Cleveland-Cliffs CEO calls on Canada to adopt steel tariffs
The notoriously combative US executive and vocal public supporter of President Donald Trump said on Monday that Carney and his cabinet should enact 'significant' trade protections for the nation's steel industry.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmonton Journal
20 minutes ago
- Edmonton Journal
'Alberta Forever Canada' petition sees potential hurdles according to Alberta political scientist
Article content 'I would think that this has got to be one of largest petition campaigns, not just in Alberta, but in Canadian history,' Wesley said. 'I can't recall a petition in Canada that would have had north of 250,000 signatures.' Article content If they are able to garner that number of signatures in the dead-heat of summer, Wesley said it would be a great political feat. Article content It's a high-risk, high-reward venture that will ultimately see where Alberta stands on the topic. Article content 'If they get enough signatures, it does definitely support their claim that Albertans want nothing to do with separatism,' he said. 'If they don't, it has the potential to put wind in the sails of the separatist movement, who can claim their numbers are bigger than what the polls are showing.' Article content Wesley hopes the petition isn't motivated by wedge politics. Article content He views petitions and referendums as majoritarian instruments that are often used on complex issues that require discussion and negotiation. Article content Article content 'In a way, taking this to the streets and having these conversations in public removes it from the elite-style accommodation that makes federalism work in Canada,' Wesley said. 'Will this drive a wedge within the United Conservative Party? I'm not sure they need any more. Article content 'They've got the federal byelection campaign that's drawn the leader of the federal party into discussions around this; the UCP has their AGM in the fall where this will be at the top of their agenda; and if anything, this petition adds one more potential area for division among the UCP caucus and cabinet.' Article content With additional external pressures, Wesley said the petition will become another front where the UCP will need to pay attention. Article content 'And that position is very unclear,' he said. Article content In terms of the petition itself, Wesley said one challenge it may face can draw similarities from what federalists ran into during the Quebec 1995 referendum campaign. Article content Article content 'Albertans, like Quebecers, are not happy with the status quo, so selling them on the notion of remaining… (it doesn't) really capture the mood of Albertans, most of whom are not actually happy with the way things are going within confederation,' he said. Article content One of the challenges he sees is avoiding the sell of 'what Canada is right now.' Article content 'That's what the federalists did in Quebec in 1995,' Wesley said. 'Jean Chretien famously said that when somebody asks him how easy it is to campaign he'd say, 'It's easy, I have the best product in the world: I've got Canada.' Article content 'And if that's the tactic that the Lukaszuk group is going to employ, I think they're going to find some resistance on the doorstep.' Article content Another potential pitfall is making people choose between Canada and Alberta. Article content 'The vast majority of Albertans strongly identify with their province and country, and more than that, they hate being asked to pick between the two,' Wesley said. 'If the Forever Canada campaign is only selling Canada and not talking about what it means to be Albertan and how being Albertan is also being Canadian, I think it's going to be a branding misfire.' Article content If there's one thing Wesley would like someone to ask, it would be regarding laws surrounding the Alberta Prosperity Project (APP) petition and Lukaszuk's petition.
Toronto Sun
3 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
Canada weighs retaliation cost against Trump tariffs as analysts warn hitting back isn't worth it
Published Aug 02, 2025 • Last updated 10 minutes ago • 4 minute read Tractor trailers entering the U.S. from Canada at the Pacific Highway Border Crossing in Blaine, Washington, on Monday, March 3, 2025. Photo by David Ryder / Bloomberg Canada's decision to retaliate against U.S. tariffs earlier this year appears to be driving a divergence in how President Donald Trump is dealing with America's neighbours. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Until this week, Canada and Mexico received similar treatment in White House trade actions. Each was subject to a 25% base tariff, with a large exemption for goods shipped under the North American free trade pact known as CUSMA (or USMCA). That changed on Thursday, when Trump granted Mexico a 90-day pause on tariff hikes while jacking up its tax on Canadian products to 35%. The administration said Canada's higher rate was a response to fentanyl trafficking and its moves to hit back with counter-tariffs. The situation leaves Prime Minister Mark Carney with a political dilemma. On one hand, he won an election by promising a muscular approach to the trade war, saying the government would use tariffs to cause 'maximum pain' in the US. His voters remember that, and some want him to punch back. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Yet the retaliatory measures already undertaken failed to prevent further escalations. Instead, they appear to have emboldened Trump's team to hit even harder. U.S. administration officials including Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick frequently talk about how only two countries retaliated against Trump's tariffs — the other was China. 'Canada's retaliatory trade measures against the United States further complicate bilateral efforts to address this escalating drug crisis,' the White House said in a fact sheet, referencing fentanyl. But Mexico is a much larger source of shipments of the drug into the U.S., according to Customs and Border Protection data. Carney, an economist and former central banker, has also made it plain he believes retaliation can only go so far. In fact, his government has watered down Canada's counter-tariffs with a number of exemptions, declined to increase them when the U.S. lifted steel and aluminum tariffs to 50% and scrapped a tax on technology services at Trump's request. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Dominic LeBlanc, the minister in charge of trade talks, told Radio-Canada on Friday the government hasn't made any decisions about further retaliation. But Carney is clearly reluctant to do so — which 'reflects the reality that counter-tariffs are understood to be economically harmful to the country which imposes them,' said David Collins, a professor specializing in international trade at City St George's, University of London. The government's priority is to keep the CUSMA carve-out that dramatically lowers the real tax on Canadian goods. The effective U.S. tariff rate on Canada is about 6.3%, according to Bank of Nova Scotia economists. 'A more diplomatic approach is likely to bear more fruit with the Americans,' Collins said. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Canada imposed two rounds of counter-tariffs in March, when Justin Trudeau was in his final days as prime minister. The first placed 25% levies on about $30 billion of imports from the U.S. that included food items, clothing and motorcycles. The second came when Trump put tariffs on steel and aluminum. Then, when Trump added tariffs to foreign automobiles, Carney essentially matched that move, imposing similar fees on U.S. cars and trucks. But in mid-April, the government unveiled a series of exemptions for business inputs — goods imported for use in manufacturing and food packaging, as well as things needed for health care, public safety and security. Automakers such as General Motors Co. and Honda Motor Co. that make vehicles at Canadian plants were also made eligible for relief from import taxes. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The large majority of U.S. products can still enter Canada tariff-free. U.S. companies and other entities exported about $440 billion of goods and services to Canada last year — more than to any other nation. For Canada, 'the logic for escalation over cooperation is just weak,' said Oliver Lavelle, global macro strategist at Thiel Macro LLC. Mexico's Way Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, in contrast, has never imposed counter-tariffs on the U.S. Sheinbaum's position is also supported by her high approval ratings, which have remained above 75% in most polls. 'It's worth saying: President Trump treats us with respect in all the calls we've had, and we do too,' she said during a new conference. 'We may not agree, but the treatment is respectful.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. A statement issued late Thursday night by Carney's office expressed disappointment in Trump's tariff hike on Canada, but made no mention of retaliation. A spokesperson for Carney declined to comment further. LeBlanc said he met with Lutnick on Tuesday night, and that Canadian officials held other meetings throughout the week, but a deal acceptable to both sides 'was not yet visible.' In his statement, Carney acknowledged that lumber, steel, aluminum and autos are still subject to U.S. levies, and said his government 'will act to protect Canadian jobs, invest in our industrial competitiveness, buy Canadian, and diversify its export markets.' 'Jitters' But while the CUSMA exemption gives Canada some breathing room, the sectoral tariffs on steel and aluminum are still harmful and will affect economic growth if they're in place for long, Collins said. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Avery Shenfeld, chief economist at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, said the idea that Canada is getting off lightly is 'both overstated and potentially premature.' Canadian industries are more reliant on U.S. exports than their overseas competitors, and Trump could also chose to weaken the CUSMA exemption at any time, he said in a note to investors. 'We are still hopeful for a deal that relieves at least some of the pressure on base metal exporters,' Shenfeld said. 'But whether any of this lasts will depend on Trump's word, and we've seen how shaky that foundation can be, leaving jitters that could impact business capital spending and confidence ahead.' —With assistance from Mario Baker Ramirez and Carolina Millan. Read More Toronto Blue Jays Columnists Columnists Toronto & GTA Canada
Toronto Sun
4 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
KINSELLA: Mark Carney's words can have real-life impacts for Jews
And sometimes pronouncements from world leaders, such as Canada's Prime Minister, can have deadly consequences Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney (R), flanked by Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand, speaks during a press conference after a Cabinet meeting to discuss both trade negotiations with the US and the situation in the Middle East, at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa on July 30, 2025. Photo by DAVE CHAN / AFP via Getty Images Canada, France and the United Kingdom recognize a 'state' run by terrorists. Canada's Prime Minister accuses Israel of violating international law. The International Criminal Court issues warrants for the arrest of Israel's Prime Minister. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Sometimes, such pronouncements made by governments seem completely detached from reality. None of those countries have yet set up an embassy in Gaza City, for example. Nor has Canada commenced a court action against Israel. No country, as far as we know, has attempted to place Benjamin Netanyahu under arrest. But it would be a mistake to shrug about the pronouncements of world leaders, or to dismiss their words as meaningless symbols. For Jews, these dark days, words can have real-life impacts. Sometimes, the consequences can be deadly. CyberWell is an Internet watchdog that closely tracks antisemitism on social media. When the Israel-based non-profit finds hate online, it notifies the social media platforms, and urges them to take it down. And two recent reports by CyberWell show that the words and actions of governments can, and do, result in shocking eruptions in cyber-hate. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. A recent example: the twelve-day war between Israel, the United States and Iran took place in June 2025. That conflict saw Israel launch hundreds of airstrikes against the Islamic republic – and Iran firing thousands of ballistic missiles and suicide drones at Israeli military and civilian targets. Israel was largely seen as the victor. Read More Online, the abbreviated Iran-Israel war had a very different outcome. Online, Iran was the hands-down victor. During and after the conflict, CyberWell found, and 'across platforms like TikTok, Facebook, and X, users once again used digital spaces to post antisemitic rhetoric, incitement to violence, and coded hate speech – at times under the guise of political commentary or religious solidarity.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. It's not a new phenomenon, CyberWell notes, and it's getting worse all the time: 'Each new flashpoint acts as a trigger for dangerous digital discourse that can quickly spill into real-world harm.' For example: during the Iran-Israel war, the words 'Khaybar, Khaybar, O Jews' were all over social media, in the Farsi and Arabic languages. The phrase refers to a long-ago battle in Khaybar, which was a Jewish town in what is now Saudi Arabia – and where Muslim forces massacred the Jewish population. The 'Khaybar, Khaybar, O Jews' slogan has been used, for centuries, to call for pogroms against Jews. On X, as the war commenced, that hateful phrase grew by more than 3,000% over the previous months. Midway through the conflict, it increased by nearly 7,000% over before. By the end of the war, those words had reached three million individual accounts. The Farsi version of the chant far outpaced the Arabic one, too. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Some of the posters were very specific. After activist Eyal Yakoby simply posted a photo of an Israeli apartment building destroyed by an Iranian missile, '@pratynachiyar' wrote: 'Kill everyone from Israel, Iran, good job buddy…let these Jew f**kers leave Earth permanently.' A June 14, 2025, post by activist Eyal Yakoby on X that included a photo of an Israeli apartment building destroyed by an Iranian missile led to a hateful post against Jews by @pratynachiyar. Photo by Posted on X And, tragically, killings were indeed happening. As the Jew hatred was growing dramatically online – as more and more governments were showing a willingness to isolate and attack the Jewish state – actual murders happened. So, just days before the war started, two young Israeli embassy staffers were assassinated outside the Capital Jewish Museum – and the alleged shooter yelled 'Free Palestine' as he was arrested by police. Days later, an elderly Jewish woman died after being set ablaze in Boulder, Colorado – again, by an alleged killer who reportedly yelled 'Free Palestine' – a phrase that was, and is, ubiquitous online. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. As CyberWell puts it: 'These are not isolated incidents. They are part of a dangerous, recurring cycle that CyberWell has repeatedly warned about: inflammatory content spreads online, fuelling real-world hate and violence. Each act of violence or hate speech online reinforces the next, creating a self-perpetuating loop.' The 'loop,' as CyberWell puts it, has recently gone like this: witless Western governments demonize Israel, which leads to antisemitic propagandists doing likewise online, which then legitimizes – and leads to – actual antisemitic crime and violence. It needs to stop. Police and prosecutors need to get better at fighting antisemitic crime. Social media platforms need to do a better job of moderating what's being posted online. And governments, like Canada's, need to recognize that what they say can sometimes result in real-life harm. Sometimes, in fact, it can result in death. Toronto Blue Jays Columnists Canada Sunshine Girls Toronto & GTA
