logo
Texas redistricting: Republicans propose new map, Democrats try to counter

Texas redistricting: Republicans propose new map, Democrats try to counter

USA Today6 days ago
WASHINGTON − An ongoing effort by Republicans to redraw Texas' congressional map ahead of the 2026 midterm elections continues to agitate Democrats across the country, as they search for ways to block or counter an initiative sought by President Donald Trump.
The White House has urged Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and state Republicans to advance on a rare mid-decade redistricting, with the hope that shifting boundaries could help the party pick up as many as five seats in next year's race for control of the U.S. House.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, and the GOP are hoping the boost can help them hang onto their razor-thin lower chamber majority during the final two years of Trump's second term and amid the 2028 race for the White House.
Texas Democrats balked when Abbott agreed to add redistricting to their to-do list for a 30-day special session that began July 21 in Austin. Now, liberal lawmakers are crying foul with blue state governors threatening tit-for-tat responses and Texas Democrats weighing their own limited protest options as the GOP seeks to make major changes to the critical voter boundary lines that make up the nation's second largest congressional delegation.
Here's the latest to know on the controversial redistricting effort happening in the Lone Star State.
What could a new map look like?
Texas Republicans released their proposed new map on July 30.
Ahead of the official release, Punchbowl News first reported that the anticipated redraw would shift district boundaries around Dallas, Houston, Austin and the Rio Grande Valley.
There would still be 38 total seats in the Texas delegation under the new maps - leaving it second only to California's 52 seats. But five Texas seats would be redrawn in a bid that Republican envision giving their candidates a leg up with more GOP voters.
Democrats who at risk of losing their spot in Congress include Reps. Henry Cuellar, Vicente Gonzalez and Marc Veasey, according to Punchbowl.
Democrats charge partisan law violation
The rare push to redraw the boundary lines has led Democratic senators to accuse Trump administration officials of breaking a decades-old law limiting executive branch employees from engaging in partisan activities − such as advocating for a state's redistricting in order to benefit their political party.
In a letter to the Office of Special Counsel, California Sens. Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff, along with Rhode Island's Sheldon Whitehouse and Illinois' Dick Durbin, called for an investigation into members of Trump's White House and Justice Department, accusing them of breaking the Hatch Act.
"The purpose of this redistricting push is to defeat Democratic Members of Congress and elect Republicans to affect the balance of political party power in the 120th Congress," the senators wrote.
"While such goals are appropriate for a political party organization, they are not appropriate for executive branch officials," they added, "especially at the Department of Justice which must take greater steps to ensure it acts with impartiality."
The Hatch Act does not apply to the president or vice president.
Hakeem Jeffries took a trip to Texas
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-New York, made a trip to Texas July 30, the same day Republicans released their proposed map.
While there, Politico reported that Jeffries planned to meet with Rep. Al Green, a Houston lawmaker whose district could be caught in the crosshairs of a major map shake up.
"We understand that this is all hands on deck for us in the Democratic Party," Green told Politico.
Jeffries has been vocal in his opposition to the redistricting plans, saying in a July 15 press conference, "Texas Republicans are likely going to continue to act like political punks and bend the knee to Donald Trump's extreme agenda."
Later, he told CNN, regarding Democrats' response: "Let me just simply say the maps in New York are not as fair as they could be."
Redistricting arms race could ensue
Jeffries is not the only blue state lawmaker proposing an equal and opposite reaction to Texas.
Democrats coast-to-coast have promised a full-scale counterattack, should the Lone Star State move forward with redistricting.
"We're not going to be sitting back with one hand tied behind our back while Republicans try to undermine the voices of the American people," Rep. Suzan DelBene, a Democrat from Washington and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, told reporters at a meeting July 23.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom has suggested a redistricting in his state to offset Republican actions. (But unlike in Texas where legislators decide district lines, Newsom does face a major obstacle in the form of a bipartisan redistricting commission, which oversees California's maps.)
The response from Democrats has enticed other Republican-controlled states to potentially jump in too.
Missouri Republicans are pondering a plan to give their party a geographical leg up, and legislatures in other states such as Florida and New Hampshire have the ability to reevaluate maps like Texas.
Texas Democrats eye leaving the state
Back in Texas, Democrats have a limited number of options to counter a GOP-controlled state House and Senate.
Their primary tool is a controversial and seldom used move to flee the state and break the quorum necessary to proceed in the legislative session. State Democrats last used the measure in 2021 to protest new voting restrictions. After that episode, in which representatives halted operations for 38 days, Republicans approved a $500 a day fine for breaking quorum.
The monetary punishment could be enough to give Democrats pause about leaving the state this time. However, the Texas Tribune reported deep-pocked Democratic donors are ready to assist and enable a potential walkout.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mayor Adams' misguided answer to gun violence: Letters to the Editor — Aug. 6, 2025
Mayor Adams' misguided answer to gun violence: Letters to the Editor — Aug. 6, 2025

New York Post

timea few seconds ago

  • New York Post

Mayor Adams' misguided answer to gun violence: Letters to the Editor — Aug. 6, 2025

The Issue: Mayor Adams' Post column on gun availability and violence after the Midtown shooting. Mayor Adams says the problem is the availability of illegal guns to those that want them, but the gun that was used in the shooting last week was purchased legally ('Combating gun violence in the wake of tragedy,' Aug. 3). I agree with the mayor that we need to get criminals and illegal guns off the street. I also recognize that his hands are tied. But the problem is a result of the ridiculous bail laws and criminal-justice reforms, which starts with Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie and the rest in Albany. Advertisement Also, useless Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg allows a turnstile of recidivism for criminals to avoid going to jail. Until these people are voted out, the insane cycle will continue. Rob Cerone Manhattan Advertisement Hey Mayor Adams: Look no further than your Democratic allies in Albany for the continuing gun violence in New York City. Gov. Hochul, Speaker Heastie and others refuse to fix bail reform. The governor's Parole Board continues to release cop-killers, child rapists and murderers. Just as Adams refused to blame then-President Joe Biden for the open-border fiasco, he refuses to blame his fellow Dems for continued violence. Mike Lapinga Advertisement Staten Island An armed, law-abiding citizen is an asset to the community. That's why we have the right to bear arms. In his essay, Mayor Adams makes the argument that lax gun laws in states like mine are responsible for gun violence in states like his. Therefore, in his mind, we must have stricter gun laws on a national basis. However, a little research will show that the correlation between strict gun laws and violent crime is not a particularly strong one — whereas the correlation between high crime and Democrat-run cities is strikingly good. Advertisement It seems to me that the best way to decrease all violence is to make an effort to eliminate Democrats in government. We're doing our part in Oklahoma. How about you, New York? Lonnie Kennedy Oklahoma City, Okla. Why did you publish Mayor Adams' gun-violence essay? I'll be snapping a picture and posting it for President Donald Trump to see. Maybe if he sees it and calls The Post out, it'll quit using the term gun violence. It's all violence — whether it's a knife, a baseball bat or fists. James Schwartz Summit, NJ The Issue: A rise in marijuana-addicted treatment patients since New York legalized weed. Advertisement The CEO of Camelot Counseling proved himself an imbecile by uttering that legalizing cannabis is one of the stupidest things our society has done ('Weed addicts are growing,' Aug. 4). First: People would be consuming it anyway. Second: When buying from a licensed dispensary, you know what you're getting, purity-wise. It's not a 'gateway drug' for anyone with willpower. Joseph Cesare Advertisement Copiague Just what New York City needs: More high people with very little purpose in life. Marijuana is a gateway drug, with users always looking for a stronger high. The legalization of pot is another progressive policy hurting everyday citizens. J.R. Cummings Advertisement Manhattan Did the morons who passed the law to legalize marijuana not know there were scores of people just waiting for this so they could buy it as if they were buying candy? We are destroying humans because certain politicians wanted to be loved and voted for again. I hope they're hanging their heads in shame because of what they have done to people. Bunny Abraham Advertisement Manhattan Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.

Rachel Maddow Calls Out Trump's Authoritarian Moves
Rachel Maddow Calls Out Trump's Authoritarian Moves

Buzz Feed

timea few seconds ago

  • Buzz Feed

Rachel Maddow Calls Out Trump's Authoritarian Moves

Hot Topic 🔥 Full coverage and conversation on Politics MSNBC's Rachel Maddow says Americans no longer have to fear potential authoritarianism in their own country, because 'we are there' already — and cited President Donald Trump 's widespread immigration raids, detainments without probable cause, and use of military force. 'We have crossed a line,' she said on The Rachel Maddow Show, Monday. 'We are in a place we did not want to be, but we are there. The thing we were all warning about for the last few years is not coming, it is here. We are in it. This is what [it's] like, it turns out.' Maddow argued that large swaths of the country might easily overlook this downward slide, as movies are still being produced, sports continue to be played, and families are still discussing the same old issues they always have around their kitchen table each night. 'But also, at the same time, life in the United States is profoundly changing,' Maddow added Monday. 'It's profoundly different than it was even six months ago, because we do now live in a country that has an authoritarian leader in charge.' She then put it even more bluntly: 'We have a consolidating dictatorship in our country.' While the MSNBC host went on to acknowledge that this might sound 'melodramatic,' Maddow noted the US now seems to have its own 'secret police,' which is commonplace across dictatorships, in the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency under Trump. 'A massive, anonymous, unbadged — literally masked — totally unaccountable internal police force that apparently has infinite funding but no identifiable leadership,' said Maddow. 'And they act in ways designed to instill maximum fear and use maximum force.' Maddow continued: 'I mean, when you imagine an authoritarian country, what you imagine is masked secret police breaking people's car windows and snatching people off the streets and out of church parking lots and courtroom hallways and taking them away with no charges, no notice, no paperwork, no explanation, not letting them see lawyers and then moving them secretly to what are effectively black site prisons where they won't tell you who's there and where no one's allowed in to see what's going on.' Experts have already warned that one such prison, Florida's immigrant detention camp that Republicans have dubbed ' Alligator Alcatraz,' is 'a human rights disaster waiting to happen.' Democratic lawmakers initially blocked from visiting were finally granted access last month and confirmed its horrid conditions. The president has justified nationwide crackdowns on undocumented workers, as well as the detainment, arrest, and deportation of college students and professors across the US, as necessary protection against supposedly violent and anti-American immigrants. Maddow argued it won't stop there, however, and that the US military in multiple states has already 'extended the legal boundaries of nearby military bases' by hundreds of miles 'so they can give active duty US troops the power to arrest and search people on US soil.' 'We are not heading toward something like this,' Maddow said Monday. 'We are there. It is here. It is the environment in which we are now living. And so, given that you now live in a country with an authoritarian leader, the question is: What can you do for your country?'

Trump Administration Moves to Destroy Satellite That Monitors Greenhouse Gases
Trump Administration Moves to Destroy Satellite That Monitors Greenhouse Gases

Gizmodo

timea few seconds ago

  • Gizmodo

Trump Administration Moves to Destroy Satellite That Monitors Greenhouse Gases

The Trump Administration's budget proposal for Fiscal Year 2026 would take an axe to NASA science. Two satellite missions on the chopping block have provided climate scientists, oil and gas companies, and farmers with critical atmospheric carbon data for years. The Orbiting Carbon Observatories are a pair of instruments that map atmospheric carbon on a global scale. NASA launched the OCO-2 in 2014 and mounted the OCO-3 on the International Space Station in 2019. Trump's budget proposal threatens both missions, but the standalone OCO-2 would be completely destroyed during its fiery descent through Earth's atmosphere. Though the budget has yet to pass, NPR reports that NASA scientists working on the OCO missions are already making 'Phase F' plans—essentially laying out options for termination. David Crisp, a retired NASA scientist who designed the satellites and managed the missions until 2022, told NPR that the NASA employees making those plans have reached out to tap his expertise. 'They were asking me very sharp questions,' Crisp said. 'The only thing that would have motivated those questions was [that] somebody told them to come up with a termination plan.' Three other academic scientists and two current NASA employees—all of whom requested anonymity—also confirmed to NPR that the agency is planning to terminate the missions. Congress has already funded both satellites through the end of fiscal year 2025, NPR reports. It could still choose to extend their funding through 2026, but it remains to be seen. In July, congressional Democrats did warn acting NASA administrator Sean Duffy not to terminate missions that Congress has funded—a sign that they may attempt to save the OCOs. Decommissioning these satellites would mark a significant scientific loss. The OCO-2 and OCO-3 sniff out atmospheric carbon dioxide using spectrometers to detect wavelengths of light absorbed by CO2 molecules. NASA designed them to improve monitoring of human-driven carbon emissions and variations in the natural carbon cycle, and they've certainly done a good job of this. OCO-2 data have helped scientists quantify how natural carbon sinks such as forests and oceans offset carbon dioxide emissions and how carbon sinks can become carbon emitters through drought, deforestation, or wildfires, according to NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. This instrument has also provided valuable insights into urban carbon dioxide emissions and contributed data that supported the Paris Agreement. That's not all. Shortly after launching the satellite, NASA realized it could also measure plant growth, according to JPL. It does this by detecting the 'glow' plants emit during photosynthesis. When plants absorb sunlight to convert carbon dioxide and water into energy, their chlorophyll—a light-absorbing pigment—leaks some unused photons, JPL explains. This produces a faint glow called solar-induced fluorescence, and OCO-2 can spot it. This data helps farmers and agricultural scientists estimate crop productivity, monitor drought, and more. If Trump's budget passes, it will mean the end of the OCO-2, but there is hope for the OCO-3. NASA is seeking partnerships with institutions and companies willing to take over the cost of maintaining this ISS instrument. For now, like many of America's climate and environmental science programs, the future of both Earth-observing satellites hangs in the balance.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store