No party satisfied with current status of electoral rolls: CEC Gyanesh Kumar amid SIR controversy
CEC Gyanesh Kumar shed light on the marathon meetings conducted with parties as well as political representatives in the past four months and informed that all shared a common opinion that electoral rolls are 'not up to the mark', thereby prompting the poll body to go for a major overhaul.
'During the past 4 months, all 4,123 EROs, all 775 DEOs and all 36 CEOs have held nearly 5,000 meetings with 28,000 political party representatives. ECI has also invited all Recognised political parties for interaction. No one was satisfied with the current status of electoral rolls for one reason or the other,' said Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.
The CEC's disclosures on intensive revision of electoral rolls assume significance as it comes in the wake of vociferous protests by the Opposition parties, as the latter claimed that their charges are being ignored and neglected by the Election Commission.
On Saturday, the CEC said that the poll panel is regularly holding discussions and dialogue with the political parties to address their concerns.
Notably, the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) - a rigorous exercise by the ECI to roll out 'fresh' electoral rolls in Bihar has come under intense scrutiny and criticism from the Opposition parties.
According to EC's guidelines on SIR, about 4.96 crore voters - comprising 60 per cent of the electorate, who were listed in electoral rolls before 2003, don't have to be part of the exercise, which means that they won't have to deposit any supporting documents to establish their date or place of birth.
However, the rest 40 per cent of the population, comprising about Rs 3 crore, will have to provide supporting documents as 'evidence' to establish their date or place of birth.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
38 minutes ago
- News18
Grand Alliance Launches Statewide Protest In Bihar Over Voter List Revision
Last Updated: The agitation targets the ongoing revision of the electoral rolls, which Opposition parties allege is discriminatory and aimed at disenfranchising marginalised communities. As political temperatures rise in Bihar ahead of the upcoming Assembly elections, the Grand Alliance, led by Congress MP and Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi, is staging a major protest in Patna today. The agitation targets the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls, which opposition parties allege is discriminatory and aimed at disenfranchising marginalised communities. Here are 5 key things to know about the protest: Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi is in Patna today to lead a statewide protest against alleged irregularities in the ongoing voter list revision in Bihar. He is scheduled to march from the Income Tax roundabout to the Election Commission office near the Bihar Assembly at 10 am. This marks his seventh visit to the state in the past five months. Protest Over Alleged Bias in Voter Roll Revision The Congress, along with its allies — RJD and Left parties — is staging the 'chakka jam' to oppose what they claim is a biased Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls. They allege the process is designed to suppress the votes of the poor, migrants, and marginalised communities. 'This is a direct attack on the voting rights of the poor," said Bihar Congress chief Rajesh Ram. The voter list revision, launched on June 24 by the Election Commission, mandates submission of any one of 11 ID documents. The opposition fears this could disenfranchise Dalits, Mahadalits, migrant workers, and economically weaker groups. They have called the update drive a 'conspiracy to block votes" in favour of the ruling alliance. Gandhi May Visit Family of Murdered Businessman Sources indicate that Rahul Gandhi may also meet the family of businessman Gopal Khemka, who was shot dead near Gandhi Maidan on July 4. The murder has intensified opposition attacks on the Bihar government over deteriorating law and order. Gandhi's visit is likely to add political weight to the opposition's narrative as the state gears up for a heated electoral season. (With inputs from IANS) view comments First Published: July 09, 2025, 07:55 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Funds released for 12 panchayat buildings
Guntur: Union Minister of State for Rural Development and Communications Dr Pemmasani Chandrasekhar said the state government sanctioned funds for construction of buildings for 12 grama panchayats in Guntur district. He said he requested funds for the construction of buildings for 14 grama panchayats, out of which the state government sanctioned for the construction of 12 panchayats. He further said that the state government sanctioned funds for the construction of buildings for 417 grama panchayats across the state and issued a GO on July 7. He recalled that he had written a letter to the government to sanction funds for 14 grama panchayats in Guntur district on March 16 this year. He said that the state government sanctioned Rs 32 lakh for the construction of buildings for each grama panchayat in the state. He said that responding to his request, the state government sanctioned funds for the construction of buildings for Narakoduru, Kattempudi, VN Palem, Venkata Krishnapuram, Veerlapalem, Morampudi, Donthaluru, Kunchavaram, Somasundarapalem, Bheeminenivaripalem, Timmapuram, and Nagabhairavapalem panchayats. He thanked Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu, deputy chief minister K Pawan Kalyan, Minister for HRD Nara Lokesh, Panchayat Raj Commissioner VR Krishna Teja for sanctioning the funds. He said the move of the government is useful for strengthening the panchayat raj system.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
There can be no equivalence between India and Pakistan on terror
A Brahmos missile — several were fired during Operation Sindoor in response to the gruesome terror attack in Pahalgam — typically costs around Rs 35 crore. For approximately less than half that cost, seven all-party delegations have made as much of an impact. Just like the BrahMos, they were precisely on target. Galvanising global political and social opinion in India's favour at such a time cannot be left to career diplomats alone. The decision to send these delegations is itself a historic step by the government, with the political class across the spectrum rising to the occasion. This step was needed as foreign governments and media, especially from the West, have not grasped the gravity of the challenge of cross-border terrorism faced by India for the last several decades. The West, generally speaking, also has the habit of looking at Pakistan as just another Islamic state, ignoring the history of its origin, its partition in 1971 and its habit of promoting terrorism while playing the victim card. Many consider both India and Pakistan to have legitimate complaints against each other, viewing both as being at fault, in one way or another. While the challenge of tackling misperceptions about India — especially our neighbourhood policy — is daunting, the least we must do is persuade foreign leaders and opinion makers to drop their habit of bracketing India and Pakistan together. It is against this backdrop that one must understand the importance of political leaders from across party lines speaking in one voice and attempting to correct perceptions in major world capitals. Global opinion makers habitually make at least four mistakes: Looking at Pakistan as being forced to secede from India; thinking that India instigated the conflict between West and East Pakistan; equating Islamic nationalism with India's cultural nationalism, and finally disregarding the centrality of the army's role in Pakistan's governance. Why does the global media continue to be shy in calling a spade a spade? Why are terrorists in Jammu and Kashmir referred to as militants? Let's examine the seriousness of these mistakes, as India has been paying a huge price for the ignorance — manufactured ignorance, in some instances — of the global community. First thing first: The global community needs to be told that the creation of Pakistan out of undivided India is not comparable with the case of East Timor or Kosovo. Those who left for Pakistan during Partition were neither persecuted nor did they face any injustice. However, the deep-seated guilt complex of Indian leaders of the time manifested through the policy of Muslim appeasement for several decades post-Partition and lent credence to Pakistan's attempts to present itself as an underdog. This went unchallenged primarily because we failed to make the right noises, backed by data, in opinion-making circles, thereby failing to show how Pakistan shelters and patronises terrorists to ensure its own survival. The second grave mistake of the global community lies in equating the separation of East Pakistan with Pakistan-sponsored secessionism in Jammu and Kashmir. Unlike the government of Pakistan back then, governments in India — regardless of which party is in power — worked to transform J&K into a developed state. They've done this by providing huge welfare support to the people of this border area. It would not be wrong to suggest that the continuation of Article 370 was used by the global community as evidence of India's wrongdoing, that it undermined its claim over this Union Territory. It is high time we make it clear to the global media, academia and intelligentsia that the case of J&K is not comparable to that of Bangladesh and that the JKLF is not the Mukti Bahini. The BJP has made it clear that not just cultural nationalism, but even the idea of a Hindu rashtra, has nothing to do with a theocratic state. Ekam sat, vipra bahudha vadanti is the foundational value of our cultural nationalism, reflected not just in the BJP's worldview but in its governance. Indian culture is all about abhorrence of any monopolistic approach in spiritual matters. Sadly, thanks to many in our own intelligentsia, there are attempts to build a false narrative that eventually allows Pakistan to take shelter under a manufactured whataboutery. Right from the time of its founding, Pakistan has presented itself as a victim. Indian governments of the time, on the other hand, failed to present Pakistan as an aggressor state. Post-Independence, our leadership always shied away from bringing Pakistan's expansionism to the notice of the global community with adequate force. The writer is a national executive committee member of the BJP
