Mark questions for visually impaired clearly, Gujarat high court tells GSHSEB
The order came after several students faced confusion during the board exams held in March 2025, leading them to answer questions intended only for visually impaired students and losing marks as a result.
Justice Nikhil Kariel said in the order, "The respondent No-2 (Board) is directed to ensure that for exams held in future, both for Classes 10 and 12, the list of instructions preceding the actual questions shall specifically state as regards the questions only to be attended by the visually impaired students."
He further ordered, "The general instructions in the body of the question paper shall also specifically mention the question numbers which are for the students having visual impairment.
"
You Can Also Check:
Ahmedabad AQI
|
Weather in Ahmedabad
|
Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad
|
Public Holidays in Ahmedabad
The court was hearing a petition filed by a Class 10 student from Surat, represented by advocate Rafik Lokhandwala. The student claimed to have lost nearly 20 marks in the basic mathematics paper due to the ambiguity in the question paper instructions.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
The Best Method for a Flat Stomach After 50 (It's Genius!)
Lulutox
Undo
She was confused and answered questions meant only for visually impaired students. Her father made a representation to the board immediately after the exam and also sought information under the RTI Act, but the board did not rectify the issue.
He eventually approached the high court seeking re-evaluation of her answer sheet.
While Justice Kariel acknowledged in the order that "the petitioner's grievance was genuine", he declined to order re-evaluation. He noted in the order: "Public interest and equity demand that there should not be any interference in the present petition." Since the student did not fail and her marks were to be used only for Class 11 admission, the court said that re-evaluation could open floodgates for litigation.
The court further stated in the order that the board "should have been alive to such a situation and should ensure that question papers in future, be it of Classes 10 or 12, such an ambiguity should not arise."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
10 minutes ago
- Hans India
Constitutionally anchored mechanism needed to balance judicial independence and accountability
Hyderabad: SeniorAdvocate at the Supreme Court of India and Distinguished Professor of Law at NALSAR, Raju Ramachandran, emphasized the need for a comprehensive, constitutionally anchored mechanism that strikes a balance between the independence of the judiciary and genuine institutional accountability. He underscored the importance of transparency, procedural fairness, and consistency in safeguarding both public confidence and constitutional integrity. Delivering a lecture as part of the ongoing Distinguished Lecture Series at the NALSAR University of Law on Saturday, delved deep into the theme 'Removal of Judges: From Justice V. Ramaswami to Justice Yashwant Verma' in his lecture. The session commenced with Prof. Anup Surendranath introducing the speaker. Dr. Malvika Prasad provided an overview of the Lecture Series. The event was graced by Prof. (Dr.) Srikrishna Deva Rao, Vice-Chancellor of NALSAR University of Law, Prof. N. Vasanthi, Registrar, Prof. Sitharamam Kakarala, and students, faculty, and members of the legal fraternity. In his address, Ramachandran drew from historical instances, key legal developments, and his own experience as a member of the Inquiry Committee in the Justice V. Ramaswami case, the first and only full-fledged judicial impeachment proceeding in India. Ramachandran began by outlining the evolution of judicial tenure protections, starting with colonial frameworks and progressing to the post-independence constitutional safeguards designed to uphold judicial independence. He noted the anomaly presented in the 1964 case of Justice Jaffer Imam, who, suffering from mental incapacity, had to be persuaded by Prime Minister Nehru to resign in the absence of a removal procedure for incapacity short of impeachment. The lecture focused extensively on the Justice V. Ramaswami case. He recounted the procedural integrity of the inquiry and the political failure of the impeachment motion, which was defeated in Parliament due to abstentions by the ruling party despite the committee's adverse findings. Ramachandran criticized the limitations of the current constitutional and statutory framework, emphasizing the excessive dependence on the in-house mechanism, a non-statutory process developed by the judiciary to address allegations of misconduct. He noted that this mechanism lacks transparency, operates outside public scrutiny, and creates constitutional uncertainty when its findings influence or precede impeachment motions in Parliament. Discussing recent developments, Ramachandran drew attention to the case of Justice Yashwant Varma, where an internal committee recommended impeachment. He raised critical questions about the implications of such findings being challenged in court and how such parallel processes of judicial inquiry and parliamentary impeachment might undermine each other, potentially resulting in what he termed a 'reverse-Ramaswami scenario.'
United News of India
21 minutes ago
- United News of India
SC Judges launch Legal Aid Scheme for soldiers' families in Srinagar
Srinagar, Jul 27 (UNI) In a historic judicial outreach, a delegation of Supreme Court judges visited Kashmir for the first time since the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. The occasion marked the launch of the Veer Parivaar Sahayata Yojana 2025, a pioneering initiative to provide proactive legal aid to the families of defence and paramilitary personnel. The program was organised by the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) in collaboration with the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh and the Jammu & Kashmir Legal Services Authority, at the Sher-i-Kashmir International Conference Centre (SKICC) in Srinagar. Presiding over the event was Justice Surya Kant, the senior most judge of the Supreme Court and Executive Chairman of NALSA. He was joined by Justices P.S. Narasimha, Rajesh Bindal, and N. Kotiswar Singh, who collectively underscored the judiciary's unwavering commitment to expanding access to justice in frontier regions. In a major highlight, Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai also joined his fellow judges in Srinagar today. He presided over two significant events, one--'In Conversation with the Bar', a NALSA-led interactive session at 10:30 am at SKICC, bringing together legal professionals from the region. CJI also attended the Mega Alumni Meet, held at 2:00 pm at the Convocation Complex, University of Kashmir, Hazratbal, reaffirming the Supreme Court's connection with legal academia and bar associations in Jammu & Kashmir. Launching the Veer Parivaar Sahayata Yojana 2025, Justice Surya Kant said, 'You serve the country at the borders; we will take care of your family at home. Soldiers brave enemy fire and harsh terrains. If their families face legal difficulties while they serve, it is the judiciary's duty to ensure they do not suffer silently.' Citing Article 39A of the Constitution, he said that legal aid is not charity, but a constitutional promise to ensure justice for all, especially those who serve on the frontlines. The key features of the Yojana include setting up of Legal Aid Clinics at District, State, and Central Sainik Boards. A dedicated network of nodal officers, legal aid counsels, and PLVs, including ex-servicemen, trained to handle defence-related legal issues empathetically. Digital integration through e-Lok Adalats, online mediation platforms, and virtual legal services to ensure fast and remote access to justice. Justice Kant noted that discussions with the Defence Ministry are already underway to ensure smooth operationalisation of these clinics across the country. He quoted Kashmiri poet Mahjoor, calling on the nation to 'create the glory of a new spring' by embedding unity, compassion, and justice into the legal framework. The event featured addresses by Justice Arun Palli, Chief Justice of the J&K High Court, and Supreme Court judges Justice P.S. Narasimha, Justice Rajesh Bindal, and Justice N. Kotiswar Singh, showcasing a united front by the higher judiciary. Also addressing the gathering were Justice Sanjeev Kumar, Executive Chairman of J&K Legal Services Authority, Justice Sindhu Sharma, Chairperson of Ladakh Legal Services Authority, Lt. Gen. Pratik Sharma, Northern Army Commander, who welcomed the scheme as 'a vital and timely support system for soldiers and their families' Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal was also present at the occasion, He called the scheme 'a major step in digital and inclusive justice' J&K Chief Minister Omar Abdullah and Lt. Governor Manoj Sinha pledged full administrative support The event was part of the North Zone Regional Conference on 'Reaffirming the Constitutional Vision of Justice for Defence Personnel and Tribals', making Srinagar the symbolic launch pad of a national promise. From the sacred land of saints, the Veer Parivaar Sahayata Yojana 2025 sends out a clarion call: that while our soldiers protect the nation's borders, the Indian judiciary will protect their rights at home. The programme stands as a living testament to NALSA's motto: 'Access to Justice for All.' UNI SNG SSP
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
US-EU trade deal wards off further escalation but will raise costs for companies and consumers
President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen have announced a sweeping trade deal that imposes 15% tariffs on most European goods, warding off Trump's threat of a 30% rate if no deal had been reached by Aug. 1. The tariffs, or import taxes, paid when Americans buy European products could raise prices for U.S. consumers and dent profits for European companies and their partners who bring goods into the country. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Design Thinking Management Artificial Intelligence Cybersecurity Data Analytics MCA Digital Marketing Product Management healthcare PGDM Leadership others Others Finance CXO Healthcare Technology Data Science Operations Management Degree MBA Project Management Public Policy Data Science Skills you'll gain: Duration: 25 Weeks IIM Kozhikode CERT-IIMK PCP DTIM Async India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 22 Weeks IIM Indore CERT-IIMI DTAI Async India Starts on undefined Get Details Here are some things to know about the trade deal between the United States and the European Union: by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pirates Climb Aboard Cargo Ship - Watch What The Captain Did Next Tips and Tricks Undo Many details remain to be decided Trump and von der Leyen's announcement, made during Trump's visit to one of his golf courses in Scotland, leaves many details to be filled in. The headline figure is a 15% tariff rate on "the vast majority" of European goods brought into the U.S., including cars, computer chips and pharmaceuticals. It's lower than the 20% Trump initially proposed, and lower than his threats of 50% and then 30%. Live Events Von der Leyen said the two sides agreed on zero tariffs on both sides for a range of "strategic" goods: Aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products, and some natural resources and critical raw materials. Specifics were lacking. She said the two sides "would keep working" to add more products to the list. Additionally, the EU side would purchase what Trump said was $750 billion (638 billion euros) worth of natural gas, oil and nuclear fuel to replace Russian energy supplies, and Europeans would invest an additional $600 billion (511 billion euros) in the U.S. 50% U.S. tariff on steel stays and others might, too Trump said the 50% U.S. tariff on imported steel would remain; von der Leyen said the two sides agreed to further negotiations to fight a global steel glut, reduce tariffs and establish import quotas - that is, set amounts that can be imported, often at a lower rate. Trump said pharmaceuticals were not included in the deal. Von der Leyen said the pharmaceuticals issue was "on a separate sheet of paper" from Sunday's deal. Where the $600 billion for additional investment would come from was not specified. And von der Leyen said that when it came to farm products, the EU side made clear that "there were tariffs that could not be lowered," without specifying which products. The 15% rate is higher than in the past The 15% rate removes Trump's threat of a 30% tariff. It's still much higher than the average tariff before Trump came into office of around 1%, and higher than Trump's minimum 10% baseline tariff. Higher tariffs, or import taxes, on European goods mean sellers in the U.S. would have to either increase prices for consumers - risking loss of market share - or swallow the added cost in terms of lower profits. The higher tariffs are expected to hurt export earnings for European firms and slow the economy. The 10% baseline applied while the deal was negotiated was already sufficiently high to make the European Union's executive commission cut its growth forecast for this year from 1.3% to 0.9%. Von der Leyen said the 15% rate was "the best we could do" and credited the deal with maintaining access to the U.S. market and providing "stability and predictability for companies on both sides." The reaction is tentative German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal which avoided "an unnecessary escalation in transatlantic trade relations" and said that "we were able to preserve our core interests," while adding that "I would have very much wished for further relief in transatlantic trade." The Federation of German Industries was blunter. "Even a 15% tariff rate will have immense negative effects on export-oriented German industry," said Wolfgang Niedermark, a member of the federation's leadership. While the rate is lower than threatened, "the big caveat to today's deal is that there is nothing on paper, yet," said Carsten Brzeski, global chief of macro at ING bank . "With this disclaimer in mind and at face value, today's agreement would clearly bring an end to the uncertainty of recent months. An escalation of the US-EU trade tensions would have been a severe risk for the global economy," Brzeski said. "This risk seems to have been avoided." Car companies expect higher prices Asked if European carmakers could still sell cars at 15%, von der Leyen said the rate was much lower than the current 27.5%. That has been the rate under Trump's 25% tariff on cars from all countries, plus the preexisting U.S. car tariff of 2.5%. The impact is likely to be substantial on some companies, given that automaker Volkswagen said it suffered a 1.3 billion euro ($1.5 billion) hit to profit in the first half of the year from the higher tariffs. Mercedes-Benz dealers in the U.S. have said they are holding the line on 2025 model year prices "until further notice." The German automaker has a partial tariff shield because it makes 35% of the Mercedes-Benz vehicles sold in the U.S. in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, but the company said it expects prices to undergo "significant increases" in coming years. Trump had cited the trade gap with Europe Before Trump returned to office, the U.S. and the EU maintained generally low tariff levels in what is the largest bilateral trading relationship in the world, with some 1.7 trillion euros ($2 trillion) in annual trade. Together the U.S. and the EU have 44% of the global economy. The U.S. rate averaged 1.47% for European goods, while the EU's averaged 1.35% for American products, according to the Bruegel think tank in Brussels. Trump has complained about the EU's 198 billion-euro trade surplus in goods, which shows Americans buy more from European businesses than the other way around, and has said the European market is not open enough for U.S.-made cars. However, American companies fill some of the trade gap by outselling the EU when it comes to services such as cloud computing, travel bookings, and legal and financial services. And some 30% of European imports are from American-owned companies, according to the European Central Bank .
