Immigration Minister Erica Stanford regrets email ‘spam' remarks after backlash
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
Immigration Minister Erica Stanford said Thursday she regretted remarks made in Parliament earlier in the month when she likened unsolicited emails from Indians to "spam".
When answering parliamentary questions about the use of her private email on 6 May, Stanford said she had received a number of emails from people in India asking for immigration advice, which she never responded to.
She told RNZ she had been receiving emails from all over the world, and she would not have singled out any particular country if she could go back in time.
Stanford said she never intended to upset anyone when she made the comments.
"You know, it wasn't my intent to draw out one particular country," Stanford told RNZ on Thursday. "It was just a recent example that I happened to have in my head at the time.
"If I could go back and not say that particular country, of course I would."
When asked if she regretted making those remarks, Stanford said, "Looking back, of course".
"I would have said many people from many countries e-mail me asking for a job and a visa, and I do treat those as spam because clearly no minister in any country would be expected to respond to such an e-mail saying, 'Can I please have a job' and 'Can I please have a visa' from someone who's not stepped foot in the country before," she said.
On 6 May, Labour's Willow-Jean Prime asked Stanford to confirm every email related to her ministerial portfolios, which had ever been sent to or from her personal email account, had been captured for official record.
The question followed revelations a day earlier that Stanford had used her personal email account for work purposes, including sending herself pre-Budget announcements to print out.
"I have complied with the Official Information Act. I have also made sure that everything is available to be captured and have forwarded everything that I've needed to my parliamentary email address," Stanford said in response to the Labour MP's question.
"I will acknowledge, though, in a very similar case to Kelvin Davis, I receive a lot of unsolicited emails like, for example, things from people in India asking for immigration advice, which I never respond to. I almost regard those as being akin to spam, and so there are those ones. But, similarly, other ministers have had probably very similar issues."
Priyanca Radhakrishnan
Photo:
RNZ / Angus Dreaver
Priyanca Radhakrishnan, a former minister of ethnic communities, made her displeasure with the remarks about unsolicited emails from India clear in a social media post on 10 May.
"Earlier this week, in response to a question by @willowjeanprime the Immigration Minister felt the need to single out people from one country/ethnicity in a negative light," Radhakrishnan wrote.
"If you're from India, don't bother emailing her because it's automatically considered spam. So much for the National govt's
all-of-government focus
on strengthening the relationship between India and NZ and focus on people-to-people links."
Approached by RNZ, the minister initially
defended her remarks
, claiming Radhakrishnan's assertion was "incorrect".
"As I advised the House, I receive unsolicited emails from people overseas to my personal email address, often requesting personal immigration advice," Stanford said.
"In this instance, I recalled a recent email I'd received of this nature when answering in Question Time. I did not say it is automatically considered as spam, I said 'I almost regard those as being akin to spam'.
"While these people are attempting to contact me as the minister of immigration, I have no ministerial responsibility for providing non-citizens with immigration advice, nor do my officials at Immigration NZ have any responsibility.
"Therefore, these emails to my personal email address are not responded to. Emails sent to my official email addresses are managed appropriately by my office."
Stanford's remarks have sparked anger in India over the past two weeks, with many mainstream media in the subcontinent devoting column inches to the story.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said Stanford
could have expressed herself better
, but meant no offence when she made comments about receiving emails from people in India.
Veer Khar
Photo:
RNZ / Blessen Tom
Members of the Indian community in New Zealand have also criticised the minister for her remarks.
Veer Khar, president of the New Zealand Indian Central Association, expressed concern about Stanford's comments.
"We find this characterisation ill-mannered, dismissive and inappropriate," Khar wrote in a letter to the minister.
"While we appreciate that ministers receive a high volume of unsolicited emails, the specific reference to Indian-origin correspondence creates an unfortunate impression of bias against a community that has long contributed positively to New Zealand's economy, culture and society," he wrote.
"Your comments not only risk damaging trust in the immigration process but also send an unwelcome message to aspiring migrants and Indian-New Zealanders who seek fair and respectful engagement with the government."
Ravi Bajpai
Photo:
Supplied
Ravi Bajpai, editor of Indian community newspaper Indian Weekender, said Stanford's remarks contained two core assumptions.
"First ... is the way Stanford made the reference to Indians," Bajpai said. "[She] actually doesn't need [to] typecast a particular ethnicity.
"Second one is more subtle. When the immigration minister herself is engendering such stereotypes, it will rub off on officials making frontline immigration decisions.
"The Indian community in general feels the real question is about implicit bias.
"[But] a lot of immigration advisors I have talked to say it's not just implicit bias, it's also explicit bias against a lot of applications they deal [concerning Indians]."
Bajpai said the remarks had become a hot-button issue in the community because Indian media had picked it up.
"Her remarks have made headlines on all the major news website. It also coincides with Foreign Minister Winston Peters' visit to India," he said.
"When you are trying to crack a [free trade] deal with India, something you haven't been able to do for about 10-15 years, does it really help for your minister to say things like that?"
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
6 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Labour MP Willie Jackson accuses government of rigging next election
Willie Jackson said "the gerrymandering of our voting rules to rig the election" was offensive. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Labour MP Willie Jackson has accused the government of trying to rig next year's election through its move to block people from being able to enrol for 12 days before voting day . The claim - made during Parliament's general debate on Wednesday - goes further than Labour's official position which has been that electoral changes would make it harder to vote. Jackson also used his speech to criticise Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour as the "biggest dropkick of all" following Seymour's use of the term to disparage late enrollers. "I don't know what's more offensive," Jackson told MPs. "The gerrymandering of our voting rules to rig the election, or the deputy prime minister referring to 600,000 people as dropkicks." Seymour last week told reporters he was "sick of dropkicks that can't get themselves organised to follow the law". More than 600,000 people enrolled or updated their enrolment details after writ day in 2023, including 110,000 on election day itself. In a fiery speech on Wednesday, Jackson poured contempt on the "disgraceful, rotten, useless government", accusing it of actively suppressing the vote and "vandalising democratic participation". He pointed to official advice which noted that young people, Māori, Pasifika and Asian communities would be disproportionately affected by the changes. "It's racist disenfranchisement," Jackson said. "It's a breach of democracy... this government risks being accused of rigging the next election." Jackson commended Attorney-General Judith Collins as "one of the most principled National Party members" for standing up to her "weak and useless leader" by warning that the voting changes breached human rights. "She's had the courage to call these voter suppression powers what they are: discriminatory." Jackson concluded his speech by taking at aim at Seymour, calling on him to apologise for his "disgraceful" description of some voters as dropkicks. "He's the most dangerous politician of the last generation... not only a disgrace as the deputy prime minister, but surely the biggest dropkick of all." Speaking to RNZ, Seymour laughed off Jackson's description of him as a dropkick: "To be honest, I was always an open side flanker. Didn't really do a big drop kick, although, on a good day, I could nail one from just outside the 22." Seymour said Jackson's claims were "wrong and insane" but he could not help but like the man because "you know he doesn't mean it". "He's more a figure of fun for me," Seymour said. "Although I do worry a little bit about - you know - a man of his age - the old ticker can give out if he hyperventilates too much at work in the House." In a statement to RNZ, a spokesperson for Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said Jackson was prone to "hyperbole and mangling of the facts". "People are not being disenfranchised, they are merely being required to enrol," the spokesperson said. The government's legislation banning same-day voter enrolment passed its first reading in Parliament on Tuesday and will now be considered by select committee. During the debate, Goldsmith told MPs the change was required because the increasing number of special votes was delaying the final vote count. "The final vote count used to take two weeks. Last election, it took three," Goldsmith said. "The advice I received is that if we leave things as they are, it could well take even longer in future elections." Goldsmith flatly rejected the claim that people were being disenfranchised, saying the 110,000 people who updated their details on election day in 2023 only did so because they had been told they could. "The message will be different this election. People will be told they need to be enrolled well before voting starts. It's not that hard, and people are capable of doing these things." Justice officials, however, recommended against the move and warned it could result in lower turnout and reduce confidence in the electoral system. "Its impact on reducing special votes is uncertain, while its impact on democratic participation could be significant," officials said. The move has also been criticised by the Chief Human Rights Commissioner and electoral law experts Andrew Geddis and Graeme Edgeler. Since 2019, voters have been able to turn up to the booth at any time during the advance voting period and enrol at the same time, as well as on election day, with their vote being counted as a special vote. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Review into use of Whānau Ora Commissioning funding set to conclude this week
The review into the use of Whānau Ora Commissioning funding is set to conclude this week. Photo: RNZ / Mihingarangi Forbes Te Puni Kōkiri has confirmed the review into the use of Whānau Ora Commissioning funding is being concluded this week, and the findings will be released next month. The review , led by Doug Craig, was set up after reports agencies with soon-to-expire contracts had paid for an ad campaign urging people to switch to the Māori roll, and to the Moana Pasifika rugby team . Concerns were also raised about contracting decisions and conflicts of interest by a Pasifika Futures senior executive. The agencies maintained the ad campaign was part of the mission to advance Māori wellbeing, and denied they had put any public money towards the rugby team . Te Puni Kōkiri launched the review and released terms of reference in late June, but would not set a firm timeframe despite earlier assurances from the prime minister it would be completed in July. In a statement to RNZ, Te Puni Kōkiri confirmed it "will be completed this week". "As part of the review process, it is appropriate that those covered in the report are given the opportunity to comment on its findings before any public release. Te Puni Kōkiri expects to release the findings of the report in mid-August," the statement said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
'System's obviously flawed' - Te Pāti Māori calls on Electoral Commission to check its processes are robust
Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Te Pāti Māori is calling on the Electoral Commission to check its processes are robust, saying it's heard hundreds of complaints about people's details being altered. But the commission say it has found no technical issue with its online system and has suggested the problem could be due to user error. Speaking at Parliament on Wednesday, co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer said her party had been contacted by "a few hundred people" who said they had recently checked their enrolment details only to discover they had been changed. "Some of them have never moved, and they've never not voted, so there is a concern about that process," she said. "The system's obviously flawed. It's got something technically wrong with it, and [the commission] needs to come back and guarantee to us." In a statement, the commission's Deputy Chief Executive Operations Anusha Guler said they were aware some people could not find their enrolment record on the website, but after checking, had found no technical issues with their online system. "If you're Māori, I also want to assure you that your roll choice - Māori roll or general roll - is up to you. We won't put you on either roll by default and we won't change your roll without your permission," Guler said. Guler said there might be a few reasons why people could not find their enrolment record. "When you look up your details on your search must exactly match the name and address we have on our records. The same goes for verifying your information with ID - the names on your enrolment record and your ID must match exactly. "If we lose touch with you - for example if we get returned mail from an old address - we will try to contact you by email or text to ask you to update your details. If we can't contact you or don't hear back from you, you may be put on the dormant roll." The records of those on the dormant roll would not show up on the website, but they would be re-enrolled as soon as they filled in a form with their current address, Guler said. Ngarewa-Packer said the commission needed to do "a little bit more digging" to prove the system was working - especially given upcoming changes to enrolment rules which stop same-day enrolment . "They need to look into it and give it the credibility that it deserves," she said. "It shouldn't be taken lightly, particularly when the government is saying that you're the problem, you 100,000 drop kicks."
