Asian shares mixed after Nvidia nudges Nasdaq to a record, while other U.S. stocks slump
By ELAINE KURTENBACH
Shares in Asia traded mixed on Wednesday after an update on U.S. inflation pulled most Wall Street stocks lower, though gains for Nvidia pushed the Nasdaq to another record.
Tokyo's Nikkei 225 edged less than 0.1% lower, to 39,663.40. Investors are focusing on the potential impact of an election for the Upper House of Parliament on Sunday that is expected to lead to tax cuts and higher spending as lawmakers try to restore the waning popularity of the ruling Liberal Democrats.
Worries over a deterioration in Japan's fiscal health have pushed yields of long-term Japanese government bonds to their highest levels in years.
'What's at stake isn't simply which party hands out the biggest bundle of goodies. It's whether the walls holding up Japan's house of debt can withstand another round of fiscal fireworks…' Stephen Innes of SPI Asset Management said in a commentary.
Elsewhere in Asia, Hong Kong's Hang Seng added 0.1% to 24,618.23 while the Shanghai Composite index slipped 0.1% to 3,503.78.
South Korea's Kospi lost 0.9% to 3,186.38 and in Australia, the S&P/ASX 200 declined 0.8% to 8,561.80.
Taiwan's Taiex jumped 0.9% and India's Sensex was flat. Thailand's SET also was little changed.
In Jakarta, shares rose 0.4% after President Donald Trump said on Truth Social that he plans to tariff imports from Indonesia at 19%, while American goods sent to the Southeast Asian country will face no tariffs. Trump also said Indonesia committed to buying U.S. energy, agricultural products and aircraft.
On Tuesday, the S&P 500 fell 0.4% to 6,243.76, but stayed near its all-time high set last week, as 90% of the stocks within the index fell. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 1% to 44,023.29.
The Nasdaq composite rose 0.2% to a record 20,677.80 thanks to Nvidia, the market's most influential stock.
Nvidia said the U.S. government has assured it that licenses will be granted for its H20 chip, used for artificial intelligence, again and that deliveries will hopefully begin soon. Its 4% gain was by far the strongest force pushing upward on the S&P 500.
Stocks of big U.S. banks were mixed following their latest profit reports. JPMorgan Chase slipped 0.7% despite reporting a stronger profit than analysts expected, as CEO Jamie Dimon warned of risks to the economy because of tariffs and other concerns.
Citigroup rose 3.7% following its better-than-expected profit report. But Wells Fargo fell 5.5% following its own, as it trimmed its forecast for an important way that it makes money.
A report showed inflation in the United States accelerated to 2.7% last month from 2.4% in May as prices rose for clothes, toys and other goods that usually are imported. Economists say prices may be rising because of stiff tariffs that President Donald Trump has proposed on other countries.
Treasury yields yo-yoed after the report and then began rising.
The yield on the 10-year Treasury climbed to 4.48% from 4.43% late Monday. The yield on the two-year Treasury, which more closely tracks expectations for what the Federal Reserve will do with short-term interest rates, rose to 3.95% from 3.90%.
Higher inflation could inhibit interest rate cuts by the Fed. It has been keeping rates on hold this year after cutting them at the end of last year. That's because lower rates can give inflation more fuel, along with a boost for the economy. Wall Street loves lower rates because they goose prices higher for stocks and other investments, and Trump himself has been clamoring for the Fed to cut more quickly.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell, though, has been adamant that he wants to wait for more data about how tariffs affect the economy and inflation. Following Tuesday's inflation report, traders are still overwhelmingly betting that the Fed will cut its main interest rate by the end of the year. But they pulled back their bets on the number of potential cuts, according to data from CME Group.
In other dealings early Wednesday, U.S. benchmark crude oil picked up 42 cents to $66.94 per barrel. Brent crude, the international standard, was up 30 cents at $69.01 per barrel.
The dollar fell to 148.66 Japanese yen from 148.87 yen. The euro was at $1.1627, up from $1.1602.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
13 minutes ago
- The Mainichi
Japan protests South Korean military drills near disputed islets
TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Japan's government said Thursday it lodged a strong protest with South Korea over military drills conducted in waters near remote islets in the Sea of Japan that are controlled by Seoul but claimed by Tokyo. Masaaki Kanai, head of the Japanese Foreign Ministry's Asian and Oceanian Affairs Bureau, told the South Korean Embassy in Tokyo that the exercises were "totally unacceptable and extremely regrettable," the government said. The islets, called Takeshima in Japan and Dokdo in South Korea, are "clearly an integral part of Japanese territory in light of historical facts and international law," the Foreign Ministry said. Earlier in the day, the South Korean navy said it had carried out the drills, the first since President Lee Jae Myung took office last month, succeeding Yoon Suk Yeol. South Korea's Yonhap News Agency reported that troops did not land on the islets and that the biannual regular training, similar in scale to previous years, was closed to the public, as was the case under the Yoon administration.
2 hours ago
President Lee's 'Pragmatic Diplomacy': Can He Balance Foreign Ties and Security?
Eight decades after the end of World War II and 60 years on from the normalization of Japan–South Korea ties, a new president in Seoul promises a more practical take on foreign policy. A specialist looks at the prospects for Lee Jae-myung's administration in the diplomatic and security arenas. Consistency Builds Trust Between Nations Issues of historical awareness have long complicated Japan–South Korea relations. Following his election on June 3, South Korea's new president Lee Jae-myung hinted at a more flexible approach to history issues, saying that 'Taking a consistent approach is extremely important in diplomacy' and that it is 'unrealistic' for new leaders to unilaterally change diplomatic tack based on their personal views. As such, President Lee seems likely to emphasize the importance of 'pragmatic diplomacy centered on national interests' over historical consciousness in relations with Japan. Also notable is that, when President Lee made his introductory phone calls to world leaders on June 9, Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru was second after US President Donald Trump. When fellow progressive Moon Jae-in took office in 2017, he spoke to both the United States and China before speaking to the Japanese leader. President Moon also advocated 'balanced diplomacy' between the United States and China. By contrast, Prime Minister Ishiba and President Lee agreed that 'amid a worsening strategic environment' in East Asia, maintaining close bilateral ties between Japan and South Korea, as well as trilateral cooperation with the United States, is essential to diplomatic stability. On June 17, Lee and Ishiba conducted an in-person meeting on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in Canada. There, the South Korean president emphasized the importance of 'looking past minor differences' to keep building a 'cooperative relationship' in a 'future-oriented manner.' Welcoming this, Prime Minister Ishiba expressed hope that, amid the current challenging international situation, cooperation between the two nations would contribute to both regional security and global stability. With both sides embracing 'pragmatic diplomacy,' it appears that the next chapter of Japan–South Korea relations is off to a smooth start. The so-called 'minor differences' President Lee has in mind relate to events over the last decade that soured diplomatic relations between the neighbors. In 2015, the conservative administration of Park Geun-hye concluded an agreement with the Abe Shinzō administration regarding the comfort women issue. However, the progressive Moon Jae-in administration effectively abandoned it in 2018, in the process damaging mutual trust between the two countries. There were concerns that something similar would happen this time with the wartime colonial laborer issue. While this issue was effectively 'resolved' in Korea during the Yoon Suk Yeol administration, there are concerns in Japan that a progressive administration will revive it. During the three years of the Yoon administration, Japan–South Korea relations quickly normalized, and trilateral security cooperation among Japan, the United States, and South Korea similarly strengthened. Will this momentum be maintained going forward? This year, 2025, marks the eightieth anniversary of the end of World War II and the Korean Peninsula's liberation from colonial rule. It is also the sixtieth anniversary of the normalization of diplomatic relations between Japan and South Korea. During this period, the countries concluded various agreements, including the 1965 Treaty on Basic Relations and the Agreement on the Settlement of Problems concerning Property and Claims and on Economic Cooperation. They also entered into security agreements such as the 2016 General Security of Military Information Agreement to protect classified military information. Japan has also addressed war responsibility through official statements by Prime Minister Murayama Tomiichi in 1995, by Prime Minister Kan Naoto in 2010, and by Prime Minister Abe in 2015. With the inauguration of South Korea's new president coinciding with the sixtieth anniversary of his country's diplomatic relations with Japan, it is the perfect opportunity for both sides to reaffirm the core international legal principle of pacta sunt servanda ('agreements must be kept') that underpins mutual international trust. An event held in Seoul on June 16, 2025, to commemorate the sixtieth anniversary of the normalization of diplomatic relations between Japan and South Korea. President Lee can be seen delivering a video message (back right). (© Kyōdō) President Lee Jae-myung declared that the 'real' Republic of Korea has resumed with his election, ending the period of social unrest that began with the declaration of martial law by his predecessor that many progressives saw as a coup d'état. His challenge is to reset domestic affairs while emphasizing the importance of consistency in foreign policy and national security. President Lee has stated that he intends to stabilize relations with North Korea, thereby reducing 'Korea risk,' but a much greater risk that he must contend with is one where South Korea is perceived as a 'swing state' where a new government regularly results in drastic foreign and security policy changes. Trilateral Cooperation but No Mention of the 'Indo-Pacific' Polarization between conservatives and progressives in South Korea remains severe. Reaching consensus in the National Assembly has been extremely difficult, and divisions among citizens are intensifying and becoming more emotional. These dynamics are particularly evident in foreign affairs and national security, especially when Japan and North Korea are involved. According to a January public opinion survey conducted by the East Asia Institute, a South Korean think tank, when asked about the most important issue the South Korean government should prioritize in diplomacy toward Japan, conservative respondents cited 'resolving historical issues' (24.0%) less frequently than 'advancing future-oriented cooperation' (55.5%). Progressive respondents, however, were the mirror opposite: 56.2% wanted to prioritize resolving historical issues versus 26.8% preferring to emphasize cooperation. If President Lee Jae-myung wants to maintain his support base, a resurgence of historical issues should be expected at some point during his administration. There are similar divisions when it comes to South Korea's policy toward North Korea and the United States. Among conservative respondents, 41.5% wish to strengthen security measures while only 17.0% of progressives chose this as a priority. On the other hand, only 15.7% of conservatives valued 'expanding inter-Korean exchanges,' while 44.6% of progressive respondents chose this option. Regarding South Korea's general approach to relations with the United States, 50.4% of conservatives selected strengthening the US-ROK alliance as the top priority, compared with only 26.6% of progressive respondents. Progressives on the other hand were more likely to select 'establishing an equal partnership with the United States' as the top priority (32.6%)—only 9.8% of conservative respondents chose this option. Despite these divisions, majorities of both progressive (55.1%) and conservative (84.6%) respondents did favor strengthening trilateral military security cooperation among Japan, the United States, and South Korea. In a situation of extreme polarization where citizens unreservedly support or oppose the policies of an administration based on their ideology, it can be very difficult for new governments to carry forward initiatives of their predecessors if they are not from the same party. The resolution of the wartime labor issue is a characteristic example of this, and indeed President Lee is on record as criticizing Yoon's pragmatic diplomacy toward Japan on this issue as 'humiliating' and something that 'undermined national self-respect.' Another prominent policy pursued by former President Yoon that could come under scrutiny is South Korea's Indo-Pacific Strategy. The normalization of Japan–South Korea relations during the Yoon administration, and South Korea's seeming rhetorical commitment to an Indo-Pacific Strategy, shaped the redefinition of the US-ROK relationship as a global comprehensive strategic alliance (April 2023), which in turn underpinned the Camp David Principles (August 2023) that marked the beginning of a new era of US-ROK-Japan trilateral security cooperation. However, President Lee Jae-myung did not once mention the term 'Indo-Pacific' during his presidential election campaign. What one does not say can often speak louder than what one does say. When considering future diplomatic policy, it is important to pay close attention to South Korea's approach toward the Indo-Pacific strategy under the new administration. A Stark Temperature Difference on Taiwan The Free and Open Indo-Pacific concept was originally formulated by Japan as a global strategy, and some variation of this vision has subsequently been adopted by the United States, South Korea, Australia, Canada, the European Union, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. It has become an indispensable framework contextualizing the common international challenges of our time. Particularly notable is that since 2022, the leaders of Japan and South Korea, as members of the IP4 (Indo-Pacific Partners) grouping with Australia and New Zealand, have participated in NATO summit meetings. This symbolizes the increasing interdependence of security between the Indo-Pacific and North Atlantic regions, as well as between the east and west of the Eurasian landmass. At one time in the past Japan and South Korea were considered 'quasi-allies' due to both nations sharing intimate military alliances with the United States. However, this designation is currently much more likely to be applied to Australia and the United Kingdom in Japan's case. In order to reinvigorate the Japan–South Korea 'quasi-alliance,' there needs to be a cold hard look at what Japan, South Korea, and the United States should do, what they can do, and importantly, what they cannot do together. It is important to neither get overly ambitious nor give up too soon when trying to forge trilateral cooperation. One area of potential divergence relates to Taiwan. The 2023 Camp David Principles reaffirmed the importance of 'peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait'; this was part of a broader clarification that the US-ROK alliance was a global comprehensive strategic alliance not necessarily limited to contingencies on the Korean Peninsula. The United States' Indo-Pacific strategy is predicated on the region comprising one theater, with American forces in both South Korea and Japan effectively positioned on the frontlines of this single theater. In the event of a crisis not only on the Korean Peninsula but also in the Taiwan Strait or the South China Sea, the United States requires flexible and organic coordination between the US-ROK alliance and the US-Japan alliance. In Tokyo, this notion is increasingly acceptable. Successive prime ministers have, after all, adopted the stance that 'today's Ukraine could be tomorrow's East Asia' and that 'a Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency' requiring the US-Japan alliance to act. As such, political leaders and officials have doubled down on efforts to enhance deterrence and response capabilities and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Mutual trust is of extreme importance between allies. In South Korea, though, there is a different sense of urgency. Taiwan is perceived to be far away, and the likelihood of a crisis is considered low. Somewhat astonishingly, President Lee has openly stated during past political campaigns that all South Korea needs to do is say xiexie (thank you) to both China and Taiwan should a conflict break out, and that Korea does not need to overly concern itself with Taiwan Strait events. President Lee does not appear to fear the possibility that President Trump might consider drawing down American forces from allies who are unwilling to commit to supporting American forces during a regional US-China conflict—wherever it takes place. This is despite the removal of American troops being likely to drastically alter the balance of power with North Korea and impact South Korea's own security. President Lee is on record repeatedly saying that fighting and winning is a poor strategy, and that it is more important to avoid fighting in the first place through diplomacy. While diplomatic efforts to avoid conflict are of course important, preparing for the worst is a fundamental principle of deterrence and national security approaches that aim to avoid fighting in the first place. The true effectiveness of President Lee's 'pragmatic diplomacy centered on national interests' will ultimately be determined by how the new South Korean president strikes the balance between diplomacy and national security. (Originally published in Japanese. Banner photo: Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru, at left, shakes hands with South Korean President Lee Jae-myung ahead of their summit meeting on June 17, 2025. © Jiji.)
4 hours ago
S. Korean Foreign Min. Nominee Vows Mature Ties with Japan
News from Japan World Jul 17, 2025 21:15 (JST) Seoul, July 17 (Jiji Press)--South Korean foreign minister nominee Cho Hyun said Thursday that he will work to build a firm and mature relationship with Japan. Cho, former permanent representative to the United Nations, told a parliamentary hearing that he will seek to hold a trilateral summit with Japan and China at an early date. This year, Japan holds the presidency of the trilateral framework. Cho was nominated last month to become the first foreign minister under President Lee Jae-myung. During the hearing, Cho stressed that he is eager to find mutually beneficial ways to cooperate with Japan in the fields of the economy, society and culture. He added that he will deal with history issues, which have repeatedly caused friction in Japan-South Korean relations, with patience and by taking a consistent position. As this year marks the 60th anniversary of the normalization of Japan-South Korea diplomatic relations, Cho said he would like to promote student exchange programs and speed up immigration processes at both countries' airports to expand human interaction. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press
