Public Service Work From Home Policies Dispute Heading To Employment Relations Authority
Public Service Association Te Pkenga Here Tikanga Mahi National Secretary, Fleur Fitzsimons, said they were dismayed to have not settled the matter quickly for public sector workers.
Confidential mediation today failed to resolve the difference between the PSA and the government on public service work from home policies, and the issue is now heading to the Employment Relations Authority.
Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi National Secretary, Fleur Fitzsimons, said they were dismayed to have not settled the matter quickly for public sector workers.
'While we're still open to settling this matter outside of the Authority, the government is digging in its heels on its arbitrary wish to force public servants, who have performed to a high standard for years now while working from home, back into the office.
'Not having working from home as the default disadvantages women, who make up 62 per cent of the public service and who disproportionately hold whanau care responsibilities.
'Working from home is good for women, good for people with chronic health conditions, and good for people with disabilities. It's good for everyone including employers and even the government too.'
In 2018, the PSA entered in into an agreement – the Gender Pay Principles, following legal action in the Employment Court to establish principles governing work performed by women in accordance with the Equal Pay Act 1972.
The follow up agreement, Flexible Work by Default, gave effect to these principles and was signed by the PSA, CTU, the State Services Commission (as it then was) and the Ministry for Women in 2020.
'The fact of the matter is, the government entered into the Gender Pay Principles and the Flexible Work by Default agreements.
'You can't just rip up these agreements when thousands of people rely on them to maintain their personal and whanau wellbeing.
'But then – we didn't see much care for women when the government also ripped up the Pay Equity Bill last week.'
Previous media statements:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
New Low From Govt In Public Service Act Changes Aimed At Ending Long Term Planning, Diversity & Inclusion & Pay Equity
The Government's proposed changes to the Public Service Act, to be debated in Parliament today, aim to strip away key provisions that ensure fairness, equality and long-term planning in the public sector. Under the proposed amendments, detailed in the Public Service Amendment Bill, diversity and inclusion, pay equity and long-term planning would be downgraded. "This is a new low from the Government. It now wants to tell chief executives of Government departments that they are not to focus on the long-term public interest, this is reckless given that the complex problems New Zealand's facing need long term policy solutions," said Fleur Fitzsimons, National Secretary for the Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi. "This approach will limit New Zealand's ability to solve complicated problems like climate change adaptation, family violence and our infrastructure deficit." The Public Service Amendment Bill also scraps requirements on pay equity. It would remove responsibilities for chief executives and the Public Service Commissioner to work towards pay equity between women and men, and to work towards eliminating bias and discrimination in decisions about pay. "Pay equity is about fairness and justice for workers and includes ensuring flexible and part time work is available. The Government has already ripped up pay equity claims, denying pay increases for more than150,000 women in the public and community sectors. Taking away its priority in this legislation again shows how little the Government values supporting the career of women and closing the gender pay gap." The Bill would also remove requirements on chief executives and the Public Service Commissioner to foster a public service that's inclusive and representative of the communities it serves. "Diversity and inclusion in our workforce are not nice to haves - they are essential to delivering fair and effective public services that are sensitive to the needs of all New Zealanders. The public service does its job well and is legitimate because it represents our diverse country. Reducing the importance of these principles risks turning back decades of progress." The PSA is also alarmed by amendments to the purpose of the Public Service Act which would reduce emphasis on pursuing the long-term public interest, and remove the requirement of the public service to enable both the current Government and successive governments to develop and implement their policies. "This is a worrying attack on the political neutrality of the public service and makes it less accountable to the people of New Zealand. Public services must look beyond the next political cycle. Downgrading the public service's role in pursuing the long-term public interest means less focus on how our public service can meet future challenges - whether that's dealing with an ageing population, infrastructure challenges, adapting to new technology, or responding to climate change. "The Government has stripped the public service of thousands of jobs despite our population growing, and our challenges becoming more complex and urgent. "The Bill was tabled on the same day the Government extended a tax break for big tobacco, showing how misplaced its priorities are. "This is a time to invest in a fairer, more future-focused public service - not tear down the progress we've made. It's 2025, not 1955." Note
Otago Daily Times
24-07-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Legal action against MBIE over flexible working
The Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment recently introduced a new flexible work policy intended to align with the government's directive to restrict flexible work arrangements for public service workers, including reducing days working from home. That directive is also subject to legal action by the Public Service Association (PSA) and the union has filed proceedings with the Employment Relations Authority (ERA). "Cracking down on flexible work is the wrong approach from employers in 2025," PSA national secretary Fleur Fitzsimons said. The union originally raised objections to MBIE's flexible work guidance last month, but attempts to resolve the dispute through mediation had failed, she said. "MBIE hasn't been willing to back down, leaving the PSA with no choice but to take this step to protect the rights of MBIE staff included in existing agreements." The ministry could not just change existing agreements, which were protected under the collective agreement, she said. "The collective agreement binds MBIE to supporting flexible work, so its new policy is simply unlawful. "We are seeking a determination from the ERA that MBIE is violating the 'flexible by default' approach which forms part of its collective agreement with members." The PSA hoped the authority would allow the MBIE case to be joined to the broader case against the Public Service Commission. MBIE response MBIE's chief people officer Jennifer Nathan said consistent with the Public Service Commission's Flexible Working (work from home) guidance for the public service received last year, MBIE had updated its flexible working policy in line with government expectations. "Conversations with the Public Service Association regarding the updated policy have been ongoing, including attending mediation with the PSA on 8 July. To date the parties have been unable to reach an agreement on resolving the PSA's concerns. "MBIE does not accept the PSA view that the review and refresh of the flexible working policy and procedures is a breach of the Collective Agreement." MBIE was notified yesterday that the union intend to file legal proceedings and was awaiting more information, she said.
NZ Herald
24-07-2025
- NZ Herald
Tiny number of new pay equity claims expected – but first is ‘very close'
Last week, the Herald asked Workplace Relations Minister Brooke van Velden for an update on the number of claims brought or likely to be brought under her new regime. Van Velden's office said the matter was better handled by the agencies responsible for the claims, and forwarded the Herald's query to them. When asked whether she was happy with the way the new regime was working, van Velden said it was 'early days to see how it will roll out in practice'. 'I do believe we got the law correct,' she said. Health NZ Te Whatu Ora's funding and investment director, Jason Power, told the Herald it purchased 'services from a large number of third-party providers but we are not the employer of the workforces that deliver these contracted services'. 'We are not aware of any new pay equity claims across the third-party providers we purchase services from,' Power said. The Ministry of Education's hautū (leader), Anna Welanyk, told the Herald 'no new pay equity claims have been raised since the amendments were made to the Equal Pay Act'. She said the ministry 'has ongoing obligations under the amended Equal Pay Act to respond to and investigate new pay equity claim/s that are raised, once it's been determined the claim meets the required thresholds applying to new claims. Our responsibility to respond to new claims continues under the amended Equal Pay Act.' PSA not intending to use new law The Herald also spoke to the unions responsible for the workforces likely to take claims. Public Service Association (PSA) national secretary Fleur Fitzsimons, who ran as a Labour candidate at the last election, told the Herald the union 'had no intention to file any claims under the new amended Equal Pay Act'. Fitzsimons said the union had 'no confidence women will get equal pay through that legislation'. 'It guts the heart of pay equity. It undermines the ability for women to even be heard,' she said. She said that in some cases, the legislation barred claims from being lodged. This was the case with care and support workers' claim. That claim, which was fought in the courts and sparked the creation of the old pay equity scheme, expired at the end of 2023. In some cases, these workers are now earning the minimum wage. The new regime prevents settled claims being revisited for 10 years after they were initially settled. This means if a pay equity settlement is eroded as a result of male-dominated workforces' wages rising faster, it cannot be litigated until 10 years after the settlement. 'There isn't any ability for those women to even advance a claim under the current legislation – it's not a choice we've made, the legislation itself bans the claim,' Fitzsimons said. She said in the case of other workforces such as probation officers, library assistants, and administration and clerical workers, the union would not be taking pay equity claims but is 'seeking improvements to their pay through collective bargaining'. Nurses' union to take claims soon The New Zealand Nurses Organisation (NZNO) is taking a different approach. It had 12 claims that it took or was a party to – covering 13,200 members – extinguished by the law change. NZNO chief executive Paul Goulter told the Herald 'we decided pretty much immediately after the announcement the issue was too important for us not to pursue any chance at all of continuing pay equity claims'. 'Our members are very strongly in support of us doing that,' he said. Goulter said the Government's changes were 'intended in our view to rule out advancing pay equity claims under the guise of making it easier and more transparent'. He said employers in the funded sector, the private employers who deliver mainly government-funded services, were also keen to have pay equity established because it would help to grow the workforce. He said the union was 'very close' to lodging claims relating to Plunket and hospice workers. Goulter also raised concerns with the 10-year rule. He noted a large claim relating to nurses employed by Health NZ could not be reopened until 2033. It covered 35,000-40,000 nurses. Education union analysing law's effects Education sector union NZEI Te Riu Roa is still delving into how the new regime will function. Because it was passed in mere hours under urgency, without consultation or a select committee, unions had very little time to come to grips with the way the new regime works. NZEI's national secretary Stephanie Mills said her union was still 'analysing' the new regime. 'We've asked the ministry a number of questions about how they would interpret the new act in relation to a claim or claims,' she said. Mills said many of the things her union is looking at include 'technical' problems, such as the new regime's changing of the threshold for raising a claim to one of 'merit'. The old system allowed claims to be raised if they were 'arguable'. What that means in practice is still not clear to NZEI. Asked whether the union would take a claim in future, Mills said NZEI wanted to 'keep looking'. 'We do want to do the best by members. In the end we'll have to make a call about whether we do or don't [lodge a claim]. 'In the meantime we'll be making the argument that the legislation does need to change and does need to be fixed,' she said.
