
'We don't want another Hiroshima': Japanese shift to action on Israel's Iran and Gaza wars
Plumes of smoke over incinerated debris in Tehran and charred remains in Gaza from Israel's nearly 21-month assault – altogether bring back a painful and generational trauma from Hiroshima and Nagasaki after the Second World War.
On Wednesday, US President Donald Trump probably reinvigorated their anguish with his remarks justifying his country's first direct strike on Iran attacking three nuclear sites.
'That hit ended the war,' he said, referring to the Israel and Iran conflict.
'I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima. I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki. But that was essentially the same thing. That ended that war,' he added.
Except it did not, in the case of Israel and Iran. Retaliatory attacks ensued the very next day despite Mr Trump's claim of a ceasefire. Since Tuesday, however, a fragile ceasefire has been in place.
His rhetoric about Israel's war with Iran, and also Gaza, hit home for many Japanese.
'I remember a feeling I had that resonated … we can't let what happened to Hiroshima happen to Gaza,' said Star Myata, a Japanese American whose family was incarcerated in the 1940s US internment camps and were also originally from Hiroshima.
Israel's attacks on Iran, and the US bombing on Iran 'absolutely echo the same violent logic the US used on Japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki', said Hanin Siam, who is a key organiser and member of Palestinians of Japan.
'This is nuclear colonialism in real time. It's not about defence, it's about domination, with zero regard for human life or environmental catastrophe.'
In August 1945, the US used uranium and plutonium filled bombs with the names Big boy and Fat Man to annihilate Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Big Boy killed up to 75,000 people on impact, Fat man 45,000. By the end of the year, about 140,000 died due to injuries and radiation.
We can't let what happened to Hiroshima happen to Gaza
Star Myata,
Japanese American and member of Kifu for Palestine
Meanwhile, Israel chose more valiant names in parallel, such as Operation Swords of Iron, which has so far led to the direct killing of about 55,000 Palestinians, mostly civilians, since October 7, 2023. As of May, the casualty count rose to 109,000 when taking into account indirect causes of death such as starvation and disease, according to estimates by The Economist.
Ms Myata said through the lens of her family experience, and similarities between the experiences of Hiroshima and Gaza, she felt connected despite being thousands of kilometres away across time zones, world views and geopolitical realities.
'So the urgency to act, I feel, comes from that. You don't want the same thing to happen to other people.'
She is a member of Kifu for Palestine. Kifu, which means donation in Japanese, is an eight-member volunteer group that relies on community fund-raising through events to aid victims in Palestine.
'I didn't have this move towards action until October 7, and that was, you know, being in Tokyo, seeing what was happening, and having this really deep fear of, but they will not stop, like the bombing will not stop,' Ms Myata explained.
Dealings with ethics
Kifu for Palestine was formed in March last year after a call for support from Ms Siam. Her Palestinians of Japan group of about 50 people has cross-country volunteers who protest and encourage government institutions and corporations to conduct more ethical dealings.
Like in the case of Itochu, one of Japan's largest trading companies valued at more than $70 billion, that entered a strategic partnership with major Israeli defence company Elbit Systems in March 2023.
'This is a mega company, that's a trading company, that's import, export, and many Japanese students really want to go work for Itochu,' said Ms Siam, a digital finance graduate degree holder.
'Once we knew that they were complicit because they had signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Elbit Systems, we knew that we had to do something about it,' she said.
They conducted a series of protests, sit-ins, marches, film screenings, and exhibitions to educate Japanese people and leaders of companies and state about its impact on Palestinian lives.
This led to people in Malaysia, Canada, and other places showing support by not shopping at Itochu's famed convenience story Family Mart, Ms Siam said.
After the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to stop the genocide against Palestinians in Gaza in January, Itochu a month later ended its partnership with Elbit Systems.
'That was the biggest success,' said Ms Siam, 28, who is now targeting Japan's Government Pension Investment Fund that manages about $1.7 trillion. About 50 per cent of the fund's investments in equities and bonds are abroad.
Information about how much of those investments are in Israeli companies and in which is not publicly available.
Japan's imports from Israel were valued at $1.44 billion in 2024, according to the UN Comtrade database. Electronic equipment, medical apparatuses, fruits and vegetables, and also nuclear reactors were some of top valued imports.
Israel imported about $1.94 billion from Japan the same year, with vehicles, boilers, and also nuclear reactors as the most valued imports, reported the database.
From peace to liberation
Ms Siam, who was born in Gaza and raised in Japan for about 10 years, is the daughter of Palestinian Ambassador to Japan, Waleed Siam.
She is one of the few Palestinians living there. In 2023, there were only 95 Palestinians in Japan among the 124 million people living there, according to the country's Statistics Bureau of Japan and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
This number might be increasing as Japanese residents are gradually becoming more aware and connected to what's happening in the Middle East. Before October 7, knowledge about the region was minimal, according to Ms Myata.
'For many people, they might not even know where Palestine is. They might hear the name and mistake it for, like, Pakistan,' she said, although that is changing.
'It's [the common bond] often very closely tied to the general anti-war or anti-nuclear weapon, which is big here in general,' Ms Myata said.
Aiko Yamakita, an organiser at Kifu for Palestine, said that Japan has always had interest in humanitarian issues.
'There's a lot of peace-washing that happens, and we're trying to change that narrative as well – that before peace, we need liberation,' she said, adding that while many ceasefires and peace agreements have taken place in Gaza, they do not last long.
For Japanese, the work that's been done since October 7 is noticeable, especially given that Japanese people do not like disruption, explained Ms Yamakita.
There's a lot of peace-washhing that happens, and we're trying to change that narrative as well - that before peace, we need liberation
'I didn't expect to see protests in Japan, and whenever you see them, I think people are always surprised and try to avoid,' she said.
'But with that [said], I think it's definitely grown over the past year and a half, so we're definitely seeing a shift.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
18 minutes ago
- The National
Israel's war may have weakened the hold of Iran-aligned groups on Iraqi politics
The Middle East has been in turmoil since October 2023. Missiles have flown in just about every direction, and there is significant concern about what the future might hold. One of the surprises, however, is that Iraq has managed to stay out of the conflict. For years, many analysts have argued that Iraq has fallen completely under Iran's shadow partially through control that proxy groups exercise in the country. And yet, these groups have been almost entirely inactive since October 2023, leading to questions as to where exactly the balance of powers lies in Iraq. The Popular Mobilisation Forces were established following ISIS's 2014 invasion and occupation of Iraq's north-west. After the terror group's defeat, the PMF and affiliated groups sought and obtained direct representation in Parliament and in government. Like all other parties, they used those positions to extract rents and to exercise influence over policy and financial matters. The difference, however, is that the PMF used its status as a paramilitary organisation to impose outcomes in ways that many other groups could not. Many factions within the PMF were also plainly anti-western in their rhetoric. On occasion, their leaders could be seen directing marches of (relatively small numbers of) followers and openly declaring that their ultimate source of authority was the supreme leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. However, since 2003, Iraq has lost its monolithic status and has become a more complicated society. The PMF may have been pushing a specific political line, but much of the state and society have had little to no interest in being involved in regional struggles of any kind. Formally, the Iraqi government's position has been to seek to de-escalate tensions in the region and internally. Politically, however, the government is made up of myriad forces, including groups affiliated to the PMF, each of which has its own set of interests and the means to act upon it. The quietist groups have long been at a disadvantage, however, given that they favour a moderate and dialogue-based approach that shies away from confrontation no matter the circumstances, which more aggressive groups have consistently used to push the limits on a range of issues. The contrast can most obviously be seen after arriving at Baghdad International Airport, the road to which has been co-opted by the PMF's efforts to construct a narrative of struggle and resistance. But visitors to Baghdad who drive along that road can look immediately to the left and see the enormous campus of the newly established American University of Baghdad and the thousands of students who now visit every day. English business schools and language academies can be found almost everywhere in the capital, including on streets that sometimes bear the names and faces of Iranian officers and their Iraqi allies who were killed in action by the American military. Recent developments will probably have an impact on that delicate balance. Iraqis and outside observers will all have noticed that the PMF did not get involved at all during the recent fighting between Iran and Israel. Analysts have offered different explanations for what was happening in the background. Some have said that Iran was opposed to any involvement by the PMF for fear that this could lead to greater escalation. Others have argued that Iran's main priority in Iraq is not to seek military support from the PMF but rather to keep the flow of dollars from Baghdad open. According to that narrative, any direct military involvement by the PMF could threaten that financial lifeline. Others still have noted that the Iraqi government – mainly Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudani and the security forces – worked tirelessly behind the scenes to keep the country out of the conflict, which has been bearing fruit. Now that the conflict is over, however, a number of consequences will probably flow. Regardless of which narrative is the most accurate, the fact that the PMF did not take any action whatsoever will be interpreted by many as a sign of weakness and vulnerability. Political forces that have always been antagonistic to the PMF will seek at least partial realignment on a number of fronts, much of which the PMF will find hard to resist given that it will all be coming at the same time. Within the Iraqi government itself, and within governing coalitions – including but not limited to the Co-ordination Framework (of which the PMF is a part) – the quietist camp will necessarily feel emboldened. It could be that Iraqi politics will be entering a non-confrontation stage, in which armed skirmishes of any kind will be eschewed in favour of business as usual (including the continued and uninterrupted extraction of rents). Clearly, however, Iraq's relationship with Iran will not break entirely. All that is likely to happen is that Iraqi groups will feel less compelled to consult or to defer to Tehran in as many matters as before. Iraqi political groups' relentless rent-seeking for the past 20 years has always meant that they are economically independent, and many now will feel less politically tethered to Iran as well. If that does happen, it is altogether unclear whether this will translate into any concrete improvements for ordinary Iraqis. It will probably only mean that political power will gradually slip away from the confrontation camp – not with a bang, but with a whimper – with nothing much to replace it other than Iraq's decrepit political system. Iraqi politics is too fractious to coalesce around a concrete strategy, particularly in relation to foreign policy, given the country's limited regional influence. Thus, it is not that a new strategy is being developed. It is that the previous status quo will probably fray without collapsing altogether.


The National
7 hours ago
- The National
Donald Trump optimistic Gaza ceasefire may come 'some time next week'
US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he will push for a Gaza ceasefire next week and be 'very firm' with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the need to end the 20-month war. Mr Trump said he will discuss the situations in Gaza and Iran in a White House meeting with Mr Netanyahu next week. A senior Israeli official, Ron Dermer, has been in Washington holding talks before the meeting as the US, Egypt and Qatar push for a truce. 'We hope it's going to happen. And we're looking forward to it happening sometime next week,' Mr Trump told reporters as he departed the White House for a trip to Florida. 'We want to get the hostages out.' Later, during a tour of a migrant detention centre in Florida, Mr Trump was asked how tough he would be with Mr Netanyahu on ending the war. 'Very firm,' he replied. 'But he wants it too ... he wants to end it too.' Hamas officials have said the group is engaging positively with mediators, but that the fate of a Gaza ceasefire lies in talks between the US and Israel. 'What matters to us is stopping the aggression and the massacres. We hope something positive will happen on this front,' a Hamas official based in Beirut said. 'The problem lies with Netanyahu and his government, which does not respond to the mediators' calls to halt the aggression, release the prisoners, allow aid into Gaza, and withdraw.' A second Hamas official said 'the Israelis and Americans are discussing matters among themselves. We are waiting for what will come out of those discussions'. 'There are positive signals from the Israelis and Americans, but there is no reliance on Mr Trump given his historical positions on Hamas, which are far from promising,' he added. In Washington, Mr Trump is expected to tell Mr Netanyahu that the war, which is now more than 20 months old, can no longer continue, sources in the US said on Monday. Mr Trump this week said a deal could be reached within a week. 'Make the deal in Gaza, get the hostages back,' he later wrote on Truth Social, his social media platform. Mr Netanyahu said new opportunities had opened up to recover the hostages held in Gaza. However, Israel and Hamas remain far apart on the terms of a possible truce and hostage deal in Gaza, further sources said on Tuesday. Mr Trump's upbeat comments on the prospect of an agreement were premature, they said. 'The mediators from Egypt, Qatar and the US don't see that a deal can be reached any time soon,' one of the sources said. 'You only need to listen to Hamas and Israeli negotiators talking about their conditions to realise that there's no way a deal will be reached within in a week.' Contact between Hamas and Israel on one side and mediators from Egypt, Qatar and the US on the other has increased over the past week in Cairo, with the objective of finding enough common ground to hold another round of talks, said the sources. They said Israel, with US backing, has rigidly stood by its long-standing demands that Hamas surrender its arms and dismantle its military capabilities, including its network of underground tunnels and hardware manufacturing sites. Hamas has categorically refused to give up its arms but signalled it was open to discussing laying down its weapons and not being part of the postwar government or reconstruction of the enclave. It has also suggested it was prepared to agree to a demand that its leaders leave Gaza to live in exile abroad but only on condition that Israel does not pursue them. Israel, said the sources, has meanwhile been threatening to pursue Hamas leaders in Gaza if the group does not accept a temporary ceasefire during which it releases the remaining hostages. 'Israel and the US have made it clear they don't want another Lebanon in Gaza,' said another source, alluding to decades of the Iran-backed Hezbollah operating in that country as a 'resistance' group outside state authority. 'Hamas is in a tenuous position. It has lost much in this war, with its top-tier military and political leaders eliminated. Yet it continues to try to maintain a presence in Gaza as a resistance group fighting an illegal occupation.' Under discussion is a 60-day truce during which Hamas is expected to release 10 living hostages and half the remains of others who died in captivity. In return, Israel is expected to free hundreds of Palestinians detained in Israeli prisons. Of the estimated 50 hostages Hamas still holds, only 20 are believed to be alive, according to Israel's military. The proposal also includes the resumption of humanitarian assistance into Gaza and the start of Hamas-Israel negotiations on an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and an end to the war. Hamas wants the US to guarantee that these negotiations will continue until Israel pulls out and ends the hostilities. The war in Gaza started after a Hamas-led attack on October 7, 2023, that killed about 1,200 people, according to Israeli figures. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed more than 56,600 Palestinians in Gaza and reduced most of the coastal strip to rubble. food aid and supplies.


Middle East Eye
9 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Turkish magazine condemned for allegedly depicting caricatures of Prophet Muhammad
A Turkish satirical magazine has sparked backlash across the country this week after publishing a controversial cartoon that many have interpreted as depicting the prophets Muhammad and Moses. In its 26 June issue, Leman Magazine published an illustration showing two angelic figures hovering above a bombed city, presumably over Gaza. One figure says, 'Salamun Aleykum,' while the other replies, 'Aleyhem Shalom.' Social media users and commentators widely identified the figures as representations of Muhammad and Musa (Moses), prompting widespread outrage across the country. Many public and government figures, including Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, condemned the magazine, saying, 'This is an open provocation hidden under the guise of humour. It is a heinous provocation.' An investigation was launched into the magazine for "publicly insulting religious values", and the editor-in-chief, the manager, the cartoonist, and the director of drawings were detained. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya announced on X that police had detained the cartoonist behind the controversial image, along with Leman Magazine's graphic designer. 'The person named DP who made this vile drawing has been caught and taken into custody,' he said, adding: 'These shameless individuals will be held accountable before the law.' In his tweet, Yerlikaya also shared a video of the moment when the cartoonist was violently detained. The magazine has denied that it was a depiction of the Prophet Muhammad, as stated in a lengthy thread shared on its social media account. Parts of the thread read, 'More than 200 million people in the Islamic world are named Muhammad. The artwork contains no direct reference to the Prophet Muhammad. The cartoonist intended to portray a Muslim individual killed by Israel, aiming to highlight the just cause of the oppressed Muslim population. There was absolutely no intention to insult or demean religious values. We reject the accusation directed at us, as there is no depiction of the Prophet Muhammad in the illustration.' The magazine's editor-in-chief, Tuncay Akgun, told AFP by phone from Paris that the image had been deliberately misinterpreted and was "not a caricature of Prophet Mohammed". "We would never take such a risk," he added. Some people are defending the cartoon, saying it should be only a crime to depict the prophet in an Islamic state, and Turkey is a secular state. Zaman dik durma zamanı, 19 Mart ne kadar niyetli ve organize ise bu işler de o kadar organize, hesaplı ve yapay. Türkiye'de kimsenin dine hakaret derdi yok, birileri sineğin yağından çıkarıp darbeye dayanak etmek istiyor. Dini kisvede siyasal darbe yaprak dindar seküler herkesin… — Murat Somer (@murat_somer) July 1, 2025 Translation: No one in Turkey is interested in insulting religion; some are trying to extract meaning from nothing and use it as a pretext for a coup. Under the guise of religion, they aim to carry out a political coup and establish a regime where both devout and secular citizens are made subservient to others. However, many people have disagreed and view the cartoon as an insult to Islam and Muslims. Peygamberimiz Hz. Muhammed'e hakaret eden Leman isimli paçavranın kapısına kilit vurup yazanın, çizenin, basanın hayatını karartacak bir adalet istiyorum. — Marginale (@themarginale) June 30, 2025 Translation: I want the kind of justice that will shut down the disgraceful publication named Leman, which insulted our Prophet Muhammad, and ruin the lives of those who wrote, drew, and published it. Protests Many people angry at the cartoon took to the streets on Monday to protest against it, calling for the magazine to be shut down. Many met in front of the Leman Magazine building and prayed there as an act of protest. Some people marched at Taksim Square in downtown Istanbul, shouting, 'down with secularism', 'long live Sharia', which also created backlash online, as the Turkish government has long banned protests there, specifically including Feminist Night Marches, pride marches and May Day celebrations. Pride için yürüyüş yapcaklar diye bir aydır taksim kapalı yasak var genel diyolar?? Ama şeriatçi militan olunca bi anda açılmış taksim — luctuosa (@Iuctuosa) July 1, 2025 Translation: They've kept Taksim closed for a month, saying there's a general ban because of the Pride march. But suddenly, it's wide open when religious hardliners are gathering. An AFP correspondent reported that an Istanbul bar, a venue often frequented by Leman Magazine staff, was attacked by several dozen enraged protesters. This sparked angry scuffles with police, which quickly escalated into clashes involving 250 to 300 individuals. In April, Amnesty International said that the 'Turkish authorities must lift all restrictions on a planned May Day solidarity demonstration in Istanbul's Taksim Square and allow people to gather peacefully in accordance with a ruling by Türkiye's Constitutional Court.' Meanwhile, Ozgur Ozel, the leader of the Turkish opposition party, said, "I won't allow any disrespect toward the Prophet Muhammad, but I also won't stand by while people are targeted and vilified over something that wasn't disrespectful to begin with." With politicians getting involved and individuals being arrested, the impact of the issue has grown in the country, becoming increasingly viral on social media. The controversy over Leman's cartoon has once again brought to the surface the enduring tension between secular and religious worldviews in Turkey, a divide that has shaped the country's politics for decades. Since the early days of the Republic, secularism has been enshrined as a foundational principle, while conservative and religious movements have steadily gained ground, particularly under the rule of the Justice and Development Party since 2002. Analysts have long pointed to what they describe as a deepening culture war over religion, press freedom and national identity.