
Who is Angela Paxton, wife of Texas AG Ken Paxton? Net worth, family, and more
Meet Angela Paxton, a Tesax State Senator, and the wife of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton – who has filed for divorce from her husband – over 'biblical grounds'.
Who is Angela Paxton?
Angela Suzanne Paxton is a prominent Texas Republican politician, state senator for District 8 since 2019, and a former educator. On July 10, she filed for divorce from her husband, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, after 38 years of marriage – citing 'biblical grounds' and 'recent discoveries.'
Early life, education, and family
Born in New Braunfels, Texas, and adopted shortly after birth, Angela Paxton (née Allen) became the first in her family to attend college, earning a B.S. in Mathematical Science from Baylor University and a Master of Education from the University of Houston–Clear Lake. While adoption is something that has its own story that's unravelled over time, Angela credits her adoption for shaping her staunch anti‑abortion convictions.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Dubai's Next Icon: Experience Binghatti Aquarise Luxury
Binghatti Developers FZE
Learn More
Undo
Meeting Ken Paxton
Angela met her future husband, Ken Paxton, during their time as students at Baylor University in Waco, Texas. Back then, Ken was serving as the student body president. Their relationship blossomed during their college years, leading to their marriage in 1986. Together, they have four children – Tucker, Abby, Madison, and Katie – and five grandchildren. The couple co-founded Stonebriar Community Church in Frisco in the 1990s before later attending Prestonwood Baptist Church.
Life in politics
Before entering politics, Angela spent more than two decades teaching mathematics and working as a guidance counselor in Collin County, including at Legacy Christian Academy.
In 2017, Angela entered the political arena, launching a successful bid for Texas Senate District 8. This seat was formerly held by her husband, Ken, before he became attorney general.
Angela's primary campaign was the most expensive in Texas Senate history at the time, grossing over $10 million in expenditures while she raised about $3.7 million, including a $2 million loan backed by Ken's campaign.
Angela narrowly won the primary by 9 points and then prevailed in the general election.
Since taking office in January 2019, Angela has served on key Senate committees – Finance, Education, State Affairs, Local Government, and Nominations – and was Majority Leader from September 2023 to January 2025.
Angela also authored Senate Bill 13 in 2025, transferring library book control from librarians to parent-appointed boards, and has actively championed educational outreach, conservative economic policies, and pro-life legislation.
Net worth:
Angela's personal net worth figures are not publicly disclosed in official filings. One estimation reportedly places her wealth between $1 million and $5 million, citing her earnings as a long-time educator, small business owner, and state senator. Her public salary as a state senator in Texas is modest – about $7,200 per year plus per‑diem during legislative sessions. Ken Paxton earns $153,750 annually as Attorney General.
The Paxtons have reportedly invested heavily in real estate – spending nearly $3.5 million in 2021–22 on six properties, including in Oklahoma, Florida, Utah, and Hawaii – which raised scrutiny. However, those are not conclusively linked to Angela's personal finances. Paxton's financial disclosures show assets including mutual funds and Texas properties.
Blending conservative faith and folkloric charm, Angela has long held a public persona of a devout Christian.
As per her faith and belief, marriage is a sacred covenant, emphasizing reconciliation. However, on July 10, she announced her divorce, citing 'recent discoveries' that staying together no longer honored God or served their family.
Her divorce petition alleges adultery, irreconcilable differences, and notes that the couple has lived apart since June 2024, while Ken Paxton responded that the split stems from political pressures and scrutiny, expressing pride in their family and asking for privacy.
Abhishek Bachchan and Shweta Nanda to get equal share from Amitabh Bachchan's Rs 3000+ crore property; sister-in-law to beat Aishwarya Rai Bachchan in terms of net worth: Reports
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
7 minutes ago
- Hans India
Cambodia-Thailand border situation eases: PM Hun Manet
The situation of the Cambodia-Thailand border has eased after a ceasefire took effect Monday midnight, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet said on Tuesday morning. In a post on his official social media platforms, Hun Manet said, "The frontline has eased after a ceasefire took effect from Monday midnight in accordance with the spirit of the agreement between Cambodia and Thailand at a special meeting in Malaysia." "A sooner cessation of hostilities will also allow affected people, such as evacuees, to return to their homes and resume normal livelihoods sooner," he said. "This ceasefire and peace agreement is yielding positive and effective results," Cambodian Senate President Samdech Techo Hun Sen said on Tuesday morning in a post on his official social media platforms. Thai and Cambodian leaders have agreed to implement a ceasefire starting midnight on Monday, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said following a meeting on Monday hosted by him in Malaysia, Xinhua news agency reported. Cambodia and Thailand agreed on Monday to an "immediate and unconditional" ceasefire, following talks in Kuala Lumpur that were mediated by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim. According to a joint press statement, the special meeting was chaired, hosted, and witnessed by Prime Minister Ibrahim in Putrajaya city of Malaysia. Prime Minister Manet and Thailand's Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai participated in the discussions. The talks were held amid escalating border clashes between Cambodia and Thailand which disturbed regional peace tremendously. The exchange of gunfire between Cambodian and Thai soldiers over disputed border areas began on July 24, with both sides accusing each other of violating international law.


Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's trade vision takes shape: EU, Japan, Vietnam, others concede to tariff-heavy deals— but economic risks may dim the victory for US
Donald Trump (File photo) US President Donald Trump 's approach to global trade policy is yielding results with international partners. Nations including the European Union , Japan and Vietnam are accepting elevated tariffs for access to American markets. This strategy, rooted in Trump's protectionist views, represents a significant economic and political venture regarding American consumer interests. The United States and the European Union reached a trade agreement where the EU accepted 15% US tariffs on most goods. The EU also committed to purchasing $750 billion in US energy products and making $600 billion in new investments through 2028, according to White House figures. "We just signed a very big trade deal, the biggest of them all," Trump said Monday. The framework agreement's success remains uncertain, with minimal detail provided. Traditional trade agreements typically require extensive negotiations spanning months or years, with outcomes dependent on specific details. Financial markets have adapted to the highest US import tariffs in approximately 90 years, following initial concerns about protectionist policies. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Recover All Your Loss in Stock Market With This Superclass By Mr. Gopal ! TradeWise Learn More Undo The US Treasury is receiving substantial revenue from foreign goods levies, potentially offsetting recent tax reductions signed on July 4. Economic experts suggest these high tariffs could increase consumer prices, affect Federal Reserve interest rate decisions, and reduce US economic efficiency. Democratic opponents argue these costs will primarily impact lower and middle-income Americans. "It's pretty striking that it's seen as a sigh of relief moment," said Daniel Hornung, a former Biden White House economic official who now holds fellowships at Housing Finance Policy Center and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, as reported by AP. "But if the new baseline across all trading partners is 15%, that is a meaningful drag on growth that increases recession risks, while simultaneously making it harder for the Fed to cut. " Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Is NEP 2020 reforming education or reinforcing central control?
Five years after its launch, the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 is at once transforming classrooms and igniting a political standoff. While foundational learning outcomes have shown historic gains and enrolment has surged across marginalised groups, the policy's implementation has also triggered accusations of centralisation and ideological overreach—particularly from opposition-ruled states. At stake is not only the future of India's education system, but the very balance of power in a federal structure under pressure. Foundational gains on paper, and in practice At the primary level, NEP 2020 has catalysed notable improvements in learning outcomes. ASER 2024 reported that 23.4% of Class III students in government schools can now read a Grade II-level text, up from 16.3% in 2022—the highest since 2005. Arithmetic skills have also improved, with 27.6% of students able to do basic subtraction, compared to 20.2% two years prior. The rollout of the NIPUN Bharat Mission, the 12-week Vidya Pravesh programme, and the distribution of 'Jaadui Pitara' kits in 22 Indian languages have supported these improvements. Over 14 lakh teachers have been trained under the Nishtha foundational programme, marking one of the largest teacher development efforts in recent years. However, even as rural students now outperform urban peers, just half of government and aided schools offer preschool, revealing a systemic lag in infrastructure and access. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Most Beautiful Women In The World Undo Higher education access expands, but structural gaps persist In higher education, gross enrolment rose from 3.42 crore in 2014-15 to 4.46 crore in 2022-23—a 30.5% jump. Female enrolment increased by 38.4%, and PhD enrolment among women more than doubled. Enrolment among SC, ST, minority, and Northeastern students saw record growth, raising hopes for a more equitable academic future. Initiatives like the Academic Bank of Credit (ABC)—with over 32 crore IDs generated—and the biannual admission cycle promise greater flexibility. Yet uptake remains minimal: just 31,000 undergraduates and 5,500 postgraduates have used the multiple entry-exit system. Even with Rs 100 crore each given to 35 institutions to become multidisciplinary, most remain in transition, weighed down by outdated curricula, rigid administrative frameworks, and faculty shortages. The language of policy—or policy of language? Despite measurable progress, the NEP has run into political headwinds. States like Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and West Bengal have opposed what they describe as an over-centralised, one-language-fits-all approach. The rollout of a national curriculum framework, the promotion of Hindi and Sanskrit, and the centralised design of assessments (like PARAKH) have been read as symptoms of deeper attempts to recentralise control over education—an area constitutionally shared between the Centre and states. For these governments, the question is not whether reform is needed, but who controls the direction of that reform. Their pushback is less about pedagogy and more about constitutional autonomy. Federalism under strain The NEP's top-down execution has exposed a widening rift between the Union government's vision and state governments' autonomy. With education on the Concurrent List, any major reform ideally requires collaborative federalism. Instead, critics argue, NEP 2020 has been operationalised through policy instruments, funding structures, and curricular frameworks that reduce states to implementers rather than partners. Some educationists warn that this model could create a two-speed education system—where compliance ensures funding and dissent leads to marginalisation, particularly in politically non-aligned states. Reform or reinvention of control? The central dilemma surrounding NEP 2020 is not about whether its goals are desirable, but whether its execution honours the diversity and decentralisation embedded in India's educational history. While the policy has undeniably set in motion long-needed changes—from early childhood integration to greater inclusion in higher education—its delivery model has raised questions about uniformity trumping local context, and reform being equated with central authority. As the Centre pushes ahead with further implementation and state resistance hardens, NEP 2020 may be remembered not just as an education reform, but as a test case for Indian federalism. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!