This PBS Station In Boston's Sign Is Going Viral After Trump Defunded Them
Donald Trump celebrated the cuts on Truth Social, saying, "THIS IS BIG!!!"
And now, a picture from the outside of PBS station WGBH in Boston is going viral on Reddit:
"Local. Trusted. Defunded."
"Short and to the point," one person said.
"Way to go WGBH! Don't pretend this is normal and don't be silent. Make them wear this forever," another person commented.
And this person said they were, "Canceling Paramount + , subscribing to PBS Passport. Easy. Done."
Other people eulogized the station: "RIP PBS. You taught us to be good people."
Another person replied to that comment, saying, "They will be around still, they know they just need to make it another 3.5 years if we have a fair election."
And then a bunch of people highlighted all of the good things WGBH has done over the years, "WGBH, especially WGBH, has done so much good for the country and it's children over the decades. If you weren't already on high alert and ready to go to the mat with these fuckers, here's your sign."
This person pointed out that WGBH was home to Julia Child's cooking series The French Chef, "WGBH gave us Julia Child... for that, we owe them a debt that can never be paid."
And this person said WGBH provides closed captioning for mainstream shows, "In addition to the mass amount of public radio and public television broadcasting produced at WGBH, they also provide closed captioning for many commercial programs as well."
And for their part, WGBH commented on the thread: "Still here."
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
20 minutes ago
- Fox News
Obama issues rare statement on foreign policy issue
Former President Barack Obama issued a rare statement weighing in on the hunger situation in Gaza on Sunday, suggesting aid must flow to Palestinians regardless of whether Israel can secure a hostage deal for now. Obama made the statement on social media in reference to reporting from the New York Times stating that "Gazans are dying of starvation." Israel, which blockaded aid to Gaza earlier this year, has recently begun to airdrop aid resources into the region, and its leaders argue reports of starvation are a false campaign promoted by Hamas. Reporting from Fox News' Trey Yingst has indicated that hunger is indeed spreading across the region, however. "While a lasting resolution to the crisis in Gaza must involve a return of all hostages and a cessation of Israel's military operations, these articles underscore the immediate need for action to be taken to prevent the travesty of innocent people dying of preventable starvation," Obama wrote on X, providing a link to the Times. "Aid must be permitted to reach people in Gaza. There is no justification for keeping food and water away from civilian families," he added. President Donald Trump touted U.S. efforts to provide aid to Gaza when asked about the situation on Sunday. Meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at the time, he stated that Europe has not provided aid to Gaza. He also said that Hamas is stealing much of the aid being sent to Palestinians, a claim Israel has put forward repeatedly. "When I see the children and when I see, especially over the last couple of weeks people are stealing the food, they're stealing the money, they're stealing the money for the food. They're stealing weapons, they're stealing everything," Trump told reporters. "It's a mess, that whole place is a mess. The Gaza Strip, you know it was given many years ago so they could have peace. That didn't work out too well," he added. The IDF says it conducted 28 drops in a matter of hours on Sunday, in addition to transferring some 250 aid trucks over the course of the week. "Let me be clear: Israel supports aid for civilians, not for Hamas. The IDF will continue to support the flow of humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza," an IDF spokesperson said Sunday. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also pushed back on criticism of his regime, arguing that the United Nations has been falsely pushing claims of widespread starvation. He told the Jerusalem Post on Sunday that it has long been Israel's policy to allow aid into Gaza so long as it did not benefit Hamas. "We've done this so far," Netanyahu told the paper. "But the U.N. is spreading lies and falsehoods about Israel. They say we don't allow humanitarian supplies in, yet we do. There are secure corridors. They've always existed, but now it's official. No more excuses."
Newsweek
21 minutes ago
- Newsweek
People Will Die at Alligator Alcatraz
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Alligator Alcatraz, the immigration detention center that opened July 3 at a remote abandoned airstrip in Florida's Everglades, is the centerpiece of Governor Ron DeSantis' plan to be a "force multiplier" for President Donald Trump's mass deportation plan. The facility has a capacity of 1,000 beds—with plans to raise that to 4,000—costing $245 per bed per day, for an estimated cost of $450 million per year. Detainees who have managed to communicate with family, friends, and lawyers report appalling conditions. Insufficient and contaminated water. Inadequate, spoiled food. Ignored requests for medical care. Swarms of mosquitoes. Unbearably hot tents that leak when it rains. Severe overcrowding. Facility personnel who berate and threaten them. We have studied immigration detention for over a decade and can say with grim certainty that it's just a matter of time until someone dies at Alligator Alcatraz. This is what happens when detainees are seen as dollar signs. In our book, Immigration Detention Inc: The Big Business of Locking Up Migrants, we follow the money that coalesces around detention in the United States. Countless companies, state and local governments, and communities are tangled up in the economic webs tied to incarcerating migrants. These entities make money by starving, sickening, and exploiting detained migrants. The less they provide, the bigger their profits. President Donald Trump speaks with Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem as they tour a migrant detention center, dubbed Alligator Alcatraz, located at the site of the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport in Ochopee, Fla.... President Donald Trump speaks with Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem as they tour a migrant detention center, dubbed Alligator Alcatraz, located at the site of the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport in Ochopee, Fla. on July 1, 2025. More ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images In fact, it's the business model that has driven the wild growth of the detention system over the last 30 years, regardless of what party controls the White House. Since the 1980s, big prison corporations, like GEO Group and Core Civic, have used lobbying, political donations, and strategic hiring to push for ever-tougher immigration policies that keep up the supply of new bodies to detain. With Trump's push for mass deportations, it's only ramping up. "This is to us an unprecedented opportunity," said GEO Group Executive Chairman George Zoleyon a call with investors after Trump won. A range of other types of companies profit, too: Aramark and Wellpath, which provide food and medical care, respectively, make millions from immigration detention centers. In-facility stores run by corporate giants like Keefe Group charge detainees' outrageous prices for food, medicine, and other necessities, like personal hygiene products. Companies involved in communication, transportation, maintenance, security, technology, and equipment also profit ... the list is endless. County jails also become addicted to detention money. Local officials, in Democrat- and Republican-led districts alike, often see detaining people for ICE as a way to make up for budget shortfalls. With the Trump administration's encouragement, Ron DeSantis is taking this approach to a whole new level, turning detention into a speculative business. Build centers, enact laws that make more people detainable to fill them, then get the big ICE check. Policymakers, too, benefit from businesses tied to detention, often receiving generous campaign donations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio got political contributions for years from GEO Group. Both Attorney General Pam Bondi and "border czar" Tom Homan have been on GEO Group's payroll. Policymakers may invest in detention-adjacent businesses, like Trump's "mass deportation" architect Stephen Miller, who has a financial stake in Palantir Technologies, a software company specializing in surveillance and defense tools that works with the U.S. government. Such mutually beneficial arrangements are central to Alligator Alcatraz. As the Miami Herald reported, contractors hired to build it donated to DeSantis' campaign. Detainees, in turn, pay with their health and even their lives. People have been dying in ICE custody for decades, but that's increased dramatically since Trump took office—11 people have died in ICE detention since then. ICE facilities are supposed to adhere to a set of national detention standards, and ICE is legally required to conduct periodic inspections. But facilities with egregious conditions pass with flying colors. In June, when a local news chopper captured detainees at the Krome Detention Center in Florida spelling "SOS" with their bodies in an outside area, in a desperate plea for help, ICE issued a statement that the facility maintains "compliance with federal standards." To make matters worse, the Trump administration has drastically cut DHS funding and staff charged with protecting detainees' rights, and tightly restricted elected officials' access to facilities. The groundwork for the "follows standards" response has already been laid at Alligator Alcatraz. Responding to horrifying observations by Democratic congresspeople who visited the facility, on July 13 in an NBC Meet the Press interview, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said that it's "held to the highest levels of what the federal government requires for detention facilities." We know what that means. With Trump's so-called Big Beautiful Bill, another $45 billion will be injected into supersizing the detention system, enlarging the machine of cruelty and exploitation. If we don't demand accountability and eliminate profit incentives, more companies and communities will become economically dependent on locking up, starving, and making human beings sick. Nancy Hiemstra and Deirdre Conlon are co-authors of Immigration Detention Inc: The Big Business of Locking Up Migrants. Hiemstra is a political geographer whose research focuses on U.S. immigration enforcement policies. She is an associate professor at Stony Brook University in Long Island, N.Y. Conlon is a critical geographer working on privatization of immigration controls in the U.S. and Britain. She is an associate professor based at the University of Leeds in Leeds, U.K. The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.
Newsweek
21 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump's EU Trade Deal Explained
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. After months of negotiations, and the two sides exchanging threats of further tariffs and potential countermeasures, the European Union and the United States have finalized terms of a deal that offers the bloc a reduced tariff rate in return for billions of dollars' worth of purchases and investments. "I think it's the biggest deal ever made," President Donald Trump said following a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday afternoon. Why It Matters As well as averting a prolonged standoff and the risk of an all-out trans-Atlantic trade war, the deal substantially reduces the potential barriers that were emerging in the world's largest bilateral trading relationship—valued at just under $1 trillion last year per the U.S. Trade Representative. The announcement, which follows weeks of back-and-forth and periodic reports of stalled negotiations, also marks a major victory for the administration, which has been racing to finalize as many deals as possible ahead of the latest, August 1 deadline. Former Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross told Newsweek recently that this could have proved one of the hardest deals to finalize, given that 27 members make up the EU, with the resulting difficulty of the bloc forming a unified front on complex issues such as trade. What Are the Terms of the New Deal? After pivotal in-person negotiations between Trump and von der Leyen, the president read out the terms of the new deal at the his luxury golf course in Turnberry, Scotland. He said that the EU has agreed to purchase $750-billion-worth of U.S. energy products, including oil, gas, nuclear fuel and semiconductors. In a press release, von der Leyen said that this will "diversify our sources of supply and contribute to Europe's energy security." In addition, the deal calls for a $600-billion investment in the U.S. by the EU, which comprises purchases of American military equipment. In exchange, the U.S. will lower the import tax on the vast majority of European products to 15 percent, half the rate that was set to go into effect on August 1, and far below the 50-percent rate Trump briefly threatened in May. President Donald Trump, right, shakes hands with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen as they meet in Turnberry, Scotland, on Sunday, July 27, 2025. President Donald Trump, right, shakes hands with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen as they meet in Turnberry, Scotland, on Sunday, July 27, 2025. Jacquelyn Martin/AP Photo The outcome is less favorable than the 10-percent rate negotiated by the United Kingdom, but matches that secured by Japan last week. "This rate applies across most sectors, including cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals," said von der Leyen. "This 15 percent is a clear ceiling. No stacking. All-inclusive." Trump said that the lower tariff rate will come with the condition of the EU "opening up their countries" to more American exports. The pair have also agreed on "zero-for-zero" tariffs on several goods, including aircraft and component parts, certain chemicals and agricultural products, and critical raw materials. The EU chief said that the bloc will "keep working to add more products to this list." However, Trump said that the 50-percent tariffs on steel and aluminum will remain unchanged. "That's a worldwide thing that stays the way it is," he told reporters. What Were the EU Tariffs Before Trump's Presidency? Given the absence of a free trade agreement between the U.S. and EU, the pair have historically traded using the most-favored nation tariffs under World Trade Organization rules. According to analysis by the economic think tank Bruegel, the average rate of tariffs on European imports was around 1.4 percent prior to Trump taking office, and his succession of tariff announcements threatened to push this average rate up to over 15 percent. However, sector-specific tariffs were higher on a range of agricultural products, as well as certain vehicles. Meanwhile, the EU reported in February that most U.S. exports were duty-free or faced a roughly 1-percent tariff. However, higher charges are also placed on certain products, including a 10-percent tariff on vehicles and apparel taxes of 12 percent, according to CNBC. What People Are Saying European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, in a statement following the meeting, said: "Today with this deal, we are creating more predictability for our businesses. In these turbulent times, this is necessary for our companies to be able to plan and invest. We are ensuring immediate tariff relief. This will have a clear impact on the bottom lines of our companies. And with this deal, we are securing access to our largest export market. "At the same time, we will give better access for American products in our market. This will benefit European consumers and make our businesses more competitive. This deal provides a framework from which we will further reduce tariffs on more products, address non-tariff barriers, and cooperate on economic security. Because when the EU and U.S. work together as partners, the benefits are tangible on both sides." Chris Beauchamp, chief market analyst at global trading and investing platform IG, told Newsweek: "For the second time in a week, President Trump has been able to proclaim a trade deal with one of the U.S.' key partners. Like the Japan deal, it seems to involve the U.S. slapping on tariffs while the other side pledges to open up its markets. "Tariffs continue to be defanged as an issue, and the announcement of yet another 90-day pause for China merely underlines the view that Washington is now closing down the issue having gained a series of 'wins.' Now we wait to see whether the tariff price increases do start to show up in inflation data." Robert Basedow, professor of international political economy at the London School of Economics, told Newsweek: "I do not expect the deal to put trans-Atlantic differences over trade to rest. We have seen it in the past that Trump reneges on trade deals and seeks to renegotiate them…Hence, I expect the Trump administration to come back with new demands or complaints as opportune to him (typically for domestic policy reasons). "These Trump deals are not classic trade agreements that pass through parliament and are of hard law nature," he added. "They are more akin to political agreements, with often limited technical detail and thus scope for diverging interpretations." What Happens Next? Von der Leyen described the deal as "a framework." She added that there were certain details yet to be ironed out, France 24 reported, and that this would happen "over the next few weeks." The deal remains subject to EU member state approval. The bloc's ambassadors will meet on Monday for a debrief from the European Commission. Basedow told Newsweek that von der Leyen "will get a lot of pushback from member states, businesses, and media over this deal," which will hold "EU-internal political ramifications."
