Marcos chopper conducts fly-by at Malampaya gas field
A presidential fly-by on Monday was conducted in the ongoing Malampaya Phase IV drilling campaign in Palawan.
WATCH: Presidential Fly-By on the ongoing Malampaya Phase IV drilling campaign in Palawan ????: PCO pic.twitter.com/nALcS7mFVw — ????Anna Felicia (@annafelicia_) July 14, 2025
Earlier in the day, President Ferdinand ''Bongbong'' Marcos Jr. said they were going to fly by the rig at the Malampaya gas field. He expressed hope that there is a ''reasonable chance of success in finding further reserves.''
In October of last year, Razon-led Prime Energy Resources Development B.V.'s plan to drill new deepwater wells at the Malampaya gas field received a certification, which will pave the way for faster regulatory approvals of the project.
Malampaya has contributed over $13.8 billion to the Philippine government since its commercial operations began in 2001.
It supplies about 20% of Luzon's electricity needs and has significantly contributed to the nation's energy independence since 2001. —LDF, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


GMA Network
12 hours ago
- GMA Network
Go, Bato, Padilla seek for Rodrigo Duterte's house arrest in The Hague
Senators Robin Padilla, Ronald 'Bato' Dela Rosa, and Bong Go have filed a resolution urging the Philippine government to push for the interim release of former president Rodrigo Duterte in the form of a house arrest arrangement in a residence in The Hague, Netherlands. In the resolution, Duterte's allies pointed out that the former president's health is 'in danger of deteriorating further,' considering his old age, various medical conditions, and social isolation from loved ones. '[E]ven if the Philippines has already withdrawn from the Rome Statute, the Philippines is not precluded from advocating, in good conscience of the State, for more humane conditions for FPRRD, while he bravely faces the allegations against him,' the resolution read. Senator Alan Peter Cayetano also filed a Senate resolution earlier urging the Philippine government to push for the interim release of Duterte before the ICC, and enter into an agreement to have him placed under house arrest at the Philippine Embassy in the Netherlands. Malacañang, meanwhile, said that Cayetano's call was 'noted.' Vice President Sara Duterte previously said that her father, Rodrigo, has lost a lot of weight since his detention in The Hague, describing him now as 'skin and bones.' She also said that her father has asked that his remains be cremated should he pass away while detained in The Hague. Since March 12, former President Duterte has been in ICC custody and is currently detained at Scheveningen Prison in The Hague for charges of crimes against humanity for the alleged extrajudicial killings during his administration's war on drugs. His lawyers have since insisted that the ICC lacks jurisdiction to try him for the charges he is facing and are seeking his release to an undisclosed country. Amid these, they have been reviewing the batches of evidence disclosed by the Office of Prosecution in preparation for the confirmation of charges hearing set for September 23. —VAL, GMA Integrated News

GMA Network
14 hours ago
- GMA Network
Marcos to study calls on banning online gambling
President Ferdinand ''Bongbong'' Marcos Jr. will study the calls to ban online gambling, Malacañang said on Tuesday. During a press conference, Palace Press Officer Undersecretary Atty. Claire Castro was asked for reaction on the call of Senator Raffy Tulfo to totally ban online gambling. Castro said this matter should be dealt thoroughly as this will affect the Philippine economy and the residents as well. ''Ang mga pagpapasyang ganito po ay talagang pinag-aaralan kung ito ba'y makakaapekto sa ekonomiya, makaapekto sa mamamayan at hindi po tayo maaring magpadalos-dalos po dito,'' Castro said. (Decisions like this are really being studied to see if they will affect the economy, affect the people, and we cannot rush into this.) ''Dahil minsan po, kapag po mismo ang legal at license ng mga online gaming sites ang iyong iba-ban, mas dumadami ang mga illegal na online gaming sites at iyan po ay mas nakakaapekto sa ekonomiya, so pinag-aaralan po iyan ng Pangulo,'' she added. (Because sometimes, when you ban legal and licensed online gaming sites, the number of illegal online gaming sites increases and that has a greater impact on the economy, so the President is studying that.) Earlier, online gaming operators licensed with the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR) expressed opposition over proposals for a total ban on online gambling in the country. They warned that Filipinos might shift to unregulated sites on the black market. In a joint statement, the companies said they 'are standing united with the PAGCOR and 'forward-thinking' lawmakers to call for stronger regulation — not a total ban — to keep Filipino players safe and the country's economy thriving. At the House of Representatives, lawmakers including Negros Occidental Representative Javi Benitez and Bicol Saro party-list Representative Terry Ridon are pushing for stricter regulations instead of a total ban. Meanwhile, Akbayan party-list Representatives Chel Diokno, Perci Cendaña, and Dadah Ismulla filed House Bill 1351, seeking to limit access to online gambling or the Kontra e-Sugal Act. — BAP, GMA Integrated News


GMA Network
16 hours ago
- GMA Network
Cha-cha for inclusion of WPS as PH territory, foreign ownership of public utilities eyed
The crew of the F/B John fishing vessel wave a Philippine flag as they acknowledge the presence of the Philippine Coast Guard during the Atin Ito second civilian mission to Bajo de Masinloc in the West Philippine Sea in 2024. DANNY PATA A proposal amending the 1987 Constitution to include the West Philippine Sea as part of Philippine territory and lifting restrictions on foreign ownership has been filed anew in the House of Representatives. Ako Bicol party-list Rep. Alfredo Garbin made the proposal under Resolution of Both Houses 1 which amends Articles 1, 12, 14, and 16 of the Constitution. "The National Territory definition is silent on the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf na ipinanalo na natin sa arbitral tribunal. At ito ay dapat, kumbaga isaad natin. We should enshrine it in our Constitution," Garbin told reporters in an interview. (We have already won in the arbitral tribunal. This should be enshrined it in our Constitution.) Under Garbin's proposal, Article 1 on National Territory is amended to include the phrase 'the Philippines exercises sovereign rights over its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) extending 200 nautical miles from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured, and its continental shelf as defined under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, including the West Philippine Sea, in accordance with international law." "Though it also speaks of all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction, which might arguably include the exclusive economic zone, but in my humble view, it is much better that we should expressly incorporate the exclusive economic zone sa ating Saligang Batas," Garbin added. 'It is imperative and long overdue that these hard-won sovereign rights, embodying the Filipino people's unyielding resolve to defend their patrimony, be enshrined in the 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, to unequivocally reflect the nation's unwavering commitment to its territorial integrity, maritime heritage, and national dignity in the West Philippine Sea, in full consonance with the principles of international law and the enduring aspirations of the Filipino nation,' Garbin's resolution read. Foreign investors In the same resolution, Garbin proposed that Article 12 Section 10 be amended to 'Congress shall, upon recommendation of the economic and planning agency and when the national interest dictates, reserve certain areas of investment to citizens of the Philippines or, unless otherwise provided by law, to corporations or associations at least 60% of whose capital is owned by such citizens, or such higher percentage as Congress may prescribe, certain areas of investments." Under the current Charter, the qualifiers 'certain' and 'unless otherwise provided by law' are not present. This means that as it is, all areas of investment are reserved for Filipino citizens or corporations or associations that are 60% owned by Filipino citizens. Garbin also wants the qualifying phrase 'unless provided for by law' inserted in Articles 12, 14, and 16 to allow foreign ownership of public utilities, educational institutions, mass media and advertising industry instead of the existing limitations such as: Public utilities and educational institutions should be at least 60% owned by Filipino citizens Mass media should be 100% owned by Filipino citizens Advertising company must be 70% owned by Filipino citizens and The state should encourage equity participation in public utilities by the general public. 'The burgeoning global interest in Asia continues to position the Philippines as a prime destination for foreign investments, bolstered by its robust economic growth... This underscores the urgent need to maximize economic opportunities through constitutional reforms to ensure inclusive and sustainable growth for all Filipinos,' Garbin added. There had been several attempts in previous Congresses to amend the 1987 Constitution, but all have failed. One factor is the public's opposition. Garbin, however, believes the public will be enlightened if the proposed amendments are fully explained. "Paano magiging against ang publiko sa RBH1 kung ito ay sumasang-ayon at inilalagay lang natin yung ipinanalo natin sa arbitral tribunal sa The Hague? Paano magiging against ang publiko kung papalawakin natin yung pagnenegosyo sa ating bansa by encouraging foreign direct investment to come in and giving Congress the flexibility to legislate those economic provisions whenever there's a need to amend the same," said Garbin. (How will the public be against RBH1 if it is agreed upon and we are just putting what we won in the arbitral tribunal in The Hague? How will the public be against it if we are trying to expand business in our country by encouraging foreign direct investment to come in and give Congress flexibility to legislate those economic provisions whenever there's a need to amend the same.) —VAL, GMA Integrated News