Revamped deal spells out iwi role in resource consenting
Cr Birchfield has argued that the intention was to consult the rūnanga on matters important to them, rather than require their approval for every resource consent, which he claims is happening now.
The original agreement says the council will process resource consents in a way that appropriately recognises the effects of activities on Poutini Ngāi Tahu.
The revised clause goes further.
'The parties agree that to ensure timely, efficient and cost-effective resource consent processing, applicants and planners must both recognise and provide for the rights, interests and values of Poutini Ngāi Tahu as manawhenua.'
That is consistent with the principles of the Resource Management Act (RMA), the draft says.
'As such, the council will treat Poutini Ngāi Tahu as an affected party for all applications for resource consent where there is potential for adverse cultural effects, unless it is demonstrated otherwise.'
A new clause, added to the agreement, states that the Council will strongly encourage consent applicants to consult the rūnanga early on, through their environmental entities, Poutini Environmental or Pokeka Poutini Ngāi Tahu.
'Where consultation has not occurred, and a written approval letter has not been supplied, the Council will need to consider limited notification ... to Poutini Ngāi Tahu which can result in increased processing time and costs for applicants."
The draft also spells out how the Council will support monitoring by manawhenua.
'Achieving a culturally relevant monitoring programme will require dedicated and consistent resourcing for Pokeka Poutini Ngāi Tahu Limited ... a specific funding agreement dedicated to environmental cultural monitoring will be needed before this programme can commence."
WCRC chief executive Darryl Lew said last month the agreement and its protocol document, Paetae Kotahitanga ki Te Tai Poutini, were still fit for purpose and needed only minor changes.
Because the council had been through some turbulent times with changes of leadership, key pieces of work had not been done including its practical implementation and the five year review was the opportunity to do that, he said.
Cr Birchfield has argued that the agreement effectively gives iwi a sign-off right that was not intended by the RMA and has added to the delays and costs of obtaining resource consents on the West Coast.
In a supplied statement he said the changes were far from minor.
'The role of Ngāi Tahu is strengthened to having, effectively, the same functions and powers as local government in certain areas.'
However, Ngāi Tahu was not accountable to West Coasters in the same way as local government was, Mr Birchfield said.
A particular issue in the agreement was the use of the term, "joint planning' which elevated Ngāi Tahu to the same level as the council, Mr Birchfield said.
The changed proposal moved the region towards co-governance, and if Ngāi Tahu were to have a greater role in regional government, West Coast electors should be consulted on the changes by way of a referendum, Cr Birchfield said.
The Regional Council says the changed wording in the agreement confers no additional powers on Ngāi Tahu but clarifies the existing rights of manawhenua under the RMA and the Treaty of Waitangi, and operational processes for council staff.
During a meeting in May, Ngāti Waewae representative Francois Tumahai defended the iwi's current role in resource consenting.
[www.teaonews.co.nz/2025/05/08/iwi-defends-role-in-west-coast-consent-process/]
Tumahai said the rūnanga were required to give feedback on consent conditions.
'The decision is still made by the consents team on council. We don't make a decision on it,'
The new document with the changes outlined, is available on the WCRC website in the agenda for today's council meeting.
The Council this morning agreed to hold some clauses over for further advice and clarity, and the meeting continues this afternoon.
- By Lois Williams, Local Democracy Reporter
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
16 hours ago
- Scoop
Prabha Ravi For Mayor Of Lower Hutt
LOWER HUTT — Independent Mayoral candidate Prabha Ravi officially launched her campaign for Mayor of Lower Hutt last Friday 27 June, unveiling her vision for the city to a hall of dozens of enthusiastic supporters and community leaders at the Lower Hutt Events Centre. In a powerful speech, Ravi laid out her platform of 'smarter with your money; stronger for our community,' positioning herself as a fiercely independent leader with the governance experience to tackle the city's biggest challenges. 'Our city is at a crossroads,' Prabha told the audience. 'Rates are rising fast, but core services are struggling. This is not just a budget problem; it's a leadership problem. That's why I'm standing for Mayor, because I believe we can do better, and I have the experience to make it happen.' Drawing on her nearly 30 years as a Lower Hutt resident, business owner, and community advocate, Ravi shared her personal journey from arriving in New Zealand in 1999 to building a life and a renowned dance school in the city. She positioned her lived experience as a "bridge-builder" between cultures as a unique strength she would bring to the mayoralty. 'I'm not a career politician. I don't answer to any political party. I answer to you,' she stated, emphasising her independence. Ravi's speech outlined three core priorities: Value for Money: She committed to commissioning an immediate financial review of the Council and introducing a "Ratepayer Value Charter" to ensure spending is focused on outcomes. 'Every dollar must work harder for the families who pay it,' she said. Infrastructure That Works: She pledged to prioritise investment in basics like roads and water systems, while advocating for more frequent and affordable public transport. Inclusive, Connected Communities: Ravi promised to invest in libraries, parks, and community spaces, and to launch initiatives like 'Community Connect' to fund grassroots projects and elevate underrepresented voices. The event served as a key fundraiser for the campaign and marked the official start of Ravi's bid for the city's leadership ahead of the local body elections. About Prabha Ravi Prabha Ravi is a Justice of the Peace and management consultant with over 20 years of governance experience across the health, education, arts, and community sectors. She is the founder of the Natraj School of Dance and a recipient of the Queen's Service Medal (QSM) for her services to ethnic communities and dance. Biographical Snapshot Prabha Ravi – Independent Candidate for Mayor of Lower Hutt Justice of the Peace (JP) Queen's Service Medal recipient (2017) – for services to ethnic communities and dance Founder & Artistic Director, Natraj School of Dance (est. 1999, Lower Hutt) Principal Consultant, Grow Consultancy Former Chair, Hutt Valley DHB Consumer Council Board Member: Arohanui Strings, Hutt Radio and Archives Charitable Trust, Hutt Sister City Foundation Member: Hutt City Council Community Panel – Central Ward (two terms) Governance roles with: Volleyball NZ, Baseball NZ, Play Aotearoa, BATS Theatre, Arts Wellington Senior leadership roles at Education NZ, Toi Whakaari, YMCA Central, WelTec, and more Finalist, Wellingtonian of the Year (Education, 2016) Mayoral Civic Honour Award, Hutt City (2011) Special Commendation, Indian Newslink Business Awards
Scoop
16 hours ago
- Scoop
Revamped Agreement Spells Out Iwi Role In Resource Consenting
West Coast Regional Councillors are voting today on an updated version of their historic agreement with iwi to work together for the benefit of the Coast. The Mana Whakahono a Rohe document is recognised under the Resource Management Act and spells out how the council will collaborate with the region's two rūnanga, Ngati Waewae and Makaawhio on issues including wastewater, drinking water, planning and flood protection. The revised version clarifies and strengthens the role of manawhenua in resource consenting and has drawn objections from the council's former chair Cr Allan Birchfield who first signed the document in 2020. Cr Birchfield has argued that the intention was to consult the rūnanga on matters important to them, rather than require their approval for every resource consent, which he claims is happening now. The original agreement says the council will process resource consents in a way that appropriately recognises the effects of activities on Poutini Ngāi Tahu. The revised clause goes further. 'The parties agree that to ensure timely, efficient and cost-effective resource consent processing, applicants and planners must both recognise and provide for the rights, interests and values of Poutini Ngāi Tahu as manawhenua.' That is consistent with the principles of the Resource Management Act (RMA), the draft says. 'As such, the council will treat Poutini Ngāi Tahu as an affected party for all applications for resource consent where there is potential for adverse cultural effects, unless it is demonstrated otherwise.' A new clause, added to the agreement, states that the Council will strongly encourage consent applicants to consult the rūnanga early on, through their environmental entities, Poutini Environmental or Pokeka Poutini Ngāi Tahu. 'Where consultation has not occurred, and a written approval letter has not been supplied, the Council will need to consider limited notification ... to Poutini Ngāi Tahu which can result in increased processing time and costs for applicants." The draft also spells out how the Council will support monitoring by manawhenua. 'Achieving a culturally relevant monitoring programme will require dedicated and consistent resourcing for Pokeka Poutini Ngāi Tahu Limited ... a specific funding agreement dedicated to environmental cultural monitoring will be needed before this programme can commence." WCRC chief executive Darryl Lew said last month the agreement and its protocol document, Paetae Kotahitanga ki Te Tai Poutini, were still fit for purpose and needed only minor changes. Because the council had been through some turbulent times with changes of leadership, key pieces of work had not been done including its practical implementation and the five year review was the opportunity to do that, he said. Cr Birchfield has argued that the agreement effectively gives iwi a sign-off right that was not intended by the RMA and has added to the delays and costs of obtaining resource consents on the West Coast. In a supplied statement he said the changes were far from minor. 'The role of Ngāi Tahu is strengthened to having, effectively, the same functions and powers as local government in certain areas.' However, Ngāi Tahu was not accountable to West Coasters in the same way as local government was, Mr Birchfield said. A particular issue in the agreement was the use of the term, "joint planning' which elevated Ngāi Tahu to the same level as the council, Mr Birchfield said. The changed proposal moved the region towards co-governance, and if Ngāi Tahu were to have a greater role in regional government, West Coast electors should be consulted on the changes by way of a referendum, Cr Birchfield said. The Regional Council says the changed wording in the agreement confers no additional powers on Ngāi Tahu but clarifies the existing rights of manawhenua under the RMA and the Treaty of Waitangi, and operational processes for council staff. During a meeting in May, Ngāti Waewae representative Francois Tumahai defended the iwi's current role in resource consenting. Tumahai said the rūnanga were required to give feedback on consent conditions. 'The decision is still made by the consents team on council. We don't make a decision on it,' The new document with the changes outlined, is available on the WCRC website in the agenda for today's council meeting. The Council this morning agreed to hold some clauses over for further advice and clarity, and the meeting continues this afternoon.
Otago Daily Times
20 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Revamped deal spells out iwi role in resource consenting
The revised version clarifies and strengthens the role of manawhenua in resource consenting and has drawn objections from the council's former chair Cr Allan Birchfield who first signed the document in 2020. Cr Birchfield has argued that the intention was to consult the rūnanga on matters important to them, rather than require their approval for every resource consent, which he claims is happening now. The original agreement says the council will process resource consents in a way that appropriately recognises the effects of activities on Poutini Ngāi Tahu. The revised clause goes further. 'The parties agree that to ensure timely, efficient and cost-effective resource consent processing, applicants and planners must both recognise and provide for the rights, interests and values of Poutini Ngāi Tahu as manawhenua.' That is consistent with the principles of the Resource Management Act (RMA), the draft says. 'As such, the council will treat Poutini Ngāi Tahu as an affected party for all applications for resource consent where there is potential for adverse cultural effects, unless it is demonstrated otherwise.' A new clause, added to the agreement, states that the Council will strongly encourage consent applicants to consult the rūnanga early on, through their environmental entities, Poutini Environmental or Pokeka Poutini Ngāi Tahu. 'Where consultation has not occurred, and a written approval letter has not been supplied, the Council will need to consider limited notification ... to Poutini Ngāi Tahu which can result in increased processing time and costs for applicants." The draft also spells out how the Council will support monitoring by manawhenua. 'Achieving a culturally relevant monitoring programme will require dedicated and consistent resourcing for Pokeka Poutini Ngāi Tahu Limited ... a specific funding agreement dedicated to environmental cultural monitoring will be needed before this programme can commence." WCRC chief executive Darryl Lew said last month the agreement and its protocol document, Paetae Kotahitanga ki Te Tai Poutini, were still fit for purpose and needed only minor changes. Because the council had been through some turbulent times with changes of leadership, key pieces of work had not been done including its practical implementation and the five year review was the opportunity to do that, he said. Cr Birchfield has argued that the agreement effectively gives iwi a sign-off right that was not intended by the RMA and has added to the delays and costs of obtaining resource consents on the West Coast. In a supplied statement he said the changes were far from minor. 'The role of Ngāi Tahu is strengthened to having, effectively, the same functions and powers as local government in certain areas.' However, Ngāi Tahu was not accountable to West Coasters in the same way as local government was, Mr Birchfield said. A particular issue in the agreement was the use of the term, "joint planning' which elevated Ngāi Tahu to the same level as the council, Mr Birchfield said. The changed proposal moved the region towards co-governance, and if Ngāi Tahu were to have a greater role in regional government, West Coast electors should be consulted on the changes by way of a referendum, Cr Birchfield said. The Regional Council says the changed wording in the agreement confers no additional powers on Ngāi Tahu but clarifies the existing rights of manawhenua under the RMA and the Treaty of Waitangi, and operational processes for council staff. During a meeting in May, Ngāti Waewae representative Francois Tumahai defended the iwi's current role in resource consenting. [ Tumahai said the rūnanga were required to give feedback on consent conditions. 'The decision is still made by the consents team on council. We don't make a decision on it,' The new document with the changes outlined, is available on the WCRC website in the agenda for today's council meeting. The Council this morning agreed to hold some clauses over for further advice and clarity, and the meeting continues this afternoon. - By Lois Williams, Local Democracy Reporter
