
Damage to Iranian nuclear sites so far appears limited, experts say
Israel's attacks succeeded in killing Iranian military leaders and nuclear scientists and striking military command and control facilities and air defenses, but satellite imagery did not yet show significant damage to nuclear infrastructure, several experts said.
"The first day was aimed at things that you would get through surprise — killing leadership, going after nuclear scientists, air defense systems, the ability to retaliate," said nuclear expert David Albright at the Institute for Science and International Security.
"We can't see any visible damage at Fordow or Isfahan. There was damage at Natanz," said Albright, referring to Iranian nuclear sites. But "there's no evidence that the underground site was destroyed."
U.N. nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi told the Security Council on Friday that the above-ground pilot enrichment plant at Iran's Natanz nuclear site had been destroyed and Iran had reported attacks on Fordow and Isfahan.
Grossi said electricity infrastructure at Natanz was also destroyed and the loss of power to a cascade hall may have damaged centrifuges there. But he said the level of radioactivity outside Natanz remained unchanged and normal.
The sprawling Natanz nuclear complex is Iran's main uranium enrichment facility. The site includes a vast underground uranium enrichment plant and a smaller, above-ground pilot enrichment plant.
In a telephone interview, Trump said it was unclear whether Iran still has a nuclear program following the Israeli strikes. "Nobody knows," Trump said. "It was a very devastating hit."
Two regional sources said at least 20 Iranian military commanders were killed in the attack, a stunning decapitation reminiscent of Israeli attacks that swiftly wiped out the leadership of Lebanon's once-feared Hezbollah militia last year. Iran also said six of its top nuclear scientists were killed.
Albright said his analysis was based on the latest available images from about 11:20 a.m. Tehran time. He added there may also have been drone strikes on tunnels to underground centrifuge plants and cyberattacks that did not leave visible traces.
"In terms of visible damage, we don't see much and we'll see what happens tonight," he said, adding that he believes Israel's strikes were still in an early stage.
Albright said the status of Iran's stocks of enriched uranium was not known and that it was possible Israel had avoided major attacks on nuclear sites due to concerns about harming international inspectors who were there.
Albright said there were thousands of centrifuges at the underground plant at Natanz and knocking out the electrical supply would bring into play a backup battery system.
He said it was likely that Iran was shutting down the centrifuges at the underground site in a controlled manner, which was a big operation.
"Batteries ... last a while, but eventually they will run out and if the centrifuges spin down in an uncontrollable manner, a lot will break," he said.
Israel said it targeted Iran's nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and military commanders at the start of what would be a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran from building an atomic weapon.
Military and nuclear experts said that even with massive firepower, military action would probably only temporarily set back a program the West fears is already aimed at producing atom bombs one day, although Iran denies it.
Jeffrey Lewis, a nonproliferation expert at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, said damage at the Natanz facility appeared "moderate."
"Israel destroyed the Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant, as well as some support buildings associated with power supply," he said. Lewis added Israel also hit a support building — possibly for power supply — near two underground nuclear enrichment facilities.
"The underground enrichment halls, as well as the large underground facility nearby in the mountains, do not appear damaged."
It was unclear what damage was sustained at the key Fordow nuclear facility, which could be used to develop nuclear weapons and is buried deep underground.
"It has always been the conventional wisdom that Israel may not have the ordnance to destroy Fordow without American military support," Mark Dubowitz, head of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies think tank, told a podcast.
The United States is better equipped than Israel to destroy such targets with its most powerful bunker buster bombs, the 30,000-pound (14,000 kg) Massive Ordnance Penetrator.
If Iran decides not to negotiate a nuclear deal, the U.S. could use its B2 bombers and those bombs to destroy Fordow, Dubowitz said.
Decker Eveleth, a strategic analyst with the CAN Corp. research group, said the overall aim of Israel's campaign was still unclear.
"They may be successful at dismantling Iranian command and control, destroying air forces (and) hitting a variety of targets related to the Iranian missile program," he said.
"(But) if their core objective is prevention of a nuclear breakout, can they destroy enough of Iran's nuclear infrastructure to actually prevent that from happening?"
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NHK
an hour ago
- NHK
Iran invites media to prison destroyed by Israeli airstrike
The Iranian government has invited domestic and foreign media outlets to a prison in Tehran that was destroyed in an Israeli attack. The prison tour took place on Tuesday, one week after the two countries started a ceasefire. The walls and ceilings have collapsed and people were clearing rubble. Judicial authorities say the airstrike on June 23 killed 79 people, including inmates, their families, administrative staff and neighborhood residents. Israel argues that it was targeting Iran's nuclear and military facilities, not civilians. But Iranian officials say Israel attacked hospitals, residential areas, and the state-run broadcaster, with the death toll from the 12-day clash reaching 935. Israel has reported that 28 people in the country died due to Iranian missile and other attacks.


NHK
14 hours ago
- NHK
Trump signs executive order lifting sanctions on Syria
US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order to remove most sanctions on Syria. Trump also directed Secretary of State Marco Rubio to review Syria's designation as a state sponsor of terrorism. Monday's order underscores the US commitment to supporting Syria's interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa's efforts to rebuild the country. Sharaa is a former anti-government forces' leader. The Bashar al-Assad regime fell last December. The Assad family had ruled the country for half a century. Trump's executive order says the United States welcomes "developments in Syria over the past 6 months," including the "positive actions" taken by Syria's interim government. It removes sanctions on Syria while maintaining restrictions on the ousted former Syrian president, his associates, and some others, including those linked to chemical weapons. Trump had told Syria's interim president that he would lift sanctions on the country when they met in Saudi Arabia in May. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Monday that the executive order is aimed at promoting and supporting Syria's path to stability and peace.


Japan Today
14 hours ago
- Japan Today
Bilateral frictions to overshadow Rubio meeting with Quad partners
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio meets with Indian External Affairs Minister Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, 2nd left, Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong, far right, and Japanese Foreign Minister Iwaya Takeshi at the State Department in Washington on Jan 21. By David Brunnstrom and Humeyra Pamuk U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio hosts his Australian, Indian and Japanese counterparts on Tuesday, seeking to boost efforts to counter China even as trade and other bilateral disagreements introduce friction into the relationships. The four countries, known as the Quad, share concerns about China's growing power, but their ties have been strained by President Donald Trump's global tariff offensive from which none of the Quad members have been spared. Other issues are also putting pressure on relations. Japan, the key U.S. ally in the Indo-Pacific, postponed an annual ministerial meeting with the U.S. State and Defense Departments that was supposed to be held on Tuesday. Press reports said this followed U.S. pressure for it to boost defense spending further than previously requested. The Financial Times said last week the demands came from Elbridge Colby, the third-most senior Pentagon official, whom analysts say has also recently created anxiety in Australia by launching a review of the massive AUKUS project to provide that country with nuclear-powered submarines. India, meanwhile, has differed with Trump's claims that his intervention and threats to cut off trade talks averted a major conflict between India and Pakistan after militants killed Indian tourists in the disputed Kashmir region in April. Rubio hosted a meeting of Quad ministers in his first diplomatic engagement as secretary of state on January 21, the day after Trump began his second term, a move meant to underscore the importance of the Indo-Pacific region. Trump has since been distracted by issues elsewhere, including most recently the Israel-Iran conflict. Tuesday's meeting will be a chance to refocus attention on the region seen as the primary challenge for the U.S. in the future. After a joint session with Quad foreign ministers, Rubio is expected to hold bilateral meetings with Japan's Takeshi Iwaya, India's Subrahmanyam Jaishankar and Australia's Penny Wong. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce told reporters on Monday the Quad partners would "reaffirm our shared commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific. "This ministerial reinforces our joint resolve to defend sovereignty, strengthen regional maritime security and build resilient supply chains," she added. Speaking at an event in New York on Monday, Jaishankar addressed U.S. ties by saying "relationships will never be free of issues," and adding: "What matters is the ability to deal with it and to keep that trend going in the positive direction." Referring to the Quad, he said there were a lot of issues that needed to be discussed in the Indo-Pacific, including maritime security, technology, pandemic preparedness and education. "I think we'll get good results," he said. NO TROPHIES In January, the Quad said officials would meet regularly to prepare for leaders' summit in India expected later this year. Arthur Sinodinos, Australia's former ambassador to Washington now with the Asia Group consultancy, said bilateral issues could overshadow the meeting, from which Washington is keen to see a greater Quad focus on security. "Australian audiences will be looking for clues on the U.S. stance on AUKUS as well as on trade," he said, adding that there also was interest in when Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese would secure a first meeting with Trump. Nicholas Szechenyi, a Japan expert at Washington's Center for Strategic and International Studies, said U.S.-Japan ties appeared to have lost momentum since a February summit between Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Trump. "The two leaders heralded a golden age in U.S.-Japan relations, but there are no trophies to put on the mantle at this stage," he said. "The tariff negotiations are all-consuming, and the Japanese appear exasperated by the administration's public lectures on defense spending." Richard Rossow, an India expert, also at CSIS, said Trump's approach to India on trade and security interests had been "clumsy," but the long-term strategic and commercial reasons for deeper cooperation remained largely unchanged. "So, the chances of further cooperation remain viable, even if the mood is less conducive," Rossow said, while noting the slow pace of staffing senior roles critical to managing day-to-day U.S. dealings with India, with no ambassador nominated and State and Defense department positions also unfilled. © Thomson Reuters 2025.