Suspect in Kentucky church shooting had a domestic violence hearing the next day
The man accused of a shooting rampage Sunday at a rural Kentucky church after wounding a state trooper had been expected in court Monday for a domestic violence hearing, a local official said.
Police say Guy House, 47, shot the trooper during a traffic stop near Lexington's airport, fled in a carjacked vehicle then opened fire at Richmond Road Baptist Church, killing two women and wounding two men before officers fatally shot him.
House went to the church looking for the mother of his children but his domestic violence hearing did not involve her, the Lexington Heald-Leader reported, citing a sister of the woman, Rachael Barnes.
Matt Ball, a deputy clerk for family court in Fayette County, confirmed to The Associated Press that House had been scheduled for the domestic violence hearing on Monday.
Police say Beverly Gumm, 72, and Christina Combs, 34, were killed in the shooting. One of the wounded men was being treated for critical injuries and the other was in stable condition, police said. The trooper was in stable condition, police said.
'Preliminary information indicates that the suspect may have had a connection to the individuals at the church,' Lexington Police Chief Lawrence Weathers said at a news conference Sunday.
The shootings remain under investigation, Weathers said. The trooper stopped House after receiving a 'license plate reader alert,' police said.
A woman who witnessed that shooting said it initially appeared to be a routine traffic stop, with the trooper talking to the suspect through an open window.
'And as we were driving by, I heard, 'pop, pop' and I knew it was gunshots,' Larissa McLaughlin told WLEX-TV in Lexington.
Police tracked the carjacked vehicle to the Baptist church about 16 miles (26 kilometres) from where the trooper was shot, police said. Fayette County Coroner Gary Ginn said the church is home to a small, tight-knit congregation.
In a post on social media, Gov. Andy Beshear said, 'Please pray for everyone affected by these senseless acts of violence, and let's give thanks for the swift response by the Lexington Police Department and Kentucky State Police.'
State Attorney General Russell Coleman said detectives with his office were ready to support local and state agencies. 'Today, violence invaded the Lord's House,' Coleman said in a statement. 'The attack on law enforcement and people of faith in Lexington shocked the entire Commonwealth.'
Bruce Schreiner, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Barrie men accused of murder in 2024 Keswick park shooting return to court
Ethan Pashka-McNeil, 21, (Source: Reddit) and John McKay, 19, (Source: Facebook) both from Barrie, are charged with first-degree murder. What was supposed to be the start of a scheduled preliminary hearing for two Barrie men accused of first-degree murder, turned into an adjournment in a Newmarket, Ont. courtroom. John McKay, 19, is accused alongside Ethan Pashka-McNeil, 21, of killing two men who were shot at Bayview Park in Keswick September 18, 2024, at about 7:30 a.m. Dead are 21-year-old Reilly MacDonald, better known online as Stackzz Mac and Mark Sutcliffe, 39, of Stouffville who were gunned down that morning in what police called an isolated and targeted incident. At the time, police said all four men knew one another but would not reveal how. Reilly MacDonald Reilly MacDonald, of Newmarket, Ont., died in a double shooting at Bayview Park in Keswick, Ont., on Sept.18, 2024. McKay was bailed out in March, to three sureties who pledged more than half a million dollars to secure his release from custody. Pashka-McNeil remains behind bars. Barrie and York Regional Police officers were out canvassing the area of Browning Trail in Barrie with the K-9 unit and metal detectors in hand along with a Barrie home along Barrett Crescent when neighbours said a vehicle was towed away from the property. Mark Sutcliffe Mark Sutcliffe, 39, of Stouffville, Ont., was pronounced dead after an alleged shooting in a Keswick park on Wed., Sept. 18, 2024. (Source: Facebook) Friends of Sutcliffe told CTV News he was loving and loyal and never did anyone wrong. MacDonald was seen posing in several social media posts carrying weapons while throwing up gang signs. The accused are scheduled to make their next appearance in October. The allegations against them have not been tested in court.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
No parole eligibility for 12 years for Vancouver park caretaker's killer
Police tape is seen at W. 3rd Avenue and McDonald Street, where Justis Daniel, 77, was found dead inside his home. The man who murdered Vancouver park caretaker Justis Daniel has been sentenced to life in prison, with no chance of parole for 12 years. Brent Steven White was handed his sentence Wednesday in B.C. Supreme Court, along with a 10-year firearms ban and an order to provide a DNA sample to law enforcement. Justice Miriam Maisonville found the 55-year-old guilty of second-degree murder in May. The victim served as caretaker at Tatlow Park, where he lived in a small cottage until he was violently attacked on Dec. 9, 2021. Daniel was 77. The court heard he had invited White into his home for a visit, and that his guest attacked him with a knife, leaving him with 50 stab and slash wounds. Daniel also suffered several fractures in his face and a broken vertebrae. White claimed Daniel had attacked him first, and that he was acting in self defence. The judge didn't believe him, however, noting that Daniel was battling cancer at the time, and weighed just 139 pounds. There were emotional moments in the courtroom last Friday as victim impact statements were read during a sentencing hearing for White. The victim's son Amaris Daniel, who appeared by video link, described his father as a generous man who 'welcomed many in need into his home.' 'I'm haunted by the fact that his kindness was betrayed in such a devastating way,' he said. With files from CTV News Vancouver's Ben Miljure
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Western Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Attorneys at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. Address Retaliation for Workplace Injury Claims
Retaliation against injured workers who file for benefits remains a persistent and unlawful problem in Pennsylvania workplaces. The Western Pennsylvania workers' compensation attorneys at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. ( are calling attention to this critical issue and encouraging injured employees to understand and assert their legal rights when faced with wrongful treatment. For many injured workers, seeking compensation is not just a financial necessity—it's a legally protected right. However, some employers respond with demotion, job reassignment, or even termination, sparking concern and confusion among employees already struggling with injury. The Western Pennsylvania workers' compensation attorneys at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. are committed to helping workers understand that the law is on their side, and retaliation for filing a claim is prohibited. Pennsylvania law provides clear protections for employees who report job-related injuries or file workers' compensation claims. The Western Pennsylvania workers' compensation attorneys at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. emphasize that retaliation—whether blatant or subtle—violates public policy and specific state statutes. 'The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has made it clear that the Workers' Compensation Act reflects a strong and unmistakable public policy: protecting injured workers and providing them with a path to compensation and medical care,' the firm notes in its recent guidance. At-will employment, which allows employers to terminate staff without warning, does not override these rights. In Pennsylvania, this legal framework is counterbalanced by the public policy exception. This means that while employers can make decisions about staffing, they cannot fire someone simply for asserting their legal rights, such as filing for workers' compensation after a workplace injury. Courts look at the timing and context of a firing to determine whether it was retaliatory. Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. explains that Pennsylvania's anti-retaliation statute—Title 43 P.S. § 933.10—gives injured workers powerful tools to defend their rights. The statute prohibits employers from discriminating or taking adverse action against employees for exercising their legal rights under the Workers' Compensation Act. This includes filing a claim, making a complaint about noncompliance, or simply informing coworkers about their rights. The statute even protects workers who raise concerns in good faith, even if those concerns are later found unsubstantiated. 'Retaliation after filing a workers' compensation claim is not always dramatic or immediate,' notes Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. 'In many cases, it unfolds gradually, masked as everyday management decisions or subtle changes in working conditions.' This could include reduced hours, denial of benefits, increased scrutiny, or being transferred to less desirable roles. These forms of retaliation, while harder to detect, are just as illegal. The firm also highlights a key legal provision that supports retaliation claims: if an employer takes adverse action within 90 days of an employee filing or reporting a claim, the law presumes the action was retaliatory. This 'rebuttable presumption' shifts the burden to the employer to prove a legitimate reason for the adverse action, giving workers a significant advantage in proving their case. Another common concern is whether workers' compensation benefits continue if an employee is fired. According to Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C, benefits should not automatically stop if the employee is already receiving them. However, employers may attempt to challenge ongoing payments by alleging misconduct or insubordination as grounds for termination. In these situations, the workers' compensation judge evaluates whether the injury still limits the employee's ability to work and whether the termination was justified. The firm also clarifies the difference between a workers' compensation claim and a retaliation lawsuit. While the former addresses the injury and related benefits, the latter is a separate legal action aimed at holding employers accountable for retaliatory conduct. Retaliation lawsuits may result in compensation for lost wages, emotional distress, and even punitive damages, depending on the severity of the employer's actions. For employees who have experienced job loss, demotion, or harassment after reporting a workplace injury, legal remedies may be available. Damages in a retaliation lawsuit can include back pay, front pay if reinstatement isn't possible, compensation for emotional distress, and attorney's fees. In serious cases, courts may also award punitive damages to deter future misconduct. Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. encourages any worker in Pennsylvania who suspects retaliation to document incidents, gather records, and seek legal guidance immediately. Acting quickly can help preserve evidence and ensure legal protections are upheld. Retaliation after a workplace injury isn't just unfair—it's against the law. The legal team at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. continues to defend workers across Western Pennsylvania who are treated unfairly after filing a legitimate claim. Their approach ensures that injured employees don't face additional harm simply for standing up for their rights. Employees who believe they've been targeted after reporting a work injury are encouraged to reach out to Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. for help navigating the legal process and protecting their rights. About Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C.: Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. is a team of Western Pennsylvania workers' compensation attorneys committed to standing up for injured workers. With a focus on workplace injury claims and related retaliation cases, the firm helps clients understand their rights and take action when those rights are violated. Embeds: Youtube Video: GMB: Email and website Email: lmkelly@ Website: Media Contact Company Name: Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. Contact Person: Lauren Kelly Gielarowski Email: Send Email Phone: (724) 658-8535 Address: 315 N Mercer St City: New Castle State: Pennsylvania 16101 Country: United States Website:
