier one-bedroom apartment in Docklands. The fashionably attired 70-year-old former international buyer for Myer, who now designs the Petal Back Clothing range for older people and those with disabilities, says she's never been happier.
'I absolutely love it,' she says. 'I really enjoy being a part of the community in the building and we have our own walking club and meet for coffee, whereas I never had much to do with my neighbours in a house in the suburbs. I love being able to engage with all the different cultures here, too, which is a fantastic learning experience.'
Loading
Similarly, retired hospitality credit manager Kathryn Thiele, 70, decided to trial a move from a house in inner-Sydney Paddington to a one-bedroom apartment in nearby Darlinghurst for three months. Within three weeks, she'd decided it was perfect. 'It gives you so much freedom,' she says. 'You can come and go as you please, you can travel, and you always feel secure. In addition, there's a great sense of community, and people of all ages and professions in the same block. I would never go back to a house.'
There are so many options now for downsizers, too. In Melbourne, many people are also opting to downsize to warmer climes in Queensland, combining a small home with a coastal or treechange lifestyle,
according to Lisa Hutchinson, the co-CEO of Downsizing, a listing company for downsizing properties. 'A large emerging market is of people often leasing land and then putting their own property of choice onto it,' she says. 'That might be on green estates or golf courses or caravan parks.'
Downsizers choosing apartments have become a major part of the market – up to 40 per cent of demand, according to Mirvac's CEO for development, Stuart Penklis. At the top of their shopping lists are connectivity, infrastructure and amenity and, as a result, Mirvac is building more three-bedroom apartments, and two bedroom plus study configurations. 'Having amenities in the buildings means they can share them with their visiting children and grandchildren,' says Penklis. 'Many love the vibrancy of the communities.'
But for those who haven't shifted to communities which are vibrant, who don't appreciate the greater density or who are still grieving the loss of their old castles, it's proving a tough transition. Whether they'll end up grinning and bearing it or throwing in the towel and trying to reverse the move depends on their temperament and the state of their finances. Peter Moor sighs. 'I just think some people should never have moved into apartments,' he says. 'Like me.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Billions to be slashed from student debt
Billions to be slashed from student debt

Perth Now

time17 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Billions to be slashed from student debt

Labor's key election promise to slash student debts by 20 per cent has passed parliament. More than 3 million Australians are set to see their debt reduced, with the average debt of about $27,600 receiving about $5520 in relief. The debts will be reduced automatically by the Australian Taxation Office over the coming months, with calculations backdated to the amount owed on June 1, 2025. The Opposition benches were notably empty as the Bill passed parliament on Thursday morning, with Labor, Greens and crossbench senators, David Pocock, Tammy Tyrell, and Fatima Payman supporting the motion. Education Minister Jason Clare said the promise was important to 'young Australians' who 'don't always see something for them on the ballot paper'. However he urged patience with the ATO now required to 'write about 50,000 lines of code to implement' the policy and 'make sure that they get it right'. 'But this is now going to happen. It's guaranteed and it will be backdated to 1 June this year, before indexation happened,' he told reporters. 'We're doing that for a reason – to make sure that we honour the promise we made to the Australian people in full, that we would cut their student debt by 20 per cent and today the parliament has acted and I'm glad to see that they have.' Labor's promise to slash thousands from students debts has passed parliament. NewsWire / Nicholas Eagar Credit: NewsWire One Nation senators Malcolm Roberts, Warwick Stacey and Tyron Whitten opposed the Bill. Standing up to speak after the Bill passed, Greens senator Sarah Hanson lashed the lack of Coalition presence in the Chamber, however was admonished by Senate president Sue Lines. 'I'd just like to draw attention to the state of the Opposition benches in the last 15 minutes. They seem to be invisible, missing,' said Senator Hanson-Young before she was cut off by Senator Lines. In response, the President said: 'This is not a time for a statement. It's not appropriate for a quorum because there are senators in here and the practice in this place is that we don't comment on whether senators are in the chamber or not'. The Bill also contained measures which will increase the minimum income repayment threshold before Australians begin to pay back their student loans from $54,000 to $67,000. Rates of repayments will also be lowered. More to come

‘Always makes my heart pound': Scary ATO scam trend that has become a ‘plague'
‘Always makes my heart pound': Scary ATO scam trend that has become a ‘plague'

News.com.au

timea day ago

  • News.com.au

‘Always makes my heart pound': Scary ATO scam trend that has become a ‘plague'

There's nothing that fills me with dread and panic more than an unexpected email from the ATO. But, at second glance the email that landed in my inbox this week is obviously a scam and it's clear I'm far from the only one receiving it. This year, I've been on the receiving end of a barrage of official-looking emails claiming to be from the Australian Taxation Office – spoiler alert, they're not. One of the most recent emails I received was the most realistic-looking email I'd gotten so far, which I stumbled upon while enjoying a lunch break at work. I instantly panicked because it appeared as a legitimate email from the Australian Taxation Office and I was caught off-guard. 'You have a new payment message in your inbox,' it read, with a 'View now' link to click. The email ended with, 'Regards, ATO.' It was simple and concise, which made the correspondence seem genuine. The email was particularly triggering because it's tax time, and I'm always worried I've made a mistake that will result in me owing the ATO a substantial amount of money. When the email appeared in my inbox my knee-jerk reaction was to click on it and see what the ATO wanted. I managed to stop myself from spiralling too much, and took a deep breath. I then clicked on the sender's email to double-check who sent it. Even though it appeared to be from the ATO, once I double-clicked on the email, it revealed a completely different and clearly unofficial email address. The ATO scam is scary, given how legitimate it appeared. If I had rushed to click on the link, we could be telling a very different story today. Thinking about what might have been is enough to give someone a stress rash. Accountant issues warning on 'plague' Accountant Linda Mirams said that ATO scams are becoming increasingly common to the point she called it 'a plague' that is impacting far too many Aussies. Ms Mirams had five clients this year alone who have been scammed by clicking on links in emails that they believed were official correspondence from the ATO. 'They prey on people thinking 'oh s**t, the ATO is going to come arrest me',' she told According to Ms Mirams, the way the scam works is that once people click on the link in the email, it somehow means hackers can obtain enough personal details to fill out the person's tax return without them knowing. The scammer then logs into the victim's myGov or ATO account, updates their bank details with their own, files their return, and pockets the refund. Obviously, because they're trying to get as much money back as possible. They'll also go to town on claiming stuff. Ms Mirams said the hackers are smart and also unlink people's tax agents from their accounts so accountants aren't notified. 'They are getting a few thousand dollars and are putting in deductions that the person wouldn't be able to claim,' she explained. 'Then they're getting the refunds and putting it in their bank accounts. One client was scammed and the person got her $5000 refund.' Often, clients will only discover they've been scammed after Ms Mirams goes to file their tax returns for them and discovers it has already been filed. 'I've stopped it a couple of times. I've contacted the ATO, and then they mark the tax file number as compromised,' she said. Ms Mirams explained she's only able to stop the transaction if the ATO hasn't already issued the refund. She managed to stop one scam recently, but only because her client clicked on the link and then regretted it, contacting her. 'If we catch it we can stop it,' she said. 'If it has already gone through then there's nothing we can do.' The seasoned accountant warned that people need to be particularly cautious this tax season to avoid falling victim to scams. They're sophisticated and realistic-looking, and it can be easy not to think to verify emails if the ATO makes you nervous. 'They make it look so legit. The key is never follow a link from an email. If myGov is asking you to do something go onto myGov and do it that way,' she said. 'Don't click on it. Call your tax agent or call the ATO.' Ms Mirams said one of the problems that comes with being scammed is that often you'll end up with a compromised tax number which is a 'nightmare' to remedy. In her experience, it also takes a long time for the ATO to sort it out because there's 'such a huge backlog' of scam victims at the moment. The accountant said she is aware of the emails, not just because of her clients, but also because she has received scam emails on her personal accounts. 'It is scary,' she said. ATO responds to email scam In a statement to the ATO encouraged Aussies to 'act quickly' if something feels wrong. 'The ATO's advice to taxpayers who are questioning if an ATO interaction is legitimate or not is to check their account on our online services through myGov or the ATO app, speak to their registered tax professional if they have one, or phone us on 1800 008 540 to confirm the legitimacy of the interaction,' a spokesperson said. 'If they think the interaction is fraudulent, it can be reported by sending an email to ReportScams@ The ATO explained that 'impersonation scams continue to remain a risk to the community' and it is important to remain cautious. 'ATO and myGov themed email phishing scams, and variations of these, are some of the most commonly reported scams received from the community and are on the rise. 'Scammer methods continue to evolve and become more sophisticated, linking to fraudulent websites, designed to steal taxpayer information,' the statement reads. The ATO also advised that it may contact taxpayers via SMS or email but it will 'never send an unsolicited message containing a hyperlink to log on to online services' and all taxpayers should remain vigilant. 'Before giving anyone your personal information it is important to Stop, Check and Protect. Stop – Never share your myGov sign in details, and only share personal information such as your Tax File Number (TFN), or bank account details, if you trust the person and they genuinely require them. 'Check – Ask yourself if the message or call could be fake. Is it really the ATO contacting you? Protect – Act quickly if something feels wrong or you've noticed suspicious activity on your ATO accounts.'

ATO to review processes around decision to cancel ex-PM's company's $950k tax bill
ATO to review processes around decision to cancel ex-PM's company's $950k tax bill

ABC News

time2 days ago

  • ABC News

ATO to review processes around decision to cancel ex-PM's company's $950k tax bill

The Australian Taxation Office has moved to allay fears powerful individuals are given special treatment, saying it will review how it made a decision to wipe almost $1 million in penalties and interest from a company owned by former prime minister Paul Keating. "We are following up to ensure all processes were correctly adhered to," the ATO said in a statement following Monday night's Four Corners program. Four Corners revealed an abrupt about face from the tax office in 2015, which followed three years of negotiations and came after a formal payment notice for $953,000 was issued to Mr Keating's company. The decision was unusual because, for most taxpayers, formally challenging such a ruling on a so-called general interest charge (GIC) would typically require them to contest the matter in the Federal Court. "We note concerns raised in the segment about GIC remission for a high-profile taxpayer, which we take seriously," the ATO's statement said. "Where concerns are raised, we aim to respond through appropriate channels, including internal review, independent oversight, and, where necessary, improvements to our systems and processes. "The public rightfully expects the highest standards of integrity, fairness and accountability from us, and we take matters raised in the segment seriously." Jason Harris, a professor of corporate law at Sydney University, said the decision to waive the interest and penalties charge had the potential to undermine public trust in the tax system. "We have an example of someone very famous seemingly getting a special deal without any explanation and that should be a matter of public concern, even outside of tax," he said. "If we had a former PM getting a waiver on a driver's licence fee we should be equally concerned. There should be transparency." The tax debt was discovered in 2012 when the tax office realised that a company owned by Mr Keating had not reported profits from a 2004 share sale. While the company, Brenlex Pty Ltd, later paid the $446,000, the ATO then demanded more than $600,000 in interest and penalties that had accrued in the eight years since the sale occurred. The negotiations stretched over three years, during which time Mr Keating's advisers asked for the debt to be written off via a tax rule called a "commissioner's discretion". Mr Keating's advisers sought the exemption because the former prime minister mistakenly believed Brenlex had paid the tax and had "inadvertently failed to advise his directors" of the sale, the advisers told the tax office. Professor Harris said a commissioner's discretion was generally applied when a taxpayer had experienced some form of unfairness, such as bad advice from an accountant, or where there had been a significant event in their life, such as the death of a loved one. He said the reason Mr Keating's advisers gave — that he had forgotten he had not complied — did not pass muster. "It's outrageous," he said. In April 2015, the ATO issued Mr Keating a statutory demand for payment of the bill, which by then had grown to $953,396. Ten days after a final letter from Mr Keating's advisers, the tax office decided to cancel the debt in full. "I am able to confirm that the GIC and Late Lodgement Penalties … have been remitted in full," a tax official wrote. "Consequently the balance of the account has been reduced to nil and the amount payable as stated in the Creditors Statutory Demand is no longer owed." The email provided no reasons for the tax office's abrupt about face after three years of resisting the arguments of Mr Keating's financial advisers. The principal tax adviser at Australia's Institute of Public Accountants, Tony Greco, said the decision to waive Mr Keating's GIC appeared unusual on its face. "From a normal perspective, forgetting to pay your tax wouldn't be a strong case for remission of the GIC," he said. "More information needs to be provided to see whether they [the tax office] acted within their discretion." Professor of taxation law at UNSW, Michael Walpole, cautioned that not enough was known about Mr Keating's matter to be able to draw any firm conclusion. Speaking generally, he said it was desirable that, as long as they relied on the appropriate protocols, the tax office be able to reach settlements with taxpayers. The ATO told Four Corners in a statement last week that "inadvertently overlooking" the need to pay tax was generally not valid grounds on which to cancel GIC. "However, there may be instances where GIC is remitted when a taxpayer inadvertently overlooks the requirement to lodge a form or make a payment, depending on the individual circumstances of the taxpayer," the ATO said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store