Fetterman hypes Israel's ‘opportunity' against Iran, blasts Dems that have ‘taken side with the regime'
'There's no war crimes. This just was an existential war. You can never rebuild Gaza — would you have to rebuild Gaza — if Hamas is allowed to be in force?' Fetterman (D-Pa.) told 'Real Time With Bill Maher' on Friday.
'I think that's really the truth. And our party, the Democratic Party, has lost that argument, and they've taken side with the regime that doesn't have the kind of values and live the kind of ways that we want here in our country.'
The Keystone State senator has previously groused that the pro-Israel faction of the Democratic Party has 'lost the argument' in elements of his party.
On late Thursday, US time, Israel fired off pre-emptive strikes on Iran, taking out some of the theocratic regime's top scientists, military brass, nuclear facilities and rocket capabilities.
4 Sen. John Fetterman hasn't been shy about speaking his mind on issues regardless of the political consequences.
Youtube/ Real Time with Bill Maher
4 Israel and Iran have exchanged fire following the preemptive strikes on the theocratic regime earlier this week.
AFP via Getty Images
Iran is still widely believed to have retained critical nuclear infrastructure, such as its infamous Fordo site, which is buried deep underground. The regime has also since fired back at Israel, shooting ballistic missiles into the heart of Tel Aviv and elsewhere.
Israel accused Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons — something Iran has denied. The Trump administration had been negotiating a nuclear deal with Iran, with another set of talks expected to take place Sunday, before getting canceled due to the attacks.
'We really have to fully support them taking out Iran at this point. We can't ever allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon,' the Keystone State senator told Bill Maher.
'After Israel was able to destroy the proxies like Hezbollah and Hamas as well too. They have a really, once-in-a-generation opportunity to take the nuclear facilities out.'
4 Iran has proven its ability to overwhelm Israel's missile defense capabilities.
REUTERS
Israel's preemptive attacks against Iran come against the backdrop of the regime's proxy forces in the region taking a massive hit. Israel had launched an explosive pager attack against scores of Hezbollah operatives last year, dramatically weakening the Lebanese terror group.
Its operations in the Gaza Strip have dramatically eroded Hamas' capabilities. Then, late last year, Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa's forces overthrew the Assad regime.
Fetterman ripped into progressive critics of Israel for making incendiary claims about the Jewish state's military campaign in the region.
'I don't believe Israel has occurred [sic] any kind of war crimes. And then I also think we've seen a lot of language has been cheapened as well, too. There was never a genocide,' Fetterman said. 'People are putting Israel to a double standard now.'
Maher, who has a knack for punching at the left despite his liberal politics, has been a fan of Fetterman and even floated him for president.
Fetterman had been a darling of the progressive movement in 2022 when he dispatched Dr. Mehmet Oz during their battle to succeed former Sen. Pat Toomey. He was the only Democrat to flip a Senate seat blue that cycle and made a name for himself with a snappy online campaign while recovering from a stroke.
4 Bill Maher has been a fan of Sen. John Fetterman.
Youtube/ Real Time with Bill Maher
Since then, the progressive flank of his party has soured on him over his support for Israel and, to a lesser extent, his push for bolstered border security.
'Parts of my party just want to turn me into a Colonel Kurtz,' Fetterman quipped. 'That's what happened after Israel and the border, and some of the times I might have to disagree with my party.'
Still, Fetterman underscored that he is still a Democrat and disagrees with many of President Trump's top agenda items, such as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
'I'm never going to be a part of the 40 trillion club, and now that's going to push our debt up to $40 trillion, I mean, it's incredibly dangerous,' Fetterman said, also noting his staunch opposition to Medicaid cuts.
'A lot of the things that have been happening since Trump took the office, a lot of it's professional wrestling,' he quipped. 'But for this, if they pass … the big, beautiful bill, that will change our nation, and that's going to impact, truly impact millions and millions of people.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
9 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Gaza hunger presents Trump with moral test familiar to past presidents
'I mean, some of those kids are -- that's real starvation stuff,' Trump said in Scotland on Monday. 'I see it, and you can't fake it. So we're going to be even more involved.' It was unclear what Trump meant by getting 'more involved.' Days earlier, he had withdrawn his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, from talks between Israel and Hamas in pursuit of a ceasefire to end the war in Gaza. Advertisement But Witkoff will now travel to Israel on Thursday to discuss Gaza, and Israeli news outlets reported that he might even visit a food distribution center in the territory. Witkoff's change of plans comes as aid groups say hunger in Gaza is reaching crisis levels. One United Nations-affiliated group said in a report this week that a 'worst-case' famine scenario is unfolding, and Gaza health officials say that dozens of Palestinians, including children, have died of starvation in recent weeks. Those grim facts have been driven home by gut-wrenching images of skeletal toddlers and people fighting for food. Advertisement Israeli officials reject responsibility for food shortages in Gaza, which they say are exaggerated and caused by Hamas. 'There is no policy of starvation in Gaza, and there is no starvation in Gaza,' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. Hamas 'robs, steals this humanitarian aid and then accuses Israel of not supplying it,' he added. But Hamas denies that, and Israeli military officials privately say they have found no evidence that Hamas systematically steals aid. Such protests have not defused global anger. France announced this week that it would recognize an independent Palestinian state at the United Nations in September, and Britain said it would follow suit if Israel did not agree to a ceasefire with Hamas. And in Washington this week, one of Trump's fiercest Republican allies in Congress, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, condemned Israel's actions in Gaza as 'genocide.' Trump has few good options. The United States supplies Israel, its close partner, with billions in annual military aid. Even if Hamas is the main obstacle to aid delivery, Trump lacks influence over the militant group. His only real hope is to insist that Israel, which controls Gaza's borders, does more to clear roads and protect aid convoys. And a long-term solution may require leveraging American aid to force Netanyahu to accept a ceasefire on terms short of his longtime demands. Stephen Wertheim, a senior fellow in the American Statecraft Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said the quandary is a familiar one for U.S. presidents. 'President Trump's excuse-making over Gaza resonates with a long line of presidents who were pressured to address humanitarian catastrophes,' Wertheim said. Advertisement That pressure comes from a sense of moral duty in the country's DNA, dating as far back as John Winthrop's 1630 'City on a Hill' sermon, in which he told Puritan Massachusetts colonists that 'the eyes of all people are upon us.' As the United States grew in power and wealth, so did its sense of obligation to people in need everywhere. When President Herbert Hoover, a free-market Republican, ordered aid to famine-stricken Soviet Russia in 1921, he declared: 'Whatever their politics, they shall be fed!' Cold War competition for global influence with the Soviet Union reinforced the instinct, on strategic grounds. Many conservatives argue that America is not a charity, and should help people abroad only when it advances the national interest. Trump has made that argument explicit in his 'America first' foreign policy, his deep cuts to foreign aid spending and his dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development. Stephen Pomper, the chief of policy at the International Crisis Group, noted that a president who preaches an 'America first' foreign policy has undermined an international system built over decades to prevent foreign atrocities. The United States, he said, 'looks increasingly like it rejects or is indifferent to the founding principles of the order that it helped create.' Still, the crisis in Gaza has echoes of past humanitarian crises that left presidents wringing their hands over how to respond. President Bill Clinton took office in 1993 as a champion of human rights and international institutions. But when machete-wielding Hutu militias started to slaughter ethnic Tutsi in Rwanda in 1994, he rejected calls for U.S. action. Scarred by the deaths of 18 American soldiers on a peacekeeping mission in Somalia, Clinton feared that even modest steps could escalate dangerously. Unchecked, Hutu killers carried out the genocide of an estimated 800,000 Tutsi. Clinton later said he regretted not doing more to stop it. Advertisement Clinton also hesitated as Serbian forces slaughtered civilians in Bosnia-Herzegovina in the mid-1990s, rebuffing direct pleas from the likes of Elie Wiesel by saying the problem did not warrant risking American lives. The 1995 massacre of 8,000 men and boys at a U.N.-declared 'safe area' in the Bosnian town of Srebrenica finally moved Clinton to act. A U.S.-led bombing campaign against Serbian forces led to a peace deal credited with stabilizing the region. Stopping mass killings in the Darfur region of Sudan in the early 2000s became a campaign for activists and celebrities, including Angelina Jolie and George Clooney. But even after the State Department formally declared the atrocities there a 'genocide' in 2004, President George W. Bush refused calls to deploy U.S. troops to stop it. He cited, among other things, concern about intervening 'in another Muslim country' at the time of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. By the time Barack Obama became president, activists and scholars -- fueled by the American failure in Rwanda -- had developed new legal theories to support cross-border intervention to protect victims of atrocities. Among them was Samantha Power, an influential national security aide to Obama, who helped engineer a 2011 presidential directive on the subject. 'Preventing mass atrocities and genocide is a core national security interest and a core moral responsibility of the United States,' it declared. Obama put that idea into practice in 2011, when he ordered airstrikes in Libya against government forces preparing to crush a rebellion in the city of Benghazi. Obama said he acted to avert 'a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world.' Advertisement But that supposedly limited intervention expanded into a monthslong NATO bombing campaign, and Libya collapsed into violent anarchy, leaving Obama regretting the experience. So when he was pressured again to intervene in Syria's civil war against the country's brutal regime, he rejected pleas for airstrikes from top officials, including Secretary of State John Kerry. Obama did, however, order limited airstrikes in Syria in 2014 against Islamic State group fighters, in part to save thousands of Yazidi people trapped on a mountain in Iraq and at risk of genocidal massacre. 'Earlier this week, one Iraqi cried that there is no one coming to help,' Obama said in an address to the nation. 'Well, today America is coming to help.' Gaza presents Trump with an especially difficult case, as it did for President Joe Biden. Biden faced withering questions about his support for Israel's military campaign, and was shouted down at public events by protesters accusing him of complicity in 'genocide.' But while Biden often harangued Netanyahu to allow more aid into Gaza -- usually with limited and temporary results -- he never risked a full break with the prime minister over the matter. One reason, Biden officials say, was intelligence showing that Hamas responded to signs of a potential split between the United States and Israel by hardening its negotiation position in ceasefire talks. Biden felt enough of a responsibility -- and also perhaps political vulnerability -- that he resorted to dramatic displays of support for hungry Palestinians, sending military planes to airdrop supplies and ordering the construction of a $230 million pier to allow aid delivery by sea. Critics dismissed both measures as made-for-TV substitutes for putting decisive pressure on Netanyahu. Advertisement Ultimately, Wertheim said, America's real problem in Gaza is itself. 'It's not that other parties are engaged in atrocities and the question is whether the United States will use its righteous power to stop,' he said. 'In this case, the issue is that the United States is complicit in Israel's conduct.' This article originally appeared in
Wall Street Journal
11 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump: Canada's Support for Palestinian State Makes Trade Deal 'Very Hard'
President Trump cast doubt on reaching a trade agreement with Canada after Prime Minister Mark Carney's government said it planned to recognize a Palestinian state. "Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine. That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them," President Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. Canada's move is contingent on the Palestinian Authority reforming its governance structure and holding general elections next year in which Hamas plays no role. Go deeper:
CNN
37 minutes ago
- CNN
US support for Israel's actions in Gaza drops, as Democratic opposition grows and MAGA movement splits
Americans' support for Israel's military actions in Gaza is dropping rapidly, prompting pro-Israel Democrats and some of President Donald Trump's long-time allies to warn that the country could permanently damage its standing in the United States. A Gallup poll released this week found that just 32% of US adults support Israel's military actions in Gaza — a record low since the war was launched in response to Hamas' October 7, 2023, terror attack. The poll also found the strongest partisan split yet: Support among those who identify themselves as Republicans remained strong, at 71%. But just 8% of Democrats and 25% of independents say they back Israel's military actions. In perhaps the most ominous long-term sign for backers of Israel, the poll found just 9% support for its actions among those age 18-34 of all political parties. The shift in public opinion has crucial implications for both parties: Some key members of Trump's MAGA movement are vocally questioning whether the United States should keep supporting Israel, while plummeting backing for the country among Democrats will likely impact the party's primaries in key races in 2026 and 2028. The collapse in American support for Israel is part of a global trend. The United Kingdom said this week it would recognize a Palestinian state before the United Nations General Assembly unless Israel takes major steps to end the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The announcement followed France's decision to do so. United Nations agencies are warning that 'time is running out to mount a full-scale humanitarian response' in the besieged Gaza Strip. Data show that more than one in three people (39%) are now going days at a time without eating, the UN's World Food Programme said in a statement Wednesday, adding that over 500,000 people — almost a quarter of Gaza's population — 'are enduring famine-like conditions.' Rep. Brad Sherman, a California Democrat who co-chairs the bipartisan Congressional Israel Allies Caucus, told CNN that Israel is losing the battle for worldwide public opinion. He said Israel's military faces serious challenges in Gaza, where Hamas is willing to incur massive civilian casualties 'to undermine Israel's position in the world,' but said its objectives 'have to be balanced against each other.' 'Israel has to determine, what are its military objectives, and what casualties is it willing to incur to realize that national security includes your image around the world,' Sherman said. 'You can't get everything you want, and your worldwide image is important.' Within the GOP, fissures over Israel's actions came into public view after Trump on Monday disputed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's weekend assertion that there is 'no starvation in Gaza.' 'That's real starvation stuff,' Trump said. 'I see it, and you can't fake that. So, we're going to be even more involved.' Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a prominent figure in Trump's 'Make America Great Again' movement, appeared to become the first Republican in Congress to describe the crisis in Gaza as a 'genocide' with a Monday night social media post. 'It's the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct 7th in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza,' Greene said. Her comment came in a longer post criticizing Florida GOP Rep. Randy Fine, a staunch supporter of Israel. Fine told CNN that 'those who claim that Israel is engaged in genocide are either antisemites or idiots or both.' 'If Israel had wanted to commit a genocide in Gaza, they had the ability to do it. And it would have been done 18 months ago, and it would have been over in two days,' he said. 'Israel has the capability to kill everyone in Gaza, but they haven't. … Hundreds and hundreds of Israeli soldiers have died in order to minimize the deaths of Gaza Arabs.' He argued that Israel should stop putting its own soldiers at risk 'to minimize the deaths of the enemy.' Fine added: 'Israel needs to stop worrying about what the rest of the world thinks and take care of business. Political opinion does not win wars.' While many Republicans still agree with Fine, Steve Bannon, the former Trump chief strategist, said Tuesday on his podcast that there is 'very little support for Israel' within Trump's MAGA movement among those under age 30. 'And now, even people who support Israel are sitting there going, what in the hell's going on here?' Bannon said. Inside the Democratic Party, the issue of support for Israel proved to be a difficult one in 2024 for President Joe Biden and then his replacement atop the ballot, Vice President Kamala Harris, particularly in the battleground state of Michigan. That state, with its large Arab-American population, will host a competitive Senate contest in 2026. And Democrats who hope to run for president in 2028 will surely be pushed on their Israel policies in primaries across the country. Progressive Pennsylvania Rep. Summer Lee, who was one of six members of Congress to support a recent Greene amendment to strip $500 million in funding for Israel's missile defense systems from a defense appropriations bill, said in a statement that, 'The United States has a responsibility to demand a permanent ceasefire, stop funding and supplying the bombs being dropped, and call for unconditional humanitarian aid to enter Gaza immediately. It is good policy, good politics, and the right thing to do.' More establishment figures in liberal media have also sharpened their criticism of Israel in recent days — offering a preview of what could become a significant long-term shift in the party. The former aides to President Barack Obama who host the 'Pod Save America' podcast argued this week that Democratic candidates should stop supporting military aid for Israel. 'There has to be a total mindset change in the Democratic Party,' co-host Tommy Vietor, a former Obama National Security Council staffer, said. 'When the war ends, we are not going back to the pre-October 7 status quo. It's not where the party is. It's not where the world is.' Eric Fingerhut, the president and chief executive officer of the Jewish Federations of North America and a former Ohio Democratic congressman, said the Gallup findings numbers reflect 'overwhelmingly negative media coverage of the war.' 'There's no question that we are in a very partisan moment in America, and that that is an overlay on how people react to the situation in Israel and in the war in Gaza,' Fingerhut said. CNN's Nadeen Ebrahim and Ibrahim Dahman contributed to this report.
