logo
Glasgow dad's tragic death after 'routine drug' reaction

Glasgow dad's tragic death after 'routine drug' reaction

Glasgow Times10-07-2025
John Young suffered from rheumatoid and osteoarthritis for 20 years before undergoing a successful surgery at University Hospital Hairmyres, where he was given six blood-thinning Clexane injections to prevent clots.
Despite his family raising concerns with medics that the 59-year-old was struggling with his mobility and still appeared medically unwell, they say he was discharged and told to continue taking the medication to prevent DVTs.
Just days later, John collapsed at home and was rushed by ambulance to A&E at University Hospital Wishaw, where medics administered a powerful dose of anticoagulant Heparin to flush out clots in his lungs and aortic valve.
John with his grandkids (Image: supplied) He was then transferred to a cardiovascular consultant back at Hairmyres, where it is claimed the drug was given again for around five hours. The family say doctors then realised that it was causing damage to his organs.
Daughter Candice Coleman, 33, told how they had to watch helplessly for four days as her dad died an agonising slow death.
Speaking exclusively to the Glasgow Times, she said: 'My dad passed in the most horrendous way, screaming out in pain because of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).
'There was no 4T screening carried out to determine if he might suffer a reaction, so by the time doctors realised what was wrong, severe damage had already been done. Instead of stopping clots from forming, the medication caused more to form on his lungs and in the aortic valve. His legs turned purple and his kidney function plummeted, along with his platelets. His body started shutting down right in front of us.
'Dad was moved to intensive care and the consultants were very honest, telling us they had never seen this happen at any point in their careers. They told us the best-case scenario would see his legs amputated and the worst was that he wouldn't survive.
John in ICU (Image: supplied) 'For four days we had to just sit and watch him suffer. It was beyond heartbreaking - and then we were told there was nothing more they were able to do.'
John was put on end-of-life care to make him comfortable and the family could only sit and hold his hand as he passed away on June 21.
John's feet due to blood clots (Image: supplied) Candice said: 'He waited five years for a hip replacement that ultimately cost him his life.
'The surgery itself went well, we had no idea that blood thinning medication could cause vital organs to stop working. I feel I've been robbed of my dad, and that's why we want 4T screening introduced across the NHS to ensure this does not happen to anyone else.
'This procedure is carried out in America before these drugs are administered, so why not here? It could have saved my dad's life if it was standard practice across Scotland's health boards.'
'That is what we will now be campaigning for in my dad's memory.'
John Young was a proud family man (Image: supplied) John, who was raised in Barrowfield in the East End of Glasgow before moving to Holytown for the last 25 years, was a devoted husband to wife Jacqueline, dad to Candice and brother Ryan, 29, as well as a proud grandfather to Amiee 16, Blake, eight, and seven-year-old Anna.
READ NEXT: Glasgow man faced sleeping rough until charity 'saved him'
He worked for 30 years with meat manufacturers Calder Millerfield in Dalmarnock before being medically retired.
Candice said: 'He was a real family man and would do anything to help others. He was the best father and grandad and knowing that he's gone now through no fault of his own is absolutely devastating.'
The family is demanding answers from health board chiefs.
John Young (Image: supplied) Candice added: 'We want justice and we want a proper explanation as to how this was allowed to happen.
'Our dad's life mattered and we are now taking legal steps to ensure no one else goes through the heartbreak we have had to endure. We thought my dad would be enjoying life after getting a new hip, but instead he's been cruelly robbed of his future because of a recognised, albeit rare, complication."
The Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service told the Glasgow Times that they are now investigating the circumstances surrounding John's death. NHS Lanarkshire is also carrying out a detailed review into his care.
Candice added: 'We welcome the investigation and hope this prevents this from happening again, but it won't bring back my dad. We miss him so much – you never expect a nightmare like this to happen to your own family.'
A COPFS spokesperson said: "The Procurator Fiscal has received a report on the death of a 59-year-old man in East Kilbride on 21 June 2025.
"An investigation is ongoing and any significant developments will be shared with the family of Mr Young.'
Russell Coulthard, director of acute services at NHS Lanarkshire, added: 'Although we are unable to comment on the details of this individual case just now, our thoughts and sympathies are with the family at this tragic time.
'NHS Lanarkshire will undertake a review of this patient's death and our senior clinicians have already had extensive conversations with the family. We will continue to liaise directly with them.'
Candice has also written to the makers of the medication, Sanofi, to make them aware of what happened when the drug was given to her dad.
In a letter back, the company passed on their condolences and said the case had been forwarded to its pharmacovigilance department, which monitors all reports of adverse effects associated with its medicines.
Candice said: "We want change. We want proper testing. We don't want this to happen to anyone else."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NHS must adapt to work better in heatwaves
NHS must adapt to work better in heatwaves

The Guardian

time17 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

NHS must adapt to work better in heatwaves

Higher temperatures are becoming more frequent with climate change, and our patients are paying the price ('Profound concern' as scientists say extreme heat 'now the norm' in UK, 14 July). Increasingly, physicians are seeing more patients whose health is affected by extreme heat. During heat periods in the summer of 2022, there were 3,271 excess deaths in England and Wales, and last month's heatwave alone will cost hundreds of lives. Demand for healthcare will rise as a result of extreme temperatures. It is not only people's health at risk, but our ability to care for patients too. About 90% of hospitals in England alone are at risk of overheating, making it harder to keep services running safely. We need to get serious about adapting the NHS to cope with changing conditions. The climate crisis is a health crisis. Preventing disruption in the NHS, by investing in building upgrades, workforce preparedness and adequate resilience planning, is no longer optional – it is essential, so the NHS can continue to provide healthcare when Mark HarberSpecial adviser on healthcare sustainability and climate change, Royal College of Physicians Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

As a long-term psychiatric patient, I've had superior care from the NHS
As a long-term psychiatric patient, I've had superior care from the NHS

The Guardian

time17 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

As a long-term psychiatric patient, I've had superior care from the NHS

I read with interest the letters about psychiatric care in the NHS (11 July), prompted by Rachel Clarke's review of Bella Jackson's book Fragile Minds (A furious assault on NHS psychiatry, 30 June). I have not read the book but, as a long-term psychiatric patient, I would like to make two points. First, care naturally varies in quality, suitability and success. Following three years in unsatisfactory private care (after many previous years in NHS care), I have happily returned to the NHS. I find its care superior, but hamstrung by limited resources, which can mean waiting many months for an appointment. But I have never been treated badly, as Jackson suggests is common, even when in the worst state. Second, I was struck by what Jackson says a junior doctor said to her (as quoted by Clarke): ''Let's quetiapine them today!' And I asked him why quetiapine, and he said, 'They put you in the best hotels for conferences.'' As Clarke says, this is ludicrous, and certainly the only time I have heard 'quetiapine' used as a verb, which strikes me as improbable. Quetiapine has been a generic drug since 2012 (ie open to any company to manufacture and market, just as, say, paracetamol is). I cannot believe that a junior doctor would prescribe it in the hope of being put up in a 'best hotel' for a conference. It has long been the first-line treatment for psychosis, and for good reason: it works. I have been on quetiapine for 15 years. It's not an enviable position to be in, but I am glad it exists, and grateful to those who have – quite rightly – prescribed it to and address supplied I was disappointed to read that Cathy Wield was 'subjected to increasingly damaging interventions, including electroconvulsive therapy' (Letters, 11 July). I was treated with ECT for severe depression (with my full consent) in 2006 and it saved my life. In subsequent years when I had relapses, it again was highly effective as a treatment and I recovered fully, and have been well for the last five years. I would hope that patients won't dismiss ECT as a potential treatment for depression based on its negative portrayal in the press, but be guided by NHS professionals who prescribe what they believe is best for the individual and address supplied

Union demands £6,000 per consultant to cover one weekend of doctors' strikes
Union demands £6,000 per consultant to cover one weekend of doctors' strikes

Telegraph

time17 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Union demands £6,000 per consultant to cover one weekend of doctors' strikes

The doctors' union is demanding £6,000 for consultants on call to cover strikes this weekend. NHS leaders accused the British Medical Association (BMA) of making 'outrageous' demands as the planned walkouts grow nearer. Consultants are being told by the union to demand 'on call' rates that amount to £6,000 for Saturday and Sunday, even if they do not end up doing any work or even leaving their homes. Senior doctors who work shifts can expect £3,700 for a 13-hour weekend night shift, and £3,250 for doing the same shift during the day. It comes as new research shows two million appointments could be cancelled because of doctors' strikes this year. Resident doctors, formerly known as junior doctors, will walk out from 7am on Friday until 7am on July 30. The BMA has set a 'rate card' which asks consultants to seek pay of at least £188 an hour on weekdays, rising to £313 on weekend nights. Those who sign up to be 'non-resident on call' can expect rates of £125 per hour, for up to 48 hours, without doing any work. If they were called in to cover a shift, the rate would rise further. Officials from the Government and BMA are attempting to resolve the dispute in talks which began on Thursday. Wes Streeting has said there is no room for manoeuvre on pay, after doctors were offered 5.4 per cent. The BMA is pushing for an increase of 29 per cent. He has promised improvements in working conditions for doctors, but the union has said it wants 'solutions that address the cost of living'. The BMA has pushed for some student loans to be written off, which the Government is unwilling to do. Other daily costs include costs of exams, and a licence to practice. Mr Streeting suggested doctors could exchange some of their generous pensions for better take-home pay, and has said he is keen to address bottlenecks in training, which could mean doctors earning higher salaries sooner in their careers. Ahead of the talks, Daniel Elkeles, chief executive of NHS Providers, said it was 'outrageous' for one group of doctors to profit from the strikes. He said patients would suffer because of the strikes, in both the short and long term. Mr Elkeles said: 'It is especially worrying to see demands for excessive rates to provide this cover. These rates are simply unaffordable and would mean cuts to services. 'The withdrawal of labour by one staff group should not be seen as a financial opportunity for another. That would be outrageous in a situation where there can be no winners.' A report from the Institute for Fiscal Studies suggested that changes to pensions could benefit young medics far more quickly than making changes to loans, which only have to be paid off when salaries reach high levels. By the time a resident doctor is in their last year of specialist training, they have a basic salary of £73,992 a year. Earnings can surpass £100,000 a year for such doctors, depending on their rotas and speciality. A report by the Policy Exchange think tank estimated that the five-day strike could lead to the cancellation of a quarter of a million appointments and operations. The BMA has a mandate to strike until January 2026. The research found that if walkouts continued with a similar frequency to previous strikes, it could result in two million appointments and operations axed, and make it impossible for Labour to meet its pledge to cut waiting times. The report estimates that covering strikes could cost £367m. If doctors go ahead, it will be the first national strike by a healthcare union under a Labour government since the winter of discontent in 1979. Policy Exchange urged Labour to abandon plans which would make it easier for doctors to strike. Under the Employment Rights Bill, pushed by Angela Rayner, unions will no longer have to meet a legal threshold of a 50 per cent turnout in a ballot to hold a strike. The Deputy Prime Minister's reforms will also increase the length of a strike ballot mandate from six months to 12. The BMA had only a 55 per cent turnout in its recent ballot of resident or junior doctors, and on current trends turnout would dip below 50 per cent if the union reballoted doctors next year. Victoria Atkins, a former health secretary, said: 'This powerful new analysis from Policy Exchange demonstrates the scale of disruption that industrial action from the BMA may cause in the coming days and months. 'This is in nobody's interest, particularly patients, who will be the ones who bear the brunt of the disruption once more.' 'The Government risks further alienating the wider NHS workforce and public sector if they cave in – on pay, on student loans or other exceptional terms. 'Nurses and other health professionals, teachers, police officers and others will ask why they're being treated differently from resident doctors. 'As Labour changes the law to make it easier for unions to call strikes, this sort of action will only become more likely.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store