Midsize businesses struggle with high tariff costs
Why it matters: Tariff turmoil is hitting smaller companies especially hard, raising costs they're less able to absorb than the corporate giants.
The big picture: Though it will take some time, higher tariffs will likely slow the economy and raise consumer prices, the survey authors said, even if the headline inflation number reported Wednesday still looks relatively benign.
How it works: The RSM US Middle Market Business Index fell nearly 19 points to 124.5 in the second quarter.
A number above 110 is in expansion, or positive, territory. But this was the biggest drop (outside of the pandemic) over the decade that consulting firm RSM and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have fielded the survey.
"The trade war unleashed real, significant changes in trade policy and at best is going to result in a significant slowing in the U .S. economy," Joe Brusuelas, chief economist with RSM, said on a call Wednesday.
By the numbers: The index is based on a survey of 412 executives at middle market firms, defined roughly as those with revenue between $10 million and $2 billion.
They were asked 20 questions about their businesses, including changes in gross revenue, net earnings and capital spending.
About a quarter of executives reported declines in gross revenue and net earnings. There was also a 20% drop in capital expenditures, or spending on buildings, machinery, long-term projects and more.
Hiring also slowed and executives expressed more economic pessimism.
57% of executives said they had raised prices in the current quarter, and 63% said they intend to do so over the next six months.
The fine print: The survey was conducted in the field from April 7 to April 29, so respondents had lived through both the "Liberation Day" shock and the tariff pause that followed, while absorbing the hikes that did go through.
Effective tariff rates are substantially higher than at any time since 1937, according to the Yale Budget Lab, about 15.6% as of early June.
The intrigue: The deal announced with China on Tuesday doesn't change that number, and that's a particularly rough problem for these companies.
Very large firms have profit margins at around 13%, Brusuelas said, but among midsize businesses the number is in the 5% to 7% range, which isn't sufficient to absorb at 15.6% increase.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
One of Wall Street's biggest bulls sees tech powering an 11% gain in stocks through the rest of 2025
The US stock market looks like it's going to keep powering through to new records, says one of the biggest bulls on Wall Street. Christopher Harvey, the chief US equity strategist at Wells Fargo, predicts that the S&P 500 will reach 7,007 by the end of the year. His forecast — now one of the most optimistic on Wall Street — implies the benchmark index climbing another 11% from its current levels, or a 19% gain for the year. Speaking to Bloomberg about his thesis on Monday, Harvey pointed to a handful of reasons that would keep the market climbing higher: AI boom. Mega-cap tech stocks will likely keep climbing higher, Harvey said. He brushed off concerns that the hype over artificial intelligence resembled the dot-com bubble in the 1990s, noting that many companies today have stronger fundamentals. Large-cap tech and AI stocks have been on a tear since their low in early April, shortly after President Donald Trump announced his Liberation Day tariffs. The Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF is up 41% from its April 8 low. "What we're seeing is the winners continue to win. The uber-cap companies have the higher margins, are gaining more market share. There is a real secular trade in AI that will continue," Harvey said. Strong mergers and acquisition activity. Dealmaking has remained relatively strong on Wall Street, another factor that should support the market, Harvey said. Strategic M&A activity was up 11% year-over-year from January through May, according to an analysis from the consultancy Bain & Company. "We think that M&A will continue to be very, very healthy up and down the capitalization," Harvey added. The US consumer remains strong. Americans keep spending, despite concerns that tariff-related price increases could shut off an important engine of the economy. Consumers ramped up their spending more than expected last month, with retail sales rising 0.6%, according to the US Census Bureau. The Fed is likely to cut interest rates. The central bank looks on track to e ventually lower interest rates despite hesitation stemming from President Donald Trump's tariffs in recent months. Investors are pricing in two or three rate cuts from the Fed by the end of 2025, according to the CME FedWatch tool. Those bullish factors override any concerns investors have over the market, Harvey said, pointing to concerns about the impact of tariffs and Trump's escalating feud with Fed Chair Jerome Powell. Investors are worried that tariffs could raise inflation while hampering economic growth, and that Trump could interfere with the Fed's independence, which could stoke inflation down the line. "We had seen Trump 1.0. We know his style," Harvey said, referring to the belief that the president goes hard on his policies before softening his tone. Harvey was one of the few strategists on Wall Street who stuck to his original S&P 500 target for the year, even during the historic sell-off in April as Trump unveiled his slate of tariffs. Forecasters like Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan lowered their stock forecasts and lifted their recession odds, before reversing once Trump paused most tariffs.
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Well-timed or just lucky? Top Trump officials' stock sales clustered before tariff news
Several top Trump administration officials sold off stock market holdings in the days leading up to the president's announcements of sweeping tariffs that sparked fears of a global trade war and rattled financial markets. Sales by top officials, including Cabinet members, their deputies and senior White House officials were clustered in two 10-day periods leading up to President Donald Trump's major tariff announcements Feb. 13 and April 2, according to a USA TODAY analysis of 20 officials' publicly available transaction forms. Of the stock and stock fund sales administration officials reported between Jan. 20 and April 30, 90% fell within 10 days of the tariff announcements. The Feb. 13 announcement had little immediate impact on the markets, but stock prices plummeted after April 2. The markets have recovered since April 9 when Trump paused the tariffs, and the S&P 500 index was up about 7.5% for the year as of July 21. 'It is concerning and begs the question of whether these public officials knew something that informed their trading,' said Dylan Hedtler-Gaudette, acting vice president of policy and government affairs at the Project on Government Oversight, a nonpartisan government watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. 'We don't know whether they used any private knowledge to benefit. That would require at least some Justice Department inquiry.' Trades complied with ethics rules and did not rely on nonpublic information, according to spokespeople for several of those in the analysis. Others did not respond to USA TODAY's requests for comment. 'Insinuating this was anything other than an ethically fully compliant transaction required for government service is dishonest and demonstrates a lack of understanding of both how markets and our ethics laws work," said Katie Martin, a spokeswoman for the Department of the Interior, defending trades reported by Interior Secretary Doug Burgum. Burgum and several other officials faced deadlines to divest their holdings to serve in the Trump administration, and USA TODAY found no evidence any of these trades were made based on nonpublic information. Such a connection is hard to prove, ethics experts say, but they recommend officials avoid even the appearance of impropriety. On Feb. 13, Trump announced plans to impose tariffs on countries worldwide. Then on April 2, which Trump dubbed 'Liberation Day,' he unveiled specific tariff figures on countries across the globe, triggering a broader market sell-off and raising fears of a recession. The early February spike in sales was in part driven by divestments by Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and Burgum. The late March flurry included sales by Troy Edgar, deputy secretary at the Department of Homeland Security; Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth; and Keith Sonderling, deputy secretary at the Department of Labor. USA TODAY reported that White House Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino sold up to $5 million in Trump Media stock the day before the Liberation Day announcement, and Attorney General Pam Bondi sold a similar stake on the day of the announcement, which came after markets closed. A handful of sales before Trump's tariff announcements also came from Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner, as well as White House Counsel David Warrington and Sergio Gor, director of the Office of Presidential Personnel. 'Hard to prove' Spokespeople for Duffy, Burgum, Edgar, Kennedy, Bondi, Warrington and Sonderling responded to questions by saying the divestments had nothing to do with the tariff announcements. Hegseth did not respond to USA TODAY's request for comment. After ProPublica first reported on Bondi's April 2 sale, Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Maryland Democrat, sent a letter to the Justice Department inspector general urging an investigation into whether Bondi or other DOJ officials 'engaged in illegal insider trading.' 'This stock sale had been in the works since Attorney General Bondi's nomination process in constant consultation with the Department of Justice's Ethics Department" and the U.S. Office of Government Ethics, DOJ spokesman Gates McGavick said in a written statement to USA TODAY. 'Any implication that it was somehow tied to tariffs is an outright lie.' Duffy's stock transactions were made through an independently managed retirement account, according to an unsigned statement from the Transportation Department press office, and he 'had no input on the timing of the sales.' Edgar's sales had nothing to do with Liberation Day, said Tricia McLaughlin, a Homeland Security spokeswoman. By reporting on 33 stock sales by Deputy Secretary Sonderling just days before the April 2 announcement, USA TODAY is 'creating a fictitious narrative to generate clickbait,' said Courtney Parella, a Labor Department spokesperson. Not all of the disclosure forms USA TODAY reviewed showed stock or stock fund sales before Trump's tariff announcements. Transactions by Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and Deputy Counsel to the President Gineen Bresso fell outside those time periods. Education Secretary Linda McMahon offloaded bonds worth millions, but not stocks. 'Good questions to ask' The USA TODAY analysis focused on 250 sales of stocks, stock funds and cryptocurrencies disclosed in publicly available transaction forms filed with the U.S. Office of Government Ethics. It doesn't include all Cabinet members or White House officials, but only those whose disclosures were published on the ethics office website as of July 15. The findings show an increase in divestment activity in the 10 days ahead of the February news event, followed by a sharper spike in a similar period before Liberation Day. Together, these sales accounted for about 90% of transactions reported between Inauguration Day and April 30. Specifically, about 60% of the disclosed sales came in the 10-day window ending April 2, with a dollar value ranging from $2.7 million to $13 million. The sales outside these periods represented between $1.9 million and $7 million. Government ethics watchdogs say the findings are 'striking' as well as 'concerning.' 'It is hard to prove an insider trading case because it is not like there is a video showing impropriety,' said Hedtler-Gaudette. 'You have to be extremely sloppy and stupid to get caught.' Trump's trade agenda was a consistent theme throughout his campaign, and he promised to impose tariffs in his inaugural address for the second term. The Feb. 13 announcement had little immediate impact on the markets. But after April 2, when the president unveiled specific tariff figures, the stock market lost almost $10 trillion in value, with the S&P 500 plummeting 12% through April 9, when Trump hit a pause on tariffs. 'Looks like there was a lot of activity between March 15 and April 2. That is very concerning,' said Virginia Canter, chief counsel for oversight and anti-corruption at State Democracy Defenders Action, a nonprofit group that says it opposes autocracy. 'It could be a coincidence, too.' Officials cashing out just before the Liberation Day announcement should raise some eyebrows, she said. 'Why didn't they divest sooner? Were they in possession of nonpublic information? These are all good questions to ask. They are fair questions to ask,' said Canter, a White House associate counsel to presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton. How does the ethics office work? Government officials and members of Congress are required to publicly disclose their stock trades under the 2012 STOCK Act, which is designed to prevent officials from profiting from nonpublic information they learn by virtue of their positions. They are not prohibited from trading based on public information. An Office of Government Ethics spokesman, Patrick Shepherd, declined to comment on whether the agency reviews the timing of transactions. Officials who go through Senate confirmation sign an ethics agreement with the office. The agreement, which takes effect upon confirmation, also may require the official to divest from holdings if the companies in question are likely to have business before the agency. Upon confirmation, officials have 90 days to divest and come into compliance. A few chose to sell on the final day of the 90-day window or within the first week of taking office, while a significant number completed their divestments around major news events originating from the White House. For example, Gabbard and Bondi were required to divest stocks under their ethics agreements. Gabbard sold holdings in Apple, Tesla and cryptocurrencies on the final day of her divestment window, and Bondi sold her Trump Media stake on Liberation Day, just before the public tariff announcement. Unlike Senate-confirmed officials, White House officials are not required to sign agreements with the ethics office, but they are still obligated to report any financial transactions during their time in office. White House ethics officials typically work to ensure that staff avoid conflicts of interest, but the extent of that consultation − and any divestiture requirements − is less transparent than for Senate-confirmed officials, who sign publicly available ethics agreements outlining their divestment obligations. Of the 20 officials included in USA TODAY's analysis, six who serve in White House roles were not subject to the same ethics office requirements. The remaining were Senate-confirmed jobs and signed ethics agreements requiring them to divest certain holdings within 90 days of confirmation. Once officials have entered into an ethics agreement, Canter said, 'they will argue they were following their obligations to divest.' But, she said, the difficult question of whether these trades were strategically placed or merely lucky timing still needs to be addressed. To that end, Canter said, ethics officials should interview these officials. Still, it may require an investigation by the Justice Department or the Securities and Exchange Commission to reach a conclusion, she said. 'You look at the facts and circumstances,' she said. "You might ask: Why did they sell before the president announced tariffs? Maybe they were caught unaware or didn't know what was coming. They'd need to be interviewed and, if necessary, conduct an investigation.' White House Counsel David Warrington sold three stocks on March 25: NVIDIA, Amazon and Berkshire Hathaway. 'The timing of white House counsel trades is concerning by virtue of them being in the White House,' Canter said. Warrington did nothing wrong, said Taylor Rogers, a White House spokeswoman. 'White House senior staff, including Dave Warrington, fully comply with the executive branch ethics rules,' Rogers said, 'attending required ethics briefings and complying with conflict of interest and financial reporting obligations.' Separately, the nonprofit news agency ProPublica in May identified more than a dozen White House officials and congressional aides who appeared to have timed their stock trades before widespread stock market sell-offs triggered by White House announcements. 'Strong, clear rules' needed Though members of Congress have occasionally faced public scrutiny over well-timed stock trades, similar activity by executive branch officials has received far less attention. At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, several lawmakers sold off millions of dollars in stocks just before the market crashed. These moves triggered a Justice Department inquiry at the time as the lawmakers had been briefed on the severity of the virus, information that was not yet fully public, and were accused of offloading stocks even as they publicly downplayed the threat. Online bots now monitor the portfolios of high-profile lawmakers. The "Nancy Pelosi Stock Tracker" closely follows the California Democrat's trades. Questions have been raised about the timing of her transactions and the impressive returns of her portfolio, especially when it outpaces the broader market. 'Strong, clear rules that apply to everyone is the only way to avoid this kind of thing,' said Hedtler-Gaudette of the Project on Government Oversight. It is not the sales that captured lawmakers' attention but the purchases made April 9, when Trump paused tariffs. Just before the pause that sent markets soaring, unknown traders placed multimillion-dollar bets on a rebound, Reuters reported. Some Democratic lawmakers called for an investigation into possible market manipulation or insider trading, though experts told Reuters there's no way to determine whether the moves were strategic or coincidental.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Veteran technician drops perfect metaphor, forecast for this market
Veteran technician drops perfect metaphor, forecast for this market originally appeared on TheStreet. Investors have struggled to ride the proverbial 'wall of worry' to record highs on the stock market. Buffeted by the volatility that followed President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff announcement – and with continuing uncertainty about tax levies on imports – investors have been fighting a case of the nerves, struggling to trust the rally even as the numbers say they should. 💵💰 💵💰 As the Standard & Poor's 500 reached a record high closing level July 17 and the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite registered its tenth record close of the year, the American Association of Individual Investors was reporting increasing pessimism among individual investors about the short-term outlook for equities. Optimism and neutral sentiment, meanwhile, waned. In these conditions, longtime market observers have struggled to find a parallel to today's market. They can point to the 1970s as a time of high inflation and interest rates, but the economic underpinnings were much different while there is plenty of mention of the last time the U.S. set import levies this high, those days of the Smoot-Hawley Tariffs were about a century ago, and no investor alive today recollects the market sentiment as the Roaring 20s came to a halt. Without being able to draw on a true market parallel, investors are flailing, unsatisfied with analogies and metaphors that have fallen short amid whipsaw headline risks. Amid that uncertainty, a veteran technical analyst's forecast for market results this year hasn't wavered or changed, even in the face of the April headlines and correction. He has seen his prediction not only hold up, but also deliver a flawless metaphor for the market's action in the first half of 2025. The market's action in 2025 defines 'clear-air turbulence' Mariner Wealth Advisors Chief Investment Strategist Jeff Krumpelman entered 2025 with a forecast of the Standard & Poor's 500 ending the year at or near $6,600, and with a theme that investors would live through 'clear-air turbulence.' Clear-air turbulence is an aviation term, and while Krumpelman is neither a pilot nor an aviator, he said on the Money Life with Chuck Jaffe podcast that 'it perfectly describes what's happened this year.' The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) defines clear-air turbulence as sudden and severe air disturbances occurring in cloudless skies or between and among non-threatening cloud patterns that result in violent buffeting of aircraft. It is a higher-altitude phenomenon – typically occurring above 15,000 feet – that can drop a plane hundreds of feet in seconds. More on investing: The stock market is being led by a new group of winners Opendoor stock is another AMC or GameStop Warren Buffet has harsh words for stock market investors Sometimes called 'air pockets,' these bumps are hard to avoid because they are not visible in clear-air conditions. Krumpelman said that for all of the anxiety over the headlines, the economy is showing 'clear blue sky hard-data fundamentals.' 'And yet, you've got policy concerns and speculation about it that have caused us to hit these air pockets,' Krumpelman said. 'Through good pilot navigation and communication, you climb back to your original altitude and you get to your destination, you get your decent returns, but boy are you white-knuckled and you kiss the ground when you get there.' The stock market was struggling against headwinds after peaking in mid-February, but it hit an air pocket with Liberation Day on April 2, losing more than 12% of its value in six trading days. The path to S&P 6,600 by year's end Krumpelman says that while market reactions to subsequent tariff announcements have become increasingly muted, he sees more turbulence ahead, even as the market has recaptured record-breaking levels and is poised for more. Krumpelman says that the clear-air turbulence theme helped him and Mariner – which managed roughly $250 billion in assets – stay the course on the forecast with which they entered the year. He noted that a majority of financial firms 'have changed their price targets and their odds of recession time and again. They were bullish going into the year. They turned bearish around April. Then they turned bullish again….It can actually cause wealth destruction. It can cause premature selling activity, and it's just not helpful.'We've had a consistent message. It's been psychology and psychiatry that has caused [price/earnings ratios] to go from 22 to 18 back to 22,' he added. 'P/E volatility is self-correcting if the data remains solid. And I'm not going to sit here and tell you that absolutely, we know with 100% certainty that this data is going to continue to trend in a positive direction but…the data is solid.' When the market sells against solid market data, Krumpelman says he sits tight. He has held his ground on 6,600 based on an assumed price/earnings level that he considers reasonable. 'And if everything is moving forward and it looks like earnings are going to continue to progress, margins are going to hold up, interest rates are going to stay at reasonable levels, we'll have a higher earnings figure 12 months from now,' Krumpelman said on the July 18 edition of Money Life. 'And we could be above 7,000 12 months forward.' Krumpelman noted that the firm is always looking one year out and puts a 60 to 65% probability on the 6,600-7,000 range within 12 months, with a 30% chance that 'the market goes nowhere.' Krumpelman said this would happen with 'continued, changing mixed news on tariffs that do drive inflation up just a little bit, that do slow things down, that have lingering impacts on CEO confidence, [making for] earnings that are just a little bit lighter than anticipated, and P/Es a little bit lighter. That takes us to nowhere over the next 12 months.' Krumpelman noted that what is not in the forecast for the next 12 months is a recession, because 'it's just not in the data.'Veteran technician drops perfect metaphor, forecast for this market first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 22, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 22, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio
