Sally Susman helped steer Pfizer through COVID-19. Her advice for leaders? Learn to write — and listen.
Susman, who recently announced plans to leave Pfizer later this year after an 18-year-run, previously held similar roles at Estée Lauder and American Express. In an interview with Business Insider, she described her field as one in which there's never an average day and said that it can sometimes be as dramatic as a Hollywood blockbuster.
"This work of corporate affairs, communications, public affairs, government affairs is completely so exciting," she said. "I wake up and look at the news across the globe and I think, 'OK, now my agenda is set.' "
The profession is also important, as it can make a significant impact on a company's trajectory, according to Susman, who has advised nine CEOs over the course of her career. But she thinks the field sometimes gets misunderstood.
"It's a mistake to consider communications a soft skill," she said. "The leaders and people who want to make change, who I've seen embrace and prioritize their communications, and who know it to be a rock-hard competency, are the game changers."
Succeeding in the field requires being a strong writer, Susman said. Comms pros are tasked with storytelling, internal messaging, crafting statements for media outlets and more.
"There's no substitute for picking up the pen, parsing the arguments, drafting yourself," she said.
Still, that doesn't mean you should avoid using AI tools like ChatGPT, she added. In fact, Susman recommends taking advantage of the technology for conducting research and outlining ideas.
"I know many people are apprehensive about AI, but it is an important tool," she said. "Just like photography didn't decimate painting, AI is not going to ruin communications."
Talking regularly to executives, politicians, and other leaders can also help with writing by providing knowledge and context, Susman added. Conversations she's had with such individuals over the years informed her thinking, she said, which is why "relationships matter so much."
Another piece of advice from Susman for aspiring comms pros is to dive into geopolitics. Always keep up with major events happening around the world and ask yourself what these mean for companies and their employees.
"The opportunities around what I call 'global policy and diplomacy topics' are unlimited right now," she said.
Also, don't punish yourself for making mistakes. Susman said she's made countless gaffes over the course of her career and has no regrets.
"There were times when I failed to do enough due diligence, times my ego got the better of me," she said. "It's just human nature. It's humanity. It's what we do when we're out there trying to make a difference."
Having mentored interns and junior employees at Pfizer and companies where she previously worked, Susman said she's noticed that many young people seem to suffer from anxiety. She's seen them do things like rewrite their résumés over and over and stress about what they said or didn't say in meetings — none of which is healthy, she said.
"We are judged over long, vast, savannahs of time," she said. "We are not judged in a moment."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Jerry Jones' worst NFL enemy remains Jerry Jones
Jerry Jones, owner of the Dallas Cowboys, has an NFL nemesis hell bent on keeping him from reclaiming the glory of the 1990s. That man is Jerry Jones, de facto general manager of the Dallas Cowboys. To be clear, Jones' talent evaluation and trust in his scouts remain top notch. The Cowboys continue to generate elite homegrown talent on a semi-regular basis. Draft-n-Play Jerry Jones? That guy is an asset. But once those guys get near the end of those rookie contracts, Contract Extension Jerry Jones comes out. And while Contract Extension Jerry is great for his stars' checking accounts, it's actively hindering the roster around them. None of that is new. Jones' propensity to drag his feet early in negotiations has often led to more expensive deals down the line for players Dallas cannot afford to see leave. What could have been a five year, $262.5 million extension for Dak Prescott in 2023 (using Justin Herbert's deal as a comparison) eventually became a four year, $240 million deal in 2024, paying him $5 million more annually than any other NFL player ($231 million of that is guaranteed). CeeDee Lamb was always set to reset the wide receiver market. Doing so at the eve of the 2024 season lined him up for $34 million per year instead of around $30 million had he signed the offseason prior ($100 million of that is guaranteed). That creates salary cap bottlenecks down the line for a team that's perpetually high on star power and often low on depth. Jones' hesitation has logic behind it; he's waiting to see if a young player's production wanes before making a massive commitment. At the same time, that keeps said young player on a less expensive salary, which allows some breathing room to pay off the other massive extensions looming around the corner. However, that strategy keeps costing him money while antagonizing the players on which he relies. And Monday's comments about Micah Parsons, whose upcoming extension gets pricier each month? Fairly antagonistic! "Even if" is a bold way to address your team's desire to keep a 26-year-old with 52.5 sacks and four Pro Bowl honors in four seasons as a pro. Yet, here is Jones, quietly negging a player who has only missed four games due to injury in his career to date (a fifth game, in Week 18 vs. the Eagles in 2021, was due to COVID-19). Jones also added 'I am not the least concerned about having any dangling participles out here on a contract,' which is a folksy, homespun way of suggesting that, yep, this approach will once again cost Dallas extra money as a luxury tax for an owner/manager who lives for the escalation of contract negotiations but still seems to lose the big ones more often than he wins. Parsons, by the way, took notice. How could he not? So why is Jones waiting? He offered a couple rationalizations. The first, naturally, was the fleeting nature of mortality and rising tide of reckless drivers. The second, more sensible option was that he'd been burned before and had some regrets. And Jerry Jones, because he is Jerry Jones and you do not have to speak diplomatically when you own a superyacht, named names beyond Prescott and his nine missed games in 2024. Trevon Diggs was an All-Pro his second season in the league and a Pro Bowler the third. He signed a five year, $97 million contract to become one of the league's five highest paid cornerbacks, then missed 15 games due to injury in 2023 and six games in 2024 while providing good-not-great coverage. Steele signed a five-year, $82.5 million contract in 2023 after ascending to a starting role at right tackle, which made him the ninth-highest paid offensive tackle in the NFL. He hasn't missed a game since then, but his play hasn't lived up to the salary even though he'll only be the league's 25th-highest paid tackle in 2025. Jones paid market value for a boom-or-bust cornerback and a rising young tackle. One of them was derailed by injury and the other has struggled, but there's room for both players to revert to form (Steele is the oldest of the two and only 28 years old). Jones isn't in the hope business, however, he's looking for results. And these results align more closely with his wait-and-see philosophy than the fact Lamb was an All-Pro for the third straight season last fall. Thus, the Cowboys will likely be stuck with the privilege of paying Parsons a record-setting amount in the late stages of the 2025 preseason. A deal to beat out the $41 million in annual salary to TJ Watt -- resetting the market last offseason probably would have clocked in closer to $36 million per year -- could leave the franchise committed to something like $137 million in annual average salary to three players. That's not unmanageable, but it's a problem. Dallas has been so strapped for cap space in recent years that its top free agent additions the last few seasons have been: All the while, players like Connor McGovern, Dalton Schultz, Dorance Armstrong, Tyler Biadasz, Jourdan Lewis and Demarcus Lawrence left for cash elsewhere. That's not why the Cowboys have one playoff win since 2019, but it certainly doesn't help. Monday's comments were a refreshing display of honesty. Not about Micah Parsons, of course, but about how Jones views his roster management. The sunk cost of paying a player who might get injured or fall off far outweighs the opportunity savings of paying young, proven players what they're worth before it gets damagingly expensive. Jones is content to lose leverage and give up more in guarantees than he would have years earlier if he can find data that rewards his wait-and-see approach. That's not anything we didn't already know, but it's something else to hear Jones go out and effectively admit it. It's an approach that keeps the Cowboys from turning its stars into a constellation. And while it means guys like Prescott, Lamb and, eventually, Parsons all get truly lucrative contracts down the line, it also means they won't have the support to maximize the talent for which Jones is paying so much.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
72% of US teens have used AI companions, study finds
Hopefully not Grok's companions… A new study by a U.S. nonprofit focused on the lives of kids and families, Common Sense Media, has found that a vast majority of U.S. teens (72%) have tried an AI companion at least once. By 'companion,' the study is focused on AI chatbots that are designed for users to have more personal conversations with, not AI assistants that work as homework helpers, image generators, or voice assistants that just answer questions. For instance, the study's definition of AI companions could include those digital AI personas provided by companies like or Replika, but it could also encompass the use of general-purpose chatbots like ChatGPT or Claude, which can be used for more personal conversations, if desired. The idea of chatting with an AI seems to be appealing to U.S. teens (ages 13 to 17), the study found, as not only had nearly three-quarters tried an AI companion, 52% said they are regular users. Among those who engaged with these companions regularly, 13% chat with them daily and 21% chat a few times a week. Boys (31%) were also slightly more likely than girls (25%) to say they had never used an AI companion, among the 1-in-4 teens who said they have never tried it. The findings are based on a study that ran during April and May 2025, and used a representative sample of 1,060 teens and was conducted by researchers from NORC at the University of Chicago. There have already been concerns about AI's impact on teens' well-being, as one firm, is being sued over a teen's suicide in Florida and for promoting violence in Texas. There are also a number of reports that describe the potential dangers of using AI for therapy. The findings from Common Sense Media's new study offer an early understanding of how young people are using AI to simulate human interactions, which could include virtual friendship, emotional support, therapy, and role-playing games, among other things. The analysis also examined other behaviors around teen usage of AI companions, including what sorts of tasks teens turned to them for, why, and what the after-effects were. For instance, nearly half (46%) said they saw AI companions as tools or programs, and 33% said they use them for social interaction and relationships. Teens said they use the AI companions for various purposes: entertainment (30% said this), curiosity about AI technology (28%), advice (18%), and because they're always available (17%). Half of teens (50%) said they don't trust the information provided by AI companions. However, older teens are less likely to trust the AI's advice compared with younger teens, ages 13-14, at 20% and 27%, respectively. One-third of the teens said they find the conversations more satisfying than those with real-life friends, though the majority (67%) felt the opposite way. Plus, 39% were using the AI conversations as practice for real-life interactions, as 39% said they applied skills they first tried with an AI to real-world situations. Among the skills practiced, social skills were the top use case, with 39% of teens having explored this area, followed by conversation starters (18%), giving advice (14%), and expressing emotions (13%). In terms of whether or not real-life relationships will be replaced by tech, there was one positive finding: 80% of teens who used AI companions said they spend more time with real friends than with their AI chatbots. Only 6% said the reverse was true.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
ChatGPT users send 2.5 billion prompts a day
ChatGPT receives 2.5 billion prompts from global users every day, OpenAI told Axios. About 330 million of those are coming from users in the U.S. These numbers show just how ubiquitous OpenAI's flagship product is becoming. Google's parent company, Alphabet, does not release daily search data, but recently revealed that Google receives 5 trillion queries per year, which averages to just under 14 billion daily searches. Independent researchers have found similar trends. Neil Patel of NP Digital estimates that Google receives 13.7 billion searches daily, while research from SparkToro and Datos — two digital marketing companies — estimates that the figure is around 16.4 billion per day. Still, ChatGPT has shown impressively rapid growth. In December, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said that users send over 1 billion queries to ChatGPT each day. At Altman's word, the company's search volume has more than doubled in around 8 months. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data