logo
We tried beating last year's Silverstone pole time in F1 25… by driving it backwards

We tried beating last year's Silverstone pole time in F1 25… by driving it backwards

Top Gear2 days ago
Gaming
Who knew Northamptonshire was this lumpy? Skip 8 photos in the image carousel and continue reading
Last year, George Russell put his Mercedes on pole for the British Grand Prix by driving a surgically precise 1m25.819s around Silverstone. Like all of Russell's career pole laps to date, there was an element of underdog victory to it, a triumph of talent and performance under pressure against the odds. The odds being, of course, quicker McLaren, Red Bull, and Ferrari packages, depending on the season.
Let it be noted, however, that Russell elected to drive his pole lap around Silverstone by going the correct way around the track. We've gone back and checked – they all did.
Advertisement - Page continues below
One of F1 25's unsung new features is reverse layouts. Silverstone is one of three circuits that can now be raced in the opposite direction, along with Zandvoort and the Red Bull Ring, and after all the time we've spent lapping it in the usual, status quo, boring way, the chance to take on the layout in reverse got us thinking: can we beat Russell's lap if we race in reverse?
With that hare-brained notion filling our minds and the mental image of waving to adoring stands full of patriotic fans on a cool-down lap making our chests puff out with pride, we head to the track. And the first thing we have to contend with is that, goodness, this feels so wrong . You might like
It was bad enough when they changed where the start-finish line was a few years ago, but this is another level of disorienting. The reality of driving such an historic circuit backwards, the place where Formula One began and where every aspiring British F1 driver logs untold virtual hours of videogame hotlaps, feels like burning along the wrong way down the M25. Forget sector times, our eyes keep getting drawn to the mirrors to see if the police are about to pull us over.
It takes ten laps just to shake that feeling, and to draw the roughest of mental sketches of the brake markers and turn-in points. So far we are, it should go without saying, quite a lot slower than when driving Silverstone clockwise.
Advertisement - Page continues below
Then comes the next mental adjustment to contend with: the elevation. Silverstone isn't exactly famed for its dramatic topography, but driving that familiar space anti-clockwise seems to reveal much more elevation change than you perceive when driving it clockwise.
After navigating those slow, twitchy curves around Club and Vale, it's uphill – notably uphill – up to Stowe, which can be taken even closer to flat-out since we're not carrying as much speed. The elevation doesn't level out along the Hangar straight, either.
We're still gaining altitude as we head into Chapel-Becketts-Maggotts, a trio of corners that form a kind of racing tongue-twister when approached in reverse. Anyone who's hot-lapped Silverstone plenty knows to gradually scrub off the speed through each of these corners since they get sequentially tighter. When taking them in reverse and going uphill, of course, it's the complete opposite.
Now it's about carrying maximum speed through Chapel and into Becketts, scrubbing off just a tiny bit of speed in order to make the apex and line up a flat-out exit through Maggotts, where your corner exit speed is compounded all the way round to Luffield.
Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox.
Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox.
Which leads onto mental hurdle number three: Silverstone in reverse might be the most technical track in existence. After 30 laps, roughly 12 of which have actually remained within track limits, we're still miles off the pace, and it's because this reverse layout seems to bring out an even more pronounced version of Silverstone's defining challenge - precise turn-in points at high-speed corners.
So many of its corners are taken with either just a momentary tap of the brakes or a single downshift. You have to be incredibly confident, committed and precise about your turn-in point at those speeds, because the trajectory of your corner exit can vary massively. That's one reason we're not getting near our usual Silverstone hotlap times.
Russell would probably be looking pretty smug by now if he could see our efforts. The combination of going uphill instead of down on the straights and lacking the precision on high-speed turn-in is hurting our lap times, and there's not even much we can do about it in the setup menu. The demands on the car are similar to the clockwise layout, only… more. We turn down the downforce a bit, and find a couple of tenths after another five laps.
We're hours in now. The fruits of our labour? A *cough* 1m28s. Just the three seconds shy of Mr Spreadsheet's lap from last year. We're blaming the hills. A glance at the global leaderboard time reveals that nobody else has beaten the 2024 pole time in reverse either – at the time of writing, the fastest is a 1.25.9 – so maybe there's something to our theory after all.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Human error' - Wimbledon sorry over missed line calls
'Human error' - Wimbledon sorry over missed line calls

BBC News

time28 minutes ago

  • BBC News

'Human error' - Wimbledon sorry over missed line calls

Wimbledon organisers have apologised after the electronic line-calling system on Centre Court was turned off in error and missed three calls in one Pavlyuchenkova said a game was 'stolen' from her after there was no 'out' call when a Sonay Kartal backhand went long in the first set of their fourth-round Russian stopped after seeing the ball go long, and chair umpire Nico Helwerth halted All England Club initially said the system was "deactivated on the point in question" due to "operator error".A spokesperson said later on Sunday that, after further investigation, it was found that the technology was "deactivated in error on part of the server's side of the court for one game".During that time three calls on the affected side of the court were not picked - who did not know the system had been turned off - called two of them himself before the incident highlighted by Pavlyuchenkova. "We have apologised to the players involved," a spokesperson for the All England Club said."We continue to have full confidence in the accuracy of the ball tracking technology."In this instance there was a human error and as a consequence we have fully reviewed our processes and made the appropriate changes." Had the ball been called out, Pavlyuchenkova would have won the point and taken the it was replayed, Kartal won the point and went on to break for a 5-4 had seen the ball was out - and a TV replay showed that was the case by some the crowd, Helwerth said: "We're just going to check if the system was up and running, because there was no audio call."After a telephone call, he announced the electronic system "was unfortunately unable to track the last point" and ordered the point to be rulebook states that if the electronic line calling system fails to make a call, "the call shall be made by the chair umpire".It adds: "If the chair umpire is unable to determine if the ball was in or out, then the point shall be replayed. This protocol applies only to point-ending shots or in the case when a player stops play."The fact Pavlyuchenkova went on to win the match meant the malfunction was not as costly as it could have been, although she still questioned why the umpire did not call it out."That's why he's there," she said. "He also saw it out, he told me after the match. "I thought he would do that, but he didn't. Instead they just said replay."I don't know if it's something to do [with Kartal being] local."I think it's also difficult for him. He probably was scared to take such a big decision." 'You took the game away from me' Pavlyuchenkova was clearly frustrated when she returned to her chair at the end of the told the umpire: "I don't know if it's in or out. How do I know? How can you prove it? "You took the game away from me ... They stole the game from me. They stole it." The automated line-calling system was introduced at Wimbledon for the first time this Jevans - chair of the All England Club - said on Friday she was confident in its accuracy and the decision to bring it in. Electronic line-calling technology has been under scrutiny this week at Wimbledon, with a number of players saying they do not trust Emma Raducanu has been one of those to voice concerns, saying some of the calls had been "dodgy", while former Olympic champion Belinda Bencic said the technology was a topic of discussion among players in the locker said she was usually a fan of the technology but "it is not correct" at this judges have been replaced by technology at many top-level tournaments, including the US Open and Australian previously said the technology was brought in because "the players wanted it" and some have backed the system, with former world number one Iga Swiatek saying she has had doubts but "has to trust" the calls. 'Let's just play without umpires' When there were line judges, players could challenge the calls by using an electronic review. There are no challenges under the current system and video replays are not suggested tennis should use video checks like football does "so that we can review the point"."On such a big event I think it is necessary, since this isn't the first time this has happened," she told BBC said umpires were there to make big decisions otherwise they could "just play without them", adding: "I think the chair umpire should be able to take initiatives. "That's what he is there for and that's why he is sitting in that chair, otherwise I think we could have also had a match without a chair umpire. "They have no problem giving us fines and code violations, for any reason sometimes. So I would like them to be a bit more intensive to this sort of situation." Pavlyuchenkova added in a news conference: "I would prefer they looked at the lines and call in the errors [and] mistakes better."

Brits' opponent forced to retire from Wimbledon after suffering freak injury when he tried to catch the ball
Brits' opponent forced to retire from Wimbledon after suffering freak injury when he tried to catch the ball

The Sun

time31 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Brits' opponent forced to retire from Wimbledon after suffering freak injury when he tried to catch the ball

A WIMBLEDON star had to retire with a freak injury after trying to catch the ball. Robert Galloway and Aldila Sutjiadi teamed up in the mixed doubles. 9 9 9 They faced British duo Joshua Paris and Eden Silva on Court 18 on Sunday. However, Galloway had to withdraw from the match at the end of the first set because of his finger being in agony. Facing Paris' serve at 3-2, the ball clipped the net on its way into the service box, prompting a let. So with the ball dead and out of play, and the direction changed by the let cord, Galloway tried to save time by grabbing the tennis ball as it hurtled towards him. But while the incident happens in many matches, it very rarely leads to anything of note. However, on this occasion, Galloway, 32, did not take the catch cleanly. Instead, the ball jarred the end of his finger awkwardly. And that immediately left the American wincing in pain and shaking his hand in agony. Galloway knew something was wrong and at the next change of ends, signalled to his camp that he had done damage. Both his partner and opponents looked on worried as the Wimbledon physio was called to come and check on him. Cam Norrie's fuming Wimbledon rival Nicolas Jarry squares up to him as Brit wins epic to set up potential Alcaraz clash 9 Wimbledon 2025 LIVE - follow all the latest scores and updates from a thrilling fortnight at SW19 Galloway - the world No37 in doubles - soldiered on until the end of the first set, which they lost on a tie-break. And he then decided it was too much to carry on and retired hurt in sad scenes. British pair Paris and Silva will face Sem Verbeek and Katerina Siniakova in the quarter-finals. Ironically, Galloway was put back on Court 18 for Monday's order of play in the men's doubles. He and partner Yuki Bhambri are due to face No4 seeds and French Open champions Marcel Granollers and Horacio Zeballos in round three of the men's doubles. 9 9 9 9 9

Alcaraz resists red-hot Rublev to reach Wimbledon quarter-finals
Alcaraz resists red-hot Rublev to reach Wimbledon quarter-finals

Reuters

time32 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Alcaraz resists red-hot Rublev to reach Wimbledon quarter-finals

LONDON, July 6 (Reuters) - Carlos Alcaraz came through a ferocious fourth-round firefight against Andrey Rublev to win 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 6-4 on Centre Court and keep his bid for a third successive Wimbledon title on track on Sunday. The Spanish second seed stuttered in his opening three rounds but found his best form to eventually subdue an inspired Rublev who once again came up short against the very best. Rublev rocked Alcaraz to lead 4-1 in the opener only to be pegged back but the Russian produced some astonishing tennis to snatch the tiebreak and move ahead. Alcaraz knew he was in a scrap but never looked ruffled and levelled the match after Rublev double-faulted on a break point. Rublev continued to throw everything in his arsenal at the champion in the third set but paid for not taking some early break points as Alcaraz found another gear. Alcaraz looked impregnable in the fourth set and a single break of serve was enough to seal a 22nd successive match win and set up a last-eight clash with Britain's Cameron Norrie.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store