EU-US trade deal: Ireland ‘no doubt' in challenging position over tariffs, says Minister
tariffs
but the recently announced
agreement
does bring 'some clarity', the Minister for Enterprise has said.
Peter Burke said the deal reached on Sunday, which will lock in tariffs of 15 per cent on most
EU
imports to the
US
, had avoided a 'direct trade war'.
Speaking on RTÉ Radio 1's Morning Ireland on Monday, Mr Burke said the EU was four days away from 30 per cent tariffs, which would have been 'significant', while the Government is awaiting more details to emerge.
The final terms of the deal were worked out during a meeting between European Commission president
Ursula von der Leyen
and US president
Donald Trump
at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland on Sunday.
READ MORE
The accord effectively sees the EU accepting import taxes of 15 per cent on most of its huge volume of trade with the US.
The two sides agreed that no tariffs would be charged on imports of aircraft, certain chemicals and some agri-food goods, though the finer details of what agricultural products will benefit from these exemptions are still to be worked out.
[
EU-US trade deal analysis: Tariffs have a price for both sides. Trump was willing to pay it
Opens in new window
]
Mr Burke said there would be a number of 'carveouts' for particular sectors such as aviation, agri-foods and spirits. He said the Government was concerned about the 'stacking mechanism', which refers to the cumulative effect of multiple tariffs applied to the same imported product.
'All of those areas have been called out for separate carveouts, so we have to see what that will look like and what will that amount to on paper, and that's where the devil is going to be in the detail,' he said.
'But the critical thing is that at all costs we have to avoid escalation because it would be devastating in terms of the impact because the scale of the market is so huge.'
The Fine Gael TD said the Government had been 'very clear that tariffs are bad'.
'They constrain supply, they drive prices up. They're not good for the US economy, or indeed for the Irish economy,' he said.
'Ireland's position is very clear – we always favour an open, rules-based fair trade at every hand's turn. When you have the talk of tariffs and a deal like this, it is going to be challenging, and I think we have to be very honest about that.'
[
EU-US trade deal represents 'substantial burden' for Irish businesses
Opens in new window
]
The deal includes EU commitments to purchase set amounts of US oil, nuclear power and liquefied natural gas annually.
In terms of Ireland buying US oil or gas, Mr Burke said he was not aware of it at this point in time but could not 'give a definitive answer'.
Mr Burke added that a deal between China and the US had yet to happen, which would affect Irish exports and they would also have to see what separate carveouts will emerge.
'Until we get flesh on the bones in all those areas over the coming weeks, we'll be in a better position then to really put forward what the budgetary parameters will end up with.'
He also said he and the Government remained committed to cutting the hospitality VAT rate to 9 per cent and that it was in the programme for government, which had been agreed by all parties.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
6 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Maurice Regan sent message saying he hoped article would give Barne Estate rival John Magnier a ‘heart attack'
Construction magnate Maurice Regan, a bidder for the coveted Barne Estate in Co Tipperary, wrote in a text to a third party that he hoped a newspaper article would give rival bidder and billionaire John Magnier a 'heart attack', the High Court has heard. US-based Mr Regan appeared in the Four Courts on Wednesday before Mr Justice Max Barrett giving evidence of his involvement in bids for the estate. It was put to him by Paul Gallagher SC, for the Magnier side, that he sent the WhatsApp message about Mr Magnier. Mr Regan replied: 'All is fair in love and war.' READ MORE Mr Magnier wants the court to enforce a €15 million 'handshake deal' for the estate that he claims was sealed at his home on August 22nd, 2023 with Richard Thomson-Moore, an heir to the 751-acre, 17th-century estate. The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Mr Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group – the estate trustees – seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been 'unequivocally' agreed. The Barne defendants say there was never any such agreement as they needed the consent of the trustees to finalise any deal. They subsequently decided they preferred to sell the estate to Mr Regan for €22.25 million. Mr Thomson-Moore has told the court that while a 'price' was agreed with Mr Magnier for Barne, a 'deal' was not. The trustees who hold the estate initially decided to remain loyal to the Magnier offer and felt Mr Regan's higher offer could be seen as 'provocative'. After the exclusivity period had ended, the trustees decided to go with Mr Regan's offer. At the High Court on Wednesday, Mr Regan, who is not a party to proceedings, was questioned about the message sent in October 2023 to another man with some knowledge of the deal's progression. Mr Gallagher said Mr Regan sent a link to the man of a newspaper article referencing Mr Magnier and Mr Regan and followed this up by saying 'hopefully, it will give him a heart attack'. Mr Gallagher said the message referred to Mr Magnier to which Mr Regan said 'yes, we were at war, according to him [Mr Magnier] and ... all is fair in love and war'. The row between the two businessmen has been described as a 'war' by witnesses in the case. Mr Regan told Martin Hayden SC, for Barne Estate and Mr Thomson-Moore, that he rejected being described as a 'dark force' in the deal by Mr Gallagher at a previous hearing when claiming Mr Regan was funding the defendants in the litigation. After agreeing on a €15 million price, Barne and the Magniers entered into an exclusivity agreement stipulating that Barne would not permit itself or its representatives to solicit or encourage any expression of interest, inquiry or offer on the property from anyone other than Mr Magnier between August 31st and September 30th, 2023. Mr Regan said the description of him as a 'dark force' trying to breach the exclusivity agreement was a 'cheap shot' and that he had been a victim of 'derogatory remarks' that were going to be in the press 'forever'. He described Mr Gallagher's remarks as 'very hurtful' to him and said he did not know why they were made. He added that he 'just wanted to buy a farm ... and here I am today'. He said he never knew anything about the exclusivity agreement when bidding and that nobody told him it was in place. He denied funding the Thomson-Moore defence and said he had last April given Barne Estate Ltd a commercial loan from one of his companies against the farm. Mr Regan said he was 'blocked' out of bidding for the farm and that 'multiple offers were ignored for a long time', making him think that 'something is going on'. He told Mr Hayden he admired the Thomson-Moores as a nice family and would not have 'misled' them in the selling process, as claimed by Mr Magnier in his evidence. Mr Regan told Mr Gallagher the signed exclusivity imposed obligations on the vendors of Barne Estate but not on him and that he did not attempt to induce any breach of the agreement. At one stage during the evidence, Mr Regan had to clarify to Mr Gallagher that he was using 'light humour' when he said that the silence from Barne on his offers made him wonder if Mr Thomson-Moore had actually been 'kidnapped'. Mr Regan said approaches to the joint estate agents handling the deal was an attempt to make himself 'relevant' regarding the sale and to get 'back in the game'. Mr Gallagher put it to Mr Regan that his contact with certain individuals with knowledge of the deal was 'highly improper'. 'Me being blocked out at a higher price than a lower price is improper,' said Mr Regan. He said legal letters sent to the joint estate agents handling the sale were not meant to 'frighten' or 'threaten' but his concern was that his bids were not getting to the trustees of the estate. Mr Hayden asked if any of the defendants or anyone from the Magnier side had at any point written to Mr Regan to say he should desist in his bidding. Mr Regan said 'no'.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
X wants to appeal High Court ruling dismissing Coimisiún na Meán case
Elon Musk's X wants to appeal a High Court ruling dismissing its action against Ireland's broadcasting and online media regulator, Coimisiún na Meán , over its online safety code. X International Unlimited Company, which operates X, formerly known as Twitter, had alleged that the media regulator engaged in 'regulatory overreach' in its approach to restrictions on certain video content. Coimisiún na Meán's online safety code, which was adopted last October and came into effect earlier this month, sets out legally binding rules for video-sharing platforms. It is aimed at protecting the public, and especially children, from harmful online content. The social media giant had sought a High Court order compelling the commission to quash its decision to adopt certain sections of the code. It also sought the court to overturn the commission's decision to apply the code to its platform. READ MORE In a judgment, Mr Justice Conleth Bradley this week refused reliefs sought by X . The judge dismissed several arguments made by the platform in the proceedings, including that the code was out of step with European legislation. At the High Court on Thursday, senior counsel Declan McGrath, for X, appearing with barrister Emma Synnott, said he was instructed to seek permission to appeal the court's judgment. In some High Court cases, permission must be granted by the court to appeal a judgment. Noting the judge's provisional view that the costs of the High Court action be awarded to the commission, Mr McGrath said he would not be making any submissions on the matter. Mr Justice Bradley set a date in October for the hearing of X's application for permission to appeal.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
US trading partners rush to sign deals before Donald Trump's tariffs hit
Top officials from big US trading partners have rushed to Washington in a bid to strike last-ditch trade deals with Donald Trump less than 24 hours before being hit again with the president's highest levels of tariffs . US allies Canada and Mexico sent delegations, according to people familiar with the negotiations, and were locked in intense talks to Trump administration officials on Wednesday. As the August 1st deadline neared, Mr Trump signalled late progress with key trading partners, announcing a deal with South Korea late on Wednesday while also saying he would hold last-minute talks to India – just hours after he announced 25 per cent tariffs on the country. But Mr Trump also warned other trading partners he would not back away from the sweeping tariff regime he has threatened on countries that do not reach an agreement by his deadline. 'The August first deadline is the August first deadline – it stands strong, and will not be extended. A big day for America!!!' the president posted on his Truth Social platform on Wednesday. The threats, coupled with deals struck in recent days with the EU and Japan, have left negotiators from other trading partners in an urgent rush to find time to meet administration officials and settle terms. Despite Mr Trump's tariff threat to India, one person familiar with its negotiations said New Delhi was close to an agreement, even though its top negotiators have left Washington. Canada's prime minister Mark Carney struck a cautious tone about the progress of his country's talks to the Trump administration. 'These are complex, they're comprehensive, they're constructive negotiations,' Mr Carney told reporters. 'It's possible that they may not conclude by the first of August.' Trump hit out at Canada late on Wednesday, writing on his Truth Social platform that Mr Carney's decision to recognise Palestinian statehood would 'make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them'. Foreign diplomats have spent hours in recent weeks negotiating with commerce secretary Howard Lutnick and US trade representative Jamieson Greer. Although one diplomat described Mr Lutnick as 'instrumental' in securing any deal, many said he had warned them that all final decisions rested with Mr Trump. People familiar with various trade talks said Mr Trump had on more than one occasion rejected potential deals proposed to him by Mr Lutnick and other aides, and demanded they push for more concessions to the US. The president had personally intervened in several deals, including joining a call with the Indian trade minister and Mr Lutnick as negotiations progressed, according to two people familiar with the talks. Mr Trump is also due to decide whether to extend a pause in his trade war with China , after treasury secretary Scott Bessent and Mr Greer held a third round of talks to a team from Beijing in Sweden this week. The latest diplomatic blitz comes as US markets broadly shrug off Trump's trade war. The S&P 500 share index has zoomed to record highs, while the dollar has hit its highest level since May as traders bet on the president baulking at imposing levies severe enough to spook investors. But some Wall Street banks and investors remain concerned that markets are complacent. 'Deadlines have come and gone, tariffs have climbed ... but economic data and markets have not rolled over. So, it's tempting to move on from the idea that US trade policy will move markets,' Morgan Stanley told clients in a note. 'Resist that temptation.' The diplomatic efforts cap a tumultuous six months in US trade relations marked by truculent rhetoric and tariff threats from Mr Trump, often followed by reversals and climbdowns. US trading partners without a deal have until 12.01am eastern time on Friday to find one – or face Mr Trump reimposing the steep tariffs he announced in April but suspended after days of severe market turmoil. After threatening foreign capitals with levies to exact political concessions, the president has since made reciprocal tariffs the centrepiece of his combative trade agenda. Those tariffs, imposed on 'liberation day' in April, reached up to 50 per cent for most US trading partners. Mr Trump has said he wants the tariffs to eliminate trade deficits with foreign exporters. Although Mr Trump promised to strike 90 deals in 90 days of his earlier pause on the reciprocal tariffs, negotiations have often been fraught, with major trading partners seeking to protect crucial industries, and some negotiators confused by the administration's mixed messages. Mexico and Canada, among the US's top three trading partners, have been offered a substantial carve-out for goods complying with their existing 2020 free trade agreement with the US. But they were also among the countries Mr Trump threatened with steeper tariffs in a barrage of letters posted online in recent weeks. Trading partners have sought to understand the mechanism for new tariffs – or their removal – and have been confused about which tariffs might snap back or be imposed, and which would diverge from those announced. Mr Trump would need to issue executive orders in advance of the deadline on Thursday night to impose any levies that differ from those he set out in April. In the UK last week, the president also raised the possibility that he would impose blanket 15-20 per cent levies on countries without a new deal by August 1st. 'You can't sit down and make 200 deals,' Mr Trump said in Scotland, where he unveiled his trade deal with the EU. Several countries have also been sent letters outlining new tariff rates, or have agreed on new levies – but the administration has not yet issued any fresh legal documents to carry through on its threats. Mr Trump has suggested that he could send more letters to countries stipulating other tariff rates. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
