
Florida lawmakers give boost to ‘Schools of Hope'
The schools of hope proposal appeared to die before the scheduled May 2 end of this year's legislative session, but it resurfaced as part of a bill linked to a new state budget. Lawmakers late Monday also passed the budget for the 2025-2026 fiscal year after weeks of negotiations.
Charter schools are public schools often run by private operators. Lawmakers in 2017 created the schools of hope program to serve children in areas with 'persistently low-performing' traditional public schools.
The bill passed Monday night, in part, would change criteria for determining whether traditional public schools are persistently-low performing, which could increase the number that would receive the designation — and, as a result, open the door for more schools of hope.
The designation would begin to apply to traditional public schools that are in the bottom 10 percent of schools statewide for student performance on third-grade standardized English-language arts or fourth-grade math exams in at least two of the previous three years.
Also, the bill would give schools of hope the right to use vacant school facilities or 'co-locate' with other schools if space is available.
During a debate Monday night, House bill sponsor Jenna Persons-Mulicka, a Fort Myers Republican who chairs the PreK-12 Budget Subcommittee, repeatedly emphasized that charter schools are public schools.
'We're seeing these specialized charter schools coming in and transforming communities, changing children's lives, changing the metrics,' she said. 'They're working.'
But some Democrats blasted the bill, saying it would harm traditional public schools. For example, Rep. Anna Eskamani, D-Orlando, said lawmakers were changing the definition of persistently low-performing public schools 'to capture more schools for the sake of privatization.'
'Why don't we fund traditional public schools instead of creating these schemes that pull funding away from traditional public schools?' Rep. Kelly Skidmore, D-Boca Raton, said.
The Republican-controlled House voted 80-24 to pass the bill (SB 2510), after the Senate approved it in a 25-9 vote. It now will go to Gov. Ron DeSantis.
While lawmakers were scheduled to end the legislative session May 2, they had to extend it for more than six weeks to reach agreement on a budget and related bills. Before the scheduled end, they took other steps to bolster charter schools.
As an example, lawmakers passed a bill (HB 443) that included allowing charter schools to have stricter codes of conduct than traditional public schools and to increase enrollment to more than what was initially approved, though they could not exceed the capacities of their facilities. DeSantis signed that bill on May 30.
The House in April passed a bill that included the school of hope changes, but the measure was not approved by the Senate. The changes were included in a broader education bill passed Monday.
A House staff analysis this spring said Florida had approved seven school of hope operators that ran 12 schools. It said that during the 2023-2024 school year, 51 traditional public schools were considered persistently low performing.
More broadly, charter schools, which are not bound by the same regulations as traditional public schools, have grown dramatically over the years.
For example, 382,367 students were enrolled in charter schools during the 2022-2023 school year, up from 229,428 students during the 2013-2014 year, according to data posted on the Florida Department of Education website. The state had 726 charter schools in 46 districts in 2022-2023.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
40 minutes ago
- The Hill
6 in 10 voters view Democrats negatively: WSJ poll
The Democratic Party is viewed negatively by 63 percent of American voters — the lowest approval rating of the party in more than 30 years of The Wall Street Journal's surveys — according to a new poll from the newspaper. The survey found that while voters disapproved of President Trump's handling of a variety of issues, they generally said they trusted Republicans more than Democrats to take care of those issues in Congress. On tariffs, for instance, voters disapproved of Trump's policies by 17 percentage points, but trusted Republican lawmakers more than Democrats on the issue by seven points. Only 8 percent of voters viewed Democrats 'very favorably' in the poll. President Trump himself had an approval rating of 46 percent. The Wall Street Journal poll follows a survey from CNN released Thursday which found that just 28 percent of voters viewed the Democrats favorably. Democrats are confronting widespread voter malaise and perceptions that the party is listless ahead of the 2026 midterms as key parts of the party's national infrastructure have been rocked by infighting. Still, they are seeking to capitalize on Trump's more unpopular policies. They hope the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill,' with tax cuts favoring the wealthy alongside significant cuts to Medicaid and other social services, could galvanize voters. A slight majority — 52 percent — of voters in Friday's Journal poll disapproved of the bill. The ongoing controversy over the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — a flashpoint for MAGA voters that Democrats have sought to exploit — may also come into play as members of Congress head home for the August recess. The Journal's poll found that voters were highly skeptical that the Justice Department had thoroughly investigated the issue, with 65 percent of Democrats and 30 percent of Republicans saying they had 'no confidence' in the department's review. The poll of 1,500 registered voters was conducted between July 16 and July 20 with a margin of error of 2.5 percentage points. It was conducted by Democratic pollster John Anzalone and GOP strategist Tony Fabrizio.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Democratic Texas congressional candidate dragged out, arrested after rant at redistricting hearing, wild video shows
A Democratic congressional candidate was forcibly removed from the Texas State Capitol Thursday and arrested after he filibustered a hearing on redistricting in the Lone Star State. 'It is a shame. It is horrific. For what you have … ' Isaiah Martin shouted as he was dragged out of the House Redistricting Committee meeting in Austin, just before a capitol security official fell on top of the 27-year-old House hopeful. 3 Isaiah Martin is running to represent Texas' 18th Congressional District in the House of Representatives. CBS Austin Advertisement Martin is seeking to replace the late Rep. Sylvester Turner (D-Texas), who died on March 5, as the Texas' 18th Congressional District representative. The Texas Department of Public Safety confirmed Martin was arrested and booked into Travis County Jail on charges of criminal trespass, disrupting a meeting or procession and resisting arrest, according to local outlet KVUE. All charges against Martin were dropped Friday, and he was expected to be released from jail, his brother said in a social media post, arguing that the state was trying to make 'an example' out of Isaiah. Advertisement Republican state Rep. Cody Vasut ordered the sergeant-at-arms to remove Martin from the hearing after he went over his allotted two minutes to speak and refused to stop talking — even after his microphone was shut off. It took three men to wrestle Martin out of the room. 'Jesus! Get off of him!' a woman in the crowd demanded after the candidate fell to the ground with the sergeant-at-arms on top of him. 'He tripped,' one of the security members assured the woman. Advertisement 'America will rise up against you!' Martin screamed as he was finally pulled into the hallway, where it appeared he fell, or was taken down, once more. 3 Martin was forcibly removed after he refused to stop speaking at the hearing. Fox News West Texas 3 As he was being dragged out, Martin appeared to trip and fell to the ground. CBS Austin Martin's brother contends that Isaiah was simply using his First Amendment rights and 'willingly walked with the officers out of the building' after his arrest. Advertisement 'He shouldn't have been arrested in the first place,' Martin's brother said. Martin, who previously worked as a staffer for late Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas), is one of eight Democrats currently running in a special election race for the Houston-area congressional district. He is opposed to Republican-led efforts in Texas to tweak the state's congressional maps further in the GOP's favor. The redistricting proposal may create five new winnable seats for Republicans ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Suffolk County Executive Ed Romaine signs off on longer terms for lawmakers — now voters get to decide
Suffolk lawmakers could soon serve twice as long — from two to four years — under a new measure signed Friday by County Executive Ed Romaine. But voters will still need to approve the term-limit change on the November ballot. The 'Term Limit Preservation Act' will ask voters on Nov. 4 whether they support doubling the term length for county legislators, while still capping their total time in office at 12 years. Advertisement Suffolk County Executive Ed Romaine signed a new measure Friday that could lead lawmakers in the county to serve twice as long. Brandon Cruz / NY Post Romaine signed the bill to place the measure on the ballot in Hauppauge, framing the move as a way to give residents more control over how local government functions due to a new controversial state law dictating election schedules. 'This is an opportunity,' Romaine said. Advertisement 'If you think that less politics and more government is a good thing, then this is something to support.' The proposal, first passed by the legislature in early July, stems from a 2023 state law signed by Gov. Kathy Hochul that moves all local elections in New York to even-numbered years to coincide with state and federal races — which Hochul said would reduce voter fatigue and save taxpayer dollars. But Long Island politicians, especially Republicans, say they're worried about important local issues being drowned out by the national noise, and argue the shift has created confusion and could wreak havoc on the county's election calendar. The legislation signed by Romaine will allow lawmakers to serve four-year terms, but voters still need to approve the term-limit change on the November ballot. Suffolk County Government Advertisement 'If the elections stay in even years, I am concerned that local issues will get lost in the shuffle of national and state politics,' Romaine told reporters. He said this amendment would allow legislators to spend less time campaigning and more time doing the work of local government, as they would essentially win in November and have to start immediately campaigning again due to the changes. If the ballot measure passes, current lawmakers would be allowed to serve out their final term if it goes beyond the 12 year maximum — a move politicians claimed was to avoid the 'chaos' of midterm resignations. Advertisement Although lawmakers used the shift in election years as justification to beef up the length they could serve without campaigning, Suffolk recently pushed to stretch lawmakers' terms from two to four years in 2020. More than 70% of voters voted against the measure on ballots. Westchester County's Board of Legislators similarly tried to extend term limits in 2024, with voters promptly voting against the measure.