logo
Trump is bragging about his deportation plan but he still trails Obama's numbers ... by a lot

Trump is bragging about his deportation plan but he still trails Obama's numbers ... by a lot

Independent17-06-2025
Throughout his campaign, Donald Trump promised ' the largest deportation program in American history.' He depicted a country where immigrants are emptied out of the world's most notorious jails and mental institutions to 'poison the blood' of America with violent crime rampages. His vision commanded the swift removal of millions of undocumented Americans.
But four months after entering office, the president's history-making deportation plan isn't anywhere close to those figures, and the targets are largely anything but the faces of horrific crime that he sold to voters.
Instead, Trump's administration has revoked humanitarian protections for roughly 1 million people who were living and working in the country legally and now are vulnerable for their immediate deportation. He also deployed federal agents to stand outside courtroom doors to arrest people moments after their cases were dismissed in immigration courts.
The number of removals under Trump so far dwarfs those under former president Barack Obama, labeled among many immigrant communities the 'deporter-in-chief' for his record-setting removals. His administration deported more than 438,000 people in 2013 alone, a single-year record for this century that even outpaces removals during Trump's first term.
If Trump wanted to reach those same numbers, the president would need to more than double the current pace of removals. A frustrated Stephen Miller recently directed immigration officials to make at least 3,000 arrests a day, including sending agents to Home Depot and 7-11 stores to round up day laborers.
Deportations under Trump increased to 17,200 in April, surpassing removals from the same period last year under then-President Joe Biden. But Trump may be struggling to hit deportation targets with fewer people crossing the U.S.-Mexico border.
The president effectively shut down the asylum process and ended other legal pathways to entry along the southern border. Within the third month of his administration, apprehensions at the southern border plummeted to roughly 7,000 — marking a 95 percent decrease compared to March 2024.
Immigration enforcement under Obama zeroed in on unauthorized border crossings and cooperation with local law enforcement, while Trump is indiscriminately targeting communities with costly high-profile raids.
Prior to the Obama administration, people who were caught crossing the southern border without permission typically were allowed to return to Mexico without a formal law enforcement response, which critics say opened the door for people to try to cross again without facing any legal consequences.
Under Obama, with bigger budgets for immigration enforcement in the years after the Department of Homeland Security's creation during the War on Terror, formal removal proceedings became more common, as did criminal charges for illegal entry or re-entry, according to the Migration Policy Institute.
Those changes reduced the number of deportations overall, but recidivism along the border fell from 29 percent in 2007 to 14 percent by 2014, the group found.
Obama later prioritized removals of people considered national security or public safety threats, and issued an executive order in 2014 characterizing criminal gang members, terrorists and people with felony convictions as the highest priority for removals.
The number of deportations fell to about 414,000 that year, marking fewer deportations than his recent predecessors overall — to the tune of more than 3 million, compared to George W. Bush's 2 million.
Obama also relied on mechanisms to coordinate federal and local law enforcement on immigration enforcement, effectively deputizing state and local cops to enforce immigration laws. He arranged 70 of those so-called 287(g) agreements in 2009.
Trump is seeking an expansion of those agreements. But, unlike Obama, Trump is running into significant and volatile political opposition as he explicitly targets cities with majority Democratic control, where officials are resisting the administration's sweeping, militarized response to immigration enforcement.
The president's border czar Tom Homan has even suggested that Democratic leadership, including the governor of California and mayor of Chicago, could be arrested if he finds they have violated Trump's commands or shielded immigrants from removal.
Trump has resorted to other tactics — including commanding all federal law enforcement agencies to prioritize immigration arrests and rescinding policy that prevents raids in places like workplaces, courthouses, schools, hospitals and other 'sensitive' areas.
He also is using federal resources including the IRS to identify undocumented people, targeting international students for removal, rescinding temporary legal status for roughly 1 million people legally in the country after feeling violence, disasters and political turmoil in Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.
On Sunday night, following a weekend of nationwide protests against his immigration agenda, Trump issued an 'order' on Truth Social commanding his entire administration to get behind his push for ICE 'to do all in their power to achieve the very important goal of delivering the single largest Mass Deportation Program in History.'
That includes deploying agents to several major Democratic-run U.S. cities, home to millions of people and thousands of undocumented immigrants.
The president also suggested he was backing away from workplace raids in farms, meat processing and dairy plants and hotels — multi-billion industries that backed his campaign while employing thousands of undocumented laborers — but he appeared to reverse course just days later.
Trump also is running up against budget constraints as he demands more funding for ICE and more capacity to detain tens of thousands of immigrants in an already-cramped detention system.
While Trump and Republicans in Congress push for bigger budgets DHS, ICE is already estimated to be $1 billion over budget with a few months left this fiscal year.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump news at a glance: president hails US-EU trade deal as House speaker weighs in on Epstein controversy
Trump news at a glance: president hails US-EU trade deal as House speaker weighs in on Epstein controversy

The Guardian

time5 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump news at a glance: president hails US-EU trade deal as House speaker weighs in on Epstein controversy

Donald Trump has hailed what he called 'a powerful deal' on tariffs with the European Union to avert a damaging transatlantic trade war after months of tough negotiations between the two sides. 'It solves a lot of stuff and was a great decision,' the US president said of the agreement after meeting the European Commission chief, Ursula von der Leyen, in Scotland. The 'important' partnership involved the EU agreeing to spend tens of billions of dollars more on US energy products, Trump said. US House speaker Mike Johnson, meanwhile, said he would have 'great pause' about granting a pardon to Ghislaine Maxwell while another House Republican said it should be considered as part of an effort to obtain more information about Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. Here's more on this and the day's other key Trump administration stories: Donald Trump has announced a tariff deal with the European Union to end months of difficult negotiations between Washington and Brussels after meeting the European Commission chief, Ursula von der Leyen, at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland. 'This is really the biggest trading partnership in the world so we should give it a shot,' the president said before the private meeting started. Von der Leyen described it as 'a huge deal' that would bring 'stability' and 'predictability' to both sides. Read the full story US House speaker Mike Johnson said he would have 'great pause' about granting a pardon or commutation to Ghislaine Maxwell while Kentucky Republican representative Thomas Massie said a pardon should be on the table for the jailed Epstein confidante if she were to give helpful information around the Epstein case. On Sunday – after deputy attorney general Todd Blanche met with Maxwell last week –Johnson was asked on NBC about the possibility of a pardon and said: 'I think she should have a life sentence at least … That she orchestrated it and was a big part of it, at least under the criminal sanction, I think is an unforgivable thing. So again, not my decision, but I have great pause about that, as any reasonable person would.' Read the full story A top US medical body has expressed 'deep concern' to Robert F Kennedy Jr over news reports that the health secretary plans to overhaul a panel that determines which preventive health measures, including cancer screenings, should be covered by insurance companies. The letter from the the American Medical Association comes after the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday that Kennedy plans to overhaul the 40-year old US preventive services task force because he regards it as too 'woke', according to sources. Read the full story Thai and Cambodian leaders will meet on Monday for talks to end hostilities, Thailand said, after pressure from Donald Trump to end a deadly border dispute. UK prime minster Keir Starmer will recall his cabinet from their summer break for an emergency meeting on the Gaza crisis this week as cross-party MPs warned his talks with Donald Trump provided a critical juncture in helping to resolve the conflict. Catching up? Here's what happened on 26 July.

Epstein furor undermines public trust, Republican election hopes, two US lawmakers say
Epstein furor undermines public trust, Republican election hopes, two US lawmakers say

Reuters

time5 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Epstein furor undermines public trust, Republican election hopes, two US lawmakers say

WASHINGTON, July 27 (Reuters) - The uproar over disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein could undermine public trust in the Trump administration, as well as Republican hopes of retaining control of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections, two U.S. lawmakers said on Sunday. Republican Representative Thomas Massie and Democratic Representative Ro Khanna, who want the House of Representatives to vote on their bipartisan resolution requiring full release of the government's Epstein files, said the lack of transparency is reinforcing public perceptions that the rich and powerful live beyond the reach of the judicial system. "This is going to hurt Republicans in the midterms. The voters will be apathetic if we don't hold the rich and powerful accountable," Massie, a hardline conservative from Kentucky, told NBC's "Meet the Press" program. Republicans hope to add to their current 219-212 House majority - with four seats currently vacant - and 53-47 Senate majority in November 2026, although the U.S. political cycle traditionally punishes the party of the sitting president during midterm elections. The Washington Post reported late on Sunday that Trump was increasingly frustrated with his administration's handling of the furor around Epstein. Even so, the president was hesitant to make personnel changes to avoid creating a "bigger spectacle" as his top officials underestimated the outrage from Trump's own base over the issue, the newspaper reported, citing unnamed sources. Khanna said Attorney General Pam Bondi triggered "a crisis of trust" by saying there was no list of Epstein clients after previously implying that one existed. The change in position unleashed a tsunami of calls for her resignation from Trump's MAGA base. "This is about trust in government," the California Democrat told "Meet the Press." "This is about being a reform agent of transparency." President Donald Trump, who on Sunday announced an EU trade deal in Scotland, has been frustrated by continued questions about his administration's handling of investigative files related to Epstein's criminal charges and 2019 death by suicide in prison. Massie and Khanna believe they can win enough support from fellow lawmakers to force a vote on their resolution when Congress returns from its summer recess in September. But they face opposition from Republican leaders including House Speaker Mike Johnson, who sent lawmakers home a day early to stymie Democratic efforts to force a vote before the break. Johnson, who also appeared on NBC's "Meet the Press," said he favors a non-binding alternative resolution that calls for release of "credible" evidence, but which he said would better protect victims including minors. "The Massie and Khanna discharge petition is reckless in the way that it is drafted and presented," Johnson said. "It does not adequately include those protections." Massie dismissed Johnson's claim as "a straw man" excuse. "Ro and I carefully crafted this legislation so that the victims' names will be redacted," he said. "They're hiding behind that." Trump has tried and failed so far to distract attention from the Epstein controversy six months into his second term. On Saturday, Trump repeated his claims without evidence that 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris and other Democrats should be prosecuted over payment for endorsements from celebrities including Oprah Winfrey, Beyonce and the Reverend Al Sharpton. Last week he accused former President Barack Obama of "treason" over how the Obama administration treated intelligence about Russian interference in U.S. elections nine years ago, drawing a rebuke from an Obama spokesperson. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, a staunch Trump ally, said on Sunday that Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's director of national intelligence, had found new information that investigators initially discovered no evidence of Russian election interference but changed their position after Obama told them to keep looking. "I'm not alleging he committed treason, but I am saying it bothers me," Graham told "Meet the Press." Democratic Representative Jason Crow dismissed Gabbard's claims, telling the "Fox News Sunday" program that the national intelligence director had turned herself into "a weapon of mass distraction." The Department of Justice has said it is forming a strike force to assess Gabbard's claims.

Tulsi Gabbard becomes ‘weapon of mass distraction' as Trump White House grapples with Epstein fallout
Tulsi Gabbard becomes ‘weapon of mass distraction' as Trump White House grapples with Epstein fallout

The Independent

time34 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Tulsi Gabbard becomes ‘weapon of mass distraction' as Trump White House grapples with Epstein fallout

Critics have accused Tulsi Gabbard of trying to shield Donald Trump's administration from scrutiny through her recent claims that top Obama administration officials should be prosecuted for leading a 'coup' against the president in 2016 by investigating Russian efforts to help his campaign. The allegations and conspiracy theories 'would be sad if they weren't so dangerous,' Democratic Rep. Jason Crow told Fox News on Sunday. 'She has turned herself into a weapon of mass distraction, is what I've been calling it." Crow accused Trump's national intelligence director of 'trying to curry and get back into favor with Donald Trump and has concocted these theories to do so,' an apparent reference to Gabbard and Trump's public disagreement over the state of Iran's nuclear program. This month, Gabbard spearheaded the release of materials regarding the then-outgoing Obama administration's attempts to probe Russian influence operations during the 2016 election. Critics saw the release as an attempt to distract from continued criticism of the Trump administration for its handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files and the president's ties to the late financier, who died in prison while awaiting a federal sex trafficking trial. 'Nothing in this partisan, previously scuttled document changes that,' Senator Mark Warner, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, told The Hill after the disclosures. 'Releasing this so-called report is just another reckless act by a Director of National Intelligence so desperate to please Donald Trump that she is willing to risk classified sources, betray our allies, and politicize the very intelligence she has been entrusted to protect,' he said. Gabbard claims the Obama materials, including a declassified 2020 Republican report from the House intelligence committee, reveal his 'years long coup' against Trump. She claims that top Obama officials pushed to override past intelligence findings to allege that Russians specifically wanted to boost the Trump campaign, rather than undermine faith in the U.S. election system more generally, and has called for Obama and others to face criminal charges. Trump has echoed such claims, sharing a fake, AI- generated video of Obama being arrested and thrown in jail on his Truth Social account. As evidence of the alleged coup, Gabbard honed in on past conclusions that Russian actors did not successfully hack digital voting infrastructure or change vote counts, suggesting these findings clashed with intelligence officials' later assessments that Russia sought to help Trump. Susan Miller, a former CIA officer who helped oversee the 2017 intelligence assessment, said Gabbard was 'lying.' 'We definitely had the intel to show with high probability that the specific goal of the Russians was to get Trump elected,' Miller told NBC News, adding that intelligence officials had briefed Trump on their findings and he had thanked them. 'At the same time, we found no two-way collusion between Trump or his team with the Russians at that time,' she said. Obama's office issued a rare public statement denouncing Gabbard's allegations. 'These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction. Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes,' a spokesperson said. The White House has pushed back against the argument that Gabbard's investigation is a partisan play. 'The only people who are suggesting that the director of national intelligence would release evidence to try to boost her standing with the president are the people in this room who constantly try to sow distrust and chaos among the president's Cabinet,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said during a Wednesday briefing. 'And it's not working,' she said. Multiple assessments have backed up the intelligence community's original findings of a general, one-way Russian influence operation that sought to boost Trump through tactics like hacking Democratic party materials and spreading disinformation online, even though the Trump campaign itself wasn't shown to have collaborated on the effort. Special counsels have investigated both the underlying 'Russiagate' claims and the origins of the FBI investigation into the Trump campaign without uncovering any intentional 'coup' by the Obama administration. A bipartisan 2020 report by the Senate Intelligence Committee — which Marco Rubio was leading at the time — concluded intelligence officials put together a 'coherent and well-constructed intelligence basis for the case of unprecedented Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.' During the 2024 election, Trump and his allies campaigned on a promise to rid the federal government, and in particular U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies, of politicization, arguing he had been a victim of partisan backlash — with two impeachments, two federal indictments and several criminal and civil cases, including a felony conviction on 34 counts. Since taking office, however, Trump has faced criticism that he is in fact driving politicization of those same entities, through actions like sanctioning law firms that worked with political opponents and calling for the prosecution of his various real and perceived critics. Over the weekend, the president ranted on social media and threatened to prosecute Kamala Harris, Oprah Winfrey and Beyonce while lashing out at news networks whose 'licenses could, and should, be revoked,' claiming without evidence that Democrats spent millions 'probably illegally' seeking high-profile celebrity endorsements during the 2024 campaign.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store