Lanarkshire school pupils honoured at inaugural Ken Muir Awards
Five pupils from Lanarkshire have been recognised for their exceptional personal growth, resilience and workplace readiness as recipients of the first-ever Ken Muir Award for Exceptional Achievement – an award which celebrates the skills and attributes that go beyond exam results.
Jenny Renfrew, Dylan McManus, Owen Leitch, Eva McGowan and Kieran Smith, all S5 and S6 pupils from Cathkin High School, Greenfaulds High School, Lanark Grammar, St John Ogilvie High School and Strathaven Academy, were among 86 recipients from across Scotland of the inaugural Ken Muir Award.
All recipients had successfully completed the Powering Futures Challenge Programme - a nationally-delivered course equivalent to a Higher, which supports senior-level pupils in becoming workplace ready.
While over 1000 pupils nationally earned a formal SCQF Level-6 qualification through the process, the Lanarkshire award winners impressed their teachers with their personal development throughout the programme - with winners recognised for growing in confidence, strengthening their teamwork and communication skills, and taking meaningful steps towards their future careers.
Professor Ken Muir - after whom the awards are named - has played a key role in advising the Scottish Government on the future of Scottish education. As a key contributor to the 2023 report It's Our Future - Independent Review of Qualifications and Assessment, Professor Muir has called for reforms to Scotland's system of education to better prepare learners for the world of work.
Professor Muir said: 'We need a culture shift in Scotland's education system. Of course, grades are important - but so is working hard, reflecting on progress, and growing as a person. These awards are symbolic of this shift. They celebrate personal development, resilience, communication, and teamwork. These are all critical attributes that help young people thrive in life and in work.'
The Powering Futures Schools Programme, now in its fourth year, sees pupils tackle real-life business and industry challenges in teams, developing vital meta-skills while building links with employers. Jennifer Tempany, co-founder of Powering Futures, said: 'These awards highlight the often-overlooked achievements that sit beyond academic results, but which can inspire confidence and purpose in young people as they go into the world of work. We are proud to play our part in helping young people see their potential, and congratulate every recipient, including those from Lanarkshire, for their well-earned achievement.'
*Don't miss the latest headlines from around Lanarkshire. Sign up to our newsletters here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Rangers signings are Championship dross while Celtic go backwards as Hotline flamethrower burns the big two
It's been a busy start to the transfer window for Rangers and Celtic with both clubs making early moves. But one unbiased Hotline caller reckons both clubs have been off their trollies in the summer shopping spree – with Rangers signing duds and Celtic in reverse. Jim McClean, Rothesay, said: 'At the moment I am glad I don't support Rangers or Celtic. Rangers are signing dross and loans once again and getting rid of better players they are signing. 'As for Celtic, they are only content to build up the biscuit tin again no wonder the fans are cracking up as they haven't signed one decent player apart from Tierney. 'Celtic are resting on their laurels once again, and they are going backwards.' There are not many tears among Celtic fans over the departure of Nicholas Kuhn to Como. Instead, Hoops fans reckon they are laughing all the way to the bank with around £17m on the way for the German winger. Liam Birney, Paisley, said: 'You have to laugh at the ridiculous and embarrassing comment from Carl McCoy in Saturday's Hotline saying Nicolas Kuhn was a failure in Scotland. 'Is he referring to the same winger who scored 18 goals and had 12 assists from 38 appearances (6 as a sub) in the season just past? "No other winger in Scotland got near those stats. But the un-real McCoy knows better than the Serie A side who paid over £17m for him! The jealousy is evident.' Scott McAdam, Glasgow, said: 'I remember a while back callers laughing about Celtic getting £15m for Kuhn. Well those laughs must have turned to tears because it's £17m. "What a bit of business by the champions again. These guys just open their gubs and their bellies rumble.' Stephen Mulhern, Dumbarton, said: 'For Celtic seemingly close to receiving £17m for a player who downed tools at the latter part of the season and clearly didn't want to be here any more is an astonishing piece of business. 'And with Rangers holding out for a paltry £5m for their top goalscorer and bringing in players from Peterborough and Luton indicating once again there won't be a title race this season.' As for Gers signings, boss Russell Martin has been plundering the English market. And Rab Picken, London, said: 'Living in England and seeing a lot of Championship games, I can assure the callers Celtic players wouldn't get on the bench in many of the teams. 'With free signings like serial chocolate soldier Kieran Tierney and the 19-year-old Fulham reserve player Callum Osmand, I don't think Russell and Rangers have much to worry about.' One Gers fan is not worried about the league the signings are coming from, more the nationalities. Robert Livingston, Palm Beach, said: 'Will Martin's foreign players know what it really means to play for Rangers? I doubt it. 'It's like Martin wants to turn Gers into the Foreign Legion. In days past, Souness and Smith's successful teams always had a Scottish core. 'I'm old enough to remember Rangers' greatest XI of all home grown – Greig, Brand, Henderson, Baxter just to name a few. They won trophy after trophy."
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Plans to keep Peterhead gas plant open could ‘blow hole' in targets
ENERGY giant SSE may keep Scotland's dirtiest power station open until 2040 – 10 years longer than planned – which critics fear could 'blow an enormous hole' in the Scottish Government's climate strategy. The company owns the Peterhead gas-fired power station in the North East which has been producing electricity since 1982. It is the largest remaining fossil fuel power station in Scotland and one of the biggest polluters in the country, releasing more than one million tonnes of climate-warming carbon dioxide (CO2) in an average year – about the same as 250,000 cars. SSE, along with Norwegian company Equinor, is planning to build a new replacement gas power station next to the current one. They claim this new plant will help Scotland meet climate targets because it will use technology to capture most of its emissions and store them under the North Sea. READ MORE: Norwegian firm planning for first UK deep-sea salmon farm However, new plans show that the old Peterhead plant could stay operational until 2040 – and could run at the same time as the new one. That is despite SSE previously saying it 'could not foresee' the old plant staying open past 2030. Meanwhile, a document published on climate change by the Scottish Government last month suggests ministers were unaware of the changed timeline – which one campaigner claimed was 'stunning' given 'all their cosy meetings with SSE'. Campaigners and local politicians argued extending the life of the 'mega-polluter' old plant could see Scotland 'bust through' its climate targets. But SSE said it is needed to play an 'important back-up role' ensuring Scotland can keep the lights on when energy from other sources like wind turbines is not available. Extended lifespan THE finding about the old plant's extended life comes from a new assessment of the environmental impact of the new plant published by SSE in May. The document says that if the new plant (Peterhead 2) is approved by Scottish ministers, the old one (Peterhead 1) is 'expected' to stay in operation with its 'existing total capacity available up to 2040'. In a response to The Ferret, SSE said it expects the current station to run until the mid-2030s, and that the 2040 date is a worst case scenario. Unlike the current station, the new one would use carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology to reduce emissions. SSE says building the new plant is essential to Scotland meeting its climate targets because it will provide a reliable source of 'dispatchable' low-carbon power at times when renewable sources cannot meet demand, such as when the wind is not blowing. But Peterhead 2 will still be linked to considerable emissions. The new environmental assessment looked at 'well-to-tank' emissions – including the climate pollution created when drilling for the gas that will be burned at the new site. These emissions will not be captured by CCS. READ MORE: Experts warn far- right are 'weaponising Christianity' Taking these into account, the new plant could cause the equivalent of 17 million tonnes of CO2 to enter the atmosphere over its 25-year life – three times more than SSE originally estimated in 2022. Climate activists believe this could still be an understatement because they are skeptical about the amount of CO2 that will be captured by Peterhead 2. 'Unreliable technology'? SSE has 'conservatively' assumed that 90% of the emissions from the new site will be captured and stored. Campaigners argue this level of capture has never been achieved in practice. The think tank Carbon Tracker published an analysis on Peterhead 2 last year which argued most carbon capture plants operating today 'struggle to achieve high capture rates above 80%, let alone 90-95%'. 'Carbon capture has repeatedly failed to deliver so trying to make future calculations based on such an unreliable technology is foolish at best and downright reckless at worst,' Friends of the Earth Scotland's senior climate campaigner Alex Lee told The Ferret. They warned that continuing to allow gas burning at Peterhead could 'blow an enormous hole in Scotland's limited carbon budget'. Last month, the Scottish Government announced a new approach to measuring progress towards its target for Scotland to reach net zero emissions by 2045. This would bring in new 'carbon budgets' – limits on how much carbon Scotland can emit every five years – to replace annual targets that were dropped last year after being repeatedly missed. A document accompanying these new budgets included the assumption that Peterhead 1 would be replaced by the new plant 'just after 2030'. Lee said it was 'stunning' that the Scottish Government did not appear to know that the life of the plant is likely to be extended 'despite all their cosy meetings with SSE'. In the five years between 2019 and 2023 – the most recent for which there is data – Peterhead 1 produced nearly six million tonnes of climate-warming CO2. SSE expects the old plant to run at reduced levels once the new station comes online and is predicting a 'reduction in overall emissions' from Peterhead. But 'worse case scenario' projections by SSE suggest in total the site could be responsible for the equivalent of 1.6 million tonnes of CO2 entering the atmosphere each year of the 2030s. SSE stressed that this was 'unlikely'. Politicians expressed concern that keeping the old plant running could see the Peterhead site consume a growing share of Scotland's carbon budgets. This would leave less room for emissions from sectors which are seen as hard to decarbonise, such as farming. Maggie Chapman, the Scottish Greens MSP, said keeping 'mega-polluter' Peterhead running until 2040 would see Scotland 'bust through its climate targets'. 'Given the success of decarbonising Scotland's energy supply, there can be absolutely no justification to continue generation from gas past its use-by date,' Chapman continued. She added that instead of expanding one of Scotland's most polluting sites, 'we need to see government-led projects to build a better future' for workers and communities which have relied on the fossil fuel industry. Chapman's fellow north east MSP, Scottish Labour's Mercedes Villalba, said the Scottish Government appeared to be 'clueless' about the overlap in running Peterhead 1 and 2 because of its 'inadequate and ineffective oversight'. READ MORE: UK events use Scottish land to clean up their carbon footprint 'Proposals for a new plant rely on CCS which remains years from realisation in Scotland,' Villalba said. 'Meanwhile, with no plan for transition, it is no surprise that the dirtier alternative is set to continue. 'Our energy transition will continue to be disorderly, with workers paying the price with our jobs, health, environment and climate, until the government gets a grip.' An SSE spokesperson pointed out that the UK Government had 'outlined the need for up to 35GW of gas generation to remain on the system by 2030'. 'This type of capacity will continue to play an important backup role into the 2030s,' they said. 'As a result, our existing assets, including Peterhead 1, will remain operational for longer than previously expected, helping us to keep the lights on when required. 'Peterhead carbon capture (Peterhead 2) will ultimately replace the existing station, delivering low-carbon power and supporting the transition to a clean energy system.' The Scottish Government said policies to meet the carbon budgets would be set in its draft climate change plan which is due 'later this year'. A spokesperson said ministers were opposed to continued use of fossil fuels to generate electricity if they are not 'abated' by CCS technology. 'However, as the UK Climate Change Committee and National Infrastructure Commission have emphasised, there will continue to be a role for small amounts of abated natural gas, due to renewables' intermittent nature and the flexibility which gas is able to provide during periods of low renewable generation,' the spokesperson said. 'The application for Peterhead low carbon power station is live – as such it would not be appropriate to comment on it or prejudice any considerations or final outcome.' The Ferret is an editorially independent, not-for-profit co-operative run by its journalists and subscribers. You can find it at and can subscribe for £5 a month here:
Powys County Times
2 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Shona Robison urges Prime Minister to follow Scotland on taxation
Scotland's Finance Secretary said Labour needs a 'new direction' as she called on the Prime Minister to look north of the border for a more progressive tax system to protect public spending. Ms Robison said that if Labour had followed the Scottish model, where higher earners pay more tax, Labour would not be in the 'complete fiscal mess that they are in now.' Her comments come after Sir Keir Starmer's Government was forced into a last-minute climbdown in order for welfare legislation to pass its first parliamentary hurdle earlier this week. In a late concession on Tuesday evening, ministers shelved plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), with any changes now only coming after a review of the benefit. These changes are expected to put pressure on other parts of the Government's finances. Ms Robison said: 'People voted for a Labour government last year because they wanted change from the Tories – but after a year of attacks on the incomes of pensioners, the poor and the disabled, they are rightly wondering exactly what, if anything, is different. 'When Keir Starmer took office, he could have chosen to ask people on higher incomes to pay a little more in tax in order to protect public spending. 'Choosing instead to target the vulnerable is not leadership – frankly, it is political cowardice. 'If Keir Starmer had done in England what the SNP have done in Scotland with taxation, Labour would not be in the complete fiscal mess that they are in now. 'After a year of mistakes, Labour needs a new direction – and they should look to Scotland. By asking people on higher incomes to pay a bit more in tax, we have ensured a majority of taxpayers pay less than they would elsewhere in the UK, and are able to unlock more spending for services like the NHS, as well as cut poverty by introducing a Scottish Child Payment, and ensure that everybody can benefit from important services like free tuition and free prescriptions.' She added: 'Labour used to tell Scotland that we didn't need independence and we just needed to get rid of the Tory government – but the last year has completely demolished that argument. 'No Westminster government will ever deliver the truly fair society which I believe the vast majority of people in Scotland want to live in – and that is why independence is the best future for Scotland.' Scottish Labour's economy, business and fair work spokesperson Daniel Johnson MSP said: 'SNP ministers have a brass neck to think they can lecture anyone after their atrocious financial mismanagement. 'The SNP use higher taxes on Scottish nurses and firefighters as a substitute for economic growth, waste billions on out-of-control prison and ferry projects, and have created multibillion-pound black holes in the public finances. 'Labour is delivering the largest funding settlement in the history of devolution, with £50 billion for Scotland's NHS, schools and public services this year alone. Despite that, the SNP are now gearing up to make cuts to fill their fiscal black hole. 'The SNP government has the money, they have the powers, but they are out of ideas, out of excuses and out of time. 'Next year, we have the chance to kick out this SNP Government that cannot be trusted with taxpayers' money.'
