logo
Estonia urges pressure on Russia after deadly strike on Sumy

Estonia urges pressure on Russia after deadly strike on Sumy

Yahoo03-06-2025
Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna has responded to Russia's deadly strike on the city of Sumy on 3 June.
Source: Tsahkna on X (Twitter), as reported by European Pravda
Details: On the morning of 3 June, Russian forces attacked central Sumy, killing two people and injuring 20 more, including a 17-year-old teenager. A medical facility, several vehicles and residential buildings were damaged.
Tsahkna reacted by recalling that Russia has repeatedly rejected ceasefire proposals, as it aims to continue what is now seen in Sumy.
"...barbaric attacks on civilians aimed at breaking Ukraine's spirit & erasing the country. Only increased pressure will force Russia to end this war," he stated.
The attack came a day after Ukrainian and Russian delegations held a meeting in Istanbul that lasted just over an hour.
Background:
Following the talks, the parties agreed on new exchanges of specific categories of military personnel, and Ukraine handed over a list of several hundred children abducted by Russia.
Meanwhile, the Russian delegation claimed it had proposed a temporary ceasefire along certain sections of the front.
Dmitry Medvedev, former president of Russia, said that the true aim of the "peace talks" in Istanbul was to ensure Russia's "swift and complete victory".
Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

X could face liability for failing to stop CSAM.
X could face liability for failing to stop CSAM.

The Verge

time14 minutes ago

  • The Verge

X could face liability for failing to stop CSAM.

Posted Aug 1, 2025 at 7:09 PM UTC X could face liability for failing to stop CSAM. It's a relatively narrow legal defeat, though. The Ninth Circuit Appeals Court ruled that X — Twitter, at the time of the lawsuit — isn't protected by Section 230 for failing to report known child sexual abuse material to authorities, nor for designing a bad system to let users flag it. (It hasn't been held liable for either; that will be argued later.) But the court found Section 230 blocked claims that it 'amplified' CSAM by failing to scrub offending hashtags, and it said the controversial FOSTA exception didn't come into play. Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates. Adi Robertson Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Adi Robertson Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Speech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Twitter - X

The questionable experts with the Global Fact-Checking Network, Russia's verification organisation
The questionable experts with the Global Fact-Checking Network, Russia's verification organisation

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The questionable experts with the Global Fact-Checking Network, Russia's verification organisation

Russian organisation the Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN), which was launched in April 2025, claims to fight disinformation. But a number of the 60-odd members of the network regularly share disinformation online. We take a look. It was to be a platform 'uniting experts dedicated to exposing unreliable information', according to the spokesperson for the Russian ministry of foreign affairs, Maria Zakharova. On April 9, she announced during a press conference the launch of the Global Fact-checking Network (GFCN), a platform promoting the verification of information 'that fosters an honest and open approach to fact-checking'. And yet, according to Reporters Without Borders (RSF), the GFCN is the 'Kremlin's latest propaganda tool'. 'This initiative is part of a well-established Kremlin strategy: mimicking independent institutions to better spread its propaganda,' the international non-profit dedicated to press freedom said in a report published on June 24 about the GFCN. GFCN is upfront that it wants to serve as a counterpoint to Western fact-checking services, including the International Fact-checking Network (IFCN), an initiative founded in 2015 that brings together 170 fact-checking organisations [including our team at the FRANCE 24 Observers] from across the world around a shared code of ethics about fact-checking practices. At first glance, GFCN seems to resemble a fact-checking organisation like IFCN: the network has, for example, a 'code of responsible fact-checking", which includes values like objectivity and impartiality and the use of verified data. Since early June, it has also offered courses on fact-checking techniques as well as an "international contest" to help people learn to better detect AI-generated videos. Co-founded by Tass and an NGO under sanction However, critics of GFCN say that the organisations behind it aren't necessarily poster children for these values. GFCN was cofounded by the Russian state press agency TASS, the New Media School – a government-run training programme for Russian journalists – and the NGO Ano Dialog. A number of specialists and Western governments have described this NGO, which is currently under US sanctions, as being closely linked to the Kremlin – as well as a number of different disinformation operations. Its director general, Vladimir Tabak, who has been placed under sanctions by a number of Western countries, is now president of GFCN as well. Maxime Audinet and Colin Gérard, researchers specialised in Russian influence, say that Tabak is one of the main actors in the disinformation operation Doppelgänger, which creates fake websites that resemble Western news outlets to share false information. 'Our goal within the Network is to unite experts, journalists, and media representatives who are ready to jointly defend the right to reliable information,' said Tabak in mid-July 2025. At that point, GFCN was made up of 65 members from 40 different countries. Eight fake news items in 12 days However, a number of the experts who appear on GFCN's website regularly share false information online and draw from unverified, unsourced content. "Many of the voices on this list are extremely biased and lack legitimacy,' says Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University in the United States and author of a number of reports about Russian online disinformation networks. When our team took a look at the X account of Tim Anderson, the first name on the list of so-called experts, we noticed a number of fake news items on his feed. Anderson used to be a professor at an Australian university and founded an organisation called the Center for Counter Hegemonic Studies. From our count, Anderson shared eight false news items during the 12-day war between Israel and Iran last June. Among the fake news items he shared that are still online: images taken from video games or generated by artificial intelligence that Anderson claimed were proof that Iran had shot down Israeli F-35 bombers. And yet, as our team reported, there is still no viable proof to date that Iran downed any of these planes. Anderson also shared a video that claimed that Mossad chief David Barnea had died – which is also not true. These errors run counter to GFCN's purported code, which stipulates that it is important to 'verify information sources to make sure that they are reliable and authentic'. You can see our analysis of the eight fake news items shared by Anderson by following this link. Other GFCN experts have also shared false claims based on unverified sources. Pakistani journalist Furqan Rao, for example, shared on two separate occasions photos that were either false or taken out of context about the conflict between India and Pakistan last May. In one case, he shared a video of a military simulation game that made it look like Pakistan had destroyed a military base. He also shared a video filmed in Dubai in 2021 and falsely claimed that it showed a cache of Indian missiles that had been targeted. He did not publish corrections about his posts. The list of experts also includes people who are not journalists, like Roigar López Rivas. GFCN says that López Rivas is the president of the National Institute for the Development of Small and Medium Industry in Venezuela. Yet he appeared on a panel of experts at a GFCN event held in June. Between November 2023 and July 2025, this fervent supporter of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro got 33 Community Notes – notes added by users of the platform X to add context to false or misleading posts –, according to the tool Community-Notes-Leaderboard. These notes include a false montage criticising Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, a false poster calling for the FBI to capture Venezuelan opposition figure Juan Guaido – which was investigated by our fact-checking partner IFCN Cazadores – as well as a video that he claimed was a strike on Moscow and which was actually an Iranian strike on Israel. Experts with links to 'Storm-1516' GFCN's list of experts also includes names of people known to work within other pro-Russian online disinformation networks. This includes Dutch independent journalist Sonja Van den Ende and Brazilian analyst Lucas Leiroz, both identified by the Clemson Institute or the French government agency for the defence against foreign digital interference Viginum as important figures within the Russian disinformation operation "Storm-1516". Storm-1516 is a complex operation whose main aim is to spread false information, primarily about the war in Ukraine and Western countries. They employ various methods of dissemination, but most often transmit these stories through fake news sites or websites that regularly share fake news. Both Sonja Van den Ende and Lucas Leiroz shared eight different narratives from this operation between 2023 and 2024, according to a report from the Clemson Institute. One that they shared was a fake news story from a Nigerian media outlet claiming that Zelensky had purchased a house in Egypt. Though Zelensky denied this and numerous fact-checking articles were published debunking this story, their X posts featuring the fake news story are still online (see links here and here). Leiroz is also known for his work in the BRICS Journalists Association (BJA), which claims to represent non-Western journalists. However, this organisation was just placed under European sanctions on July 15 for 'disseminating pro-Russian narratives and disinformation under the guise of independent journalism' following reports describing the involvement of several BJA members in Storm-1516. Leiroz has also publicly defended Irish RT journalist Chay Bowes, who is considered one of the main actors within Operation Storm-1516, as our team has documented on numerous occasions. "Russia's main success is that it has managed to build up a collection of voices that disseminate false information and give it legitimacy,' says Linvill, who describes organisations like the BRICS Journalists Association as 'tools for legitimising disinformation', in the same way as GFCN. Chay Bowes also has the support of Timofey V, whose real name is Vasiliev. Vasiliev, who is presented on GFCN's site as the head of the NGO ANO Dialog, is also behind the media outlet War on Fakes, which disseminated Russian propaganda under the guise of fact-checking. In February 2025, Timofey V shared a fake video posted by Bowes about an alleged electoral fraud carried out against the far-right German political party AfD. Our fact-checking colleagues at AFP Factuel reported that this video was staged. Our team contacted GFCN, which said that 'the experts in the articles posted under the aegis of GFCN respect the ethical and professional norms outlined in the Code of the association.' 'Communicating' on the international level "GFCN is not a structure that operates independently from the rest of the Russian influence network,' Pauline Maufrais, the RSF Regional Officer for Ukraine and author of the report on GFCN, told our team. "We see the same figures from the pro-Kremlin propaganda, who have been bouncing around in these circles for years and who pop up again when there are new projects.' Another GFCN participant is the media outlet International Reporters, founded in late 2023. This project is primarily run by French journalist Christelle Néant, who has been working in the Donbass region since 2016 and speaks out against what she says are Western 'lies' about Russia. Linvill says that the choice to bring in influential figures from across the globe is part of Russia's strategy of global influence. "Russia is very talented at giving the impression of being inclusive,' he says. 'This serves several functions – not only does this give them a good image, but it also enables them to communicate effectively in these communities.' "It's not insignificant that the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs is so involved,' Maufrais says. "The aim is to go and find new audiences to share their narrative with the aim of being visible on the international stage.' Russian embassies in Bangladesh and South Africa have also been known to tout the GFCN. An African press agency that has bought into GFCN The African Initiative, a Russian press agency created in 2023 that aims to be the main 'information bridge between Russia and Africa', joined the list of GFCN participating organisations – another sign of the collaboration between different bodies of Russian influence. The structure is an agency that promotes anti-Western and pro-Kremlin propaganda across the African continent, according to a report published by Viginum and the European External Action Service (SEAE) in May 2025. Like GFCN, the African Initiative also offers training sessions about disinformation so that it can 'independently counter the propaganda imposed by the West'. "Most Russian disinformation and propaganda aims to delegitimize the West politically, culturally, and institutionally,' says Linvill. "An organisation like the GFCN does these three things at once.'

Trump says he gave new orders to US nuclear submarines in response to an ex-Russian president's 'foolish' talk
Trump says he gave new orders to US nuclear submarines in response to an ex-Russian president's 'foolish' talk

Business Insider

time41 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Trump says he gave new orders to US nuclear submarines in response to an ex-Russian president's 'foolish' talk

"Based on the highly provocative statements" from Medvedev, who serves as deputy chairman of Russia's security council, "I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that," Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform. It was not immediately clear what type of submarine Trump was talking about. All Navy submarines are nuclear-powered vessels, but only the ballistic missile subs, or SSBNs, can launch Trident II missiles, which have nuclear warheads. US Ohio-class ballistic missile submarines are regularly on patrol, with a focus on adversarial nuclear powers like Russia or China. The US typically does not disclose the location of its secretive missile submarines, except in cases when it's trying to send a message to adversaries. Trump didn't give away the location, but the order serves the same purpose. "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances," Trump said in his social media post. The Navy deferred questions on Trump's comments to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, which deferred questions to the White House and the president's statement. The White House did not offer comment. Trump and Medvedev have been exchanging threats and warnings in the wake of the US president saying earlier in the week that Russia had just a matter of days to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or face new tariffs. The White House continues to be frustrated with Moscow's unwavering position on the grinding war. Medvedev, nowadays a warmonger who regularly rattles the Russian nuclear saber, responded by referring to what is perceived as an ultimatum as a "threat" that brings the two countries "a step towards war." Trump later singled out Medvedev in a Truth Social post, calling him "the failed former President of Russia" and cautioning that he should "watch his words." "He's entering very dangerous territory!" Trump wrote. But Medvedev hit back on the Telegram messaging platform and said that Trump should remember "his favorite movies about 'The Walking Dead,' as well as how dangerous the nonexistent 'dead hand' can be." The "dead hand" is a reference to a Soviet-era nuclear weapons control system designed to ensure that Russia can launch a retaliatory strike, even if leadership is physically unable to do so. Medvedev, who served as Russia's president between 2008 and 2012, has been one of the most prominent anti-Western voices in the Kremlin since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine began in 2022. His comments this week mark the latest nuclear saber-rattling by Russia. President Vladimir Putin has also leaned on the country's nuclear arsenal, the largest in the world, in his warnings to the West amid the ongoing support for Ukraine.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store