
Greece introduces new tobacco rules to minimise risks to children
From now on, the sale of tobacco products to minors will carry criminal consequences and it will not be possible for adults to send their children to buy cigarettes, which has been common practice in Greece for decades, Georgiades said in an interview.
"We are making a very strict bill to protect our minors from both alcohol and tobacco," Georgiades said. "The kiosk attendant, to give a packet of cigarettes to someone, must ask for identification and establish that they are an adult – otherwise they are criminally liable".
The rule was set to be published in the Official Gazette of the Government, he said.
The bill will also introduce a cap on the amount of nicotine in tobacco pouches. Checks on these products had revealed that some pouches had 70 grams of nicotine, but the cap will bring that limit down to 16 grams.
"We as a state will do what we have to do, but all conscientious professionals should help us by asking for identification to protect the young generation from this scourge," Georgiades said.
Standstill on EU price increases
For months, 15 members of the European Union have been pushing the European Commission to increase taxes, and therefore prices, on tobacco products.
The goal is to discourage people from buying cigarettes, vapes, and other tobacco products, and to dissuade young people from picking up the habit.
If the plan succeeds, a packet of cigarettes could reach €6 or €7 in Greece.
The Greek government, as well as Italy, Bulgaria, and Romania, have opposed large price increases, stressing that they will negatively affect their economies. They also point out that in places with sharp price increases, cigarette smuggling has flourished.
The decision to raise tobacco prices would requires unanimous agreement from EU member states, and it is not expected to be enacted anytime soon, if at all.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fashion Network
9 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Green claims: confusion surrounds the EU's anti-greenwashing directive
The EU's 'Green Claim' directive is designed to regulate the sustainability claims made by brands and combat greenwashing. But as the parliamentary debate under way since January was about to end, the European Commission has withdrawn its support for the text. Before specifying its position. After U-turns on the duty of vigilance directive and later on the need to display the environmental score on apparel products, the EU's tendency to back down on its green deal has once again been confirmed. This time, it all started on June 18, with a request from the European People's Party (EPP) to drop the so-called 'Green Claim' directive. The directive originally targeted vague marketing expressions such as 'green product', 'biodegradable', 'climate-neutral' and '100% natural', aiming to force brands to demonstrate the veracity of their sustainability claims. The European Council stated its position on it a year ago, and its approval was eagerly awaited by brands, NGOs and industry associations, including European textile industry association Euratex. On Friday June 20, it came as a surprise when a European Commission representative confirmed, following the EPP's request, its 'intention to withdraw its proposals' for defining the terms associated with sustainability. It was enough to stop short the debate on the directive, which had begun in 2023, despite the fact that a final meeting was scheduled for June 23 between the Commission, the Council and the European Parliament. A few hours later, the EU Commission clarified its position, saying it is still willing to push forward the directive, but not if it incorporates provisions for micro-companies, as was the case in the text's last draft. There are 30 million such companies active in Europe. This back and forth is consistent with the simplification drive the European Commission has been pushing since January. A politically motivated drive that notably led to a first package of comprehensive measures being presented in March. Measures which included a watering down of the duty of vigilance directive, and which have enraged NGOs while also not convincing companies and retailers.


Fashion Network
9 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Canali names Stefanos Tsitsipas as its new brand ambassador
Italian luxury brand Canali announced on Monday the appointment of tennis star Stefanos Tsitsipas as its new global brand ambassador. The partnership will see the Greek featured in exclusive editorial content, official appearances, and bespoke campaigns "that explore a new expression of modern elegance," according to a press release. Off court, he will wear the latest Canali creations designed to reflect both the sportsmen and the brand -- "quietly confident, impeccably constructed, and timelessly relevant." 'Stefanos stands for more than performance, he represents values we believe in deeply: dedication, composure, and the constant pursuit of excellence. He brings depth, integrity, and a strong sense of identity — qualities that align naturally with our vision," said Stefano Canali, president and CEO. Known for his strong backhand, the 26-year-old sports star was born into a tennis family -- his mother Julia was a professional on the WTA Tour and his father Apostolos trained as a tennis coach, introducing Tsitsipas to the racquet sport at age three. The professional has been ranked as high as world No. 3 in men's singles by the Association of Tennis Professionals, first achieved in August 2021 – making him the highest-ranked Greek in tennis history.


France 24
9 hours ago
- France 24
Polish supreme court ratifies nationalist's presidential vote win
In the country's highly polarised political landscape, concerns had also been voiced over the legitimacy of the court chamber which will issue the verdict. Karol Nawrocki, backed by the Law and Justice (PiS) party, scored 51 percent of votes to win the June 1 runoff election, according to official results -- a major blow for the pro-EU government of Prime Minister Donald Tusk and LGBTQ rights campaigners. Warsaw mayor Rafal Trzaskowski, the candidate put forward by the government, lost out by 369,000 votes in the country of 38 million people. "All of the circumstances clearly demonstrate that Karol Tadeusz Nawrocki garnered more votes than Rafał Kazimierz Trzaskowski during the second round of the vote," judge Krzysztof Wiak announced after a hearing, also confirming the election result. Prosecutors had alleged that the vote count was falsified in Nawrocki's favour at some polling stations, fuelling calls for a national recount. PiS dismissed doubts about the vote as an attempt to "steal the election". According to the Polish constitution, the Supreme Court had to validate the ballot before the winner could be sworn in at a joint session of parliament -- a ceremony planned for August 6. However, European courts and legal experts have questioned the legitimacy of the Exceptional Supervision and Public Matters Chamber, the Supreme Court body that issued the ruling on Tuesday. The European Court of Human Rights said in 2023 that the Chamber does not fulfil the definition of "an independent and impartial tribunal established by law". Justice Minister Adam Bodnar, who is also the prosecutor general, had asked in vain for all of the chamber's judges to be excluded. Tusk has criticised the chamber, but recognised on Monday that "it is the Supreme Court's responsibility to rule whether an election is valid or not". "It is not possible... for the Supreme Court to be replaced in this matter... by the prosecutor general or the government," the prime minister said. 'Paralyse the Supreme Court' The Supreme Court had received around 56,000 election protests since the second round of voting. Judges have already dismissed, without taking further action, more than 50,000 complaints, many of which were based on protest templates shared on social media. Supreme Court chief justice Malgorzata Manowska criticised the sending of template-based protests as an "operation meant to... paralyse the Supreme Court". Bodnar complained that prosecutors were not given access to all of the 56,000 protests and suggested that the chamber's examination of those could be nothing more than a "facade". Still, the court ordered the results from 13 polling stations to be recounted earlier this month. National prosecutors later said that in some of those polling stations votes were transferred from one candidate to another, mainly in Nawrocki's favour. Government coalition lawmaker Roman Giertych authored one of the protest templates, claiming that votes had been reassigned to Nawrocki and alleging ballot rigging. Giertych and several experts have demanded a national recount and called for the presidential inauguration to be postponed in order to clarify the alleged irregularities. These experts assert that the previous nationalist government and outgoing president Andrzej Duda introduced reforms which have undermined the rule of law in Poland. The reforms have long put Poland at odds with the European Commission, but the victory of a pro-EU coalition in October 2023 parliamentary elections mitigated the conflict. Parliament speaker Szymon Holownia, like other members of the ruling coalition, has so far firmly rejected the idea of postponing the presidential oath ceremony. Independently, Bodnar has ordered a group of prosecutors to examine "irregularities" in the vote counting. © 2025 AFP