A new coalition says Massachusetts school districts don't have enough money. Here's why.
United for Our Future consists of more than a dozen organizations, including the Massachusetts Teachers Association, American Federation of Teachers Massachusetts, Boston Teachers Union, Massachusetts Association of Regional Schools, Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents, Massachusetts PTA, Massachusetts Association of School Committees, and Lawyers for Civil Rights.
The unified front has emerged as school committees and superintendents have been frequently locked in contentious contract negotiations with teacher unions, which have included disagreements over pay raises and increasing staff, such as hiring more school counselors.
Related
:
Here's a quick rundown on some of the biggest budget busters:
The inflation gap
Many districts are still struggling to overcome sky-high inflation during the pandemic because the state's school funding formula failed to keep pace with it. During the 2022-'23 and the 2023-'24 school years, inflation in Massachusetts was just over 7 percent and 8 percent, respectively, but the state's school funding formula, known officially as Chapter 70, increased by only 4.5 percent in each of those years, according to the group.
Consequently, districts had to make up the difference.
Inflation has dropped since then, but is now on the rise again. On Wednesday, the US Department of Labor announced
Advertisement
The group is seeking a change to state law so districts don't carry the brunt of high inflation.
Related
:
Increases in special education tuition
Students with disabilities are often sent to private programs paid for by their local districts when they are unable to meet students' educational needs. Tuition for state-approved programs climbed by a whopping 14 percent during the 2023-'24 school year and increased by another 4.7 percent this school year, according to the coalition. Costs are expected to rise by another 3.7 percent next year.
That's a lot more than what the tuition increases had been previously, which usually hovered around 2.5 percent, the coalition says.
The state currently reimburses districts only a portion of those costs and there is no cap on tuition increases, which in turn has been
Related
:
Rising student transportation costs
Students heading to private programs also can travel long distances to communities well beyond their hometown borders and occasionally out of state.
Most districts rely on private vans for some or all of this busing. The state doesn't regulate how much those companies can charge, giving vendors free rein over how much they charge. The coalition contends districts are getting hit with increases they cannot afford.
Last fall, the costs were so unexpectedly high for districts that the state's reimbursement program for these expenses only covered 44 percent of the costs instead of 75 percent, which is called for under state law, according to the coalition. That funding discrepancy created a collective shortfall of more than $60 million for districts statewide, the coalition says.
Related
:
Advertisement
More support for rural & regional districts
Rural and regional school districts have long argued they are being neglected by state lawmakers as they confront a growing number of challenges, including declining enrollment and a lack of commercial tax revenue to fund their share of costs.
Transportation costs for these districts for both general education and special education students can be more expensive because buses tend to travel longer distances, often across community lines, and less competition among transportation companies.
The coalition is urging lawmakers to carry through with a recommendation from the Legislature's Rural Schools Commission in 2022 that calls for providing an additional $60 million to rural schools. The group is also imploring lawmakers to fully fund the reimbursements for regional school transportation, which they are supposed to do under state law but have repeatedly fallen short on.
James Vaznis can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
11-07-2025
- Boston Globe
Here's what education gets out of Massachusetts' new state spending plan
The spending plan slashed $130 million, including by trimming the Statewide College and Career Readiness Program, which provides online materials for students to reach college readiness, and reducing charter school reimbursements, which districts receive as partial reimbursement for student tuitions costs. Here's how the new Massachusetts state budget will impact education: Advertisement Fair Share funding and rising costs School districts faced rising costs from inflation and the end of COVID relief programs. Current state funds like the Student Opportunity Act, which largely targets schools with underserved communities, have The new state budget increased the opportunity act's minimum per-pupil cost to $150, up from $104. However, advocates like Jessica Tang, of the American Federation of Teachers Massachusetts, said there needs to be a permanent change to the Chapter 70 school funding program to account for inflation. To offset this need, the Fair Share supplementary budget, which is funded by revenue from the millionaies tax, added $1.5 billion for education. Advertisement Tang said that instead of using the money to expand education programs, the surtax funds are being used to fill gaps left by potential cuts in federal funding to programs like Medicaid, which reimburses school districts for important medical services. Tang mentioned Healey vetoed $20 million in charter school reimbursements in the state budget, which help mitigate funding losses from Chapter 70. Viviana Abreu-Hernandez, the president of the MassBudget policy organization, said the federal government is 'I'm afraid that the budget is not going to be enough once the federal cuts materialize, particularly for the children that need more support to be successful,' Abreu-Hernandez said. Vocational and technical schools The new state budget allowed to move forward The new system will allow schools to use student interest, middle school attendance, and lack of serious disciplinary issues as weights in a lottery. Lew Finfer, from the Vocational Education Justice Coalition, said the lottery system will help expand vocational school access to students from marginalized backgrounds. 'They're creating a system where conceivably every student can at least get into the lottery,' Finfer said. The state House budget included a two-year moratorium on the lottery requirement, but that was excluded from the final budget. Advertisement Mary Tamer, the executive director of MassPotential, said admission changes have to account for greater student demand, with more than 6,000 students waitlisted for vocational school seats. 'The question becomes: Will the state provide resources to create more schools?' Tamer said. Finfer said the supplementary budget accounts for at least $100 million to fund comprehensive schools that offer vocational or technical programs, which will renovate and expand existing spaces to provide around 3,000 new seats. Career readiness and higher education Healey vetoed more than $800,000 in college and career readiness programs, because they did not align with her initial budget recommendations, and she cited other programs that support career readiness. However, she added $50 million for the state's early college initiative, which allows high school students to earn college credits. 'This year's funding for early college is well positioned to catalyze growth and impact that we need to see,' said Chessye Moseley from the Massachusetts Alliance for Early College, about the program reaching 11,000 students next year. Tang said the state needs to continue promoting affordable higher education with the free community college program, and at the same time ensure there are options for students who prefer other career pathways. 'We need to focus on how do we continue to have high standards for schools and colleges, and support families and their needs,' Tang said. Literacy and student support Literacy rates in Massachusetts dropped, with four in 10 third- to eighth-graders achieving reading proficiency, Tamer said. The new state budget allocates $15 million to Tang said there is a need to expand funding for current teacher development, instead of just allocating funds to outside organizations. Advertisement Tamer said Massachusetts is following the footsteps of states like Ohio, which invested more than $100 million in literacy programs that showed significant improvements. Education Commissioner Pedro Martinez, said the state will continue to work with districts to ensure they support the rising population of students with special needs, as well as multilingual learners, whose needs are more expensive. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education expects $8.9 billion in funding. 'It is harder today to be a teacher than ever before,' Martinez said. Vatsady Sivongxay, from the Massachusetts Education Justice Alliance, said the state needs to be bolder in its funding, given school districts continue to layoff councilors and education specialists. Sivongxay, who is a parent of the Cambridge public schools, said parents should expect fewer specialized educators in kindergarten classrooms next school year. '[My son] benefits from having support staff,' Sivongxay said about her fifth-grader who does not have a specialized education program. 'He appreciates and loves all of the staff equally.' Maria Probert can be reached at
Yahoo
03-07-2025
- Yahoo
Group behind MCAS ballot question broke campaign finance law, state says
The campaign that pushed to eliminate MCAS scores as a statewide graduation requirement via the ballot box last fall missed a deadline to report nearly $2.4 million in donations, a violation of state law. Last November, the Massachusetts Teachers Union-backed effort was successful in passing Question 2 by a wide margin, forcing state education officials to chart a future where standardized tests scores don't prevent any student from achieving a public high school diploma. It was one of the most hotly-debated Massachusetts ballot questions last fall. Last month, the state informed the 'Committee for High Standards Not High Stakes' that it did not disclose a segment of donations by the required deadline. In a June 24 letter, the Office of Campaign and Political Finance wrote it had determined the committee broke state law 'by failing to timely disclose the receipt of contributions that should have been reported on a minimum of four separate late contribution reports leading up to the November 5, 2024 election.' According to state law, in the two weeks prior to Election Day, campaigns are required to report last-minute donations within 72 hours of receiving them. The letter sent last month indicates the $2.4 million disclosed on Election Day (Nov. 5) — when voters were already casting their ballots — should have been reported on Oct. 24. Read more: New MCAS guidance says former students without diplomas get another chance 'The Committee's failure to file the required late contribution reports frustrated the public's interest in accurate and timely disclosure of campaign finance activity during the relevant period,' state officials wrote. As a result, the committee was fined $4,000 by the state. In a statement, a spokesperson for the Massachusetts Teachers Association said the Committee for High Standards Not High Stakes amended its late October finance report when it realized it did not include some contributions. 'The amended filing was subject to a fine for being late,' the spokesperson said. 'The committee paid the fine.' State education officials are currently assessing what a future requirement may look like to ensure graduates are demonstrating learning and readiness for college, careers and civic life. A survey for the public and community listening sessions held in Taunton, Worcester, Somerville, Holyoke and Barnstable wrapped up in June. Until the state develops a new statewide requirement, school districts are resorting to local graduation standards and competency determinations set by school committees. Controversial guidance previously issued by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education said school districts can still use MCAS scores as part of their local graduation requirements. The leaders of the Massachusetts Teachers Association said the guidance circumvented the intention of the ballot question and, ultimately, the will of the voters. Similarly, the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education recently approved the 'limited use' of MCAS scores to determine if students are satisfying the competency determination for a high school diploma, also drawing blowback from the state teachers union. Trump threatens arrest of NYC mayoral candidate during visit to 'Alligator Alcatraz' Mass. has an on-time(ish) state budget: 3 big things to know about the $61B plan Here's how Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene described support for Trump's 'big beautiful bill' Mass. AG Campbell sues Trump admin for sharing private health info with ICE Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down 1849 total abortion ban Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
10-06-2025
- Yahoo
McCabe presents $163.8 million budget to City Council for review
WESTFIELD — Mayor Michael McCabe presented the fiscal year 2026 budget of $163.8 million for review to the City Council at its meeting on June 5. 'This budget has been a difficult budget to prepare,' McCabe said, and specifically thanked City Council President John Beltrandi and Finance Committee Chair Ralph Figy for helping sit in on some of the budget hearings. 'I came before you in March or April and we spoke briefly about issues this budget was going to face and a number of unexpected increases that were beyond the control of the city's management staff or financial team to be able to foresee,' he said, listing special education increases of $1.1 million, transportation increases of $1.3 million, mandatory staff increases of just under a million, contractual obligations of $1.8 million, a health care increase of $5.8 million, utilities cost increase of 15 percent across the board and trash and recycling fees that had a $2.3 million deficit. He said there were also $5 million in inflationary cost increases. McCabe said in FY25 there was also a tax decrease to residents. 'When we used free cash last year to give a tax decrease to folks and offset the budget deficit … that came out to negative one percent,' he said, adding that all in all costs were $17 million over the previous year's budget. He said last year the city used $5 million in free cash to balance the FY25 budget, and the funding is not available to do that again in FY26. Later he said $2 million in free cash was used to balance the FY26 budget. 'Our budget looks like it's going to come in on a free cash balance of 3%. The DOR recommends 5%. I'm not too worried about it, I think when the new free cash number comes in November, I think there will be more than 5 percent overall,' he said. McCabe said there are no new personnel across the board, no vehicles across the board, and an appropriate level of services will be kept status quo. 'There is no real decrease in services in FY26 over FY25, even though we've had this $17 million gap to close.' McCabe said the city closed a couple of schools, specifically Fort Meadow, Abner Gibbs and Franklin Avenue, and added a state-of-the-art Westfield River Elementary School. He said the consolidation in elementary schools helped to reduce costs in personnel and services. Without getting into details about the levy limit and levy ceiling and their interrelatedness to city financing, which he said currently stands at $12.5 million in excess capacity, he said, 'I remember sitting through council meetings in the cheap seats over the last 15 years, and I remember hearing that it was a really good thing if we had excess capacity built into our levy. As as it turns out, the state doesn't want to see excess capacity in our levy, because when you go to them for help, they say 'spend your own money.' ' McCabe said the city expected help from increases in Chapter 70, Chapter 74 and Chapter 90, the state's funding sources, but 'there really was not a lot of help at all.' He said unrestricted government aid went up $120,000, 'which isn't really an awful lot of anything.' In his letter to the council, McCabe said the plan is to spend $3.5 million of the excess capacity in FY26. 'By doing so, better positions to receive state funding, especially Chapter 70 and Chapter 74. This also means we will return to using only minimal free cash this year, and hopefully no free cash in FY27.' McCabe suggested in reviewing the budget, that councilors go to the Mayor's recap in the beginning of the budget for a thumbnail read. He also suggested looking at pages 194-214, the appendices in the back of the budget, 'they will walk you through all the items I just talked about.' 'If you're looking at it, you'll see how we tried to balance the budget. There are only three ways to balance the budget; through new growth, you can pick up through some local receipts — this year we're going to get an advantage of a local recept that is significantly higher than it's been before, and you can do it through taxation and excess capacity monetary use,' McCabe said, referring to the additional $2 million that will be generated by the increase in the trash collection fee. He said without new growth, the only thing left to do is tax at 2.5 percent and then tax the excess capacity at 2.5 percent, which added to the $2 million in free cash and $2 million increase in local revenues was how the budget was balanced. He said the mayor's cut sheet shows the cuts made to city departments of $3.2 million, It also shows a positive offset of $3.5 million in the insurance category. He said the School Department budget was cut by $5.2 million, but saw a four percent increase over FY25. 'It's important to realize that a four percent increase, while greater than the city budget, is a necessary increase. Unfunded mandates are crushing the School Department budget and crushing the taxpayer,' McCabe said. 'I've tried to address it with the governor. The problem lies within the legislature - the body that creates the rule and then they don't fulfill the rule that they create. They're the only ones that can fix that rule. If you have any influence with your state legislators, I would urge you to ask them to fund where they say they're supposed to fund,' he added. McCabe gave two examples of funding disparities from the state. He said the Massachusetts School Building Authority is supposed to be funded at 80 percent. The Westfield River Elementary School cost $16 million, and the city was reimbursed $32 million, roughly 50 percent. He said to be fair, the MSBA created their own exemptions. 'If they exempt pieces of the puzzle, they can still say that they're funding 80 percent of the non-exempted pieces of the puzzle,' he said. The other exemption was the funding of Circuit Breaker for special education expenses. McCabe said they are supposed to be funding at 75 percent, but are instead funding at 44 percent. 'That little difference is worth about $1.5 million,' he said. Before running off to the Westfield Technical Academy graduation, McCabe thanked Auditor Vicki Moro, who created the 214 page document, Assessor Ashlie Brown, Personnel Director Anne Larkham, Treasurer/Collector Matt Barnes, School Business Manager Shannon Barry, Solicitor Shanna Reed, City Councilors Ralph Figy and President John Beltrandi and Superintendent Stefan Czaporowski for all the help they have been in working collaboratively on the budget. 'I greatly appreciate their assistance,' he said. The budget was sent by the Council to the Finance Committee for review. Finance Committee reviews were scheduled for June 9, 10, 11, 16 and 17 beginning at 5:30 p.m. in various rooms in City Hall. A financial overview and public hearing for the budget is scheduled for June 23 at 6 p.m. in Room 207, City Council Chambers. On June 24, also in Room 207, city councilors will review the entire budget and make recommendations. On June 30, councilors will vote on the budget. The schedule of meetings is posted on the city website at The budget is also posted on the website under departments, auditor, Fiscal Year 2026. Read the original article on MassLive.
