
Trump is quietly changing the Fed, even without firing Powell
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent last week made it clear that the Trump administration intends to shake up the Federal Reserve — just as it has done with the rest of the federal government.
Change at the central bank will accelerate once Chair Jerome Powell steps aside at the end of his term in May 2026 — or earlier if he resigns or Trump manages to fire him. Those changes include the rules that impact the largest US banks, which are already being reviewed, and on the Fed's workforce of tens of thousands across the country.
'What we need to do is examine the entire Federal Reserve institution and whether they have been successful,' Bessent told CNBC on July 21. 'All these PhDs over there, I don't know what they do.'
'This is like universal basic income for academic economists,' he said.
In June, Trump began to etch the legacy of his second term on the Fed by elevating Michelle Bowman to lead banking regulation as a vice chair on the central bank's Board of Governors. She had been a member of the board since 2018.
A cornerstone of Trump's economic agenda is to slash regulations, and Bowman is widely expected to deliver on that goal when it comes to the banking industry. She has already begun to do exactly that: The Fed is in the process of revisiting and easing a raft of banking rules that came about in the aftermath of the global financial crisis of 2008.
For example, the Fed last month — after Bowman assumed her new role — proposed an overhaul of how much buffer global banks must have against their total leverage, or assets that carry some risk, such as loans and Treasury holdings. The board approved the proposal in late June.
The nation's largest banks cheered the decision, arguing that it will allow them to lend more to businesses and consumers. But critics say the overhaul 'puts our banking system at risk by weakening capital of the largest banking organizations,' Fed Governor Michael Barr, who led banking regulation before Bowman, said after the proposal was approved.
Reconfiguring banking rules was the focus of a day-long conference Bowman spearheaded last week at the Fed's headquarters in Washington, DC. By the end of the event, one thing was clear: The banking industry wants simpler regulation, and the Fed is now poised to deliver with Bowman in a key leadership role.
'Thirty-five years ago, the capital rules were simple and weak, and today they are complex and strong,' Mike Mayo, a Wells Fargo research analyst, said at a panel discussion at the event. 'Let's make them simpler and strong.'
The Fed is already moving to trim headcount, but Trump officials have suggested that won't be enough.
In May, Powell sent a memo to the central bank's roughly 24,000 employees announcing plans to reduce its workforce by 10% in the coming years, citing 'government-wide efforts to improve efficiency.' Fed employees are employed at regional banks across the country, with about 3,000 based in Washington, DC.
Powell's announcement came after various government institutions went through staffing overhauls by the Trump administration this year.
But recent comments suggest the White House is looking for even more cuts to the Fed. Bessent has called for a more aggressive downsizing and Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor seen as a potential choice to succeed Powell, told Fox Business in a July 7 interview that there's 'plenty of deadwood' at the central bank.
Since mid-2022, the Fed has operated at a loss of more than $220 billion because it raised interest rates aggressively to tamp down high inflation, raising the interest costs tied to the debt holdings on its portfolio. Bessent frequently points to those losses in his criticism of the Fed.
The Trump administration's criticism of the Fed's $2.5 billion renovation project — which the president seems to have backed off from after his Thursday tour — is also indicative that administration officials view the central bank as an excessive spender.
Conducting mass layoffs at the Fed, however, may not be so simple, according to Bill English, a former senior Fed adviser.
'The chair has the authority to dismiss senior staff at the board, but to do a broader downsizing of the institution would require a vote of the board,' English told CNN. 'The new chair may want to do that, but it's hard to say how seriously the other board members would want to change the institution.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump, Carney to speak soon, Canadian official says
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney will likely talk "over the next number of days" after the U.S. imposed a 35% tariff on goods not covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement, a Canadian official said on Sunday. Dominic LeBlanc, the federal cabinet minister in charge of U.S.-Canada trade, told CBS News' "Face the Nation" that he believes there is an option of striking a deal that will bring down tariffs. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Women call the shots across the supply chain at tequila brand 1953
Listen and subscribe to The Big Idea on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you find your favorite podcasts. When Shivam Mallick Shah and Lindsey Davis Stover founded the tequila brand 1953, they wanted to make moves in an industry that was becoming increasingly popular among their own demographic while also opening doors for other women. As the brand proudly states on its website, 1953 is "Founded, Farmed, Distilled, and Led by Women." On Yahoo Finance's The Big Idea podcast, the two entrepreneurs shared how they managed to pull off such a feat in a historically male-dominated industry. (Watch the full episode above; listen-only below.) "I just kind of got down this rabbit hole of where the women in tequila are, unfortunately, really hard to find. So that kind of led us to this idea," Davis Stover, a Texas native, said on the podcast. "We were drinking tequila. Every woman we knew is drinking tequila," she continued. "So we wanted to create a company that was founded, farmed, distilled, and led by women at every single level. Even our name, 1953, is the year women earned the right to vote in Mexico. I think that is just the essence of our company and providing opportunities for women." This embedded content is not available in your region. "People didn't think it was necessary to have a female-led supply chain," Shah said. "They didn't think that it would make a difference in the quality of the product, and they didn't think that, frankly, we could do it. They had a lot of strong opinions on what we could do, and it was different than what we wanted to do." Shah and Davis Stover tackled their mission by completing their search in an "organic way," talking with people who worked at distilleries and farms in Mexico. Eventually, they found Carmen and Adriana, who ran the family-owned distillery that 1953 would eventually use. "Their family has owned this distillery for over a hundred years, and they have trained a female master distiller, Rocio Rodriguez, who signs every bottle," Shah explained. "She had this incredible story of having come to this distillery when she was pregnant. She was trained as a chemical engineer, but she was worried about losing her job. Carmen and Adriana's families decided to build a nursery so she could come to work and bring her whole self, which has, of course, changed her life, but it changed so many people's lives." Though their journey to creating a brand with a strong female focus had its roadblocks, the biggest hurdle was finding a woman-owned agave farm. Traditionally, agave farms in Mexico are passed down from father to son, but Carmen and Adriana helped the entrepreneurs find the farm they partner with today. "We could not find an agave farm owned by women," Shah said. "Carmen and Adriana helped us find a gentleman who only had four daughters. We met with them, and we talked about what we were trying to build. We asked him if he would consider passing his farm down to his daughters if we guaranteed purchase of agave from their farms for 1953." After a family meeting in which the four women discussed the proposition with their husbands and father, they ultimately agreed, deciding to take on the responsibility and risk to help complete 1953's women-led supply chain. "They had grown up on this farm, and they knew it like the back of their hand, but they never saw themselves as CEOs. They never saw themselves as the people in charge of running the farm," Shah explained. "What made them think differently was the high school down the street and all the girls who were in that high school, just like they used to be, and wanting to let those girls know that there was nothing they couldn't do. ... It was a motivation we all shared, and we knew we had an alignment of our values, which told us we were in the right place. And that really completed our supply chain." Every Thursday, Elizabeth Gore discusses real-life stories and smart strategies for launching a small business on The Big Idea podcast. You can find more episodes on our video hub or watch on your preferred streaming service. Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rail customers urge regulators to block Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern deal, FT reports
(Reuters) -U.S. railroad customer groups have demanded regulators block or put onerous conditions on the proposed merger of Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern, the Financial Times reported on Sunday. Seven associations of shippers have expressed concern the planned deal would significantly increase the power of the merged railroad to raise prices or reduce service standards, the report said. Last month, Union Pacific said it would buy smaller rival Norfolk Southern in an $85 billion deal to create the first U.S. coast-to-coast freight rail operator and reshape the movement of goods from grains to autos across the country. The two railroads are expected to have a combined enterprise value of $250 billion and would unlock about $2.75 billion in annualized synergies, the companies said. Reuters could not immediately verify the FT report. Norfolk Southern and Union Pacific did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment. Previously, the transportation division of SMART, the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, said it plans to oppose the merger when it comes before the Surface Transportation Board for review. Major railroad unions have long opposed consolidation, arguing such mergers threaten jobs and risk disrupting rail service. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer also criticized the merger saying the deal would push "us even further down the road of dangerous consolidation and monopoly power ... This is a hostile takeover of America's infrastructure."