logo
The 30% rule is now unrealistic. Here are 3 places you won't have to overextend your budget to afford a home right now.

The 30% rule is now unrealistic. Here are 3 places you won't have to overextend your budget to afford a home right now.

Buying a home this year? You'll be spending an even bigger chunk of your paycheck.
Data from Realtor.com shows that the median-priced home in May was $440,000. To afford a home at that price, the company found the typical American household would need to spend 44.6% of its income, far above the 30% that experts generally recommend for housing costs.
(Realtor.com based its income calculation on a scenario in which a buyer purchases a median-priced home ($440,000 as of May) in the US with a 20% down payment, has a 6.82% mortgage rate, based on Freddie Mac's May 2025 average, and has an annual tax and insurance rate of 1.72%.)
That 30% rule, which the Department of Housing and Urban Development suggested starting back in the 1980s, exists for a reason: It ensures households have enough room in their budgets for essential living expenses like groceries, utilities, childcare, and life's inevitable surprises, such as medical bills or car repairs.
But with today's high housing costs and sluggish income growth, that benchmark is no longer a realistic expectation for many households.
"Home prices have leveled off, but remain near historic peaks in much of the country," Hannah Jones, a senior economic research analyst with Realtor.com, told Business Insider. "Mortgage rates have hovered between 6.5% and 7% since last fall. Altogether, this means that for many households, buying a home today would be a stretch financially."
Especially since "home prices have accelerated faster than wages over the last 5-plus years," Jones added.
Many Americans aren't convinced that buying a home is smart
In 2023, the most recent year with available US Census data, median household income rose to $80,610 — the first annual increase since 2019, before the COVID-19 pandemic. According to Census data, the national median home price surged by 33% since the first quarter of 2019.
While home prices have begun to fall in some US cities, many Americans still aren't convinced that buying a home is a smart decision.
In June, Fannie Mae — which backs the majority of mortgages originated in the US — released its monthly housing survey, which polls 1,000 Americans, older than 18, each month on their views about renting, home buying, household finances, and the broader economy. May results showed that 74% said it was a bad time to buy.
You may especially feel that way if you live in coastal cities like Los Angeles, New York, and Boston. These cities already have the reputation of being expensive, but if you're making the median salary or lower, buying a home there will deeply cut into your take-home pay, according to Realtor.com. Data from the company shows that metro areas for those cities require a 104.5%, 66.9%, and 64.3% share of your income, respectively.
As for cities where you can budget more effectively, they're all closer to the middle of the map.
"The Midwest is the most affordable region in the country, and is the only region with large metros where the typical household can afford to buy the typical home," Jones said.
Only three of the top 50 metros made the cut:
In May, the St. Louis metropolitan area's median list price was $299,900, which required only a 30% share of income to afford;
Detroit's metro required a share of 29.8%;
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas Leads U.S. in New-Home Construction, Census Data Finds
Texas Leads U.S. in New-Home Construction, Census Data Finds

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Texas Leads U.S. in New-Home Construction, Census Data Finds

If it feels like new neighborhoods are popping up all over Texas, you're not imagining it. A recent study ranked the Lone Star State as the leader in new residential construction, with more than one in five homes built in just the last 15 years. According to a report by The Steamboat Real Estate Group, 22.5% of currently occupied Texas homes were constructed after 2010 — the highest share of any state in the nation. Top 10 states with highest share of new-build homes, per Steamboat Real Estate Group That figure translates to roughly 2.5 million homes and may signal continued population growth and ongoing demand for housing in Texas' urban and suburban corridors. The report, based on U.S. Census Bureau data, highlights what many Texans have witnessed firsthand: breakneck residential expansion driven by job creation, rising migration, and a still-accessible housing market compared to coastal states. From sprawling master-planned communities around Austin, Dallas, and Houston to compact townhouse developments cropping up in overlooked corners of the state, Texas continues to attract newcomers seeking fresh starts, modern homes, and economic opportunity. Even without mentioning Austin, there's a reason the internet has adopted the phrase: 'Don't California my Texas.' North Dakota came in second on the list, with roughly 21% of its housing stock built since 2010 — a reflection of the state's brief oil boom and infrastructure push. Utah followed close behind, with 20.65% of its homes built after 2010. Other high-growth states such as Idaho, South Carolina, and North Carolina also landed in the top five, each surpassing 18% of homes constructed in the past decade. At the other end of the spectrum, older states in the Northeast recorded the smallest share of new housing. In Rhode Island and Connecticut, for example, fewer than 6% of occupied homes were built after 2010. New York and other high-density states also saw relatively low construction rates over that time. 'Interestingly, states located predominantly in the South or the West ranked highest in the study, with nine of the top states located in either region. What this tells us is that infrastructure is being heavily prioritized in these areas, with homebuyers, particularly first-time buyers being more exposed to affordability when it comes to buying a home as new build schemes often offer lower rates. 'It's important however, to ensure that thorough checks are made on newly built properties, not just for safety but to be financially responsible if you're investing into a property,' a spokesperson from The Steamboat Real Estate Group explained.

Elon Musk says he has formed a new U.S. political party, the 'America Party'
Elon Musk says he has formed a new U.S. political party, the 'America Party'

CNBC

time2 hours ago

  • CNBC

Elon Musk says he has formed a new U.S. political party, the 'America Party'

Elon Musk said Saturday that he has formed a new political party, the "America Party," which he claims will give Americans "back your freedom." "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!" Musk wrote on X, one day after he posted a poll on the platform asking his followers if they support creating the "America Party." Musk, the world's richest man, suggested Friday that the new party could focus "on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts." "Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people," Musk said Friday. Musk did not say where the party may be registered. It did not appear to be registered with the Federal Election Committee. He also said that the party would caucus independently and that "legislative discussions would be had with both parties," according to a reply to a user on X. Musk was the largest donor during the 2024 presidential campaign, giving more than $280 million throughout the cycle, predominantly to presidential candidate Donald Trump, although he also supported other Republican candidates. If Musk chooses to get involved in any competitive congressional races in 2026, it could make a significant difference in a close contest. The Tesla CEO's post comes after a public feud with Trump erupted. It was a dramatic turnaround for the two men, who had been close allies during the early days of the second Trump administration. But their relationship deteriorated as the two men exchanged barbs on social media, mainly due to Musk's vocal opposition to Trump's "big, beautiful bill," CNBC has reported. Musk had previously spearheaded Trump's efforts to slash the federal government through the controversial "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE), but stepped back from his role in May after his involvement with the program began to negatively impact his business. Since feuding with Trump, Musk has publicly floated the idea of a new political party, particularly amid his continued strong opposition to Trump's sweeping domestic policy package, which passed last week. "It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!" Musk said Monday. "Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people," he said.

Most Americans can no longer afford even a ‘minimal quality of life,' depressing new study finds
Most Americans can no longer afford even a ‘minimal quality of life,' depressing new study finds

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

Most Americans can no longer afford even a ‘minimal quality of life,' depressing new study finds

The American dream is slipping away. Most US citizens no longer enjoy 'a minimal quality of life' due to skyrocketing costs, a depressing new study has uncovered. Ludwig Institute for Shared Economic Prosperity conducted research into the economic well-being of the country's residents, defining 'minimal quality of life' as the ability to pay for a 'basket of American dream essentials': housing, food, transportation, clothing, medical costs and basic leisure expenses. The leisure expenses included access to cable TV and streaming services, as well as the ability to pay for six movie tickets and two baseball tickets per year. The Minimal Quality of Life index goes 'beyond traditional cost-of-living measures to provide a more comprehensive understanding of what it takes to secure a foothold on the bottom rung of the American dream ladder and have a real opportunity to climb it over time,' the authors wrote. The bottom 60% of American households by income fell well short of that threshold, the researchers damningly determined. The bottom 60% of American households by income fell well short of that threshold, the researchers damningly determined. The bottom 60% of American households by income fell well short of that threshold, the researchers damningly determined. 'The MQL reveals the harsh reality that the American dream, with its promises of well-being, social connection, and advancement, is out of reach for many,' the authors concluded. 'Rising costs in essential areas like housing, healthcare, and education significantly outpace wage growth, leaving millions struggling to attain even a minimal quality of life.' An average American couple with two children would need to spend $120,302 per year to cover the minimum quality of life expenses, the researchers determined. Skyrocketing costs over the past two decades are to blame, with medical premiums rising 301% from 2001 to 2023. Transportation, groceries and childcare have all increased in price by more than 50% on average across that same period. Transportation, groceries and childcare have all increased in price by more than 50% between 2001 and 2023. 'I get tired of the 'Stop your Starbucks latte habit' [advice], because in reality it's not people's fault,' financial planner Laura Lynch told CNBC in relation to the study. 'The structures around us have created an expectation of a lifestyle that is increasingly becoming unreachable for folks.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store