
The US is struggling to hire air traffic controllers. A surprising age limit and grueling schedules could fuel the problem
But the shortage of air traffic controllers is nearly the worst in 30 years, said the National Air Traffic Controllers Association, which represents 10,800 certified ATCs across the country.
The shortfall has forced many to work 'six days a week, 10 hours a day – for years at a time,' union President Nick Daniels testified at a House subcommittee hearing this week.
The US needs more than 3,000 new air traffic controllers to reach adequate staffing, he said. And recent, high-profile incidents have highlighted the scarcity and workload of exhausted air traffic controllers.
'What is new – or more problematic or more common now – is the use of overtime,' said Michael McCormick, a professor and air traffic management coordinator at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.
'I would say your larger facilities are probably more problematic in use of overtime than the smaller facilities – just where you don't want it the most.'
In January, a commercial jet and a military helicopter collided midair near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, killing 67 people. While authorities have not identified the cause of that catastrophe, CNN has confirmed one air traffic controller was staffing two different jobs in the tower – handling both local air traffic and helicopter traffic in the area.
And investigators recently said a near collision in 2023 was caused by an air traffic controller who was distracted by a third plane, though their report did not explicitly cite staffing shortage or exhaustion.
The federal government recently announced pay boosts for new air traffic controllers and more efficient hiring processes. But anyone over age 31 is too old to apply, limiting the hiring pool. And the vast majority of controllers are forced to leave their jobs a decade before standard retirement age.
Air traffic control applicants must be less than 31 years old so they can work the mandatory 20 or 25 years needed to qualify for pensions before their mandatory retirement age of 56, an FAA spokesperson said.
While that age cutoff might seem young, ATCs must have incredible physical stamina and mental sharpness, McCormick said.
'When you first start at an air traffic control facility, you have to do a lot of memorization,' McCormick said.
'You have to memorize what's known as the radar map. You have to know what every single dot dashed line means on the map. You have to memorize how the airspace is sectorized. So think of Tetris. There's multiple layers and shapes that all fit together into a puzzle. That's what airspace is like, too.'
But this Tetris-style puzzle is 'in three dimensions. So you have to memorize the geographical confines of all the sectors and the altitude limitations,' McCormick said.
Most air traffic controllers don't just monitor one airport. Many keep tabs on dozens of other regional airports to make sure planes keep a safe distance from each other.
At Philadelphia's main airport, 'there's also 72 satellite airports in the airspace that you also have to know,' said McCormick, who worked in that airport's traffic control tower.
'You provide approach control services (to) all those airports, too. So all that needs to be memorized … you can't waste time and energy looking something up or trying to remember something.'
The cognitive challenges intensify with age and when air traffic controllers move to larger airports – forcing them to memorize significantly more data and track more regional airports, McCormick said.
The head of the Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk, has touted slashing government jobs in an array of departments. But he recently asked retired air traffic controllers to consider returning to work.
'There is a shortage of top notch air traffic controllers,' Musk posted on X. 'If you have retired, but are open to returning to work, please consider doing so.'
But it's unlikely retirees will return to control towers because of a federal law requiring air traffic controllers to retire by age 56.
In rare cases, ATCs can get one-year waivers to keep working up to age 60, if they show strong mental and physical ability, McCormick said. And ATCs can still work elsewhere after their mandated retirement from air traffic control.
But many choose to retire by age 56 – if not earlier – due to generous pensions, McCormick said.
'Unlike traditional federal employees that need 30 years of service to retire, air traffic controllers are able to retire at age 50 with at least 20 years of service or any age with at least 25 years,' the FAA said.
'Retirement annuity is a guaranteed income for a person during their retirement years. Air traffic controllers receive a more generous annuity than traditional federal employees.'
But given the dearth of air traffic controllers, McCormick recommends studying whether it'd be safe to raise the mandatory retirement age to allow those who are still mentally and physically sharp to work beyond age 56 if they want to do so.
'There needs to be funded research on 'is that mandatory retirement age still valid?' Because that has been in place since the 1970s,' McCormick said.
'And since that time, there has never been any effort to validate: Is that good? Is it not good? Has the aging process changed over time?'
Since new hires often require years of training, 'if you can extend people who are eligible to retire (by) one to five years, that gives a chance for the FAA to build their workforce back up,' McCormick said.
The US Department of Transportation has not responded to why the specific age of 56 was chosen or whether it is considering adjusting the age limits.
The scarcity of air traffic controllers isn't due to a lack of applicants. It's the lack of qualified applicants who meet the FAA's rigorous requirements.
'Less than 10% of all applicants meet these requirements and are accepted into the training program,' the FAA said.
Some applicants don't pass the medical and security clearances. And many don't make it through the strenuous academy and training.
'It's a rigorous training process,' Daniels told CNN last month. 'So it's not like today we could go out and hire the 3,600. It takes two to three years to get a controller from being qualified … just to enter the job.'
After that, there are 'multiple points where they can fail out of being an air traffic controller – everything from academy to simulation training locally and then eventually talking to aircraft on their own.'
With the current staffing deficit, about 41% of air traffic controllers must work 60-hour weeks, the union said.
The mandatory rest period between shifts has increased from eight hours to 10 hours – though that includes time to commute home.
But there are no mandates requiring two days off at the end of work weeks, meaning many ATCs have only a 24-hour weekend before starting another work week.
While controllers get extra pay for mandatory overtime, grueling 60-hour work weeks can fuel attrition. And the longer the staffing shortages persist, the longer some ATCs risk exhaustion and burnout.
'The past hiring rate was not keeping up with the natural attrition of workers leaving the profession due to retirement or other stresses of the job,' said Galen Munroe, a spokesperson for the ATC union.
McCormick attributes the ongoing shortfall to the 'inability to hire and train controllers due to things like Covid, the recession, government shutdowns.'
The number of air traffic controllers started plummeting around 2013, after a government shutdown, McCormick said.
Since then, every time the government has shut down, training and hiring for air traffic controllers have come to a screeching halt. Recruits at the FAA's training academy in Oklahoma City must be sent home.
Now, experts worry a potential government shutdown on March 14 will exacerbate the shortage.
'If there's a government shutdown on March 14th, it's going to make a mess of our hiring and training and control,' McCormick said.
To combat the shortfall, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced 'a new plan to supercharge the hiring of air traffic controllers.'
The current hiring window is open through March 17, 'and we are making it more efficient than ever to apply and more affordable to begin training,' the FAA said.
The starting pay during academy training will jump from $17.61 an hour to $22.61, the agency said. 'Pay continues to increase as you gain more experience and earn professional certifications,' the FAA said.
'Within three years of graduating the Academy, the average certified professional controller earns over $160,000 per year.'
And the old, eight-step hiring process that can last well over a year is being replaced with a faster, five-step hiring method. For example, the FAA can now work to process medical and security clearances at the same time, rather than waiting for one to finish before starting the other.
The streamlined process 'will accelerate the time-to-hire for these critical positions by shaving more than four months off the old process.'
The FAA said it has already made gains in the past year, exceeding its goal of hiring 1,800 air traffic controllers in 2024 – the highest number in nearly a decade.
McCormick said the FAA could go further to get young people interested in becoming air traffic controllers.
'I think they need to start reaching out more to high school age (students) and do heavier recruiting at a younger age,' he said.
But the ongoing shortfall – and never-ending attrition – mean the problem won't be solved quickly.
'It's going to take time,' he said. 'It's going to take years to fill that gap.'
CNN's Chris Isidore, Alexandra Skores and Alta Spells contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Republicans plan to use threat of third Trump impeachment as key issue to boost their standing in midterm races
Republican strategists say they plan to make a major midterm talking point from the threat of a third impeachment against Donald Trump that could come if Democrats retake the House. 'We know what the stakes are in the midterm elections,' John McLaughlin, a Trump pollster, told NBC News. 'If we don't succeed, Democrats will begin persecuting President Trump again. They would go for impeachment.' Right now, Republicans hold an eight-seat advantage in the House, walling the president off from a third impeachment, but that could change if the Democrats surge in 2026, as the president's party typically suffers during midterm elections. Still, according to Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., who led the party's second impeachment against Trump over the January 6 insurrection, the Democrats themselves plan to focus more on what they see as the president's 'terrible agenda.' 'We've already impeached him twice,' Raskin told NBC. 'So obviously that's not a complete solution, given that he is able to beat the two-thirds constitutional spread. So I don't think anybody thinks that's going to be the utopian solution to our problems.' Both House impeachments — first for an alleged offer of quid pro quo with Ukraine to go after Joe Biden, then for the Capitol riot — did not have enough votes to secure convictions in the Senate. During the second Trump administration, the president has continued to face attempts to initiate new impeachment trials, including from Michigan Democrat Shri Thanedar in the spring and a June effort over the administration's Iran strikes, though none of these have come to pass. Impeachments may not be coming any time soon, but Republicans face a variety of other risks to their three-party majority control of the federal government. The president's job approval rating has dipped to 37 percent, according to Gallup, the lowest of this term and just above Trump's lowest-ever approval rating, driven by hemorrhaging support from independent voters. A majority of Americans also oppose his signature One Big, Beautiful Bill, which contains a series of tax cuts and restrictions on social programs like Medicaid. The party also continues to face fallout and internal division over the White House's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files scandal, in which Trump and his allies campaigned on releasing materials related to the notorious financier's sexual misconduct, only to backtrack as more information concerning Epstein and Trump's long-time friendship came to light. The president has lashed out at his own base for seeking information about the scandal, which he calls a Democratic 'hoax,' while House Speaker Mike Johnson effectively ended business in the lower house until after its upcoming summer recess to avoid Democratic amendments calling for the release of the files. Meanwhile, former White House ally (and GOP mega-donor) Elon Musk has vowed to form his own political party, in the face of disagreements with the Trump administration over spending policy and the Epstein saga. There could also be blowback to economic conditions if the Trump administration's repeatedly delayed double-digit tariffs take full effect on major U.S. trading partners.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mike Johnson says Ghislaine Maxwell coming clean on Epstein case would be ‘a great service to the country'
Speaker Mike Johnson called on Jeffrey Epstein's accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, to come clean and told Americans that he "hoped" she could be trusted as he faces the growing uproar around the White House's handling of the investigation. Johnson appeared Sunday on NBC's Meet the Press, where moderator Kristen Welker asked him point-blank if the convicted sex-trafficker girlfriend of Epstein could be trusted to accurately testify about the crimes she and Epstein committed. Epstein was awaiting prosecution for sex trafficking underage girls after a previous conviction on similar charges when he died in federal custody. Maxwell has been thrust back into the spotlight as the MAGA base has grown frustrated with President Donald Trump and his administration's shutting down of the so-called Epstein files release. Last week, a top Department of Justice official met with Maxwell about the case. "Well, I mean, look; it's a good question. I hope so," Johnson told Welker in response. "I hope that she would want to come clean." "I hope she's telling the truth. She is convicted, she's serving a 20-year sentence for child sex trafficking. Her character is in some if she wants to come clean now, that would be a great service to the country. We want to know every bit of information that she has." The House Oversight Committee voted this week to issue a subpoena for Maxwell after the Justice Department announced its own plans to speak with her. Agency officials did so for nine hours between Thursday and Friday, after making a statement seeming to confirm that her testimony hadn't been aggressively sought before. Some have called Maxwell to testify and suggested she should be given a pardon for sharing what she knows about the Epstein case. She was convicted of sexual abuse against minors and sex trafficking for helping Epstein carry out crimes. Johnson touted the Oversight subpoena favorably Sunday, casting it as evidence that GOP leadership supported efforts aimed at transparency. The Trump administration turned speculation about Epstein's death and the so-called 'Client List' of his co-conspirators into a raging wildfire in early July. The Justice Department and FBI published a joint memo explaining that future releases from the files would not take place, and that the list of Epstein's accomplices was not found. Epstein was rumored to have cultivated personal relationships with many powerful men and institutions. Critics of the president have alleged that a cover-up is in the works regarding the Epstein files. Democrats have hammered the president for his reversal, and a pair of scoops from the Wall Street Journal have reported on the president's connections to Epstein, to Trump's fury. The newspaper reported the contents of a message allegedly penned by Trump to Epstein as part of a 50th birthday celebration in 2003, including allusions to a shared 'secret' between them. Trump firmly denied authoring the note, and sued the Journal and its reporters in response. A second article from the Journal days later reported that Attorney General Pam Bondi informed Trump in May that he was mentioned in the Epstein investigation multiple times, but it was not clear in what context. The White House called that story 'fake' and has repeatedly insinuated that Democrats including Joe Biden tampered with evidence while Trump was out of office. Being mentioned in the files does not mean wrongdoing, and hundreds of names are reportedly included. The lead GOP co-sponsor behind a House resolution that would force the Justice Department to release the entirety of its collected evidence related to Epstein said Sunday that his push was to help the convicted pedophile's victims and would only grow stronger in the coming weeks. Earlier on the same network, Rep. Thomas Massie appeared alongside the resolution's lead Democratic co-sponsor, Rep. Ro Khanna, as the two promoted a resolution that would force Attorney General Pam Bondi to release 'all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials' related to the Epstein and Maxwell investigations. Massie told Welker that 'the release of the Epstein files is emblematic of what Trump ran for' and explained that the president's MAGA base expected results. 'There seems to be a class of people beyond the law, beyond the judicial all thought that when Trump was elected, he would be the bull in the china shop and break that all up,' said Massie. Massie went on to say that the Trump administration had lost his trust on the issue after publicly supporting transparency around the investigation, then doing an abrupt about-face. The administration is now calling on its supporters to move on from the issue and focus on hashing out issues with the 2016 'Russiagate' investigation instead of Epstein. Top administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance, also spent months calling for the very releases the Justice Department says it won't authorize. 'People who were allegedly working on this weren't sincere in their efforts,' Massie said. 'Somebody should ask Speaker Mike Johnson, why did he recess Congress early so that he didn't have to deal with the Epstein issue?' 'Politics is the art of the doable. There's enough public pressure right now that we can get 218 votes and force this to a vote on the floor,' said Massie. He also firmly rejected a DOJ memo explaining the administration's position against further releases of information from the Epstein files, despite the very public promises of Bondi and others to do the opposite. In the memo, agency officials said that explicit imagery involving children was 'intertwined' throughout the files collected by the Justice Department. Some have said the files should not be released to protect sex-abuse victims of both Maxwell and Epstein. 'That's a straw man [argument],' Massie responded on Sunday, after Welker read part of the memo. 'Ro [Khanna] and I carefully crafted this legislation so that the victims' names would be redacted, and that no child pornography will be released.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jasmine Crockett unleashes on Ghislaine Maxwell talking to Trump DOJ before Congress: ‘Out of jail for free'
Rep. Jasmime Crockett wants Ghislaine Maxwell — who is serving a 20-year sentence for aiding sex trafficking financier Jeffrey Epstein — to testify before Congress before she speaks under oath to the Trump Justice Department. US Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, President Donald Trump's former personal attorney, will meet with Maxwell on Thursday in Florida, where she is serving out her two-decade sentence for scheming with the late pedophile power-player to sexually exploit and abuse young women and girls. The meeting comes just a day after the House Oversight Committee, on which Crockett sits, voted to subpoena Maxwell. On Wednesday, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer issued a subpoena and set Maxwell's deposition date for Aug. 11. 'I don't know that we'll get anywhere, but I know if there's anybody that I want to talk to her, it is us — and not the administration — because at least if she comes before the committee, even if it's behind closed doors, it will be bipartisan,' Crockett, a frequent Trump antagonist, told The Independent. 'It won't just be one side able to ask questions, it'd be both sides, whereas the administration, they're a bunch of thugs,' she railed. 'And frankly, if it means that she can engage in a coverup, he'll most likely let her out of jail free. He's let people out of jail for far less.' This comes after the Department of Justice released a two-page memo on July 6 saying that Epstein, the convicted pedophile, had no 'client list' and died of suicide in his New York City jail cell, where he was found hanged by bed sheets. But Crockett, who spoke to The Independent before Comer issued his subpoena, also cautioned that she did not know if they would actually hear testimony from the once high-flying former socialite Maxwell. 'I don't know if she has appeals that are pending, and I'm sure that her attorneys will have some issues, some questions surrounding so it's more complicated than just subpoenaing her,' the Democrat said. 'We can subpoena all we want to. We have had a number of transcribed interviews as well as depositions over the last two weeks, and frankly, a lot of them ended with nothing because people invoked privilege and things like that.' Crockett has become a fundraising dynamo because of her combative style of questioning on the Oversight Committee and her willingness to joust with Republicans in the majority. But she recently lost her bid to replace the late Gerry Connolly (D-VA) as the top Democrat on the committee to Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA). Garcia told The Independent that subpoenaing Maxwell does not mean the committee trusts her to be truthful. 'She's a documented liar, she's obviously done an enormous amount to harm young girls and and and has an interest, of course, in, in being free,' Garcia said. 'We should still want to have her come testify in front of oversight in the Congress, but, but we should just be very we should understand that this is a very complex witness and someone that has caused great harm and not a good person to a lot of people.' The House of Representatives broke a day early after the House Rules Committee ground itself to a halt because Democrats continued offering amendments to release files related to Epstein. In an attempt to mollify Democrats and some conservatives, Republicans proposed a non-binding House resolution to get the Department of Justice to release files. In addition, Rep. Thomas (R-KY) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) have a discharge petition, which would force a vote and circumvent Speaker Mike Johnson, to release files related to Epstein. Massie, a critic of Trump, accused Johnson of covering for the president. 'He doesn't want a paper-thin sliver of daylight between him and the president, and so that's why he's avoided taking even the symbolic vote on the non-binding resolution,' Massie told The Independent. Trump, a friend of Epstein's for many years before a falling out that appears to have come before it was publicly known the financier was being investigated over his sex trafficking, has criticized his supporters and others for focusing on the Epstein case. He also vehemently denied a story in The Wall Street Journal that he sent Epstein a note for the disgraced financier and predator's 50th birthday party and also filed a $10 billion lawsuit against the newspaper and its owners News Corp and Rupert Murdoch, among others.