logo
What to expect in Monday's Harvard-Trump administration hearing

What to expect in Monday's Harvard-Trump administration hearing

The Hill21-07-2025
Harvard and the Trump administration are going head-to-head in court on Monday over the federal government's pause of billions of dollars in funding to the university.
Federal Judge Allison Burroughs is presiding over the case, where both sides are seeking a summary judgement to end the battle without going to trial.
Harvard argues the Trump administration is violating its First Amendment rights and seeking control over the university by yanking the nearly $3 billion.
'Harvard does not request an injunction that would prevent the Government from initiating proper investigations in full conformance with the Title VI process. It simply requests that the Government be enjoined from depriving Harvard of funding as a form of retaliation for Harvard's exercise of its First Amendment right,' reads the latest filing from the school.
The Trump administration has argued it has the authority to pull the funds after determining the university has violated the civil rights of its Jewish students by failing to properly act against antisemitism on campus. The government also argues this court is not the proper venue for this dispute.
'This case is a contract dispute. Harvard seeks to enforce government contracts to receive
money that it claims it is due. But under the Tucker Act, Harvard must pursue relief in the Court
of Federal Claims, the only court with jurisdiction to hear its claims,' the Trump administration wrote in a June 14 filing.
It is unknown if Burroughs will make a final ruling today, and any ruling is likely to be appealed by one side or the other.
The president had previously indicated the two sides were working toward a deal, but there have been no indications of progress on that.
'We have been working closely with Harvard, and it is very possible that a Deal will be announced over the next week or so,' Trump wrote June 20.
Any ruling here could shape broader discussions, as higher education leaders are on the edge of their seats over how an agreement could affect how the federal government deals with other universities.
Burroughs already handed Harvard a win after she ruled against the administration's directive to ban the university from enrolling or keeping foreign students.
After Harvard rejected a list of demands from the White House, the administration has launched multiple federal investigations, threatened its accreditation and issued a subpoena for foreign students' data.
The Trump administration had demanded Harvard eliminated diversity, equity and inclusion efforts and reform its admissions and hiring practices, among other things.
Harvard publicly posted the letter, rejected the demands and quickly sued after the research funding was pulled.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump wants to speed up Rupert Murdoch's deposition because the media mogul is 94 and had 'health scares'
Trump wants to speed up Rupert Murdoch's deposition because the media mogul is 94 and had 'health scares'

Business Insider

time24 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Trump wants to speed up Rupert Murdoch's deposition because the media mogul is 94 and had 'health scares'

President Donald Trump wants to depose Rupert Murdoch as soon as possible. On Monday, Trump's lawyers asked a federal judge to force Murdoch to sit for a deposition for his lawsuit on an expedited basis, arguing that the News Corp. executive is 94 years old and his "recent significant health scares" could hinder his ability to show up in court for a trial. "Murdoch has suffered, or is continuing to suffer, from multiple health issues," Trump's filing notes. The filing goes on to note reports that Murdoch collapsed during an interview with a journalist several years ago and was hospitalized after getting COVID-19, among other health issues in recent years. The request from Trump's lawyers comes in a lawsuit the president filed against Murdoch and News Corp. over a Wall Street Journal article about Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. According to the Journal report, Trump wrote a "bawdy" letter for Epstein's 50th birthday that included a cryptic message. "Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret," the letter said, according to the Journal, which also reported that it featured an illustration of a nude woman and featured Trump's signature. The Journal article did not accuse Trump of any sexual misconduct related to Epstein. Epstein's 50th birthday, in 2003, was well before he pleaded guilty to sex crimes and registered as a sex offender. Epstein died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on a separate set of criminal charges for sex trafficking. Trump's lawsuit says the Journal "concocted this story to malign President Trump's character and integrity" and that "no authentic letter or drawing exists." "If the purported letter in the Article somehow actually exists, which it does not, and the Defendants have it in their possession, which they do not, Murdoch has easy access to it," Trump's attorneys wrote in their Monday filing requesting an expedited deposition of Murdoch. The Journal has said it stands by its reporting. A News Corp. spokesperson didn't immediately respond to a request for comment about Trump's Monday filing. US District Judge Darrin Gayles, who is overseeing the defamation lawsuit in Miami federal court, asked Murdoch to respond to the request for an expedited deposition by August 4. On Monday, Trump told journalists that he had a "breach" with Epstein because the pedophile hired employees who had worked for him. "He stole people that worked for me," Trump said. "I said, 'Don't ever do that again.' He did it again, and I threw him out of the place — persona non grata."

Why Scotland's protests about Trump should concern every American
Why Scotland's protests about Trump should concern every American

Miami Herald

time25 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Why Scotland's protests about Trump should concern every American

'Convicted US Felon to arrive in Scotland,' read the headline on the front page of Friday's Scotland's newspaper, The National. The headline, referring to President Donald Trump, seemed like a joke, but it was real — and a sad commentary on how the people of Scotland view the president. I wasn't disheartened because I felt the paper was inaccurate — it wasn't. I was disheartened by the lack of respect in those words. The negativity didn't end with a headline. On Saturday, Trump played golf at his course in Turnberry, Scotland. Meanwhile, hundreds of protesters flooded the streets of Britain to protest his visit. The Stop Trump Coalition —'a group of campaigners across the UK determined to resist Trump and Trumpism' — organized the protests Saturday, which included signs protesters waved: 'No to Trump,' 'Trump not welcome' and 'Scotland Hates Trump.' Some protesters objected to Trump's policies on immigration, climate change and the war on Gaza — but the overwhelming focus was personal. They didn't reject the policy alone. They rejected America's president. Regardless of your personal feelings for Trump, this chilly reception should give you pause. I get it — Trump is a convicted felon. Yes, there are still questions about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. And no, Trump is not the statesman Americans are used to seeing in the Oval Office. But this disrespect for him extends to the office he holds. And that's bad for the United States now and in the future. In fairness, Trump isn't without culpability. He has spent years making politics personal, insulting opponents and threatening world leaders, often prioritizing personal feuds rather than focusing on policy. The vitriol on display in Scotland didn't come out of nowhere. Additionally, his own disregard for presidential decorum has created a permissive structure that allows others to abandon restraint and follow his lead. But as my mother used to say, two wrongs don't make a right. While our allies have previously disagreed with America's foreign policy, our critics generally respected the office, if not the occupant. During a visit to London in 2003, for example, protesters opposed former President George W. Bush's policy on Iraq and his relationship with Blair. The protests were over the Iraq War, not Bush's character flaws. A similar protest happened in 1984, when thousands of demonstrators in London rallied against then-President Ronald Reagan's nuclear policy during an economic summit. The protest was organized by the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, and when asked about its goal, Roger Spiller, a deputy president of the group, said, ''This is not an anti-American protest, but one opposing Mr. Reagan's policies.'' The protests in Scotland were different. They called Trump a dictator and a felon, focusing on his character and his presence in Scotland, rather than calling for policy changes. That distinction matters. When I first started in politics, there was an unspoken rule: Never call your opponent a liar. Now that's the starting point. And the lack of civility hasn't just taken hold here in America. It's been exported. It's sad but not surprising that this is where we find ourselves. Public vilification of the leader of the free world has serious implications. Some may argue that Trump deserves this type of backlash given his checkered history and questionable behavior. But that argument is short-sighted. When protesters attack the person rather than the policies, they're diminishing the institution itself. And if we normalize these personal attacks, it sets a precedent that won't end with Trump's presidency. We can — and should — debate policies. That's a hallmark of a healthy democracy. But when an American president is greeted with public disrespect by from citizens of an allied nation, it threatens something larger: the respect for democratic institutions. Preserving that institutional respect isn't about protecting Trump. It's about protecting the office of the presidency for whoever comes next. Mary Anna Mancuso is a member of the Miami Herald Editorial Board. Her email: mmancuso@

Trump Gives Russia 10-Day Deadline To End Ukraine
Trump Gives Russia 10-Day Deadline To End Ukraine

The Onion

time25 minutes ago

  • The Onion

Trump Gives Russia 10-Day Deadline To End Ukraine

EDINBURGH, SCOTLAND—Shortening the 50-day deadline he had previously given Vladimir Putin to put a stop to the war-torn country, President Donald Trump told reporters Monday he was now giving the Russian leader just '10 or 12 days' to end Ukraine once and for all. 'I'm disappointed in President Putin, who has failed to halt this horrible country, letting it drag on and on,' said Trump, announcing that he would impose steep secondary tariffs on Russia should the civilian population of Ukraine still exist in any capacity in two weeks. 'We cannot let this conflict continue any longer, so I'm giving Russia a hard but, frankly, generous deadline to discontinue all human life in Ukraine and leave behind a peaceful, completely uninhabited salt flat. This is the last time I'm going to say it: Putin, finish the job.' Trump also urged Putin to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in person and shoot him in the back of the head.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store