Minister Darragh O'Brien hopeful Trump's 30pc tariff will not start trade war
Mr O'Brien said negotiations between the EU and the US have been positive so far. A trade deal is yet to be reached, and the EU had hoped to negotiate a deal including zero-for-zero tariffs on industrial goods.
Asked on RTÉ's This Week if Mr Trump's announcement would spark a trade war, Mr O'Brien said: 'We sincerely hope not.
'I think the Taoiseach has been very clear as well in really setting out that we want respectful dialogue to continue.
'There is still time in this space. The EU and the US enjoy the biggest economic relationship. It's good for both blocs. It's good for the EU, it's good for the US.'
Mr O'Brien said tariffs are 'good for no one', and the EU will now be focused on pressing ahead with negotiations with a view to wrapping up a deal ahead of the 30pc tariff coming into effect on August 1.
'Obviously the statement issued by the US administration and President Trump in particular, is one that leads us to be greatly concerned, no question,' he said.
'But I think my understanding, as the Taoiseach has outlined, is the negotiations heretofore have been carried out in a very respectful way, in a business-like way, and I still believe we need to use the time between now and the first of August to conclude a deal that is good for both the European Union and the United States.'
Uncertainty brought by the threat of US tariffs has not been good for the economy, Mr O'Brien said, particularly relating to new investment in the private sector.
'We don't want to catastrophise the situation either, and this may be a negotiation… We've outlined from the very start, actually during the general election campaign, my party leader and the Taoiseach was very clear to say that obviously any budgets we bring forward are fully mindful of the economic situation at the time,' he said.
ADVERTISEMENT
'But really our focus as a government, between the Taoiseach and Tánaiste and all of my colleagues, is working with our European Union partners to conclude an arrangement that can allow us to continue to trade.
'Look, tariffs are good for no one, and obviously the trading situation that we have right now, prior to the new administration has been advantageous for both.
'It allows US companies access to their biggest market in the European Union, FDI from the United States is very important for us.'
Mr O'Brien added that the Irish people and economy 'were very resilient post-Brexit' despite concerns over the impact of the UK leaving the EU at the time.
'There were many concerns, and rightly outlined at the time, about the impact that would have on businesses, and we managed our way through it, and working together I believe we will manage our way through this also,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
30 minutes ago
- The Irish Sun
Irish presidential race still one-horse show, but from skeletons in closet to €330k pay – here's 6 questions for runners
WHY do so few people seem to want to become President of Ireland? We're expecting an election at some point in October, but so far only have one runner in the race to replace 4 The election to replace Michael D Higgins is expected to occur in October Credit: � 2023 PA Media, All Rights Reserved 4 Our man Adam Higgins shares his six questions for potential candidates Credit: Garrett White - Commissioned by The Sun Dublin 4 Independent TD Catherine Connolly is the only candidate for the election so far Credit: PA:Press Association The President gets the final sign off on new laws passed here, plays an important role in representing However, we haven't got droves of people running for the Presidency yet because of politics. Potential candidates are terrified a long campaign will see their chances unravel as they field questions and their past is poured over. Here, Irish Sun Political Correspondent HOW'S YOUR CÚPLA FOCAIL? The President of Ireland will represent the country across the world and an important part of that will be bringing a little bit of Irish culture with them on their way. Michael D Higgins has a real grá for the Irish language and has done a brilliant job in sprinkling a cúpla focail into his speeches wherever he goes. If we want to keep our language alive, we need those at the very top to lead the way. Candidates may want to sharpen up on their Irish — there's a course in HAVE YOU ANY SKELETONS IN YOUR CLOSET? You might as well come clean from the start. No matter how hard you try, those transgressions from your past will find a way to come out. With the Us reporters will be on the lookout for any sort of scandal to sink out teeth into and it can lead to I'd imagine we might see a few 'tell all' style interviews from candidates who want to air their dirty laundry early. IS THE PRESIDENT PAID TOO MUCH? How much money is too much for one person from the public purse? Especially when they already get free room and board in a beautiful home in the Uachtarán na hÉireann is the second highest-paid head of state in This falls only behind SHOULD OFFICE OF THE PREZ BE FOI-ABLE? As a journalist, I believe the Freedom of Information Act is one of the most important pieces of legislation. This law enables me to demand documents and information from every State agency and department so that we can keep tabs on what is being done with your However, the office of the President is immune to the FoI Act. Through this legislation, I can obtain documents about how much the Taoiseach spent on flights, what the Minister said to the Board of Children's Health Ireland or what developers said in letters to the Housing Minister. But I cannot access documents from the President's office about how much was spent on a garden party. Shouldn't the President be held to the same transparency measures as the Taoiseach, Ministers and other State bodies? JUST HOW WELL DO YOU KNOW CONSTITUTION? Mostly the President must do what the government of the day says when it comes to dissolving the Dail or green lighting new legislation. They can sign off on new bills or refer it to the Michael D Higgins referred a bill on how judges are appointed to the Supreme Court and considered sending the coalition's monster Planning Bill to the courts. Presidents are also supposed to avoid criticising the government of the day or favouring one political party over another during their speeches. President Higgins tested this convention by addressing and sometimes criticising issues such as housing policy, defence and neutrality policies. Will the next President use their voice as much as their predecessor? BLUR OR OASIS? Politics is a serious game but at the end of the day it's also a popularity contest. Candidates have to endear themselves to voters and not every question on the campaign trail can be hard-hitting queries on policy and the Constitution. I would hate to spend the next few months writing countless boring articles that focus solely on candidates' opinions on the constitutionality of the role of the President — and I don't think you would want to read them. Politicians are people too. Therefore, it's important we know a bit more about them. So expect some softer questions from journos that might give a bit of a laugh and also give our talented art desk staff the chance to have a bit of fun while creating mock-ups. And with the Gallagher brothers dominating August with their upcoming series of sell-out shows in Dublin's Have I missed anything? What sort of questions do you readers want to hear our Presidential candidates answer? Get in touch with me and I'll put them to the runners and riders while we're out on the campaign trail! Email 4 Potential candidates will see their chances unravel as they field questions Credit: Sportsfile - Subscription
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on EU climate targets: vital to avoid backsliding
The European Commission finally announced on July 2nd that it would retain the target of a 90 per cent CO2 reduction by 2040 compared to 1990 levels. This is a positive development as there had been fears that there would be backsliding on the headline target amid pushback from some member states. However, the Commission's latest set of proposals included a compromise that has attracted much criticism from environmental campaigners. Following intense lobbying, the commission announced new 'flexibilities' that would help member states reach their obligations. The most controversial of these is the proposal that from 2036, member states can use carbon credits to reach their overall target. Carbon credits is a system whereby countries can invest in carbon offsetting programmes in developing countries and include the reduction for domestic use. Critics of the measure claim that it will divert much needed investment from the EU to the developing world, which will result in member states rolling back on their decarbonisation efforts. It should be noted, however, that as it stands, member states can only use carbon credits for 3 percent of their reduction efforts. While it is a fudge, its overall impact will be limited. The package must to be signed off by all EU member states by September 19th. The Czech Republic, Italy and Hungary, want more compromises on the 90 per cent reduction target. READ MORE Meanwhile, it emerged last week that the Patriots for Europe, a far-right grouping in the European Parliament, will take the lead in the parliament's response to the legislation, which will be deliberated this autumn. This has prompted concerns that there will be further 'flexibilities' before the EU's final package is agreed. Broadly, the argument among sceptical member states and European Parliamentary groupings is that because Donald Trump has dropped America's climate change commitments, on the basis that they were a threat to economic growth, this will undermine the EU's competitiveness. This is an entirely spurious argument. The devastating effects of climate change are becoming more frequent. It is the biggest threat to long term economic growth and prosperity. Any backsliding on commitments now to reduce the CO2 levels will have incalculable future costs. The good news is that the EU is on track to reduce its CO2 emissions by 55 per cent by 2030 and 90 percent by 2040. But there is a significant disparity between member states. Ireland is among the worst performing , as the latest figures from the EPA show that the country is on course for a 23 per cent CO2 reduction by 2030. Just as it is incumbent upon the EU to retain its 90 per cent 2040 reduction target, it is also crucial that each member state, including Ireland, abides by its legally binding commitments.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump tariffs: In the US, ‘the EU' isn't a concept and Ursula von der Leyen is an unknown
There is a saying about new babies. When they sleep, you sleep. For the political commentariat in Washington DC, so it goes with covering the president of the United States . President Donald Trump 's tariff letter, addressed to European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and dated March 11th was posted on his social media account in the early hours of Saturday morning. It arrived at the end of yet another furiously busy week of competing issues, news stories and agendas, all of which revolved around Trump. On Friday, he visited Texas in the aftermath of the appalling flood disaster , which left at least 129 people dead and 170 missing, with Trump trenchantly dismissing questions over the efficiency of the federal response. At the same time, an internal ideological war was brewing over the announcement by attorney general Pam Bondi that the files on Jeffrey Epstein would remain classified. Trump's Maga base has long held as an article as faith that Trump would release the documents, and that their wildest conspiracy theories would be substantiated. Elsewhere, Trump found time to once again pressurise Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell to either cut interest rates or resign. He received Binyamin Netanyahu in the White House on Monday. Sunday marked a year to the day since the assassination attempt as he gave a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. READ MORE So, Trump's resumption of his role as Champion of Tariffs, completed before he flew to his gold club in Bedminster this weekend, generated a muted response from both the US political media and political opponents within the Democratic Party. That is partly because the shock value of Trump's tariff threats has worn off. While the figure mentioned in the strangely-worded series of letters sent to world leaders were alarming – a 30 per cent tariff on all European Union goods and, separately, a threat to impose a 200 per cent tariff on all pharmaceutical imports – the number that was deemed most significant was the August 1st deadline date. Both the markets and those among the public who cared interpreted the letter as a trade-deal extension disguised as a warning letter. The 90-deals-in-90-days boast in the heady aftermath of the original 'Liberation Day' tariff announcements has, to nobody's surprise, not gone smoothly. Trump's pleased observation that the phones 'are ringing off the hook' in the White House, with world leaders desperately trying to make deals, unintentionally acknowledges that his administration cannot cope with the unprecedented task of striking new trade deals with the entire world at the same time. And given the relentless eventfulness of every single day of the Trump White House, August 1st seems like a long way off. The tariff threat against the EU, with a similar hike against Mexico, may or may not materialise. If it does, only then it will become the big talking point in Washington. Only then, when a sharp and sudden rise in the price of European and Mexican imports on American shelves and car sales lots will Democrat politicians see the value in warning the public about what lies ahead. The reply by Ursula von der Leyen achieved limited coverage in the US also. There are several reasons for this, one being that if you stopped 50 people in a random American town or city and asked them who Ursula von der Leyen is, the percentage of correct answers may represent a significant blow to European esteem. 'The EU', as a concept, rarely features in US discourse beyond financial media and business interests. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen. Photograph: Guillaume Horcajuelo/EPA That may change in the weeks and months to come. EU imports to the US were more than $553 billion in 2022, according to figures release from the Office of the US Trade Representative, exceeding more than any other single country. The US imported $454 billion from Mexico in the same year. Both partners provide the US with about a third of their total imports. But for those not directly involved in trading, it's an abstract concept. Von der Leyen did offer a measured warning to Americans in highlighting the guaranteed hurt to 'businesses, consumers and patients on both sides of the Atlantic'. 'At the same time, we are ready to safeguard EU interests on the basis of proportionate countermeasure.' It was a calm retort, echoing that of Mexico's president Claudia Sheinbaum who managed to talk Trump back from the brink during his initial bout of tariff-enthusiasm. 'We believe, based on what our colleagues discussed yesterday, that we will reach an agreement with the United States government and that, of course, we will achieve better conditions,' Sheinbaum told Bloomberg media. There is that hope. But Trump's impatience with the complexity and time span required to reshape global trading patterns is wearing thin. And he is ideologically wedded to his belief in that tariffs can, magically, become an all-win-and-no-pain elixir for the US economy and consumer.
