The Wargame podcast: Fictional British government faces a terrifying choice in final episode
The home secretary, played by Amber Rudd, asks a key question.
"We have the nuclear deterrent. In what circumstances would we use it prime minister?"
Sir Ben Wallace, a former defence secretary who is playing the PM, offers his view - but is it one that is shared by the rest of his wartime cabinet?
The British side is struggling to respond to mounting pressure from an imagined Kremlin in episode five of the Sky News and Tortoise podcast series, released on Tuesday.
The Russian leam has unleashed waves of missile strikes and is demanding the UK agrees to an unconditional ceasefire.
28:54
NATO allies still not fully committed to rallying to help, the UK's options are dangerously limited.
The dilemma exposes the particular peril for a nuclear-armed nation, such as Britain, that has allowed its conventional fighting power to shrink too far.
It means, in a crisis, the UK no longer has the ability to sustain a fight conventionally, so escalating to nuclear war would have to happen far more rapidly - or else admit defeat.
4:35
Rebuilding conventional military capability and capacity as well as restoring wider national resilience, though, will be expensive.
Whether or not the government and the public want to pay for this kind of conventional deterrence, well that's the big choice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
What has Starmer demanded of Netanyahu ahead of recognition of a Palestinian state?
Sir Keir Starmer has issued an ultimatum to Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, warning he will recognise a Palestinian state in September unless a series of conditions are met. The prime minister 's decision comes after mounting pressure from his backbench MPs, and even cabinet ministers, to recognise Palestine as a state. Sir Keir held an emergency meeting of his cabinet on Tuesday to condemn the 'increasingly intolerable situation' in Gaza and discuss a UK-led peace plan for the region which David Lammy presented to allies in New York. But the PM went further, updating Labour's position on the recognition of a Palestinian state. The Independent looks at what the change of stance means, and what conditions Sir Keir has set out ahead of recognition. What does it mean? Recognition of a Palestinian state is a largely symbolic move given the situation on the ground in Gaza and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The Montevideo Convention of 1933 established several criteria which must apply before an entity can be recognised as a sovereign state. These are a permanent population, a defined territory, an effective government and the ability to conduct international relations. But the process would offer tangible benefits to the Palestinians. It involves the establishment of formal diplomatic relations, including the opening of embassies, the exchange of ambassadors, and the signing of bilateral treaties. Recognition also grants the recognised state access to certain rights in international organisations. For Palestinians, such recognition would strengthen their claim to sovereignty and facilitate greater international support. Added to that, the UK recognising a Palestinian state has a special significance because it was Britain which in effect created the modern state of Israel with the Balfour Declaration in 1926, signed by then Foreign Secretary Sir Arthur Balfour. Britain also brings extra influence as the former colonial power and current member of the UN Security Council. Who else has recognised Palestine? France has committed to recognising a Palestinian state in September, when Sir Keir's own promise to do so will take effect if Israel ignores his demands. Emmanuel Macron 's promise put his country on course to be the first in the G7 to recognise Palestine. But already 144 of the 193 UN member states, including Spain, Norway, Ireland, India, Russia and China recognise it as a state. Critics have argued that recognition has not helped resolve the problems on the ground or brought peace. They also note that Palestine does not fulfil the criteria of a state with a permanent population, a defined territory, a stable government, and the ability to enter into relations with other states. What has Keir Starmer called for? Sir Keir has set a series of conditions for the Israeli prime minister, warning that if they are not met, Britain will recognise Palestine alongside France at the UN General Assembly (UNGA) meeting in September. The first is for the Israeli government to take 'substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza', which is seeing thousands of Palestinians starving as aid is unable to get into the strip. The second is for Mr Netanyahu to promise no annexation in the West Bank. And the third is a commitment to a long-term peace process that will deliver a two-state solution between Israel and Palestine. The prime minister has also said the UK and its allies need to see "at least 500 trucks entering Gaza every day" to deliver aid. Notably, Mr Netanyahu and right-wing elements of his government have abandoned the promise of a two-state solution and pushed for a one-state solution. Sir Keir also called for Hamas to release remaining hostages, agree to a ceasefire, disarm themselves and rule themselves out of government in Gaza. But there are concerns that he has not linked Palestinian state recognition to his demands of Hamas. Is either side likely to agree? In short, no. The prime minister's ultimatum is likely to be largely ignored by Mr Netanyahu, leaving recognition of a Palestinian state by Britain looking almost inevitable. Hamas is also unlikely to agree to the prime minister's conditions and will continue to hold on to its hostages. There is a danger that while US president Donald Trump in effect said he would accept the UK recognising a Palestinian state, his US State Department is strongly opposed to the move and it could damage the special relationship. The prime minister promised an assessment of how far both sides have progressed towards meeting his tests before UNGA. But the news about Britain's plans now looks set to dominate the conference.
STV News
an hour ago
- STV News
In pictures: Donald Trump's visit to Scotland
Donald Trump has left Scotland after a five-day private visit during which he played golf and met with political leaders. The US President was greeted by large crowds as he landed at Prestwick Airport on Friday evening. On Saturday morning, Trump was surrounded by a major security operation as he teed off at his South Ayrshire golf course. Snipers were perched on sand dunes and vantage points around Turnberry throughout the weekend. Getty Images Police snipers are seen on the roof of the Trump Turnberry. Getty Images The Republican leader spent Saturday playing golf at Turnberry during his visit, which has been described as a working holiday. He also played a round on his brand new 18-hole golf course in Aberdeenshire on Tuesday after he cut the ribbon during an opening ceremony. Getty Images Donald Trump tees off at a new 18-hole course at Trump International Golf Links on July 29. Getty Images Trump met with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer on Monday to discuss progress on the UK-US trade deal, hopes for a ceasefire in the Middle East, and applying pressure on Vladimir Putin to end the war in Ukraine. The pair took questions during a lengthy press conference in a ballroom at Turnberry before they travelled to Trump's second golf resort in Aberdeenshire. Getty Images President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at Trump International Golf Links on July 28. Getty Images Trump's visit has also been marked by protests and arrests across the country. A 'festival of resistance' was held near his Aberdeenshire golf course on Monday afternoon, and hundreds of protesters gathered in both Edinburgh and Aberdeen on Saturday to voice their opposition to Trump's visit. Getty Images Demonstrators gather in Aberdeen protesting against the visit of President Trump to Scotland on July 26. Getty Images On Tuesday, Trump's fifth and final day in Scotland, he cut the ribbon and teed off in celebration of the New Course at Trump International Golf Links on the Menie Estate. Later, Trump returned to Washington on Air Force One. Getty Images President Donald Trump cuts the ribbon at the ceremony at a new 18-hole course at Trump International Golf Links on July 29. Getty Images Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Hundreds of thousands of people backlash against internet safety rules
Hundreds of thousands of people are protesting the UK's new online safety rules, with accusations of censorship being levelled at the government. Five days since Ofcom's new internet regulations began being enforced, nearly 400,000 people have signed a petition asking for them to be repealed. In response to the petition, the government said it had "no plans to repeal the Online Safety Act". Reform UK's leader Nigel Farage likened the new rules to "state suppression of genuine free speech" and said his party would reverse the regulations. In response, technology secretary Peter Kyle accused Mr Farage of being "on the side" of predators like Jimmy Savile, to which Mr Farage demanded an apology, calling Mr Kyle's comments "absolutely disgusting". 6:45 Others, like adult content creators, have accused the government of censoring social media feeds. Adult content star Jak White told Sky News he believes the way the rules have been enforced amounts to "censorship [rather] than protecting children". "We create [non-explicit] content but the engagement has also dropped down on that, I guess, because of the keywords," he said. "Even emojis are pretty much getting filtered out because of the new Online [Safety] Act." "What it's turned into now is pretty much censorship." These new rules are wide-reaching and as they were being implemented, Mr Kyle said they represented important progress. "For the first time since the creation of the internet, parents and children will notice a difference in their online experience and that is something that we should celebrate," he told Sky News last week. 3:53 In the days since, there has not seemed to be much celebrating, but many campaigners argue that something had to be done. A quarter of children's suicides in the UK are linked to content they have seen online, according to one 2019 study that was published in medical journal Psychological Medicine. When Sky News spoke to teenagers at a Warrington youth club, they were clear that they wanted more protection. Freya, 15, said she thought it was a "good idea" to have more restrictions because "there are some things that are so accessible on social media that really shouldn't be easy to find". Robyn, 15, said she is often shown violent videos that she does not want to see. "Getting restrictions on that would be way better because then it would be more, 'Oh yeah, I did not see that, oh my day is way better'," she said. 3:12 In the days since the new rules came into place, there's been a focus on the age verification systems now required for platforms hosting harmful content, but there are other changes too. Social media companies have to alter their algorithms to make sure things like violence, suicide or self-harm material are not shown to young people, and children must be given more control over their accounts, including around blocking and reporting on social media. But some people say these rules are being applied too broadly and mean that even adults are struggling to access legal content. "The problem is that good intentions don't necessarily make good law," said Matthew Feeney, advocacy manager at Big Brother Watch. "I don't doubt the intentions of those who are supporting this act. "The fact is that it's unclear that this will actually make children safer because they can just drive themselves to VPNs or to parts of the dark web to access this content anyway. "In addition, adults are going to find themselves in a position of having to upload biometric data or identification in order to access completely legal speech. "I think that's a significant cost to incur in a liberal democracy." People do appear to be turning to VPNs to bypass the new rules. In the days after age verification came into force, VPNs made up five of the top 10 apps on Apple's App Store and Google searches for the tool rocketed. In response to VPNs being used to bypass age verifications, a government spokesperson told Sky News: "Platforms have a clear responsibility to prevent children from bypassing safety protections. "This includes blocking content that promotes VPNs or other workarounds specifically aimed at young users.
