
Noble rot, the alchemist of wines, is setting fungal biology abuzz
This makes the picking process labour-intensive and drives up the cost. The crushed grape juice from rotted grapes is used to make high-quality sweet wines like the Sauternes of Bordeaux, the Trockenbeerenauslese of Germany and Austria, and the Tokaji Aszús of Hungary. They are also very expensive.
Befitting its exalted status, the botrytis fungus was also found recently to exhibit an unusual idiosyncrasy. In all animals, plants, and fungi, the nucleus of a cell contains one or more sets of all of the chromosomes of the organism. This property of nuclei allows us to clone animals. Scientists can transfer such a nucleus, which contains all the DNA instructions, into an egg cell whose own nucleus has been removed and, in the right conditions, prompt it to develop into a new organism.
But because of the idiosyncrasy, botrytis fungus cannot be cloned — nor can another fungus called Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.
A team of researchers from Sichuan University in China and the University of British Columbia in Canada have made a startling discovery: in these fungi, no single nucleus contains a complete set of chromosomes. Instead, the chromosome set is distributed across two or more nuclei, and any one nucleus contains only a subset.
These unexpected findings were reported in Science.
Ascomycetes, asci, ascospores
Botrytis and Sclerotinia are ascomycetes fungi. The first cell of a baby fungus born following a mating between two ascomycetes fungi is called the ascospore. All the subsequent other cells of the individual are derived from it. This is the defining feature of ascomycetes fungi. The ascospores are produced in a sac-like cell called the ascus (plural asci). An ascus, produced when two parental strains mate, contains two complete sets of chromosomes.
In many well-studied ascomycetes fungi, eight ascospores are made in each ascus. All the nuclei of an individual ascospore are genetically identical. That is, they all have the same set of chromosomes. B. cinerea and S. sclerotiorum also make asci with eight spores. The researchers had no reason to suspect them to be any different.
How are discoveries made?
People are often curious to know how scientists make their discoveries. Most discoveries originate in experiments that did not work in the way they were meant to. Sadly, the converse is not true.
The most common explanation for experiments that don't work the way were meant to is some kind of 'operator error' — i.e. a silly mistake of some kind: a growth medium was not properly made, the incubator was not set to the right temperature, the wrong strain was used, etc. Silly mistakes are more common than serendipitous leads.
Not surprisingly, scientists get mad with experiments that don't work. But once in a while, this type of experiment is a harbinger of an unexpected discovery. This is the scientist's dilemma.
Improbable versus true
The research team set out to obtain mutants of S. sclerotiorum. For this they exposed the ascospores to ultraviolet light. Each S. sclerotiorum ascospore contains two nuclei. Both nuclei were assumed to carry the same set of chromosomes. UV-induced mutations occur at random. Therefore, it was highly unlikely the same gene would become inactivated in both nuclei of an ascospore.
Consequently, a colony containing mutant cells was also expected to include a sector with non-mutant cells. The non-mutant cells would have nuclei descended from the ascospore nucleus with the non-mutant gene.
But in the experiment, of the more than 100 mutant colonies the researchers examined, all contained only mutant cells. None of them had a non-mutant sector. This was most unexpected. Why weren't any non-mutant cells seen in these colonies?
This observation set the researchers up for their Sherlock Holmes moment: 'When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.'
Could the two nuclei between them contain only one set of chromosomes?
Closer examination
The researchers wrote in their paper: 'Because this prediction challenges established principles of chromosome biology, we conducted a closer examination of the ascospores' nuclei and chromosomes.'
They used molecular probes that bind specifically to individual chromosomes, allowing them to say whether or not a nucleus contains the chromosome. When the probes were used individually, they lit up exclusively one nucleus per ascospore. The probe never lit up both nuclei.
This meant the two nuclei harboured distinct chromosome sets. When both probes were used together, in some ascospores the signals showed up in only one nucleus and in other ascospores the signals were seen in both nuclei. This meant the distribution of chromosomes in the nuclei differed between ascospores.
Further tests revealed that each nucleus of a S. sclerotiorum or B. cinerea ascospore contained only three to eight chromosomes.
New questions
The findings have already spawned many questions in the research community. What is the mechanism by which chromosomes are allocated to the different nuclei? How is genetic integrity preserved during cell division? What restores a complete set of chromosomes when the fungus mates, and with its mating partner forms new asci? Which genes and mechanisms are involved in chromosome sorting and regulation? What advantage does chromosome distribution confer to Botrytis and Sclerotinia?
The questions have generated a new buzz in fungal biology. Right now, scientists doing research with fruit flies, nematodes, zebrafish, mice, and other model organisms might be envying those working with rot fungi — noble or otherwise.
D.P. Kasbekar is a retired scientist.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
4 hours ago
- Hans India
Meet on latest innovations in computer science begins
Vijayawada: The Department of Computer Science at PB Siddhartha College of Arts & Science on Monday launched a two-day International Conference on Recent Innovations in Computer Science & Technology (ICRICT-2025). The conference aims at benefiting students, academicians, and researchers in the dynamic field of Computer Science. Eminent experts, professors, and researchers from various countries are set to present and discuss their latest innovations and contributions. Vice-president and Chief Data Centre Delivery Officer at Pi Data Centres Abhinav Kotagiri who was the chief guest, underscored the critical importance of both programming skills and research aptitude for securing employment opportunities in today's competitive tech landscape. The conference features a lineup of prominent speakers who will deliver keynote talks and present groundbreaking research, elaborating on the latest innovations in computer science and the significance of research papers in both academia and industry. Notable speakers include Shesha Raghunathan from IBM, Bengaluru, Venkat Pola from OneShot AI, USA, V Shiva Kishore from Infosys, Germany, Venu Nimmagadda from Velera, USA, Kiran Babu Machha from Maximus, USA, Dr Ganganagunta Srinivas from University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Oman, Suresh Suggula from SwankTek, USA, Dr Koothadi Venumadhav from International University of Science and Technology, South Africa. The conference was formally inaugurated with the release of the event poster by Principal Dr Meka Ramesh. He was joined by Vemuri Baburao (Director), Rajesh C Jampala (Dean), Dr TS Ravi Kiran (Conference Convener), G Samrat Krishna and K Sudheer (Co-conveners), and Kavuri Sridhar (Administrative Officer).
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
21 hours ago
- First Post
Google turns Android phones into earthquake detectors, records 11,000 tremors on crowdsourcing
The Android Earthquake Alerts system prioritises scale over precision, leveraging the widespread use of Android smartphones, which collect motion data by default unless opted out read more Follow us on Google News Google utilised motion sensors in over two billion mobile phones from 2021 to 2024 to detect earthquakes and issued automated warnings to millions across 98 countries, revealed a Science journal analysis released last week. The analysis shows that Google's system recorded over 11,000 quakes, matching the performance of traditional seismometers. Independent earthquake researchers commend the system but call for greater transparency into Google's proprietary technology before public officials rely on it. Traditional seismometer-based alert systems exist in places like Mexico, Japan, and the US west coast. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In 2020, Google launched a crowd-sourced system using Android phones to detect early tremors. Data from its first three years, released recently, confirm its effectiveness and improvement. Google notes that annual earthquake deaths average thousands, but its mobile-based alerts have expanded access tenfold since 2019. 'It's very impressive: most countries don't have an earthquake early-warning system, and this can help provide that service,' Allen Husker, a seismologist at the California Institute of Technology, was quoted as saying by Nature. However, he seeks more access to Google's data and algorithms. Google's scientists claim they're as transparent as possible, citing privacy constraints on sharing raw phone data. They told Nature that the Science paper aims to clarify the system's operations. 'That really is the origin of this paper,' says Richard Allen, a University of California, Berkeley seismologist and Google visiting faculty. 'I hope the community will recognise that and appreciate that.' How does Google's Earthquake Alerts system work? The Android Earthquake Alerts system prioritises scale over precision, leveraging the widespread use of Android smartphones, which collect motion data by default unless opted out. Google's algorithms analyse signals, accounting for regional geological and construction variations, as well as differences in phone motion sensors. Challenges persist in detecting major earthquakes. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The system underestimated two powerful 2023 Turkey quakes, sending 4.5 million warnings. After algorithm upgrades, re-analysis showed the system could have issued urgent 'TakeAction' alerts to ten million phones. 'This shows they have been working to improve the system since 2023, with tangible positive results,' says Harold Tobin, a University of Washington seismologist.


Indian Express
3 days ago
- Indian Express
Android phones can detect earthquakes before they strike, say scientists
In 2020, Google introduced the Android Earthquake Alert (AEA) system for people with smartphones living in earthquake-prone regions. Compared to expensive earthquake early warning systems, scientists say Google's feature is very accurate and cost-effective, as it does not require a dedicated seismic station. Available on Android devices in 98 countries, Google's earthquake alert system has now expanded to cover more than 2.5 billion people in just three years. Since the Android Earthquake Alert system works by gathering data from millions of Android devices, one might wonder if it actually works. As it turns out, crowdfunding data is a really good idea. According to a recent study published in the journal Science, Google's Android Earthquake Alert system is so effective that it is on par with traditional seismic networks in terms of detecting earthquakes and issuing alerts. In the study, researchers said that 'AEA demonstrates that globally distributed smartphones can be used to detect earthquakes and issue warnings at scale with effectiveness comparable to established national systems.' It goes on to say that while the accelerometers in smartphones are less sensitive than the equipment used in seismic networks, they are still capable of detecting ground motions. The study goes on to say that around 70 per cent of the total smartphones in the world are powered by Android and that between 2021 and 2024, the Google AEA system detected an average of 312 earthquakes in 98 countries that had a magnitude between 1.9 and 7.8. As it turns out, 85 per cent of users who received earthquake alerts also experienced sharing. Out of these, 36 per cent said they got an alert before the earthquake, while 28 per cent and 23 per cent of people said they received an alert during and after the shaking began. In the video below, the yellow dots indicate the number of smartphones nearby, while the red dot marks the epicentre. The yellow circle is the P-wave's estimated location, and the red circle is for the S-wave, which is responsible for most of the damage. The animation shows how phones detected shaking as the 6.2 magnitude earthquake progressed in Turkey, causing damage and loss of life in the country. In a blog post, Google explained that its Android Earthquake Alert system uses accelerometer sensors in smartphones to sense vibrations, which may or may not indicate if an earthquake is happening. If the system thinks an earthquake is imminent, it then sends a signal to the tech giant's earthquake detection server along with an approximate location of where the shaking was recorded. The server then combines data from various smartphones in the vicinity to determine if an earthquake is actually happening. With more than 2 billion devices around the world acting as mini-earthquake detectors, Google says its system is the world's largest earthquake detection network.