logo
Nova Scotia government refuses to release environmental racism panel recommendations

Nova Scotia government refuses to release environmental racism panel recommendations

CBC29-05-2025
Social Sharing
Opposition leaders say it's disgraceful that the Nova Scotia government is refusing to release the recommendations of a report it received on environmental racism.
Justice Minister Becky Druhan is also refusing to say if she's even read those recommendations.
"Obviously, they're not releasing it for a reason. We have major concerns over that," interim Liberal Leader Derek Mombourquette told reporters in Halifax.
"It's disgraceful what I heard today."
The creation of the panel and its subsequent report was the product of an amendment proposed by NDP MLA Suzy Hansen to the Progressive Conservative government's Environmental Goals and Climate Change Reduction Act in 2022.
AllNovaScotia.com reported on Wednesday that the province has received the report but is withholding its recommendations.
Minister provides no explanation
Speaking to reporters following a cabinet meeting on Thursday, Druhan would not provide any explanation for that decision.
"That work happened at [the Office of Equity and Anti-racism] prior to my tenure here. We are moving forward with those recommendations in mind."
The minister said she is "personally committed to transparency and to the sharing of information."
Druhan refused to answer repeated questions about why the government is not making the recommendations public, whether the panel recommended reparations and whether she's even read the recommendations.
"It predated my time at the office," she said.
'They don't want to be held accountable'
NDP Leader Claudia Chender said the government's decision to withhold the recommendations is "disheartening" for the people who worked on the panel and the communities that have experienced environmental racism.
"The only conclusion I can draw is that they don't want to be held accountable to [the report's] recommendations," she told reporters.
"The reason that they did this panel was to understand the legacy — the harmful legacy of environmental racism in this province — and understand how not to repeat it. So let's see what those recommendations were and let's all work together to make sure that we don't repeat that legacy, that we don't perpetuate it."
Druhan said a "key insight" to come from the report is the need for "systemic and foundational change" to the way the province handles and addresses discrimination and racism.
One step toward doing that is a previously announced plan to modernize and improve the province's Human Rights Commission, she said.
"We're really excited about that work, which will support addressing racism, addressing discrimination in all its forms across Nova Scotia — including issues around land use and environmental racism."
The minister noted that municipalities are also developing equity and anti-racism plans following a provincial directive.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Emergency cash from province means Northern Ont. town won't cease operations Aug. 1
Emergency cash from province means Northern Ont. town won't cease operations Aug. 1

CTV News

time16 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Emergency cash from province means Northern Ont. town won't cease operations Aug. 1

Facing an end to municipal operations Aug. 1, Fauquier-Strickland is receiving $300,000 from the province to help it get through the next few months. After going public with its financial crisis, officials in Fauquier-Strickland say the province has agreed to provide it with $300,000 in emergency funding to pay for operations for the next few months. Council had passed a motion to cease municipal services effective Aug. 1 and lay off remaining staff, getting the province's attention to its financial plight. It even planned to sell the community's snowplow. FS_PublicWorks News that the Township of Fauquier-Strickland could cease to exist at the end of the month was a shock to residents across the province, but especially to those in the community. (Lydia Chubak/CTV News) According to the agenda for a special meeting July 31, the township has accumulated an operating deficit of $2.5 million since 2014, in addition to $3.04 million in debts. All reserves had been exhausted and the township was getting by using its line of credit, which was almost exhausted. That led the township's council to vote to cease operations Aug. 1. $300K in emergency funds In a letter dated July 25, however, Robert Flack, Ontario's minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, said the province would give Fauquier-Strickland $300,000 to fund operations for the next three months, provided they met certain conditions. The first condition was that they rescind the motion to cease municipal operations and lay off staff on Aug. 1. Councillors must also adopt its 2025 operating budget, including water and sewer, by Aug. 31. A spending freeze must also be put in place, tax bills have to be issued and financial documents have to be submitted to the ministry by Sept. 15. 'To ensure appropriate and prudent decisions are made with the best interests of the residents of your community, I expect council to fulfill its duties and responsibilities under the Municipal Act,' Flack wrote. That includes managing their finances in a way that ensures 'the financial integrity of the township.' If all conditions are met, the township would receive $32,200 in August, $195,000 in September and $72,800 in October. Read the full agenda for the July 31 meeting here.

Kids under 12 in Alberta face months-long gap in COVID vaccine availability
Kids under 12 in Alberta face months-long gap in COVID vaccine availability

CBC

time17 minutes ago

  • CBC

Kids under 12 in Alberta face months-long gap in COVID vaccine availability

Shuhiba Mohammad recently took her daughter for her routine childhood immunizations at age 1, and was frustrated when she was told she'd have to book a separate appointment to get a COVID vaccine. Then, when she called Alberta Health Service's 811 phone number to book an appointment, she learned her child couldn't get a COVID shot, at all. "I was on the phone for about 45 minutes and somebody got back to me that the Moderna vaccine — that was the COVID vaccine given to children under the age of 12 — was expired as of June 17 ... and so there is no opportunity to vaccinate a child under 12 for COVID until the fall," she said. "So we're kind of in a little bit of a limbo, where she's going to have no immunity to COVID and we've just started daycare." Mohammad says she would have appreciated some kind of heads up or communication about this from public health officials, but actually received the opposite when she brought her daughter to her six-month routine immunization appointment. "They had said that we will deal with the COVID vaccines at a year of age," Mohammed said. "But now that I went and I looked it up and I dug into it a little bit deeper, I could have gotten her a vaccine at six months, but public health had told me a year." The AHS vaccine-booking website now informs visitors: "COVID-19 vaccine for individuals 6 months up to and including 11 years of age expired June 17, 2025. After this date, COVID-19 vaccine will only be available for eligible individuals 12 years of age and older." But that warning did not appear in an earlier version of the website, captured on June 14 by the Wayback Machine. Adult vaccines about to be pulled, too An AHS spokesperson declined to answer questions about the vaccine availability, referring them instead to the province's newly created Ministry of Primary and Preventative Health Services, headed up by former health minister Adriana LaGrange. An official with the ministry told CBC News in an email the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine "is currently unavailable across Canada, as all remaining doses have expired" and new doses for children aged six months and older are expected "in the fall." Adults, too, will also soon be ineligible to receive the current batch of COVID shots. "The KP.2 COVID-19 vaccine will no longer be administered in Alberta after July 31, as the province prepares to introduce a new formulation this fall," the official said. "Most remaining KP.2 doses are nearing expiry, and removing them now helps ensure a smooth transition to the new prefilled syringe formulation, which also requires different storage and planning." Craig Jenne, a professor in the department of microbiology, immunology and infectious diseases at the University of Calgary, said it's "frustrating" that children, in particular, will have a months-long gap in vaccine availability. "We have to appreciate that maybe, at a population level, the kids are less at risk of severe COVID, but we do know that the youngest ones are at risk of intensive care unit admission," he said. "So, the fact that this is a Health Canada-approved vaccine, we know it works, we know it's safe, but it's simply not available is really frustrating from the public health level." 'We've got to jump through multiple hoops' Jenne said from a public health perspective, the goal is generally to make vaccines as easily available as possible. "What we've seen with COVID is the exact opposite," he said. He worries about the provincial government's plan to starting charging Albertans a fee for COVID vaccines, once new doses arrive in the fall, and to require people to pre-register to receive them at specialized immunization clinics, because the province will no longer make them available at pharmacies. "So this is now a vaccine that we've got to jump through multiple hoops for — including a significant cost barrier to some Albertans — and there's no doubt that this will drive down uptake and leave a percentage of Albertans who may otherwise want to be protected unable to access the vaccine," Jenne said. In announcing the plans to reduce availability and start charging for the vaccine, the government of Alberta cited COVID immunization advice from the United States. "Recently, the Federal Drug Administration in the United States stopped recommending routine COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women and healthy children," the province said in a June 13 press release. That change had been announced in May by U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and runs contrary to the latest vaccine guidance in Canada. Starting Aug. 11, the province plans to launch a new "pre-order tool" through its vaccine-booking system where Albertans can "express interest" in receiving both the COVID and influenza vaccines. "Those who pre-order will receive a reminder by text or email prompting them to book their appointment in early October. Pre-ordering is being used to help plan for vaccine needs and reduce potential waste," the ministry official said. "Due to recent changes to the federal COVID-19 vaccine procurement process, provinces and territories are now responsible for purchasing COVID-19 vaccines for residents. Alberta's government remains committed to ensuring Albertans at highest risk of severe outcomes from COVID-19 have access to immunizations." Most Albertans will have to pay for the COVID shot in the fall but the price has not yet been announced. Flu vaccines will remain free, the ministry official said.

Trump's tariffs give chocolate makers in Canada, Mexico an edge over U.S. firms
Trump's tariffs give chocolate makers in Canada, Mexico an edge over U.S. firms

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

Trump's tariffs give chocolate makers in Canada, Mexico an edge over U.S. firms

"Elbows Up" chocolate for sale at the Maker House in Ottawa (Katie Griffin/CTV News Ottawa) LONDON/NEW YORK — U.S. President Donald Trump's trade tariffs are meant to boost domestic manufacturing. But in the chocolate industry, they're doing the opposite: ramping up the cost of importing already-pricey cocoa and hurting the competitiveness of local factories versus Canadian and Mexican outfits that supply the U.S., according to conversations with 11 industry executives, representatives, experts and traders. Under the United States-Mexico-Canada free trade pact (USMCA), which the Trump administration has confirmed remains in place, Canada and Mexico can export chocolate to the U.S. tariff-free no matter where they sourced their inputs of cocoa, a tropical crop that does not grow in the United States. Canada also has zero tariffs on imports of raw and semi-processed cocoa like butter and powder, while Mexico grows its own beans, meaning factories both north and south of the U.S. border can produce more cheaply than those domestically who now have to pay tariffs of between 10 to 25 per cent on cocoa inputs. The rates could rise to 35 per cent on Aug. 1. A government official said that the White House continues to monitor trends in trade and commerce and listen to industry feedback to deliver on Trump's economic agenda. Top U.S. chocolate maker Hershey, which mainly makes chocolate in the U.S. but has plants in Canada and Mexico, has estimated it would face US$100 million in tariff costs in its third and fourth quarters if the levies remain in place. Smaller firms like Somerville, Massachusetts-based Taza Chocolate, which produces chocolate from scratch using imported cocoa, have no alternatives to U.S. manufacturing. Taza in May had to pay $24,124 in duties on a container of cocoa from Haiti, subject to the blanket 10 per cent tariff imposed by Trump, a Customs and Border Protection invoice showed. Taza faces a customs check of more than $30,000 to release its next container of cocoa from the Dominican Republic, founder and CEO Alex Whitmore said. 'For a company our size, that's our profit margin gone so the immediate thought is OK, the rules have changed, we just need to create the most cost-effective solution for the consumer,' said Whitmore. He initially explored offshoring part of Taza's manufacturing to Canada to benefit from USMCA terms, but decided against it given the significant investment of both money and time that would require, in a volatile business environment. 'Right now, the environment is so uncertain that we're just hunkering down and hoping this will pass,' Whitmore said. 'A lot of us business owners are kind of frozen.' Customs data compiled for Reuters by Trade Data Monitor (TDM) shows Canada's chocolate exports to the U.S. grew by 10 per cent in volume terms in the five months to end-May, indicating some Canadian manufacturers are taking advantage of the opportunity created by tariffs. Companies benefiting are mostly Canadian and Mexican contract chocolate makers, or multinational contractors like Barry Callebaut that have a significant footprint in Canada and Mexico, industry sources said. Barry Callebaut, which has just under half its North America chocolate factories in Canada and Mexico, declined to comment. Its CEO Peter Feld said at its July post-results conference call: 'On tariffs ... we have operations in the U.S., we have operations in Canada, we have operations in Mexico. So we can actually navigate this environment in the right way.' Contract chocolate firms produce raw chocolate that U.S. factories add ingredients to and sell as American chocolate. Tariffs - a pillar of Trump's 'America First' economic agenda - come at a delicate time for U.S. chocolate makers as consumers are already buying less after absorbing double-digit inflation over the past several years. In chocolate specifically, prices have risen sharply as cocoa tripled in value to hit record highs in the first four months of last year, and remains well above historical averages because of adverse weather and disease in top growers Ivory Coast and Ghana. Under pressure from rising input costs, Hershey earlier this month rolled out double-digit price hikes across its confectionary products like Reese's cups to retailers like Walmart and Kroger. Cocoa accounts for about 30 to 50 per cent of the cost of a bar of chocolate. Hershey said its recent price hikes were not related to tariffs. Taza has raised its wholesale prices by 10 per cent since a year ago, and the price of its chocolate bars on its website rose in June to $6.99 from $5.99 previously, but Whitmore also said tariffs would cause further price hikes. Because cocoa can't be sourced domestically, Hershey said in May it is 'engaging with the U.S. government to seek an exemption' for cocoa. It declined to comment on whether it was counting on imports from its Canada and Mexico plants to help mitigate tariff costs. M&Ms maker Mars, which said Tuesday it is investing $2 billion in its U.S. manufacturing, including chocolate, has not changed its sourcing structure and continues to make 94 per cent of its U.S. products locally. A Lindt LISN.S spokesperson said the Lindor truffle maker will decide on possible changes to its sourcing after Aug. 1. Paolo Quadrini, director general of Mexican chocolate and candy association Aschoco Confimex, said U.S. tariffs are 'creating new opportunities for Mexican companies.' 'The sentiment among companies and entrepreneurs, as well as requests from U.S. chocolate companies to manufacture in Mexico, is real and has been increasing,' he said. The chocolate market in the U.S., the world's top chocolate consumer, is worth $25 to 30 billion, according to investment bank TD Cowen, and imports from top supplier Canada account for about 10 per cent of that total, while those from No. 2 supplier Mexico account for some 2.5 per cent. Tareq Hadhad, CEO of mid-sized Nova Scotia-based chocolate maker Peace by Chocolate said tariffs had largely prompted Canadian and American firms to opt for locally produced goods but that contract chocolate makers in Canada had benefited from the new trade dynamic. 'It's an advantage for them,' he said. (Reporting by May Angel, Helen Reid and Jessica DiNapoli; Editing by Lisa Jucca and Anna Driver)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store