GST relief sought for mango pulp, fruit juices
This crucial request aims at safeguarding the economic interests of thousands of mango farmers and fruit processors, particularly in Andhra Pradesh.
In a detailed representation to her on Friday, Naidu highlighted the severe challenges currently confronting the mango processing industry, especially in Andhra Pradesh's Chittoor district. Known as the country's largest mango-producing region, Chittoor boasts over 80,000 hectares under mango cultivation, yielding approximately 7.5 lakh metric tonnes annually and supporting the livelihoods of more than 1.20 lakh farmers.
The district is also home to about 42 mango pulp processing units with a combined annual capacity of 4 lakh metric tonnes. While roughly 30 per cent of this processed pulp is typically exported to markets in the Middle East and Europe, a recent downturn in exports coupled with sluggish domestic demand has triggered a crisis, leaving over 1.50 lakh metric tonnes of mango pulp unsold.
Responding to joint representations from the All-India Food Processors Association and the Chittoor District Fruit Processors Federation, Naidu articulated key proposals for GST relief. He argued that mango pulp, which undergoes minimal thermal processing and contains no preservatives or additives, serves primarily as a raw material for products like juices, ice creams, and flavourings. Exempting it from the current 12 per cent GST, he stated, would provide essential relief to processors and reduce input costs for related industries.
Furthermore, Naidu advocated for a reduction in the GST on fruit-based juices from 12 per cent to 5 per cent. This move, he explained, would promote the consumption of healthier, natural beverages, thereby boosting demand for fruit pulp and benefiting farmers through improved raw material off-take.
Naidu underscored that similar distress is being experienced by mango farmers and processors in other major mango-producing states, including Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, and Karnataka. He called for immediate policy attention to revive this vital agricultural and processing sector across the nation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
34 minutes ago
- The Wire
Modi's 'Act East Policy' Requires Him to In Fact 'Act' at Home
Modi will find it difficult to commit to a trade deal with a maverick and unpredictable US President without exposing himself to criticism at home. Anybody who knows anything about the way politics works in this country would have known that US president Donald Trump's 9 July deadline for a US –India free trade agreement was unrealistic. While Union commerce minister Piyush Goyal and his officials have logged many flying miles travelling between New Delhi and Washington DC, it was only inevitable that in the end Mr. Goyal would say that India does not make trade deals based on deadlines. It would do so only on the basis of the national interest. While a deal may yet be struck at the eleventh hour and Mr. Goyal's tactics may pay off, it will be a politically risky gamble given that the Monsoon Session of Parliament is just two weeks away. Prime Minister Narendra Modi will find it difficult to commit to a trade deal with a maverick and unpredictable US president without exposing himself to criticism at home. While President Trump has promised a 'win-win' deal, he is now known to interpret every deal as a win for his 'America First' strategy. However balanced a trade deal might be between India and the US, in the competition between Mr. Trump's 'America First' and Mr. Modi's 'India First', the political Opposition in India would have enough to go to town accusing the Modi government of once again 'surrendering' to President Trump's diktat. Just as the BJP opposed trade deals signed by the Manmohan Singh government, the Congress and Left parties would oppose whatever deal India strikes with the United States, especially in the present context. The context is important. The Modi government is still pushing back on criticism that it agreed to a ceasefire with Pakistan under pressure from President Trump. It can ill afford to be seen as buckling under pressure on the trade front. The stakes are high. It is not just the criticism from the political Opposition that would worry the Modi government but, even more so, the criticism from within its own support ranks. Even on trade policy, there are as many protectionist hawks within the Sangh Parivar as there are in the Opposition. Given the difficulties associated with declaring victory on a trade deal with the United States, the Modi government had no option but to place the trade negotiations on the back burner. There can be no movement forward until the Monsoon Session of Parliament is over. A larger challenge stares India's trade negotiators in the face. Ever since the early 1990s, when India opted to enter into a multilateral trade agreement, the government has zealously defended the country's status as a developing economy. India signed on to the membership of the World Trade Organisation after being assured that, along with other developing economies, it would receive 'special and differential treatment' (SDT). India remains a protectionist economy by Asian standards. There was a time, during the tenures of the Atal Bihari Vajpayee and the Manmohan Singh governments, when India would declare that the objective of its trade policy was to bring India's tariffs down to 'ASEAN levels'. This objective has never been restated by the Narendra Modi government, which has in fact raised tariff barriers across many product lines over the past decade. India's trade partners have been protesting all along, and in President Donald Trump they have found a strong advocate of their grievances. There is, therefore, a two-fold problem for Prime Minister Modi with respect to trade and tariff policy. On the one hand, he remains under pressure from within the ranks of the Sangh Parivar to stick to a more protectionist stance. There are many reasons put forward to justify this. On the other hand, the world outside says that if India is indeed in its 'Amrit Kaal' and is the world's fourth or third largest economy and on its way to becoming 'Viksit Bharat' and is a 'rising power', a 'leading power', and so on and so forth, then why behave like a low-middle-income developing economy seeking 'special and differential' treatment? The argument for protecting the agrarian economy and the interests of farmers stands on an altogether different foundation. The highly developed economies of Europe and Japan have defended trade protectionism in agriculture on cultural, social and political grounds. The protection of farmers and the farming economy and the cultivation of local varieties of various products is a legitimate policy objective. India stands on firm ground in rejecting an open-ended policy of trade liberalisation in agriculture. If the United States continues to insist on this front, the Modi government will have no option but to reject and resist all pressure. Neither India nor Japan can agree to trade liberalisation in farm produce without risking a domestic political backlash. The protectionist argument in the case of manufactured goods is, however, much weaker. A policy option that can be pursued would be for the government to come out with a timetable for trade liberalisation and tariff reduction, setting firm dates for sectors, and gradually allowing the rupee to depreciate to partly compensate for tariff cuts. This would be in tandem with the earlier and oft-repeated promise of bringing Indian tariffs 'down to ASEAN levels'. This is a long-stated goal and is one that should be implemented. Rather than berate the ASEAN countries and call them the 'B-team' of China, as Mr Goyal has ill-advisedly done, it is time India caught up with ASEAN on the trade and manufacturing fronts. It may be recalled that India's trade and industrial policy liberalisation began in the early 1990s inspired by the experience of ASEAN. It was after his visit to Malaysia that the then prime minister Vishwanath Pratap Singh tasked an official in the Prime Minister's Office, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, to come up with a roadmap that would enable India to catch up with Malaysia. Mr Ahluwalia's 'M Paper' was the result and formed the basis of Prime Minister P. V. Narasimha Rao's trade and industrial policy. The time has come again for India to 'catch up' with East and Southeast Asia as far as trade and industrial policies are concerned. Mr Modi's 'Act East Policy' requires him to in fact act at home. This article was originally published in Deccan Chronicle. It has been lightly edited for style. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
India Gazette
37 minutes ago
- India Gazette
"Went down memory lane": Piyush Goyal shares glimpse of his visit to J-K; meets several delegations
Srinagar (Jammu and Kashmir) [India], July 7 (ANI): Union Minister Piyush Goyal shared a glimpse of his visit to Jammu and Kashmir where he enjoyed a 'shikara' ride on Dal Lake and met various delegations ranging from business sectors and held discussions with them. Union Minister Goyal met a delegation from Jammu-Kashmir Fruits and Vegetable Processing and Integrated Cold Chain Association (JKPICCA), Kashmir Chamber of Commerce and Industry and MSME Development Forum, Jammu-Kashmir and held detailed discussions with them. The Union Minister also addressed the FTII: Traders Conclave 2025 in Srinagar. In a social media post, Goyal shared a glimpse of him enjoying the shikara ride and captioned, 'Heaven on Earth, our beautiful Jammu and Kashmir. Soaking in the breathtaking beauty of the majestic Dal Lake on a shikara. I went down memory lane today, feeling nostalgic.' Speaking to ANI, the Union Minister said, 'Even my Shikara's name is Peace of Heaven. The peace I experience when I come to Dal Lake takes me back to my school days. I haven't forgotten my childhood memories. God has given a heaven to the country.' Tourism in Jammu and Kashmir took a hit after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 people were killed. In another social media post, he wrote, 'On the occasion of Syama Prasad Mookerjee's birth anniversary, I addressed the FTII: Traders Conclave 2025 in Srinagar and honoured entrepreneurs with the 'Business Jewel Award'.' The Union Minister noted that Jammu-Kashmir is 'rapidly' progressing towards a developed India under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. 'Under the leadership of Prime Minister @NarendraModi, Jammu-Kashmir is rapidly progressing towards a developed India. The increase in tourist numbers, world-class infrastructure, business innovation, and cultural richness are proof of this. The trading community is the backbone of 'Self-Reliant India'. The government is not only encouraging them through initiatives like PM Vishwakarma, ODOP, GeM, and ONDC but is also making business simpler, more inclusive, and globally competitive by promoting Vocal for Local,' the social media post reads. Heaven%20on%20Earth,%20our%20beautiful%20Jammu%20and%20Kashmir.%20Soaking%20in%20the%20breathtaking%20beauty%20of%20the%20majestic%20Dal%20Lake%20on%20a%20shikara.%20I%20went%20down%20memory%20lane%20today,%20feeling%20nostalgic.'%20%20%20https:/ target='_blank'>
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Two arrested in cybercrime, forgery case
Vizianagaram: Two employees of MFCWL, Boora Ratnaji from Rajahmundry and GJ Srinivas from Tamil Nadu, have been arrested by the Vizianagaram One Town police for cybercrime, forgery, and GST fraud. The arrests followed a complaint by Karri Ravindra Reddy, a stockyard operator from Vizianagaram, which led police to uncover a scam involving fake email IDs, forged signatures, and counterfeit rubber stamps used to intercept communications and manipulate financial records. MFCWL, a Mahindra Group company established in 2018, operates over 800 vehicle stockyards under its Yard Management Service (YMS). Allegations have emerged that the company collects crores of rupees monthly without issuing proper receipts, raising concerns about nationwide GST evasion. A recent GST raid on Shri Sai Pawan Agency in Visakhapatnam further intensified suspicions. Police investigations revealed that Gutti Praveen Kumar, an employee of MFCWL, was the mastermind behind the forgery scheme. Others named as co-accused include Chelli Raju, Jayaprakash Reddy, Vishwanath Reddy, Sangeetha Kannan, and Mohammed Aminuddin. They created fake email IDs, stamps, and logos on behalf of Ravindra Reddy, committing fraud amounting to Rs 1 crore. FIRs have been filed, and the public is calling for the swift arrest of the remaining suspects and a thorough investigation into the nationwide operations of MFCWL. Authorities are extensively investigating the case to identify other culprits involved in this large-scale financial fraud network.
