Lawmakers visited Alligator Alcatraz. Here's what they say they saw and learned
Just before noon, Democratic and Republican lawmakers entered the facility — without their phones — to tour the tents and trailers erected at the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport off of U.S. Highway 41. Afterward, they told press gathered outside the perimeter that, over a period of about two hours, they saw the food given to detainees, met with administrators and were given a tour of a new, empty dorm.
At one point, they said their guide briefly opened the door to an occupied living quarters, where detainees began to shout 'Libertad!' Guards stood between the lawmakers and detainees.
The visit is one of the state's first steps toward transparency at a hastily erected site housing hundreds of migrant detainees slated for deportation by the federal government. Several lawmakers said they were told by the director of the Division of Emergency Management, which oversees the site, that the plan is to deport all detainees within two weeks of their arrival.
The DeSantis administration has so far refused to release a list of the men housed at the facility, or say how many people are kept in its cells, built inside heavy duty tents. Several lawmakers said the few staffers who would speak to them told them roughly 900 migrants are being detained on site.
Attorneys and families say they have had trouble locating detainees, who during the first days of operations have shared stories of toilets that don't flush, extreme temperatures and low-quality food. The day after the first detainees arrived, Democrats were turned away at the gates. The state has ignored the Miami Herald's requests to visit the facility.
But after touring the site, Republican state Sen. Blaise Ingoglia said the facility looked nothing like the poor descriptions laid out over the last week in press reports. He said he took the opportunity to lay down in one of the beds for detainees, describing it as 'better than my bed at home.'
'The first thing I will tell you is that the rhetoric does not match the reality of what you guys have been hearing from Democrats, especially congressional Democrats. It's actually a well-run facility,' Ingoglia told reporters. 'The idea that the detainees are in there and they're in squalid conditions is just not accurate.'
Before entering, Democrats, who have wanted to conduct unannounced tours of the facility, expressed skepticism about whether their limited view would reflect the day-to-day reality for detainees. 'We expect they will show us little to nothing,' said U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
U.S. Rep. Maxwell Frost brought along a binder filled with photos of people he said his constituents had asked him to look for while inside. Frost and others said they were denied access to speak with any of the detainees, without explanation.
Afterward, they didn't directly dispute Ingoglia's comments about the cleanliness of the detention center, but said they had been kept from getting a good look at the bathroom and living facilities that are currently being used by detainees. Wasserman Schultz said she brought a thermometer that showed the temperature at roughly 83 degrees at the threshold to a dorm where detainees were being held. She also noted that food portions appeared to be smaller at the Everglades facility than in the Krome Detention Center.
Democrats also focused on what they said they learned at the facility: They said officials clarified repeatedly that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is 'calling the shots' at the detention center — an open question after the agency's acting deputy associate director of enforcement and removal operations downplayed federal involvement.
In a declaration filed in response to a lawsuit by environmental groups challenging the facility's operations, Thomas P. Giles wrote that ICE's role concerning the development of the site 'has been limited to touring the facility to ensure compliance with ICE detention standards, and meeting with officials from the State of Florida to discuss operational matters.'
'The ultimate decision of who to detain' at Alligator Alcatraz, he wrote, 'belongs to Florida.'
ICE has repeatedly deferred press questions about the facility to the state of Florida.
Democrats said there are 32 detainees per 'cage,' that detainees are given color-coded wristbands to identify those with criminal convictions, and that private contractors appeared to be largely staffing the interior of the facility.
They also said they plan to return.
'I can tell you many of us will be back for unannounced visits to see how things are,' Frost said.
A Division of Emergency Management spokeswoman did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the details relayed by lawmakers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
40 minutes ago
- Forbes
More On The Tips And Overtime Deductions In One Big Beautiful Bill
Earlier this week I noted a subtle difference in the limitations on the tips and overtime deductions included in the Big Beautiful Bill which can create either a marriage penalty or a marriage bonus. I was so taken by the apparent anomaly that I devoted a whole post to it. Now I am getting back to a fuller discussion. When President Trump first came out with "no tax on tips", I studied the proposals that were floating in Congress and had some concerns. Most notable was the harmful effect one of the proposals would have on Earned Income Tax Credit recipients. And then there was all sorts of commentary on how the provision might be gamed. What ultimately emerged addressed many of the issues. What we have in the final language about tips and overtime illustrates Reilly's Third Law of Tax Planning - "Any clever idea that pops into your head probably has (or will have) a corresponding rule that makes it not work". If you had an idea about how to game the "No tax on tips" of "No tax on overtime", let's see if Congress has already knocked it out even before any regulations have been issued. Deductions Subject To Limitations And Phase Outs First of all, the benefits are only about income tax, not Social Security and Medicare as the "no tax" monikers might imply. Further, the final bill puts limits and phaseouts in place. And the benefits are structured as deductions. It you want to know more about what that means, read the next paragraph, but feel free to skip it. It is worth looking at Form 1040 to understand where the deduction fits in. If you clicked on the link, you will see that your total income is on Line 9. Then on LIne 10, there are adjustments to income. There are a lot of those so they are totaled up on Part II of Schedule 1. Subtracting Line from Line 11 gives you your adjusted gross income (AGI). This is an important number because many thresholds and limitations are keyed to AGI including those of the tips and overtime deductions. Next on line 12 you get either your standard deduction or the total of certain itemized deductions from Schedule A. The tips and overtime will not be among them, so you don't need to be an itemizer. On Line 13 you will see the qualified business income deduction which will be added to the amount on line 12 to arrive at line 14 which is subtracted from AGI to arrive at taxable income. That's where the tips and overtime deductions will go along with the automobile interest deduction included in the bill. I don't know if they will add more lines to the form or give us another schedule. If it is another schedule I hope that they call it Schedule A PLUS. Do you remember all the talk about a postcard tax return in 2017? Still not happening. UNITED STATES - NOVEMBER 14: Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., holds up a postcard tax return ... More form during the press conference following the House Republican Conference meeting in the Capitol on Tuesday, Nov. 14, 2017. Ryan is flanked from left by House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., Republican Conference Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., and Rep. Rob Wittman, R-Va. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)Both the tip deduction and the overtime deduction require that married taxpayers file joint returns to claim the deduction. There are dollar limitations. The limitation is $25,000 for the tip deduction and $12,500 for the overtime deduction on a single return and $25,000 for the overtime deduction on a joint return. The phaseout is the same - $100 for every $1,000 that modified adjusted gross income exceeds $150,000 on a single return or $300,000 on a joint return. The modification to adjusted gross income is an add back of income excluded because it was earned while living abroad or in Puerto Rico on one of the U.S. possessions. I have to wonder if the $150,000 threshold is an echo of the proposal to totally eliminate income taxes on those earning less than $150,000. Qualified Tips Unlike earlier proposals, "qualified tips" are not just tips received by employees. The deduction also applies to tips received in the course of a trade or business. The thing that comes to mind there is food delivery people or Uber drivers who are considered independent contractors. I also recall that adult entertainers can be independent contractors. The deduction will be allowed only to the extent that the gross income from the business exceeds the allocable deductions. This could present some planning issue for how capital assets might be written off. The tip deduction will reduce the amount of income counted as qualified business income for that deduction. What exactly are the "tips" that are the subject of the deduction? First of all, they have to be received by an individual in an occupation which "customarily and regularly received tips on or before December 31, 2024". There is a call for a list to be created. Next the amount involved has to be paid voluntarily, without consequence in the event of nonpayment, not the subject of negotiation and determined by the payor. So that amount that large parties have to pay in a restaurant seems to not qualify. There are excluded fields of business- health, law, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial services, brokerage services, or any trade or business where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of 1 or more of its employees. I have to wonder if the "performing arts" exclusion knocks out the adult entertainers. There is some litigation in the sales tax area that might help them. Overtime For the definition of "qualified overtime compensation" you really need to look at the bill's language and meditate for a while. Here it is "... the term 'qualified overtime compensation' means overtime compensation paid to an individual required under section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that is in excess of the regular rate (as used in such section) at which such individual is employed". That language triggered some back and forth in the twitterverse, about whether they mean the total amount paid for overtime or just the premium. If you search for what the median hourly wage for Americans is, there are a variety of answers but they seem to be between $20 and $30 per hour, so let's use $25 for illustrative purposes. With that as the base hourly wage you get $1,000 per week for 40 hours, $52,000 per year. At time and half for overtime the $37.50 premium rate would max out the $12,500 limit at 6.5 hours a week. That is how I think of overtime and how I initially read, probably misread, the statute. The consensus seems to be that the deduction is only for the premium. Tom Gorczynski EA pointed out something from the White House website that supports that interpretation. I found that quite persuasive. Kelly Erb also writes that it is just the premium, which seals the deal for me. It still bugs me though. So if it is just the premium it takes 1,000 hours to max out the benefit if you are single in my example. Call it a 60 hours work week. If you are married and your spouse does not work overtime it would be 2,000 hours. At $50 per hour you will hit the maximum at 500 hours of overtime if you are single or 1,000 hours if you are married with a spouse that does not get overtime. Absent a lot else going on, you won't be having to deal with the phaseout. I won't comment on the equity or sense behind this particular deduction other than to remark that back when I used to work more than forty hours a week mostly without overtime pay, I found it a lot harder when I was doing that by working two jobs rather than longish hours on one job. So I am puzzled as to what makes an overtime premium worthy of special tax treatment. Gaming The Overtime Deduction I don't know much about the Fair Labor Standards Act, which is the key to the deduction. It is clear however that whether people are exempt employees not subject to the overtime premium requirement can be debatable. Employers will generally prefer to not have that requirement. I don't think this deduction will change that, but I can't resist coming up with a way to game it. Here is the idea. I have a bunch of salaried employees and I want to help them out. So what I do is cut everybody's pay to below $684 per week so that I have to pay them time and a half over forty hours. Then I guarantee them overtime hours which will include overtime hours when they are "on-call". That will bring them up to whatever their previous salary was. And a third of that amount will be deductible. This is actually a terrible idea when it comes to actually executing it, but I felt I had to come up with something if I could. I haven't thought of a way to game the tips deduction, but I am sure they will be coming.


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
A Vision of 1984: Social Injustice and Its Enemies
Chadwick Lane Murray Issues a Scholarly, Soul-Shaking Clarion Call on Injustice-Rooted in History, Reaching Toward the Future With an eye on Orwell and a finger on the pulse of generational upheaval, Chadwick Lane Murray's A Vision of 1984: Social Injustice and Its Enemies is not merely a book; it is a reckoning in print. Combining personal discovery with public inquiry, this genre-defiant work dissects war, racism, economic inequality, and planetary decline through the prism of history, sociology, and unapologetic moral urgency. Launched in 2025, A Vision of 1984 arrives at a time when public discourse has never been louder-nor truth more elusive. The echoes of the past are impossible to ignore; from soldiers' personal letters smuggled through trenches in Verdun to the dusty protest pamphlets of 1968's Paris uprisings, Murray excavates the forgotten margins of history to illuminate our present. The narrative threads converge into a singular message: systemic injustice isn't accidental; it's by design. 'The people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones who do.' – Steve Jobs A Book Anchored in Humanity-and Armed with Numbers Structured into four critical sections-Arbitrariness, Inequitable Distribution, Defective Correctives, and What Can Be Done-the book provides a rigorous framework for understanding how injustice operates across cultural, institutional, and economic lines. Murray doesn't simply ask what went wrong; he asks who made it so. Arbitrariness explores how imperialism, racism, and military conflict create environments where suffering becomes predictable; the author draws on personal family archives, including letters from the Battle of the Somme and Khe Sanh. Inequitable Distribution traces the legacy of wealth hoarding and monopolistic behavior; referencing post-war boom statistics, Murray cites that by 1982, the top 1% of Americans controlled 33% of national wealth-a number eerily similar to current figures. Defective Correctives critiques modern education, judicial, and political systems. As early as 1980, voter confidence in Congress had dropped below 30%; it has yet to meaningfully recover. What Can Be Done proposes moral advocacy over institutional neutrality; a radical thesis for a radical age. His prose is often poetic; his analysis, razor-sharp. There is a method behind the heartbreak. 'Success is a lousy teacher. It seduces smart people into thinking they can't lose.' – Bill Gates The Ghost of Orwell Meets the Algorithm Age By resurrecting Orwell's prophetic spirit in the age of misinformation, A Vision of 1984 speaks not just to policy experts or historians, but to anyone questioning the trajectory of modern civilization. Murray juxtaposes the rigidity of bureaucracy with the chaos of human longing; he paints portraits of those ground down by economic gears too large to see. The book is both a historical synthesis and a sociological sermon. And there's data behind the drama. Murray pulls from the digital archives of post-war Britain; he examines U.S. labor participation trends since 1945; he even references the founding of Silicon Valley itself, noting that by 1984-the year Orwell imagined totalitarian surveillance-the seeds of the tech-industrial complex were already blooming in Palo Alto. In fact, by 1984, over 40% of the world's semiconductors were being produced in Santa Clara County; as Murray notes, 'Surveillance didn't come from the government; it came from an IPO.' It's this interweaving of ideology and infrastructure that makes the book both timeless and timely. The Rise of Humanistic Sociology-And the Moral Reckoning Ahead Inspired by the 'new sociology' and thinkers such as Morris Ginsberg, Murray refuses academic detachment. He considers objectivity overrated when facing systemic violence. Instead, he urges action; he views sociology not as a lens but as a lever. Readers will find themselves challenged-emotionally, intellectually, even ethically. 'This is not a bedtime story; this is a wake-up call,' said Ovais Riaz, who represents Murray. 'It challenges every reader-scholars, students, and citizens-to choose whether they want to be part of the solution or simply spectators to decline.' If Orwell gave us a dystopia to fear, Chadwick Lane Murray gives us one to recognize. Book Details Title A Vision of 1984: Social Injustice and Its Enemies Author Chadwick Lane Murray Publication Date 2025 Format Paperback; eBook Genre Nonfiction; Sociology; Political Science; History Availability Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Independent Retailers About the Author Chadwick Lane Murray is an independent scholar, essayist, and human rights advocate. Raised between libraries and living rooms filled with war stories, his worldview was shaped not by ideology, but by testimony. He studied the intersections of history and sociology at the University of [Insert], and later worked in urban planning and policy research before devoting himself fully to writing. His passion for justice is more than theoretical; Murray has conducted oral history interviews with veterans of World War II, organized educational outreach in post-industrial cities, and contributed to policy whitepapers addressing economic inequality. His work is known for fusing raw human emotion with empirical rigor-making him a rare voice in a world of noise. Amazon Author Page Disclaimer This original article was independently researched and published by the author with the editorial team of the Evrima Chicago News Bureau. It has not appeared in any previously published form and is presented as a digital-first feature on the sociopolitical relevance of contemporary literary works. The piece is intended for educational, editorial, and syndication purposes across the World Wide Web, news distribution networks, and academic referencing channels. Endorsed by the Author The perspectives, interpretations, and contextual framing expressed herein are those of the Evrima Chicago editorial team and are officially endorsed by Chadwick Lane Murray, author of A Vision of 1984: Social Injustice and Its Enemies . Publication Standards This piece qualifies as an official web syndication under W3C-recognized digital content frameworks and follows metadata tagging standards for news archives, search engine discoverability, and citation integrity. It is timestamped and licensed for redistribution under academic fair use and professional editorial guidelines. No Liability for Moral Reckonings Evrima Chicago assumes no responsibility for existential crises, civic awakening, or spontaneous acts of justice that may result from reading A Vision of 1984 . Proceed with caution; moral clarity is not always reversible. Publisher Note Evrima Chicago is an independent research and media outlet producing editorial content spanning literature, political thought, accessibility (A11Y), digital futures, and journalistic integrity. We aim to create thought-leading narratives rooted in credibility, depth, and meaningful public discourse. PR & Media Contact General Inquiries / Interview: PR@ PR & Media Contact: waasay@ SOURCE: Visions: Social Injustice & it's Enemies. View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Republicans and Democrats visited ‘Alligator Alcatraz' for the first time. Here's what they saw.
MIAMI — Democrats on Saturday called for the closure of 'Alligator Alcatraz' after touring the controversial pop-up tent immigration detention center that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis quickly assembled in the Everglades. DeSantis has looked to match President Donald Trump's hard line on immigration, painting his state as an eager partner in the president's plan to detain and deport potentially millions of immigrants. At least five members of Congress and roughly 20 state legislators toured the detention center over the weekend, the first inspection by elected officials of the area since it opened about a week ago. Trump visited the site ahead of detainees arriving earlier this month, accompanied by DeSantis and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and since then news accounts of dire living conditions have emerged. While Republicans insisted that the facility was appropriate and clean, and staffed similar to any detention facility, Democratic lawmakers raised concerns about food quantity, drinking water and high temperatures, with Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz calling the facility an 'internment camp.' 'They are essentially packed into cages, wall to wall humans, 32 detainees per cage,' she said in a news conference following the tour. Democrats also said they thought they got a 'sanitized' version of the center, and complained they were not allowed to talk to detainees or enter the tents where people were living so that they could get a better look and understanding of the conditions. Members were shown areas where food was being prepared and a tent where medical care was being provided. GOP state Sen. Blaise Ingoglia, a DeSantis ally, defended the conditions as 'clean, air conditioned and well-kept,' and said he lay down on one of the beds and thought it was comfortable. He countered that lawmakers would be allowed to talk to detainees if they requested a specific person by name, at least 48 hours in advance, under ICE rules. 'The rhetoric does not match the reality,' Ingoglia said. 'It's basically all political theater coming from the [Democrats]. What they're saying is pure bullshit.' The visiting lawmakers were not allowed to bring phones, cameras or any other electronic devices with them, and while members of Congress were permitted to bring staff, state lawmakers were not. Kevin Guthrie — Florida's executive director of emergency management who was at one point considered to lead FEMA under the Trump administration — led the tour, members told POLITICO. Republican state Sen. Jay Collins, who's on the short list to be the next lieutenant governor of Florida and runs a nonprofit that does disaster relief, said it was similar to the facilities he has seen in emergency situations and when he was in the military. He noted there were backup generators and praised the setup as going 'above and beyond.' 'This is one of several stops along the way for people who are detained by ICE as they go back to their country of origin,' he said. But Democrats, including Rep. Maxwell Frost, accused the state of obscuring potentially dangerous and unsanitary conditions. In the future, Frost said he plans to show up unannounced — an ability members of Congress have for federal facilities — to speak with family members of those detained. He also criticized the arrangement between Florida and federal officials on who is actually running the facility. 'There was so much ambiguity on under what authority people are being held here, and whether this is a state facility or federal facility,' he said. 'What we heard was very clear: ICE is giving them the directions from A to Z.' Democratic members of Congress said they'd already planned on showing up at the facility unannounced on Saturday before the DeSantis administration announced official tours. State Democratic lawmakers showed up uninvited on July 3, but were turned away because of security concerns. They sued in response. Many of those lawmakers returned for Saturday's tour, including state Sens. Shevrin Jones of Miami Gardens and Carlos Guillermo Smith and state Rep. Anna Eskamani, both of Orlando. 'Alligator Alcatraz' has drawn backlash among environmentalists — who have sued to try to stop it — as well as Democratic lawmakers and even some Republicans who privately conceded they're worried about the area's fragile ecosystem and effects on tribal lands. But lawmakers told POLITICO they didn't have time to ask questions about the environment. Democratic state House leader Fentrice Driskell drew attention to how expensive she said the facility was to the state in an interview, which is estimated to cost $450 million a year. It's not clear how much of the expenses will ultimately be reimbursed by the federal government, and an email to the state's emergency division inquiring was not immediately returned. 'We are talking about tents, metal bedding with very thin mattresses and pillows,' Driskell said, adding that restrooms and showers were 'jail-like.' Members did not get many questions answered, she said, and were instead encouraged to file public records requests when they asked about which contractors were hired to provide services and what kinds of crimes detainees had been accused of committing, other than illegal border entry. Driskell said her tour was abruptly cut short due to a security issue that they didn't get any additional information about. Her group had a dozen lawmakers present, and she accused the state of trying to 'put its best foot forward' and that the tour was 'pre-planned and staged.' Asked why Republicans had such vastly different impressions, Driskell replied: 'If you only see what was shown and don't have a problem already with rounding up immigrants — even if some of them have not committed crimes — then you would be OK with what you saw.' Kimberly Leonard reported from Miami.