&w=3840&q=100)
Why the last conversation of Air India pilots deepens crash mystery
The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) of India has released its findings on the June 12 crash. PTI/File Photo
The preliminary report on the Air India Flight 171 crash, which killed 260 people in June, has been made public.
The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) of India has released its findings on the June 12 crash, raising new concerns about the placement of the engine fuel cutoff switches.
ALSO READ | Inside the cockpit during final 98 seconds of doomed Air India flight
According to the report, fuel control switches on the Boeing 787's engines were briefly turned off just moments after takeoff, which stopped the fuel flow.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The cockpit voice recorder also added to the confusion in the investigation.
So, how does the cockpit voice recording add to the unanswered questions surrounding the Air India crash?
Let's take a look:
How cockpit audio adds to the mystery of plane crash
Seconds after take-off, both fuel-control switches on the Boeing 787 Dreamliner suddenly shifted to the 'cut-off' setting.
This action cut off fuel to the engines and led to a complete loss of power.
Normally, the switches are moved to 'cut-off' only after a plane has landed.
Thrust Lever Quadrant & Fuel Control Switch of the doomed Air India plane
The cockpit voice recorder picked up one pilot asking the other why he 'did the cut-off', while the other denied doing so.
The report does not say whether it was the captain or the first officer who spoke, or which of them made the 'Mayday, Mayday, Mayday' distress call before the crash.
At the time, the co-pilot was flying the aircraft, and the captain was monitoring.
The switches were later moved back to their correct position for flight, which started the automatic engine relight system.
When the aircraft hit the ground, one engine had started to regain thrust while the other had restarted but had not yet recovered full power.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The switches are designed to prevent unintentional use. They need to be lifted before being flipped, a safety design used since the 1950s, BBC reported.
They are built to strict standards and are known for being very reliable.
A Canada-based air crash expert told BBC, 'It would be almost impossible to pull both switches with a single movement of one hand, and this makes accidental deployment unlikely.'
Some experts told Reuters that it is unlikely the switches could have been moved by mistake.
'If they were moved because of a pilot, why?' asked Anthony Brickhouse, a US aviation safety expert.
The AAIB report said that the switches were flipped a second apart.
US aviation expert John Nance told Reuters that's about how long it would take to move one switch, then the other. He added that switching them off mid-flight is highly unusual, especially just after take-off. Doing so causes the engines to shut down almost immediately.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In normal operations, the switches are used to shut off engines at the airport gate or during certain emergencies, such as a fire. The report found no sign of any such emergency on board.
At the crash site, both switches were found in the 'run' position, and evidence showed the engines had begun to restart before the low-altitude crash, the report said.
It added that all maintenance directives and technical bulletins had been followed for the aircraft and its engines. As the Dreamliner lost height, it hit several trees and an incinerator chimney before crashing into a building.
The accident killed at least 260 people, including 19 people on the ground. PTI/File Photo
Meanwhile, Union Civil Aviation Minister Kinjarapu Ram Mohan Naidu has urged people not to jump to conclusions based on the report.
He said, 'The AAIB has brought out a preliminary report. This is not the final report. Until the final report comes out, we should not arrive at any conclusion. AAIB is an autonomous authority, and the ministry does not interfere in their work.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'…It is not ideal to comment on its report just yet, as the investigation into the crash is ongoing. The black box is still being probed,' he added.
'Presumes guilt': What Pilots association said on the crash report
Soon after the release of the preliminary findings, the Airline Pilots' Association of India (ALPA) said on Saturday that the investigation appeared to be proceeding with the assumption that the pilots were at fault.
ALPA chief Sam Thomas said in a statement on Saturday, July 12, 'The tone and direction of the investigation suggest a bias toward pilot error. We categorically reject this presumption and insist on a fair, fact-based inquiry.'
The association also pointed out that 'suitably qualified personnel are not taken on board for these crucial investigations,' Hindustan Times reported.
The association reiterated its request to be allowed to take part in the investigation 'even in the capacity of observers so as to provide the requisite transparency.'
The Air India crash report
The initial report has found that fuel to both engines of Air India flight AI171 was cut off nearly at the same time, causing the aircraft to crash shortly after take-off.
The 15-page report said that in the cockpit voice recording, one pilot asked the other why the fuel had been cut. The second pilot denied doing so.
Investigators are now working to determine whether this was caused by human error, a technical fault, or some other malfunction.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
14 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Too early to draw conclusions on Pilots' role in A-I crash: Ex-AAIB chief
It will be too premature to draw conclusions on the role of pilots from the preliminary investigation report into the fatal crash of Air India plane last month and the final report will mention about the most probable cause for the accident, former AAIB chief Aurobindo Handa said on Sunday. A day after the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) released its preliminary report into the crash that killed 260 people, he said, "We should allow AAIB to complete the investigation in a fair, unbiased and transparent manner." Handa has investigated more than 100 aircraft accidents, including the Air India Express plane crash in Kozhikode in 2020. "AAIB has done a good job. Going forward, they will now focus to find out as to why and how these fuel switches moved and whether there could have been any mechanical and/or electrical failures/malfunction," he told PTI. The report, released on Saturday, said the fuel switches of the crashed Boeing 787-8 plane's engines were cut off within a gap of one second, and later switched on. From the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why he did cut off the switch and the other pilot saying he did not do so. The report did not mention which pilot asked the question and which pilot responded. The co-pilot was Pilot Flying (PF), and the Pilot In Command (PIC) was Pilot Monitoring (PM) for the flight. "It will be too premature to draw any conclusions, including the role of one of the pilots from the AAIB's preliminary investigation report on Air India flight 171... we should allow AAIB to complete the investigation in a fair, unbiased and transparent manner," Handa said. The Pilot In Command (PIC) was 56-year-old Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and the First Officer was 32-year-old Clive Kundar. Sabharwal's flying experience with 787 was more than 8,596 hours, including 8,260 hours as PIC, while Kundar's flying experience with this type of aircraft was 1,128 hours. Kundar was pilot flying while Sabharwal was pilot monitoring for the AI 171 flight operated with the nearly 12-year-old Boeing 787-8 aircraft. According to the preliminary report, both pilots had adequate rest period prior to operating the flight. "In some quarters, especially in foreign media, there are endeavours to indicate that one of the pilots could have been at fault. Yet again, I would like to request our veteran aviators to refrain from any sort of speculation," Handa said. The AI 171, operated with a nearly 12-year-old Boeing 787-8 aircraft, flying from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick crashed into a building soon after takeoff and 260 people died. Out of the 242 people onboard the plane, only one survived. On Saturday, Civil Aviation Minister K Rammohan Naidu said one should not jump into any conclusions on the role of pilots in the Air India plane crash and there are multiple things that need to be looked into before preparing the final investigation report.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Aviation safety: Key findings from India's last three major air crashes
The last three major air crashes in India-Patna (2000), Mangaluru (2010), and Kozhikode (2020)-offer critical safety insights, with recommendations for improving aviation safety Deepak Patel New Delhi Listen to This Article The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has submitted its preliminary report on the AI171 crash that occurred near Ahmedabad airport on 12 June. Investigators will now focus on determining why the flight's fuel switches moved to cutoff mode, leading to a loss of thrust and the subsequent crash. Meanwhile, India's last three major commercial aviation accidents—Patna (2000), Mangaluru (2010), and Kozhikode (2020)—could offer critical safety lessons for the ongoing investigation. Patna Crash (2000) The crash of Alliance Air Flight CD-7412 in Patna on 17 July 2000, which killed 60 people, was the result of pilot error, according to
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Air India crash: Too early to draw conclusions on pilots' role from initial report, says former AAIB chief
It will be too premature to draw conclusions on the role of pilots from the preliminary investigation report into the fatal crash of Air India plane last month and the final report will mention about the most probable cause for the accident, former AAIB chief Aurobindo Handa said on Sunday. A day after the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) released its preliminary report into the crash that killed 260 people, he said, "We should allow AAIB to complete the investigation in a fair, unbiased and transparent manner." Handa has investigated more than 100 aircraft accidents, including the Air India Express plane crash in Kozhikode in 2020. "AAIB has done a good job. Going forward, they will now focus to find out as to why and how these fuel switches moved and whether there could have been any mechanical and/or electrical failures/malfunction," he told PTI. The report, released on Saturday, said the fuel switches of the crashed Boeing 787-8 plane's engines were cut off within a gap of one second, and later switched on. Live Events From the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why he did cut off the switch and the other pilot saying he did not do so. The report did not mention which pilot asked the question and which pilot responded. The co-pilot was Pilot Flying (PF), and the Pilot In Command (PIC) was Pilot Monitoring (PM) for the flight. "It will be too premature to draw any conclusions, including the role of one of the pilots from the AAIB's preliminary investigation report on Air India flight 171... we should allow AAIB to complete the investigation in a fair, unbiased and transparent manner," Handa said. The Pilot In Command (PIC) was 56-year-old Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and the First Officer was 32-year-old Clive Kundar. Sabharwal's flying experience with 787 was more than 8,596 hours, including 8,260 hours as PIC, while Kundar's flying experience with this type of aircraft was 1,128 hours. Kundar was pilot flying while Sabharwal was pilot monitoring for the AI 171 flight operated with the nearly 12-year-old Boeing 787-8 aircraft. According to the preliminary report, both pilots had adequate rest period prior to operating the flight. "In some quarters, especially in foreign media, there are endeavours to indicate that one of the pilots could have been at fault. Yet again, I would like to request our veteran aviators to refrain from any sort of speculation," Handa said. The AI 171, operated with a nearly 12-year-old Boeing 787-8 aircraft, flying from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick crashed into a building soon after takeoff and 260 people died. Out of the 242 people onboard the plane, only one survived. On Saturday, Civil Aviation Minister K Rammohan Naidu said one should not jump into any conclusions on the role of pilots in the Air India plane crash and there are multiple things that need to be looked into before preparing the final investigation report.
