Disciplinary commission rejects Indiana AG Todd Rokita's call to dismiss latest ethics complaint
The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission issued a firm rebuttal this week to Attorney General Todd Rokita's attempt to dismiss a pending ethics complaint accusing him of misleading the court.
In the 44-page brief filed Tuesday, Adrienne Meiring, executive director of the disciplinary commission, called Rokita's motion 'procedurally improper' and 'meritless.'
She referenced the Republican attorney general's filing from February, in which he argued that the pending disciplinary case violates his First Amendment rights and Indiana's anti-SLAPP law, which is designed to protect political speech from frivolous legal action.
Meiring repeatedly rejected Rokita's claims that three new charges filed against the Republican attorney general were politically motivated or an unconstitutional attack on free speech. She urged the state's high court to move forward with the case.
'This matter is not about politics. It is not about (Rokita's) viewpoint on any political, social, or cultural issue, nor is it about any executive decision or action by (Rokita) in his statutory office of Indiana Attorney General,' Meiring wrote. 'Instead, this matter pertains to the integrity of the judicial system and the attorney disciplinary process.'
At the heart of the dispute is a press release Rokita issued just hours after the Indiana Supreme Court publicly reprimanded him in November 2023 for earlier misconduct.
In a sworn affidavit, Rokita admitted to violating professional conduct rules in exchange for a public reprimand. Although he agreed not to contest the charges, the commission found that Rokita recanted almost immediately, suggesting in a public press release that he had done nothing wrong.
The disciplinary commission held that 'this retraction of acceptance of responsibility demonstrates that the respondent was not candid with the court when he attested that he admitted he had violated Indiana Professional Conduct Rules.' One member of the nine-person commission, Lake County Prosecutor Bernard Carter, abstained from the proceedings.
Story continues below.
Commission's Brief in Opposition
Rokita did not contradict the earlier disciplinary agreement — or the sworn affidavit — in his motion to dismiss. Rather, he maintained the disciplinary commission's latest charges against him violated Indiana law, specifically the 'constitutional separation of powers principles.'
The attorney general also said he 'should be permitted to speak freely to his constituents without the constant threat of an unelected commission parsing his every word, ready to pounce with a disciplinary action when they perceive any imagined inconsistency.'
'Given the serious constitutional, statutory and factual problems with its case,' Rokita continued, the 'right thing' for the commission to do is 'withdraw its complaint.'
Few actions could be deemed more in need of the Court's exercise of its constitutional responsibility than an allegation that a lawyer has lacked candor and been dishonest with the State's highest court.
– Adrienne Meiring, executive director of the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission
The commission disagreed.
'The Commission has no dispute with Respondent's right to issue a press release or to discuss the Conditional Agreement and the resolution of his disciplinary case. The fallacy in Respondent's argument is that he misidentifies the speech involved in this disciplinary matter,' Meiring wrote. 'The core issue in this proceeding is whether Respondent was candid with this Court in making sworn statements recited and relied upon in the 2023 Opinion. Simply put, Respondent's statements to the Court in the 2023 disciplinary proceeding, under oath, are the problematic speech.'
As to Rokita's free speech claims, Meiring further argued that 'the First Amendment does not protect attorney speech that lies or misleads,' and cited multiple state and federal precedents that permit disciplinary sanctions for dishonest conduct by attorneys.
Meiring asserted, too, that Rokita failed to file a required answer to the charges and instead tried to 'improperly' use a motion to bypass a formal hearing.
Rokita additionally accused the commission of retaliating against him for proposing reforms to Indiana's attorney discipline rules, which he submitted to the state supreme court in November and released to the public in January.
The changes sought to limit the disciplinary commission's power and protect attorneys from politically driven complaints.
CONTACT US
Rokita argued that the commission was aware of the proposal well before it was made public. He said the new disciplinary complaint filed against him at the end of January was a direct response.
Meiring disputed those 'groundless' claims at length in this week's brief.
She called Rokita's theory baseless, noting that the commission was already bound by a Feb. 4 deadline to conclude its investigation, 'and, if appropriate, file charges.'
'(Rokita)'s decision on when to publish his Rules Proposal had no bearing on the Commission's filing decision,' Meiring wrote.
'Respondent's decision to publicly release his Rules Proposal on or about January 7, 2025, when the Proposal had been delivered to the Justices two months earlier, was his own timing choice,' she continued. 'Respondent cannot create suspicion of retaliation simply by publicizing his Rules Proposal closer to the Commission's deadline for filing the instant proceeding. Just as a litigant cannot prompt disqualification of a judge via the litigant's own action of filing an unfounded complaint or lawsuit, Respondent should not be able to prompt dismissal based on alleged 'suspicious timing' brought about by his own actions.'
Central to the disciplinary commission's complaint is Rokita's sworn conditional agreement regarding his discipline, and a subsequent press release issued by the attorney general.
In a 2022 interview with Fox News commentator Jesse Watters, Rokita called Indianapolis doctor Caitlin Bernard an 'activist acting as a doctor' and said his office would be investigating her conduct. Bernard, an OB-GYN, oversaw a medication abortion for a 10-year-old rape victim from Ohio in 2022.
That November, a split-decision and public reprimand from state Supreme Court justices found that he had violated two of the Rules of Professional Conduct for lawyers:
They said Rokita's comments constituted an 'extrajudicial statement' that he knew — or reasonably should have known — would be publicly disseminated and would prejudice related legal proceedings.
They also said his statements had 'no substantial purpose' other than to embarrass or burden Bernard.
Rokita and the commission agreed to the discipline in the conditional agreement. In a sworn affidavit, Rokita admitted to the two violations and acknowledged he couldn't have defended himself successfully on the charges if the matter were tried.
Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita seeks dismissal of latest disciplinary commission charges
The parties disputed over a third charge — engaging in conduct 'that is prejudicial to the administration of justice' — which the commission agreed to dismiss in exchange for 'admission to misconduct' on the others.
Rokita's punishment included a public reprimand and $250 in court costs.
But the same day the reprimand was handed down, Rokita shared a lengthy and unrepentant statement, defending his 'true' remarks in which he attacked the news media, medical field and 'cancel culture.'
The disciplinary commission pointed to those remarks — as well as earlier drafts of the statement obtained by subpoena, and a recent quote provided to the Indiana Lawyer — as evidence of Rokita's 'lack of candor and dishonesty to the Court' after he agreed to accept responsibility for misconduct.
A decision on the dismissal motion and the disciplinary commission's new complaint is up to the Indiana Supreme Court.
If the charges aren't dismissed — or if the disciplinary commission and Rokita can't reach a settlement agreement — the state's high court justices will appoint a hearing officer to hold a public hearing on the case and hear evidence.
It would be up to the hearing officer to then issue findings and recommendations to the court, which has final say over the outcome of the case.
Sanctions depend on the seriousness of the case. Possible sanctions include:
a private or public reprimand;
suspension from practice for a set period of time;
suspension from practice with reinstatement only after the lawyer proves fitness; and
permanent disbarment.
The vast majority of grievances filed with the commission are dismissed, however.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
39 minutes ago
- The Hill
5 things to know as the GENIUS Act becomes law
President Trump signed the GENIUS Act into law on Friday, enacting the first major cryptocurrency legislation. The bill, which sets up a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, reached Trump's desk after a tumultuous week in the House, in which competing GOP factions revolted over a trio of crypto bills. The chaos brought the House floor to a standstill and resulted in the longest vote on record in the chamber. Republican leaders struck a deal late Wednesday night to move forward with consideration of the bills, unfreezing the floor and allowing votes to proceed on Thursday. The House ultimately voted 308-122 to pass the GENIUS Act, with 102 Democrats joining most Republicans to support the legislation. Here's are five things to know about the newly minted stablecoin law: 'Seal of approval' for crypto industry The signing of the GENIUS Act marks a key milestone for the industry, as the 'first step of the U.S. government really regulating cryptocurrency,' said Rob Nolan, a partner at Duane Morris and a member of the law firm's digital assets and blockchain group. As the first major digital assets bill to clear Congress and receive the president's signature, it imbues the industry with new legitimacy. 'It's a big deal because when you have a law … it essentially gives a Good Housekeeping seal of approval to the industry,' Ian Katz, managing partner at Capital Alpha, told The Hill. 'You now have Congress and the president of the United States signing off on the legitimacy of this industry. 'You can interpret the legislation as encouraging the activity,' Katz said. 'To a lot of people, this is the sort of thing you need to really get an industry to take off.' The passage of the bill marks a sharp reversal of the industry's fortunes in Washington, which just last year still looked somewhat bleak. The industry had struggled to regain its footing after the shocking collapse of crypto exchange FTX in 2022 and the subsequent fraud charges filed against its founder, Sam Bankman-Fried. He was later found guilty and sentenced to 25 years in prison. Under the Biden administration, the industry also contended with former Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler, who brought numerous enforcement actions against crypto firms. They accused Gensler of attempting to regulate via enforcement, rather than providing clear rules. By contrast, Trump has embraced the industry in his second term, naming David Sacks as artificial intelligence (AI) and crypto czar, inviting crypto leaders to the White House and signing an executive order to create a strategic bitcoin reserve and digital asset stockpile. Broader crypto framework still in the works While the industry secured a key victory with the GENIUS Act, it represents just one part of the regulatory puzzle for digital assets. 'This is just the first little bite at the apple because it really is a small portion of cryptocurrency assets,' Nolan added. Stablecoins are just one type of cryptocurrency. They are tied to another asset, like the U.S. dollar, to maintain a more stable price. Congress has yet to pass legislation creating a broader crypto framework. The key issue at hand is how to split up oversight between the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The House last week passed its version of crypto market structure legislation, known as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. The Senate, which has moved at a slower pace, is separately preparing to release its own discussion draft. Despite previously aiming to pass both stablecoin and market structure legislation before Congress leaves for its August recess, the White House and GOP leadership are now aiming to wrap up the second key crypto bill by the end of September. Financial regulators take on new responsibilities Under the GENIUS Act, several financial regulators are poised to take on new responsibilities regulating stablecoins. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is set to regulate stand-alone stablecoin issuers, while it and the Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and National Credit Union Administration will regulate institutions they already oversee that issue stablecoins. Stablecoin issuers can seemingly expedite the approval process if they can become chartered banks with the OCC, which has already prompted several stablecoin issuers, including Circle and Ripple, to apply for bank licenses. Banking industry pushes back on crypto charters The banking industry isn't entirely content with the direction in which things are headed and is making its concerns known, particularly on the push by some stablecoin issuers to seek bank charters. In a letter to the OCC on Thursday, several major banking associations questioned whether the stablecoins issuers would be performing the activities of national trust banks and called for the agency to hold off on taking up their applications for now. 'Given these substantial concerns, and the policy, legal and commercial implications that chartering the applicants would have for the banking system, the associations urge the OCC to postpone consideration of the applications,' the banking groups wrote. Traditional players weigh stablecoin adoption Even as some voice concerns, many traditional players in the financial services space are considering or already moving into stablecoins. Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan said last week that his bank is working to launch a stablecoin, while Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser said her bank was considering such a move, Reuters reported. JPMorgan Chase announced last month it was launching a stablecoin-like deposit token called JPMD, and CEO Jamie Dimon said last week that his company would be involved in stablecoins as well, according to CNBC. Katz said he expects traditional players to 'not let stand-alone stablecoin issuers just grab that potential market.' 'Some of them are probably not even totally convinced that this market is going to be nearly as big as what is being projected, but they can't take any chances,' he said. 'They have to plan defensively and make sure they're not left out in the cold if stablecoins really take off in a big way in the coming years.'
The Hill
39 minutes ago
- The Hill
Virginia GOP lieutenant governor candidate launches a Substack
Republican Virginia lieutenant governor candidate John Reid launched a Substack on Tuesday in an effort to engage directly with supporters. The Hill was the first outlet to report on the Republican's Substack, which is called The Reid Revolution and will publish on a weekly basis. Reid is one of the first Republican candidates to launch a Substack. The launch comes as other politicians, including a number of potential presidential candidates, have explored new forms of media like podcasts to reach voters. In his first post on the platform, which went up early Tuesday morning, Reid noted that his Substack is not a campaign newsletter. 'It's a direct line from me to you that is unfiltered by media spin, untethered from political talking points, and free from the gatekeepers who've told candidates like me to stay in our lane, water it down, or wait our turn,' Reid wrote. 'I'm not interested in playing by their rules.' In a second post obtained by The Hill, which is slated to be published on Reid's Substack later on Tuesday, Reid compares his policies to his opponent state Sen. Ghazala Hashmi (D) and Democratic gubernatorial nominee Abigail Spanberger. 'Ghazala Hashmi and Abigail Spanberger support a vision where the government always knows best. I don't. I trust families,' Reid writes. 'This campaign isn't just about childcare or safety or schools. It's about freedom. It's about who makes the decisions: you, or them.' The Republican candidate previously hosted a talk show on WRVA for eight years. Reid found himself in the center of a political firestorm in April after Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R ) called for Reid, who is openly gay, to suspend his campaign after a report that Republican researchers came across sexually explicit photos on Tumblr posted by an account with the same username Reid uses on other sites. Reid has adamantly denied the allegations and went as far as to accuse Youngkin's team of extortion. Reid, who is openly gay, has also said the reason he is being targeted is because of his sexuality. A lawyer representing Reid sent a cease and desist letter to Matt Moran, then the executive director of Youngkin's Spirit of Virginia PAC, who later stepped down from his post. Virginia Republicans were quick to come to Reid's defense in the face of the controversy, calling Youngkin's move 'an unforced error' and laying blame on the Spirit of Virginia PAC. Last month, Youngkin acknowledged Reid as the party's lieutenant gubernatorial nominee, telling reporters, 'He has clearly made up his mind that he's going to stay in.'
The Hill
39 minutes ago
- The Hill
Wielding influence and fear, Trump is most powerful president in decades
President Trump has emerged as the most powerful president of either party in decades, wielding enormous clout within the GOP especially on Capitol Hill, where Republicans have rammed through his legislative agenda despite misgivings over some of his priorities. Six months into his second term, Trump has shown a unique ability to instill fear among fellow Republicans by brandishing the threat of calling for primary challenges on Truth Social. Trump has passed much of his domestic legislative agenda, crammed into his 'big, beautiful bill,' faster than most lawmakers on Capitol Hill thought possible. The Senate has confirmed 96 of Trump's civilian nominees in short time, filling the Cabinet at the fastest pace in 20 years. The pace of confirmations during Trump's first 100 days exceeded that set by three of the past four administration, including his first term, according to the Brookings Institution. He pushed embattled Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) over the top in the January leadership election, pressuring Reps. Keith Self (R-Texas) and Ralph Norman (R-S.C.). And Trump managed to muscle through the first rescissions package Congress has passed since 1992 — something he tried and failed to do during his first term in 2018. Trump's most controversial actions, such as his global trade war against longtime allies in Europe and East Asia, as well as Mexico and Canada, and his alliance with Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency to slash, shutter and reorganize federal agencies without congressional input, received little pushback from Republican lawmakers. One Republican senator who requested anonymity to comment on the culture of fear and obedience on Capitol Hill said the president's priorities are viewed as sacrosanct, even though some Republican senators privately view a few of them, such as $40 million for the 'Garden of Heroes,' as ridiculous. 'It's sickening how we did not challenge,' grumbled the lawmaker. 'Garden of Heroes? We can't touch that. It's a priority. We're letting them call everything.' The lawmaker added that the White House budget office is dictating spending decisions to Congress and expecting veteran lawmakers to hop to the task like errand boys. 'We're not getting basic information. We're being told, 'This is what we want to do and here's how much we want for it,'' the source said. While Trump's approval rating has slipped in recent public polls, and he's hearing loud grumbling from the MAGA base over his administration's handling of Jeffrey Epstein-related files, the president faces no real opposition on Capitol Hill. 'He does want to appear to be dictating,' said Stephen S. Smith, a professor of political science at Washington University in St. Louis, who argued that Trump is also willing to offer concessions when necessary to accomplish his goals. Trump has a knack for wielding threats unlike any of his recent predecessors, Smith observed. 'Members of Congress are leery about opposing him because he's promising retribution and very seldom do we have a president who promises retribution,' he said. 'Is he the most powerful of the last generation within his party? It's probably fair to say yes. And with his party [having] a slim majority, that means a lot,' Smith said. Republican lawmakers who pop off occasionally to oppose the president find themselves immediately isolated. 'There's no doubt, ever since I've been voting, I've never seen anybody have this kind of influence, which is good,' Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) told The Hill, arguing that Trump has more influence now than any president he could remember. Tuberville delivered a blunt warning to Trump skeptics within the Senate Republican conference after last year's election: Get in line or be prepared to face a primary challenge come 2026. 'Republicans: If you're not on the team, get out of the way,' Tuberville told Fox Business in November. 'President Trump and JD Vance are going to be running the Senate,' he warned. If you want to get in the way, fine. But we're going to try to get you out of the Senate too if you try to do that.' Eight months later, Tuberville says almost all of his colleagues heard that message loud and clear and have toed the line. 'Most, not 100 percent,' he said, pointing to the speedy passage of Trump's One Big, Beautiful Bill Act before the July 4 deadline Trump set for Congress — a deadline that even Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) didn't initially think was possible, according to GOP senators. 'I never thought it would get done until the fall, to be honest with you,' Tuberville said of Trump's signature legislative achievement, which Republicans senators celebrated at a dinner with Trump at the White House on Friday. One Republican who dared to clash with Trump over the bill, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) paid the political price when Trump savaged him in a post on Truth Social, accusing the two-term senator of wanting to hike taxes and wanting to throw North Carolina's tobacco industry 'out the window.' Tillis, who supported the tax provisions in the legislation but had serious concerns about deep cuts to Medicaid, announced the next day he would not seek reelection. 'Shows you how powerful the president is,' Tuberville said, who said Tillis 'knew' that if he was going to go against Trump, he 'might as well exit, stage right, because it's going to be hard for him to win.' Republicans in both chambers swiftly fell into line and approved Trump's rescissions package last week after the president threatened to withhold his endorsement from GOP lawmakers who defied him. Ross K. Baker, a professor of political science at Rutgers University who served several stints as a Senate fellow, said historians may have to go back to Franklin D. Roosevelt to find a president who so overtly targeted members of his party who defied him. 'Fear is a powerful motivation,' he said, explaining Trump's power. 'He's cut out the intermediaries, the members of Congress, and he exercises his powers through his control of sections of electorate and has made members of Congress fearful of their constituents, in particularly fearful of constituents who are aroused when they feel Trump is being defied or his objectives are being obstructed. 'That enables Trump to use the weapon of a primary challenge with great power,' Baker said. Except for former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), who pulled his name from consideration to be Trump's attorney general, the Senate quickly confirmed Trump's most controversial Cabinet nominees. Senate Republicans moved swiftly to approve Pete Hegseth, Tulsi Gabbard and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the president's picks to head the Pentagon, national intelligence community and Department of Health and Human Services, respectively, despite strong private reservations of several GOP senators. Two key senators, Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), faced an immediate backlash from Trump's MAGA allies after they initially raised questions about Hegseth's confirmation. Ernst declined to commit to supporting Hegseth in early December, and Graham described allegations of misconduct against the nominee 'very disturbing.' But both lawmakers came around to backing Hegseth enthusiastically after Trump stuck with his embattled nominee, hailing him a 'WINNER' and dispatching Vance to shore up support within the GOP conference. Tillis was one Republican senator who wavered about voting for Hegseth and ultimately supported him under immense pressure from MAGA activists and allies. The North Carolina senator suggested earlier this month that he probably wouldn't vote for Hegseth now. 'Today, I am beginning to wonder if maybe [the] Armed Services [Committee] was a little bit generous with respect to their assessment of his capabilities as a manager of the world's largest, most complex and, arguably, consequential organization,' he admitted in an interview with CNN's Jake Tapper.
