Are meme coins killing crypto?
Within hours of Haro's death, known online as @MistaFuccYou, several meme coins based on his MistaFuccYou alias launched on a cryptocurrency platform.
'The meme coin community is pure evil,' wrote X user @destroynectar, who shared an image of one of the new cryptocurrencies being traded while Haro's live stream was still active on X.
These tokens form part of a massive influx of new cryptocurrencies to the market, which analysts are referring to as a 'meme coin frenzy'. Often based on internet jokes, the digital coins hold no inherent value as a currency but can shoot up in price through speculation alone. They can mint millionaires in minutes, but almost always crash to zero, leaving latecomers with heavy losses.
There are now tens of thousands of coins being created every day. 'Meme coins are mostly hot air and are notorious for their extreme price fluctuations,' Seamus Rocca, chief executive of Xapo Bank, says. 'These sudden surges and subsequent crashes in meme coin values often trigger a ripple effect of damage across the wider cryptocurrency industry as public trust and perception deteriorate.'
It took four years for the first ever meme coin to emerge after the creation of the world's first cryptocurrency, bitcoin. Launched by software engineers Billy Markus and Jackson Palmer in 2013, Dogecoin started as a joke that poked fun at the speculation and hysteria surrounding the crypto space at the time. But the token provided real utility, with the speed of transactions and low fees meaning that some even claimed it could one day be the currency of the internet. (The founders notoriously made no money from the venture, with one of them revealing that he sold his entire stake years ago for a giant jar of Nutella).
Dogecoin has since established itself as one of the world's top 10 most valuable cryptocurrencies, with a market cap of around $30bn at the time of writing. In the years following its release, other meme coins trickled into the market, but it took skilled developers who knew the complexities of forking blockchains or building new protocols to produce them.
All this has changed with the arrival of platforms that help to create coins, with millions of new tokens now being released every month. With such a massive volume, the vast majority fail to make any impact on the market.
The Russian roulette incident is the latest in a string of increasingly elaborate and dangerous stunts that developers are resorting to in order to gain attention and pump the value of their tokens. Last year, a someone user suffered third-degree burns after setting himself on fire as part of a dare to promote his TruthOrDare cryptocurrency. Another sexualised his own mother on a live stream in order to pump his LIVEMOM token to a $835,000 market cap.
The trend has drawn in celebrities, influencers and even presidents. Donald Trump, who has promised to make the US the 'crypto capital of the world', launched his own meme coin, along with his wife Melania and son Barron, just days before his inauguration.
The $TRUMP, $MELANIA and $BARRON coins generated enormous profits for some – estimates suggest the projects netted them more than $350m – but when the price collapsed, more than 800,000 investors suffered a cumulative $2bn in losses. It has been argued that Trump's involvement, along with other world leaders like Argentina's Javier Milei, has complicated regulation in the space and helped legitimise the phenomenon.
Eddy Lazarin, who serves as the chief technology officer at venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz's crypto division, warned that the trend was fundamentally changing how the public, regulators and entrepreneurs view crypto. 'At best, it looks like a risky casino. Or a series of false promises masking a casino,' he says. 'This deeply affects adoption, regulation/laws, and builder behaviour. I see the damage every day.'
The vast majority of meme coins exemplify the worst traits of cryptocurrency. They are volatile, confusing, and a haven for gamblers and scammers who prey on the naive and vulnerable. There is hope from some that Haro's death could bring about the death of the meme coin frenzy.
'These events have heightened skepticism toward meme coins,' says Maria Carola, chief executive of StealthEx. 'The golden age of meme coins may be coming to an end as investors grow increasingly cautious, recognising the dangers of investing in highly volatile assets.'
One sign that it could be coming to an end is the emergence in recent days of meme coins based on rug pulls – referring to a scenario where crypto creators abandon a token and cash out, leaving investors with worthless tokens. These meme coins have themselves become rug pulls, suggesting that the industry is turning into an ouroboros snake, eating itself.
The creator of one of the meme coins that spawned in the wake of Haro's death included one of the most pertinent messages, despite the opportunistic nature of the coin.
'Crypto is becoming a casino, and people are paying the ultimate price,' wrote the creator of the MistaFuccYou (RP) meme coin.
'Crypto should be about real utility and long-term value. Wake up. This has to change. Our deepest condolences to his family.'
If you are experiencing feelings of distress, or are struggling to cope, you can speak to the Samaritans, in confidence, on 116 123 (UK and ROI), email jo@samaritans.org, or visit the Samaritans website to find details of your nearest branch.
If you are based in the USA, and you or someone you know needs mental health assistance right now, call or text 988, or visit 988lifeline.org to access online chat from the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline. This is a free, confidential crisis hotline that is available to everyone 24 hours a day, seven days a week. If you are in another country, you can go to www.befrienders.org to find a helpline near you
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
a day ago
- The National
Elon Musk 'ordered Starlink shutdown' during Ukraine counterattack
The billionaire's command allegedly led to a communications blackout while Ukrainian forces attempted to retake the port city of Kherson in the south of the country in September 2022. The communication blackout, where staff at the American tech firm deactivated at least 100 Starlink terminals after being instructed to, reportedly caused the attack to fail, according to Reuters, which spoke with three people who were familiar with the demand. According to reports, the blackout caused Ukrainian soldiers to panic as drones surveilling Russian forces went dark, and long-range artillery units, reliant on Starlink to aim at their targets, struggled to hit them. READ MORE: 'He belongs in The Hague': Keir Starmer fiercely criticised over Gaza speech Although Ukrainian forces were able to reclaim Kherson, the incident was reported to have damaged the country's trust in the technology, along with shocking Starlink employees. One of the three people who were familiar with the instruction claimed it enabled Musk to take 'the outcome of a war into his own hands'. The Tesla-owner reportedly grew concerned that Ukrainian forces' advancements could provoke nuclear retaliation from Vladimir Putin. A spokesperson for SpaceX, the aerospace company that owns Starlink, told Reuters the reporting of the incident is 'inaccurate'. In March, Musk posted on his social media platform, X/Twitter: 'To be extremely clear, no matter how much I disagree with the Ukraine policy, Starlink will never turn off its terminals.' Starlink, which went live in 2019, is a satellite company that beams data across its network and is the world's largest satellite operator. It provides customers with internet access in remote and unreliable locations and has a network of around 8000 satellites in orbit. It has been a key tool in Ukraine's defence, as Musk has provided the country with more than 50,000 Starlink terminals during the war. The network has allowed Ukrainians to speak to relatives across the world, and President Zelensky uses the network to transmit broadcasts to the nation. It is also used by Ukrainian forces on the battlefield to communicate and is used to guide drones and long-range artillery units.
Economist
2 days ago
- Economist
Why armies are using laser weapons to zap things out of the sky
The Economist explains | Beam them down Your browser does not support this video. ARMIES HAVE dreamt of firing laser weapons for a long time. A lab funded by America's Defence Department demonstrated one in 1960. But decades of development failed to produce a practical weapon, and the ambition waned. Now it is back. Last year America reportedly used a high-energy laser (HEL) to down drones aimed at its forces in the Middle East. Israel and Russia have both recently used HELs to foil drone attacks. Ukraine may soon do the same. Why are laser weapons suddenly useful? And what role could they play in future wars? The Martians had a heat ray that could destroy the Royal Navy's battleships, but that was in 'The War of the Worlds', a 19th-century work of science fiction. HELs are not high-energy enough for that. To seriously damage a warship or tank would require megawatts of power–a noticeable proportion of the output of a conventional power plant. HELs produce kilowatts, ie, thousandths of a megawatt. Even aircraft can survive bombardment by HELs. For a while missiles looked like potential prey. They have thin skins and are packed with fuel and explosives. Merely damaging the shell of a supersonic missile can create drag, causing it to tumble out of control. And, no matter how fast the missile, laser beams, which travel at the speed of light, can catch up to it. President John F. Kennedy gave a laser-missile-defence project the highest national-security priority after the Cuban missile crisis in 1962. But missiles turned out to be difficult targets. They're not as fast as lasers, yet they are still hard to intercept. In 1973 a laser downed an aerial target at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico, but it was something a little slower than a missile, perhaps a small radio-controlled aircraft. The advent of the small drone as a weapon in the 2010s has given lasers a target they can handle. The Russian and Ukrainian armed forces have launched attack drones, as have the Houthi militia in Yemen. They are becoming ubiquitous in war. Conventional air defences can shoot them down, but many of the missiles these systems fire cost millions of dollars and are in short supply. Lasers, on the other hand, cost just a few dollars per shot and their ammunition is limited only by their power supply. Advocates say they're the ideal drone killers. Your browser does not support this video. America fielded a laser system in the Persian Gulf in as early as 2014, to destroy small boats and other 'asymmetric threats', but did not use it. It probably first fired one in battle last year. A 20-kilowatt LOCUST system, the size of a small garden shed and weighing some 1,500kg, reportedly downed drones launched at a military base in the Middle East, probably by an Iran-backed militia. This year Israel released video of its lasers shooting down drones fired by Hizbullah, a Lebanon-based militia. The Israel Defence Forces claim that they have taken out 'dozens' of drones. Analysts believe that Israel is using the Keren Or (Lite Beam) system made by Rafael, an Israeli firm. It's a ten-kilowatt little brother to the 50-kilowatt Iron Beam system, which is being developed to supplement the conventional Iron Dome anti-missile system. Meanwhile, Russia has released a video purporting to show an HEL engaging a Ukrainian drone. The weapon looks identical to a Chinese-made Shen Nung, with an output of more than 30 kilowatts. Ukraine has also released footage of its 50-kilowatt Trident laser destroying drones in tests. Its commanders are eager to field Trident to defend against nightly waves of Iranian-designed Shahed drones fired from Russia. Though trendy, HELs have drawbacks. Even though one blast is cheap, installing a system is not. The British Royal Navy's Dragonfire HELs will cost £100m ($135m) apiece. Today's lasers have relatively short ranges (of up to a few miles) and can be hampered by smoke, dust, haze or fog. In theory they can be carried around by planes or Jeeps, but get the power they need more easily from ships or on the ground. Lasers also have competition in the form of old-fashioned anti-aircraft guns, which are relatively cheap and can take on lots of targets. Attack drones are here to stay. The question is whether beams or bullets will blast them.
Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
Russian central bank slashes key rate by 200 bps in biggest cut since May 2022
MOSCOW, July 25 (Reuters) - The Russian central bank cut its key interest rate by 200 basis points to 18% on Friday, hoping to revive lending and boost flagging economic growth after stubbornly high inflation showed signs of easing. The move is the biggest decrease since May 2022, when the central bank cut by 300 bps as the economy was recovering from the shock from Western sanctions imposed following the launch of Russia's military action in Ukraine. The latest reduction was in line with a Reuters poll of 27 economists, and comes after Russian business leaders and some government officials complained that high interest rates were strangling the economy. The central bank had raised rates substantially since July 2023 in order to deal with the effects of an overheating economy caused by a surge in military spending. Russia's economy minister said last month the country was on the brink of recession as a result. Alongside its sharp rate cut, the central bank lowered its 2025 inflation forecast to between 6% and 7% from between 7% and 8% and said inflationary pressures were declining faster than previously forecast. The bank said it would keep monetary conditions as tight as necessary to return inflation to the target of 4% in 2026. "We are on the path to returning inflation to target, but this path has not yet been completed," central bank governor Elvira Nabiullina said at a news conference following the rate decision. "Returning to the target... implies a stable consolidation of inflation at a low level not only in actual data, but also in the perception of people and businesses," she said. Russia's consumer price index fell by 0.05% in the latest week, marking weekly deflation for the first time since September 2024, while annualized inflation slowed to 9.17% from its peak of 10.3% in March. The central bank maintained its 2025 gross domestic product growth forecast at between 1% and 2% and said it saw some softening in Russia's tight labour market. The economy grew by 4.3% last year. The central bank cut its forecast for the average oil price in 2025 to $55 per barrel from $60 per barrel, implying a fall in state budget revenues, but Nabiullina said she did not expect any surprises from the budget. The Russian economy will face another test in early September when a 50-day deadline set by U.S. President Donald Trump for Russia to show progress toward peace in Ukraine expires, with potential new U.S. sanctions against buyers of Russian oil to follow. Nabiullina said the bank will work to ensure the financial sector's resilience to Western sanctions does not weaken. "We see that indeed the financial sector is one of the main targets for sanctions, and these sanctions are being tightened," Nabiullina said. The bank was under intense pressure from the business community to start easing after it hiked the key rate to the highest level since the early 2000s last year. Business leaders complained that at such a rate, investment no longer made sense. Nabiullina said that such pressure does the economy a disservice by creating the false impression that the central bank has been forced to cave in when cutting rates, which in turn fuels inflationary expectations "Such attempts to exert pressure would, in effect, result in higher interest rates," she warned. President Vladimir Putin has backed the policy of the central bank, but warned it not to cool the economy too much. High interest rates have hit Russia's construction and coal sectors and led to a rise in bad debt for Russian banks. Speaking just before the rate decision on Friday, Deputy Prime Minister Marat Khusnullin, who oversees the construction sector, said that a 400 bps cut was more desirable, indicating that many officials in Russia want the central bank to cut more. The rouble, which rallied by 45% against the U.S. dollar earlier this year in part due to the high key rate, began to weaken ahead of the expected rate cut and touched the 80 mark against the dollar on Friday, a near-six week low. The stronger rouble has aided the central bank in fighting inflation by making imported goods cheaper with some bankers alleging that supporting the rouble was a deliberate policy by the central bank.
