Nissan Confirms the GT-R Will Return, But What Will It Be?
The R35 GT-R has been around since 2007, making it one of the longest-running performance models in recent history. But with production ending, enthusiasts have been left wondering if Nissan's halo car would return. Espinosa put those fears to rest in an interview with Automotive News, stating, 'We will continue working on sports cars. This is part of our DNA. I cannot tell you when and how, but of course, the GT-R name will exist into the future.'
Espinosa, set to take the helm as Nissan's youngest CEO, has made it clear that he values the company's performance heritage. He has expressed interest in maintaining a stable of 'four or five' iconic models, including the Z, GT-R, and potentially a revived Silvia. His deep-rooted passion for Nissan's sports cars — dating back to his childhood obsession with the 300ZX — suggests he won't let the GT-R fade away.
What form the next GT-R will take is still a mystery. Nissan has been teasing an electric future, and Espinosa himself has previously hinted at the advantages of an EV sports car. In a 2024 Top Gear interview, he noted that electric drivetrains provide superior corner-exit acceleration and control, attributes that could enhance the GT-R's track prowess.
Nissan has also showcased the Hyper Force concept, a radical EV with dual motors and a staggering 1,340 horsepower. While the production R36 may not be quite as extreme, it's clear Nissan is considering an electric GT-R. Given the brand's experience in Formula E and its push toward electrification, a hybrid or full-electric powertrain seems likely.
Nissan isn't just betting on the GT-R. Espinosa envisions a revitalized lineup of halo vehicles that could reestablish the brand's performance credentials. The Z remains a key part of that equation, and he has openly discussed reviving the Silvia as a more affordable sports car.
Of course, Nissan has broader challenges to address. The company has struggled with financial stability, production planning, and global market positioning. Espinosa has acknowledged these issues and emphasized the need for cost-cutting and smarter forecasting. While bringing back legendary sports cars is exciting, Nissan must first solidify its business strategy.
For now, GT-R enthusiasts will have to wait. The next chapter of Nissan's iconic supercar is confirmed, but its powertrain, design, and launch timeline remain unknown. Whether the R36 embraces electrification or sticks with a turbocharged legacy, one thing is certain: Nissan's new leadership is committed to keeping the GT-R alive. And for fans of Godzilla, that's a victory worth celebrating.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nissan supplier exploring wind turbine plan
A key supplier to car maker Nissan is exploring plans for a new wind turbine to help reduce carbon emissions. Unipres (UK) Ltd, an automotive manufacturing company, wants to install a 492ft (150m) tip wind turbine at its Sunderland plant on Cherry Blossom Way, in Washington. The firm, which supplies press-formed vehicle parts to the Nissan plant in Washington, said the wind turbine could generate up to 5MW. An application to Sunderland City Council planning officials has requested a "scoping opinion" on the plans to look at environmental impacts. Site plans show the wind turbine proposed for a parcel of land near the Unipres boundary with the Nissan plant site, which already has wind turbines. It was noted the "energy generated would be distributed directly to the warehouse and would function to meet the energy needs of the facility". Applicants said the proposed development would "aim to reduce the carbon emissions from the facility" and would be "largely self-sustainable", with any "excess energy" potentially being exported back to the national grid. 'Employment benefits' Following the period of operation, estimated at 25 years, the applicant is also expected to "decommission" the wind turbine "in line with best practice industry guidance". The supporting environmental impact scoping report adds: "The proposed development would have economic and employment benefits in the form of contracting opportunities for local and regional contractors both for construction activities themselves and throughout the supply chain." A decision on the screening opinion request will be made by the council following a consultation exercise, with a decision expected in coming months. Follow BBC Sunderland on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram. More on this topic Nissan Sunderland looking to cut 250 jobs Nissan supplier factory pledges more than 180 jobs Related internet links Sunderland City Council Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tesla hit with shocking sales news in key market: 'Good riddance'
New sales numbers showed that many Canadians are steering clear of Tesla, but the Elon Musk-led company isn't the only electric vehicle brand facing struggles north of the border. According to Jalopnik, a new report from Automotive News revealed that 9,000 Teslas were registered in Canada in the first six months of the year. Comparatively, data from 2024 showed the EV automaker delivered more than 26,000 new cars in Canada in the same time frame last year. That's a stunning 67% drop. Overall, EV registration in Canada has dropped 32% in the first half of 2025 amid several changes. Canada halted the Incentive for Zero-Emission Vehicles program in January. Additionally, Quebec's EV rebate program hit pause for two months before resuming. The decline in EV sales in Canada could have significant long-term environmental impacts. EVs emit less heat-trapping pollution over their lifetimes than their gas counterparts, even if you account for the electricity generated for charging. As for Tesla specifically, many have attributed the company's decline to CEO Musk's involvement with the Trump administration and involvement in global politics, with many consumers viewing support for the brand as support for Musk's politics and considering EVs from other brands. Wavering prices may have also dissuaded Canadian buyers. Tesla first raised prices on Model Y and Model 3 in February, according to Jalopnik. Another price hike came following Canada's retaliatory tariff imposed on cars imported from the United States. Most Jalopnik readers weren't at all surprised by the dwindling sales. "Tesla is toast," one commenter wrote. "Good riddance." Amid Tesla's troubles, competing brands have gained momentum in other markets around the world. In fact, a recent survey of car owners in the United Kingdom revealed that EV drivers have no plans to return to costly gas-guzzling cars for their next vehicle purchase, preferring to stick with electric instead. Making other eco-friendly investments can pay off in the long run for EV drivers. Fueling with solar energy at home is cheaper than spending on public charging stations or relying on the grid. Drivers can keep costs low by using EnergySage to compare quotes from local installers and save up to $10,000 on solar installations. Do you think a majority of Americans will have EVs in 20 years? Absolutely Only in some states No way I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hamilton Spectator
8 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Environmentally friendlier refrigerant's higher cost means bill for your car's A/C repairs may rise
Dear Ask A Mechanic, I was talking with my neighbour the other night, and it turns out we've both just had the (air-conditioning) condensers in our Chevy pickups done. His cost quite a bit more to do than mine, and he said that the repair shop told him that because his is a 2017, it uses 'the new gas' that's a lot more expensive. My Silverado is a 2016, but our trucks are both half-tons with the 5.3 (litre V8) and look pretty much the same. I'm not upset that it cost me less to fix mine (it was still pretty expensive!), but I'm wondering if that's really a thing. Cool Dude There is indeed a 'new gas' that's been adopted for use in what's known as 'mobile air-conditioning' — cars and trucks fall into that category, of course. This isn't the first time the industry has made such a change. The earliest, factory-optional automotive air-conditioning system was the 'Weather Conditioner' in 1940 Packards, although it would be decades before such systems became practical or popular. Pretty much from the outset, however, mobile A/C (air-conditioning) used 'R-12,' a refrigerant developed in part by DuPont, which marketed the gas as 'Freon.' (Definitely a better choice than going by the product's chemical name of 'Dichlorodifluoromethane' ….) R-12 provided chemical stability, was non-flammable, and was relatively efficient at transporting heat — a necessary characteristic, as all air-conditioning systems work by removing heat from the air being cooled and transferring it to an external location where it is radiated away. Unfortunately, R-12 molecules contain chlorine atoms, and it was later discovered that when released through leaks or improper service methods, the gas would find its way into the upper atmosphere, where it would react with and destroy the stratospheric ozone molecules that help reduce the levels of harmful ultraviolet radiation that reach Earth's surface. In response to the resulting ozone 'hole' discovered over Antarctica in the early 1980s, an international treaty called the Montreal Protocol was reached to address this threat, and alternative refrigerants were sought. By 1995, R-12 was phased out of new mobile A/C systems, replaced with ozone-friendly R-134a. ('Tetrafluoroethane,' in case you're curious). R-134a wasn't a perfect solution, however. As we've become more aware of the risks of global warming, this replacement refrigerant's 'global warming potential' (GWP) — how much heat a given gas traps relative to carbon dioxide — has become an issue, as it is 1,430 times greater than the gas we already consider a problem. Although far better than R-12 (10,900!), it's not ideal. While various alternative refrigerants were proposed, including carbon dioxide, itself (ultimately unsuitable due to the extreme pressures required), the auto industry and regulators settled on 'R-1234yf' (Tetrafluoropropene), co-developed by Honeywell and DuPont, as it is also ozone friendly and has a GWP rating of less than four. Canadian regulations prohibit R-134a use in new vehicles as of the 2021 model year. General Motors was an early R-1234yf adopter, with the Silverado and GMC Sierra pickup twins switching to the new gas for the 2017 model year. Interestingly, in those models at least, the condenser — it's the component located in front of the vehicle's radiator — is the same, regardless of which refrigerant the truck is designed for. (Although the two gasses are functionally similar, the oils used in the systems to lubricate the compressor are not compatible, and the service fittings are different to prevent the refrigerants being interchanged.) To your original question: for those model years the labour required to replace the condenser is the same and the component itself is the same, so the main differentiator in cost would be the refrigerant; R-1234yf is significantly more expensive than R-134a — roughly two-and-a-half to three times as much, currently. Additionally, because the refrigerant handling equipment for R-1234yf is frequently costlier to buy and maintain, service facilities may factor this into the costs of the recharge as well. The end result is that, unless the cost of the refrigerant drops over time (R-134a did, eventually), the air-conditioning in vehicles using R-1234yf will be more expensive to service and repair than the sum we've become used to over the past 30 years, and a single model year could make a difference of several hundred dollars. Ask a Mechanic is written by Brian Early, a Red Seal-certified Automotive Service Technician. You can send your questions to wheels@ . These answers are for informational purposes only. Please consult a certified mechanic before having any work done to your vehicle.
