‘I was naive in being hopeful': Labour voters feel let down after first year
Members and voters said initial optimism had given away to unhappiness about the government's record, although many were keen to state the positives they felt had been forgotten under the weight of recent events.
Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $https://uploads.guim.co.uk/2025/07/04/1.Jan_from_manc_summary_of_disappointment.mp3
Jan, a former Labour member from Manchester said she was 'disillusioned, disappointed and despairing' with Starmer's tenure so far.
She recalled the strategy often attributed to the Labour leader in the run-up to the election last year, and said: 'I kept telling myself that really, Keir Starmer was a man with a Ming vase on a polished floor, and that somehow after they were in power that things would really start to change and we would have an alternative to the Tory government that left the complete mess we're in at the moment.'
Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $https://uploads.guim.co.uk/2025/07/04/4.Jan_from_manc_feeling_let_down_and_betrayed.mp3
She said she had resigned her membership over the last year as a result of her unhappiness with the party's policies on the war in Gaza, and wider changes to welfare.
She said: 'I'm more sad than I am angry, and that's [a] very difficult place to be, to feel so let down, betrayed and disappointed.'
Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $https://uploads.guim.co.uk/2025/07/04/7.Desanka_housing_and_background.mp3
In south London, Desanka, a social housing tenant and worker, said Labour's housing policy would not sufficiently cut local authority housing waiting lists. 'What we need is genuinely affordable housing. Without housing, without good safe housing, you can't have healthy people, and you can't get an education,' she said.
'I think until they address that, if they were to do that, and to have a genuine response to allow councils to build more, and put money in it, and bring back affordable housing grants that used to be. I know times are hard, but you have to make choices.'
Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $https://uploads.guim.co.uk/2025/07/04/8.Desanka_some_positives_and_why_not_voting_labour.mp3
While she was keen to credit the government for attempting to rebalance the country, she said she wouldn't back the party again at the ballot box. She cited disagreement with the party's policy on asylum seekers on small boats not being able to apply for citizenship.
Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $https://uploads.guim.co.uk/2025/07/04/10.Kennedy_some_of_the_positives_and_govt_is_listening.mp3
Kennedy was another who believed Labour was not getting recognition for the positives so far. Giving the party a B grade for its first year, he said he was a supporter of the family farms tax policy and introducing VAT on private school fees.
He said Starmer and his cabinet had stabilised the country, but disputed how stereotypically Labour the government's policies had been.
Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $https://uploads.guim.co.uk/2025/07/04/11.Kennedy_how_he_would_rate_labour.mp3
'They need to be hitting the rich more than hitting the poor,' Kennedy said. 'So again, the welfare bill, again, that was another political suicide. Where do they think they're going? And why are they hitting the most vulnerable sectors in society? They need to be hitting the super-wealthy, the super-rich, big business, big corporations, people who really can't defend themselves.'
Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $https://uploads.guim.co.uk/2025/07/04/12.Laura.mp3
Laura, a lifelong member, said she was 'overwhelmingly disappointed' with the party's performance. She said she was unhappy with policies she thought had targeted the poorest in society.
She said: 'I remember driving to work and feeling a sense of optimism and hope for the future for the first time in a very long time. That hope and optimism has now vanished and I feel despair, disappointment and quite often guilt and regret at having voted for this government.'
The NHS worker continued: 'I've lost trust in these politicians in whom I initially had so much hope.'
Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $https://uploads.guim.co.uk/2025/07/04/13.Hazel_Lamb_beginning_on_Labour_dealing_with_the_situation.mp3
Sympathy was the overarching feeling for Hazel Lamb, who said the government was dealing with a 'much worse situation than they anticipated'.
Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $https://uploads.guim.co.uk/2025/07/04/14.Hazel_Lamb_loving_govt_honesty.mp3
'What I love is the fact that the government is honest,' Lamb said. 'I think that people have integrity and are trying their best. I don't have a sense that there's self-interest going on here, I have a sense that people are actually trying to do something about all the difficult situations that we've got.'
Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $https://uploads.guim.co.uk/2025/07/04/16.Lily_Raper_disappointed_about_palestine_and_trans_rights.mp3
Lily Raper, who has spent most of her life under Conservative-led governments, said her excitement was replaced with dismay at Labour's foreign policy, and its policies on trans rights.
She said: 'I hoped for a solid stance from the Labour government in halting the arms sales to Israel, in preventing the genocide occurring in Palestine. Obviously we've not seen that, and I've seen Labour effectively throwing trans women under the bus. Disappointment is too light a word.'
Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $https://uploads.guim.co.uk/2025/07/04/17.Barney_Duff_talks_positives_but_disappointed.mp3
Barney Duff said the initial successes of Labour's first 100 days had been forgotten. He referred to the creation of Great British Railways, and changes to renters' rights that are still going through parliament, but said things had since gone awry.
Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $https://uploads.guim.co.uk/2025/07/04/18.Barney_Duff_summary_of_feeling_negative.mp3
'It's just been a bit of a train wreck,' Duff said.
He added: 'I thought they were going to pivot when they got in charge. I was hopeful that they'd return to their manifesto that won the leadership, but I was quite naive in being hopeful.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Terrorists teaching prisoners how to make bombs
Terrorists inside British prisons are teaching organised criminals how to make bombs, according to a study. In return, extremist inmates are learning from gang members how to launder money, use the dark web and obtain weapons that could be used in terror attacks. It comes amid increasing warnings about the rising threat of Islamist gangs following attacks on prison officers in jails. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said: 'Extremists and career criminals now operate with near impunity inside some of this country's highest-security prisons. 'That is a complete failure of leadership – and a dangerous abdication of one of the state's core duties: maintaining order behind bars. 'When Islamist terrorists and organised crime figures are left to forge alliances, we aren't just witnessing a security lapse – we're watching a national threat incubate in plain sight. This cannot be allowed to continue.' Prisons have often been thought of as operating like universities of crime, with inmates learning how to become more accomplished thieves, fraudsters and even drug dealers. But according to a new report, that knowledge exchange is starting to take place between ordinary criminals and terrorist inmates. Described as the prison crime-terror nexus, a study has found terrorists are learning illegal financial techniques to better fund their operations, while gang members and organised criminals are discovering how to assemble devastating new weapons to use against their rivals Drawing on interviews with prison officers, former governors, counter terror officials and prisoners, the research suggests divisions that may have once existed between terrorists and other inmates are beginning to break down. Dr Hannah Bennett, author of the study, said: 'Some prisoners are coming out knowing how to make a bomb. Others are learning how to use the dark web or commit financial crime. For many, it's about protection – but it's also about opportunity.' The study warns that a failure to identify and disrupt these exchanges risks allowing violent alliances to flourish both inside and beyond the prison walls. In some cases, released prisoners have continued hybrid activity – either joining gangs with ideological leanings or aiding terror networks in evading surveillance. The report points out how the terrorists behind the devastating 2004 Madrid bombings financed the operation through drug dealing while al-Qaeda operatives have also been known to raise money through sophisticated credit card fraud operations. Dr Bennett warned that the most fertile institutions for such a crossover are maximum security prisons where there is evidence of corruption, violence and a lack of oversight. She described these prisons as 'black hole' environments, adding: 'Where you have violent, chaotic prisons with no consistent regime and inmates who are co-located without proper oversight, the risk is exponentially higher.' One inmate who was interviewed for the study said the authorities seemed oblivious to what was going on. He said: 'We are blind to it. There are prisoners coming out more radicalised, more connected and more capable – and no one's clocking it.' Prof Ian Acheson, a former prison governor who also served in the Home Office as the director of community safety, said: 'We have several 'black hole' prisons where a combination of weak authority, inexperience and poor leadership means the state has effectively surrendered the environment to prisoners. 'The Chief Inspector of Prisons keeps identifying these places and it is extremely concerning to see some of our high-security prisons are in that number. 'Here, ideologically inspired offenders and organised crime leaders can mix freely. Where you have such lethal capacity cheek by jowl with people with the capability to obtain weapons and help escapes there is an enduring risk to national security. 'It's a perfectly rational partnership for those whose only interest is profit. And it can happen in prisons where ferocious violence and staff retreat is becoming the norm.' The findings come after several high-profile attacks on prison officers and reports of drones delivering drugs into prisons. In April, Hashem Abedi, the Manchester Arena bomber, who is serving life for 22 murders, attacked three officers in a separation unit at the high security HMP Frankland, in Co Durham. And in May, Axel Rudakubana, the Southport killer, allegedly threw boiling water from his kettle over an officer at HMP Belmarsh. Dr Bennett's report calls for urgent reform of prison intelligence strategy, including improved staff training, a clear operational definition of the prison nexus threat, and a structured assessment tool to identify high-risk jails. She concluded: 'The risk is not just ideological or criminal – it's both. If we continue to treat them in silos, we're going to miss what's happening in the overlap.' Ministers must pay attention to this insight into how terrorists and criminals work together in prisons By Prof Ian Acheson Prisons are traditionally places where alliances are made between criminals who see incarceration as an occupational hazard. Criminologists find this opportunistic behaviour, if distasteful, perfectly rational. When I worked in the prison service in the 1990s, an inordinate amount of my time was spent trying to disrupt and deter organised criminals and paedophiles from networking to extend their power on either side of the prison walls. This cosy old paradigm has been changed forever by the inclusion in the prison population of increasing numbers of terrorist offenders. People who kill for ideas are very different from those after money or sexual deviants. But the idea they cannot cooperate is dangerously naive and woefully under researched. This is why newly released research into the Prison Crime Terror Nexus by Dr Hannah Bennett is so significant. Dr Bennett is one of those rare researchers who combines theoretical and operational experience. We met at the University of Staffordshire and I have supported her work which I am glad to see published. Ministers should pay great attention to this study. Today's prison environment is poisoned by drugs and extreme violence. Terrorists attacks on prison staff have avoided death by millimetres and seconds. The potential for those with the capability to give support to those with the capacity for terrorism is not an abstract idea, it is a real and present danger. Dr Bennett has offered an insight into how terrorists and criminals work together in the prison environment for mutual benefit. Her findings are the result of multiple interviews with prisoners and prison professionals, many detailing a chilling degree of mutual cooperation and a high degree of dysfunction in intelligence collection and dissemination from the front line to the HQ boardrooms. In part this breakdown reflects the different objectives of the prison service and policing. I know from personal experience just how difficult it is to get senior officials at the headquarters level to understand their primary role in protecting national security. Too many prison professionals at senior levels subscribe to a kind of 'reclamation theology' that puts saving souls ahead of hard nosed threat management. This cultural blindness contributes to what Dr Bennett calls with rather more delicacy than I am capable as the 'intelligence capability gap'. This lack of appetite to join the dots and do something about it is most apparent in how Dr Bennett adopts and extends the theory of 'black hole prisons'. These places are akin to failed states where rampant instability, weak or absent authority, corruption, poor leadership and a rampant drugs economy create voids of power quickly filled an exploited by stronger forces such as gangs and extremists. Dr Bennett has taken this theory and applied it to identify the meeting points of organised crime and terrorism in some of our allegedly most secure prisons. These are places like HMPs Belmarsh, Long Lartin, Whitemoor and Frankland that hold the majority of our terrorist offenders in close proximity to crime family bosses and postcode gang leaders. These are not places where it possible to say the state is fully in control. Cooperation between these groups is likely when shared opportunities and goals transcend ideological differences or any adverse consequences. This is not an altogether new phenomenon. In 1994 at Whitemoor prison, shortly after it opened, IRA terrorists escaped the prison briefly with a London gangster Andy Russell. Russell was serving a sentence for hijacking a helicopter to spring two prisoners from HMP Gartree some years before. All had been held in the special security unit (SSU) a supposedly escape proof prison within a prison. Staff there had been so intimidated the gang was able to smuggle in weapons and explosives. In some of the high-security prisons I have listed today, cell window drone deliveries make it at least theoretically possible that the drugs payload they have controlled by organised criminals could have weapons and ammunition included. We are closer to ths reality than any official is prepared to admit. Dr Bennett has offered a framework for prison bosses to identify where this nexus is likely to emerge. 'Prisoners are in control' When I worked in prison order and control at a national level, our preoccupation was identifying the characteristics of prisoners who would cause riots and ensuring that there was a balanced mix across all establishments to prevent disorder. It is somewhat paradoxical that the threat or widespread disorder has receded today in large part because prisoners are in control of an environment where drugs are easily available and authority is in retreat. This Faustian pact will not hold where ideologically motivated prisoners are located. For many, not all of these terrorist offenders, the war against the state goes on and the targets have merely changed from civilians to the men and women in uniform looking after them. It is vital that meticulous research like Dr Bennett's is seen and considered by ministers and not through the lens of bureaucrats who have allowed this nexus to flourish. Terrorists and organised criminals have worked together before and will do so again. The stakes are very high.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Hamas government office rejects US accusation of involvement in Gaza aid site attack
CAIRO, July 6 (Reuters) - A Hamas government media office rejected accusations by the U.S. State Department that the group was involved in a Saturday attack that injured two American aid workers from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation at a food distribution site in the enclave, it said in a statement on Sunday.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Classified report to reveal full scale of Iranian threat to UK
Iran is still trying to assassinate dissidents on British soil, a parliamentary report based on classified intelligence is set to warn. A study by Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee will also show the damage caused by Tehran through cyber attacks aimed at UK companies. The Telegraph understands the findings will conclude that Iran remains one of the biggest state-based threats to the UK, in the same bracket as China and Russia. Continued attempts by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which has been crippled by Israeli assassinations in recent months, to meddle with the UK will also be laid bare. The report is more than 100 pages long and the result of two years of work. It has been compiled with interviews with Iranian experts at British intelligence services and access to classified documents. Starmer signed off the study Those familiar with the report's contents expect it to be a wake-up call for ministers about the persistent threat of Iran and its ability to act within the UK. Sir Keir Starmer has personally signed off the report. Unlike other parliamentary committees, the group's work is so sensitive the Prime Minister gets prior sight of conclusions. It comes at a time of heightened tensions in the Middle East following military action between Iran and Israel, and the US bombing of three Iranian nuclear facilities. Tehran had issued veiled threats that UK military bases in the Middle East could be targeted if there was British support for the Israeli air strikes that preceded the US bombing. The Prime Minister ended up not fully endorsing Donald Trump's military strike, refusing to admit whether it was legal or the right course of action. In January 2024, the UK Government imposed sanctions on Iranian officials it said were involved in threats to kill journalists. Last year Ken McCallum, the director-general of MI5, also used a rare public speech to reveal the scale of potential attacks being thwarted by the security services. Mr McCallum said over the last two years Iran had been behind 'plot after plot' in the UK, organised with 'an unprecedented pace and scale'. He added: 'Since January 2022, with police partners, we have responded to 20 Iran-backed plots presenting potentially lethal threats to British citizens and UK residents. 'As events unfold in the Middle East, we will give our fullest attention to the risk of an increase in – or a broadening of – Iranian state aggression in the UK. 'Like the Russian services, Iranian state actors make extensive use of criminals as proxies – from international drug traffickers to low-level crooks.' The Intelligence and Security Committee is expected to conclude in its report that Iran is continuing to make plots against people living in the UK. Dissidents of the regime on British soil will be singled out as being at risk. Threats of reprisal attacks on the European continent will also be flagged. The reports will also detail the IRGC's reach in Britain. The IRGC was founded as an ideological custodian of Iran's 1979 revolution but has since morphed into a major military, political and economic force in the country. There has been a long public debate about whether the IRGC should be formally declared a terrorist group and banned under a proscription process. Critics of the move, including those inside the Government, argue that it would limit the UK's ability to talk to and therefore influence senior Iranian political and military figures. The Intelligence and Security Committee is unlike other parliamentary committees in that all nine members are cleared to read confidential intelligence to help scrutinise the agencies. Its hearings are held in private. Reports with findings and recommendations are pulled together over a much longer timescale than other committees, with direct involvement from intelligence figures.
