Conor McGregor's legal team withdraws bid to introduce fresh evidence in appeal against civil case decision
Former hairdresser Nikita Hand, 35, sued the Irish sports star over an incident at a south Dublin hotel in December 2018.
The 36-year-old was said to have "brutally raped and battered" Ms Hand in a penthouse at the Beacon Hotel.
During a three-week case at the High Court in Dublin last November, McGregor told the court he had consensual sex with Ms Hand.
After six hours and 10 minutes of deliberating, the jury of eight women and four men found McGregor civilly liable for assault.
Ms Hand was awarded €248,603.60 (about £206,000) in damages.
McGregor was ordered by a judge to pay Ms Hand €100,000 (£85,000) of the damages and €200,000 (£170,000) of an expected €1.3m (£1.1m) in legal costs before the appeal, which the court heard had been done.
Ms Hand, also known as Nikita Ni Laimhin, lost her case against another man, James Lawrence, who she accused of assaulting her by allegedly having sex without her consent at the same hotel.
McGregor has since sought an appeal, which was initially expected to include new evidence.
However, on Tuesday morning, the Court of Appeal in Dublin heard that McGregor would no longer be relying on additional evidence that had not been given to the initial trial for his appeal.
That evidence was reported to relate to two neighbours of Ms Hand who had alleged they had seen her be assaulted by a former partner.
However, his legal team said that after receiving new applications relating to the evidence to be given by pathologist Professor Jack Crane, they could no longer sustain that ground of appeal.
John Gordon SC, for Ms Hand, said it was "frankly not appropriate" for the ground to be withdrawn on that basis, adding he had only been told of the development 10 minutes earlier.
He objected to the withdrawal of the ground and argued he should still be allowed to cross-examine the neighbours.
He said his client had been "put through the wringer yet again" and that the court should not permit the appellant to "waltz in here and then they can walk away from this".
Mr Gordon said there could potentially be matters relating to perjury arising out of the developments.
Ms Justice Isobel Kennedy, alongside Mr Justice Brian O'Moore and Mr Justice Patrick MacGrath, said it cannot be the case that further submissions relating to Professor Crane could solely be the reason to withdraw the appeal matter of the neighbours' evidence.
Mark Mulholland KC, for McGregor, said he was applying to withdraw the matter on a "holistic view" of the whole case and after taking instructions.
Ms Justice Kennedy said it was "unsatisfactory" that it was being brought to the court at a late stage, but permitted the withdrawing of the ground.
Following the withdrawal of that application, Remy Farrell, SC, also for McGregor, advanced the remaining four grounds of the appeal - largely relating to the right to silence and "no comment" answers to questions during garda interviews.
He raised the issue of the cross-examination of McGregor during the original trial by Mr Gordon.
He said an "enormous amount of no comment material" had been entered into the hearings to no actual proper end.
Mr Farrell said that Mr Gordon had raised more than 100 "no comment" answers given by McGregor while being interviewed by gardai on the basis that it related to a position put forward by the fighter that he had been fully co-operative with gardai.
This was a good old-fashioned courtroom bombshell.
Nikita Hand arrived at the Four Courts with her partner, walking past a rolling maul of TV cameras and photographers and a group of supporters with a large "We Stand With Nikita Hand" banner.
The media – not expecting Conor McGregor himself to attend – were on high alert for the arrival of the two new witnesses, Samantha O'Reilly and Steven Cummins.
Former neighbours of Ms Hand, they were expected to tell the court that they may have witnessed her being assaulted by her partner after the hotel encounter with McGregor – explaining her subsequent bruising.
But they did not arrive. Inside the small, packed court it immediately became apparent why. McGregor's legal team said they were withdrawing the fresh evidence – there were audible gasps and startled looks exchanged among the benches.
The testimony of the neighbours had filled reams of Irish newsprint in the weeks ahead of this highly-anticipated appeal – now it was discarded immediately for various legal reasons.
Ms Hand's counsel was furious – demanding an apology and muttering the word 'perjury'. He had only found out 10 minutes earlier, he declared – an unacceptable situation. Ms Hand had "been put through the wringer" by all of this, he said.
The mixed martial arts fighter's appeal is now proceeding, but on reduced grounds. As so often with Conor McGregor, whether in an octagon or a courtroom, the unexpected is never far away.
Mr Farrell said this was allowed to proceed by the trial judge, with Mr Justice Alexander Owens telling Mr Gordon multiple times to get to that specific purpose of that line of questioning.
However, putting forward the appeal, McGregor's counsel said this did not occur - and was in itself based on an "entirely incorrect" paraphrasing of what the appellant had actually said.
Mr Farrell said his client had said that he had made a comment about wanting to "get everything correct" in seeking out the "best advice" from his solicitors - rather than saying he had been fully co-operative with gardai.
He said the plaintiff had used this to construct a "hook" that McGregor had said he wanted to tell everything to gardai, adding: "With respect, that's not what it says."
Mr Farrell said it was not the case that McGregor had said he had told gardai everything.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Former Irish swim coach George Gibney arrested in United States
The former Irish national swimming coach George Gibney has been arrested in the United States. Mr Gibney is wanted in the Republic of Ireland to face more than 50 historical sexual abuse charges. He left Ireland more than 30 years ago and has not been back since. He was arrested in Florida on Tuesday afternoon by US Marshals on foot of an Irish extradition warrant, according to Irish broadcaster RTÉ. He is being detained pending a court appearance in the US. He can decide whether to accede or contest his extradition. In a statement to BBC News NI, An Garda Síochána (Irish police) said it is "aware of the arrest of a male aged in his 70s in the United States on foot of an Irish international arrest warrant"."As this is currently a matter for the US authorities, An Garda Síochána will not be commenting further at this time." RTÉ is reporting that gardaí reopened an investigation into Mr Gibney after a number of people made allegations against him on the BBC podcast Where is George Gibney five years ago. The criminal investigation was commenced in 2020 by a specialist team within the Garda National Protective Services Bureau. A file was sent to the Director for Public Prosecutions (DPP) three years later. The DPP examined the file and recommended that Mr Gibney be charged with more than 50 alleged offences. RTÉ also reported that An Garda Síochána secured an extradition warrant in the High Court seeking Mr Gibney's extradition. Gardaí have been working with US authorities for more than six months. Mr Gibney was a coach at Trojan swimming club in Dublin. He was also a former Irish national swimming coach.
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
How revered charity leader groomed and raped a 12-year-old boy then told twisted pal it was ‘naughty and kinky'
It is clear that Ireland, who co-founded Surrey Pride in 2018, used his position to gain access to young people and children THE PRIDE PAEDO How revered charity leader groomed and raped a 12-year-old boy then told twisted pal it was 'naughty and kinky' Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) STEPHEN IRELAND was a popular LGBT activist, who co-founded Surrey Pride and held the important position of its head of safeguarding. But he will now spend the next 24 years in prison after raping an 'extremely vulnerable' 12-year-old boy in April 2024. 8 Stephen Ireland, who co-founded Pride in Surrey in 2018, raped a 12-year-old boy he met on dating app Grindr Credit: X 8 Ireland was sentenced to 24 years in prison Credit: Surrey Police I was in Guildford Crown Court on Monday to watch Judge Patricia Lees hand Ireland, 42, his sentence, which included a further six years on extended licence. His 27-year-old boyfriend and flatmate, David Sutton, was jailed for four and half years for his part in the sickening ordeal. The boy — referred to in court as Child A — who had been reported missing at the time, had been lured to Ireland's home in Surrey after meeting him on the popular gay dating app Grindr. In a carefully calculated move, Ireland provided the boy with a set of instructions and a key code to his flat, to avoid being seen together in public. The boy, tired and hungry, was given a bong to smoke, which was later found to be laced with methamphetamine, while pornography played on a laptop. Then he was raped by Ireland and the assault filmed, for the sadistic enjoyment of their cohorts. The four-week trial followed an extensive investigation by Surrey Police's Complex Abuse Unit. 'Keep it a secret' It began following the reported rape, which led to Ireland's arrest in April 2024. A search of a phone hidden in his flat revealed indecent images of children. Ireland and Sutton were both arrested on June 11, 2024, for distribution and possession of indecent images of children, and on August 14, 2024, charges were authorised for 44 offences (later increased to 45) relating to both, covering the period between August 2022 and July 2024. Ireland's full list of crimes is horrifying. He was also convicted of three counts of causing a child under 13 to engage in sexual activity, sexual assault, conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child, facilitating a child sexual offence, six counts of making child abuse imagery, distributing pornographic images of children, and possession of one of the most serious child abuse images, involving a toddler. Sutton, who was a Surrey Pride volunteer, was sentenced for offences including voyeurism and possession and distribution of prohibited images of children. He was also sentenced for perverting the course of justice for disposing of a phone owned by Surrey Pride (supposedly used for Pride business only). On a separate device, police found a message from Ireland to Sutton, telling him to wipe all the images and messages off the Pride handset. That device has never been found. Child A had originally told Ireland he was 17, but when he later claimed in a message that he was 13, Ireland replied: 'OK — we just have to keep it a secret.' Sickeningly, he later told the boy he found his young age 'naughty and kinky'. Other messages between Ireland and Sutton described the child as a '14-year-old baby . . . who wants to play with men's bodies'. 8 Ireland's 27-year-old boyfriend and accomplice, David Sutton, was jailed for four and half years for his part in the sickening ordeal Credit: Facebook 8 Judge Patricia Lees said Ireland and Sutton, pictured, 'fed off one another' and had supported one another in their 'perversions' Credit: Surrey Police Judge Patricia Lees said Ireland and Sutton 'fed off one another' and had supported one another in their 'perversions'. She said: 'Stephen Ireland is a man who prided himself on being versed in and highly alive to the vulnerabilities of young people linked to the Surrey Pride organisation he was at the time pivotal to. ''A' was quite obviously to any adult an extremely vulnerable child who was highly sexualised. 'Any responsible adult would have quickly appreciated that there was a high likelihood 'A' is a young man who had been the subject of sexual grooming by adult men at a very early age and been concerned for him instead of taking advantage.' It is clear that Ireland, who co-founded Surrey Pride in 2018, used his position to gain access to young people and children. He was once so revered by the community, he was chauffeured around by Surrey Police in its 'Pride Car'. But some volunteers had complained after feeling uneasy about the young age of his then boyfriend. 8 I was in Guildford Crown Court on Monday to watch Judge Patricia Lees hand Ireland, 42, his sentence Credit: Facebook 8 So militant were Ireland's views on trans rights he targeted gender critical feminists, including the author JK Rowling Credit: Facebook One of those, Eve — not her real name — told me: 'There were some volunteers that raised concerns and there was a full safeguarding investigation, which was also escalated up to Surrey County Council. 'They had a huge issue about the fact that Ireland had a younger boyfriend, but he was above the age of 18, so that was that.' Ireland was also involved in the Pride Hub, which encouraged young people to join in-person social events. There is video footage of him sitting with an older 'trans woman' telling kids they could 'have sweets and popcorn' if they came along to a film screening. He also gave talks to schools. Throughout his time at the helm of Surrey Pride, Ireland waged a harassment campaign against Policing and Crime Commissioner Lisa Townsend, which included lobbying for her removal from office, and regularly referring to her as 'anti-trans' and 'exclusionary' in public. So militant were his views on trans rights, he targeted gender critical feminists, including author JK Rowling, who had spoken out against transitioning children, and for the protection of women-only spaces. 8 Rowling posted on X about his sentence on Monday Credit: X 8 Campaigner Maria Esposito believes Surrey Pride should now be shut down for 'safeguarding failures' Credit: Alamy In June 2020, Ireland tweeted: 'How to ruin a legacy . . . Become a TERF! Very disappointing JK!' Rowling posted on X about his 30-year sentence on Monday. Maria Esposito, an LGB campaigner since the 1980s and an attendee of the inaugural Surrey Pride, expressed unease about how quickly Ireland appeared to embed both himself and Pride within mainstream institutions. She said: 'Watching them gain access to Surrey County Council, Surrey Police and local radio stations was deeply concerning.' Esposito believes Surrey Pride should now be shut down.
Rhyl Journal
2 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
McGregor continues appeal without fresh evidence
The Irish mixed martial arts fighter's lawyers are instead arguing that the jury heard an inadmissible line of questioning about his co-operation with gardai into their investigation of an incident at a south Dublin hotel in December 2018. Former hairdresser Nikita Hand, 35, successfully sued McGregor over the matter in which he was alleged to have 'brutally raped and battered' her in a penthouse at the Beacon Hotel. During a three-week case at the High Court in Dublin last November, McGregor told the court he had consensual sex with Ms Hand. After six hours and 10 minutes of deliberating, the jury of eight women and four men found McGregor civilly liable for assault. Ms Hand, also known as Nikita Ni Laimhin, was awarded 248,603.60 euro (about £206,000) in damages. She lost her case against another man, James Lawrence, who she accused of assaulting her by allegedly having sex without her consent at the same hotel. McGregor was ordered by a judge to pay Ms Hand 100,000 euro (£85,000) of the damages and 200,000 euro (£170,000) of an expected 1.3 million euro (£1.1 million) in legal costs before the appeal. He has since sought an appeal which was initially expected to include new evidence. On Tuesday, the Court of Appeal in Dublin heard that McGregor would no longer be relying on additional evidence that had not been given to the initial trial for his appeal. That evidence was reported to relate to two neighbours of Ms Hand who had alleged they had seen her be assaulted by a former partner. However, McGregor's legal team said that after receiving new applications relating to the evidence to be given by pathologist Professor Jack Crane, they could no longer sustain that ground of appeal. John Gordon, SC, for Ms Hand, said it was 'frankly not appropriate' for the ground to be withdrawn on that basis, adding he had only been told of the development 10 minutes earlier. He objected to the withdrawal of the ground and argued he should still be allowed to cross-examine the neighbours. He said his client had been 'put through the wringer yet again' and that the court should not permit the appellant to 'waltz in here and then they can walk away from this'. Mr Gordon said there could potentially be matters relating to perjury arising out of the developments. Ms Justice Isobel Kennedy, alongside Mr Justice Brian O'Moore and Mr Justice Patrick MacGrath, questioned how further submissions relating to Prof Crane could lead to the withdrawal of the appeal matter on the neighbours' evidence. Mark Mulholland KC, for McGregor, said he was applying to withdraw the matter on a 'holistic view' of the whole case and after taking instructions. The court heard it was 'unsatisfactory' that the development was being brought to the court at a late stage, but Ms Justice Kennedy permitted the withdrawing of the ground. Following the withdrawal of that application, Remy Farrell, SC, also for McGregor, advanced the remaining four grounds of the appeal – largely relating to the right to silence and 'no comment' answers to questions during garda interviews. He raised the issue of the cross-examination of McGregor during the original trial by Mr Gordon. He said an 'enormous amount of no comment material' had been entered into the hearings to no actual proper end. Mr Farrell said that Mr Gordon had raised more than 100 'no comment' answers given by McGregor while being interviewed by gardai on the basis that it related to a position put forward by the fighter that he had been fully co-operative with gardai. Mr Farrell said this was allowed to proceed by the trial judge, with Mr Justice Alexander Owens telling Mr Gordon multiple times to get to that specific purpose of that line of questioning. However, putting forward the appeal, McGregor's counsel said this did not occur – and was in itself based on an 'entirely incorrect' paraphrasing of what the appellant had actually said. Mr Farrell said his client had said that he had made a comment about wanting to 'show everything' and 'get everything correct' in seeking out the 'best advice' from his solicitors – rather than saying he had been fully co-operative with gardai. He said it was 'manifestly wrong' and 'blatantly incorrect' for Mr Justice Owens to tell the jury the questioning was allowed as McGregor had raised his status as someone trying to sort out matters with the guards as best he can. Mr Farrell argued that the line of questioning was 'wholly impermissible' and was inviting someone to draw an inference that there was 'no smoke without fire' when invoking the right to silence. McGregor's counsel said the judge appeared to have 'somewhat lost control of the issue' and instead later told the jury during the charge that it could still be allowed for the different purpose of understanding background material to McGregor's answers and understanding the sequence of interviews and statements. Mr Farrell said there had been 'various vague circling' around a suggestion of whether McGregor had been co-operative or not, but it had at no point been put to him that he had been untruthful in his answers. He said the handling of the no-comment answers meant a retrial may be appropriate. Ray Boland SC, for Ms Hand, said it was clear from a holistic consideration of McGregor's evidence that he was putting forward that he wanted to be as co-operative as possible with the investigation. He argued that it was ambiguous and possible to interpret an answer that he wanted to 'show everything' that this related to gardai rather than to solicitors, and that it was 'obvious' that Mr Gordon had cross-examined him about his co-operation with the investigation. He argued, therefore, that while the judge may have got some of the details wrong, it was appropriate for the line of questioning on the no-comment answers to be admissible. For example, he said his lack of co-operation was evidenced by how he had not handed over his phone while Ms Hand had done so. He reiterated that the judge had made it abundantly clear the jury could not draw adverse inferences from the no-comment answers. He said Mr McGregor had expressed a want to put every shred of evidence before the court. However, he said McGregor had only been 'middling co-operative' rather than fully co-operative with gardai. He said the purpose of the questioning had been followed through on, even if it was subtle or inferential. A small group of supporters stood outside the court on Tuesday morning with a banner reading 'We stand with Nikita Hand', including Socialist Party TD Ruth Coppinger and campaigner Natasha O'Brien. Ms O'Brien was among some of the crowd to enter the court to express well wishes to Ms Hand. The proceedings, including Mr Lawrence's appeal against a decision not to be awarded costs, continue on Wednesday.
