logo
ULLU, ALTBalaji, and 23 other streaming platforms get banned; government takes major step over 'p*rn*graphic' content

ULLU, ALTBalaji, and 23 other streaming platforms get banned; government takes major step over 'p*rn*graphic' content

Time of India3 days ago
The union government has decided to ban several platforms and websites for showcasing obscene, vulgar, and 'p*rnograph*c' content. According to the Hindustan Times, the centre has restricted 25 apps and websites, which include ALTBalaji, ULLU, Desiflix, Boomex, Big Shots App, Navarasa Lite, and Gulab App.
The government bans OTT apps and websites over 'obscene' content for providing
As per the report, the Indian government has ordered blocking all the websites and OTT platforms mentioned in the list for 'obscene,' 'vulgar,' and 'p*rn*graphic content.'
After authorities found that these apps and websites were violating the policies and laws, the centre took such a step.
The report further stated that as per the officials, several platforms had content with "s*xual innuendos," while some featured long scenes of "s*xually explicit acts" with nudity.
This content was described as "pornographic in nature."
Reportedly, the content hosted by these apps had no story but was just full of "obscene and vulgar" imagery. The portrayal of nudity and sexual content in unsuitable circumstances was also noticed by authorities, and they flagged it, especially "family relationships and other sensitive settings."
The government is yet to announce the ban publicly
In April this year, the Apex Court issued notices to the Centre and other popular digital platforms as a response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) asking for action against explicit content on OTT platforms along with social media as well.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years
IC Markets
Learn More
Undo
Reportedly, platforms like Netflix, Amazon Prime, ULLU, ALTT, X, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and others, along with the Centre, were served notices.
However, the bench of justices pointed out that the petition has made a strong point; however, it stated that the matter doesn't come under their "domain."
Political parties and NCW condemn ULLU and other apps
Ajaz Khan Faces Rape Allegations Following FIR by Actress
Earlier, several political party leaders and the National Commission for Women condemned the web series titled 'House Arrest,' which was streamed on the ULLU app.
Ajaz Khan
of '
Bigg Boss
' fame hosted the show. It received massive backlash for its vulgar and disrespectful content towards women.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Uttarakhand's development begins with precision on paper.
Uttarakhand's development begins with precision on paper.

Time of India

time7 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Uttarakhand's development begins with precision on paper.

No Pak Hand in Pahalgam? Chidambaram Remarks Trigger Political Face-off Between Centre, Opposition Parliament is bracing for a political explosion over the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. As the Lok Sabha holds a special discussion on Operation Sindoor, the Opposition and ruling BJP are locked in a fierce showdown. Former Home Minister P Chidambaram's explosive remark "No proof Pakistan was involved" has triggered national outrage. The BJP says the Opposition is echoing Pakistan. Samajwadi Party's Akhilesh Yadav says terrorists are vanishing under BJP's watch. Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi demands truth from the government. Meanwhile, Shiv Sena's Priyanka Chaturvedi says India needs no more 'proof', we've lived the pain of Pakistani terror. The nation watches as politics, security, and sovereignty collide in Parliament.#operationsindoor #pahalgamattack #parliamentdebate #chidambaram #bjpvscongress #rahulgandhi #pmmodi #nationalsecurity #terrorism #pok #akhileshyadav #gauravgogoi #priyankachaturvedi #kirenrijiju #nishikantdubey #anuragthakur #indianarmy #pakistanterror #parliamentshowdown #indiafirst #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews 2.4K views | 3 hours ago

Delhi Waqf board case: Court frames charges against Amanatullah Khan, others
Delhi Waqf board case: Court frames charges against Amanatullah Khan, others

Time of India

time9 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Delhi Waqf board case: Court frames charges against Amanatullah Khan, others

A Delhi court on Monday framed charges against AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan and others in an alleged case of irregularities in the Delhi Waqf Board recruitment. Special judge Dig Vinay Singh framed charges against Khan and others. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Degree Data Science Data Analytics Operations Management Technology Finance CXO PGDM Leadership Project Management others Data Science Design Thinking Public Policy Others Management Digital Marketing MBA Product Management Skills you'll gain: Data-Driven Decision-Making Strategic Leadership and Transformation Global Business Acumen Comprehensive Business Expertise Duration: 2 Years University of Western Australia UWA Global MBA Starts on Jun 28, 2024 Get Details A detailed order is awaited. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If you have a mouse, play this game for 1 minute Navy Quest According to the FIR, Khan, while working as chairman of the Delhi Waqf Board, illegally recruited 32 people in violation of norms and government guidelines.

Film ‘Udaipur Files' yet to be recertified by CBFC, producer tells Delhi HC
Film ‘Udaipur Files' yet to be recertified by CBFC, producer tells Delhi HC

Hindustan Times

time12 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Film ‘Udaipur Files' yet to be recertified by CBFC, producer tells Delhi HC

The Delhi high court on Monday refused to stall the release of the movie 'Udaipur Files', based on the 2022 brutal murder of a Rajasthan-based tailor Kanhaiya Lal, till July 30, noting that the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) is yet to recertify the film despite the Centre's suggested cuts being implemented. Poster of the movie 'Udaipur Files'. (Photo from X) The Centre had on July 21 cleared the movie's release, subject to the filmmaker carrying out six additional edits, in addition to the 55 cuts already implemented. A bench of chief justice DK Upadhyay and justice Tushar Rao Gedela rejected the request to stay the film's release after petitioner, Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind chief Maulana Arshad Madani, sought a hearing on Wednesday, while co-petitioner Mohammed Javed, an accused in the Kanhaiya Lal murder case, requested a stay until then. The movie has been challenged for allegedly vilifying the Muslim community while Javed claims that his trial is at a crucial stage and the movie's release could prejudice his right to fair trial. The bench said that there was no urgency, since the movie could only be released pursuant to certification, which was yet to be granted. 'Please don't get overwhelmed. Argue the matter with ease. The movie will only be released after recertification. You (producer's counsel) say that it (recertification) is pending. As of today, there is no urgency. We can hear the matter the day after (on Wednesday). The film can only be exhibited after re-certification and thus there is no urgency,' the bench said to Javed's counsel Maneka Guruswamy. The petitions were listed before the high court, after the Supreme Court, while refusing to take a call on allowing the movie's release, had requested the Delhi high court to take up the matter on Monday. In its petition, argued by advocate Saumya Dwivedi, Javed asserted that the July 21 order was egregious since the Centre had simply accepted the recommendation of a committee comprising three advisory panel members from the CBFC, without any application of mind. It further stated that the procedure to constitute the Committee was based on a repealed law and was thus flawed. The Cinematograph Act, 1952, the petition stated, does not empower the CBFC to review its own decision. To be sure, the July 21 order was issued in response to the pleas filed by Madani and Javed, seeking cancellation of the film's certification, following the liberty granted by the high court on July 10. The high court on that day, had temporarily stayed the movie's release and allowed Madani to approach the Centre, regarding his concerns. 'The constitution of the committee by the Central Government, in the absence of any applicable provision, amounts to wrongful delegation of powers. The committee was the sole authority who heard and considered the submission of the parties, including the CEO of CBFC,' the petition stated. It added, 'Thereafter, the recommendation of this committee was accepted by the Central government without any application of mind and this amounts to CBFC adjudicating the validity of its own decision to certify the film for public exhibition.' Lal was murdered in June 2022 with a cleaver in Udaipur district of Rajasthan for allegedly sharing a social media post endorsing the disparaging remarks made against Prophet Muhammad by former Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) spokesperson Nupur Sharma. She made the comments while participating in a television debate in May 2022. The assailants, who were arrested by the Rajasthan police, even prepared a video claiming responsibility for the murder. They even displayed the weapon of offence used for the crime. Considering the sensitivity of the case, the matter was probed by the National Investigation Agency and the accused was charged under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA). The trial in the case is pending before a special NIA court in Jaipur.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store