logo
Low-cost airline Ryanair cancels flights to Israel until August

Low-cost airline Ryanair cancels flights to Israel until August

Yahoo28-05-2025
The airline said in a statement that it had been "forced to cancel flights" for reasons "beyond our control."
Low-cost airline Ryanair said it was "forced to cancel flights" to Israel until at least the beginning of August, citing reasons "beyond our control" on Wednesday.
Opposition head MK Yair Lapid stated that the cancellations "could have been prevented if the government had worked in an orderly manner and offered airlines insurance reimbursement," adding that it had been done in the past.
Earlier this week, British Airways delayed flights to Israel as well, citing concerns regarding the security situation in Israel.
The Lufthansa Group, consisting of an alliance of airlines, including Lufthansa Airlines, Austrian Airlines, Brussels Airlines, Discover Airlines, Eurowings, ITA Airways, and Swiss International Air Lines, has delayed flights to Israel until at least June 15.
Multiple airlines canceled flights to Israel following a Houthi missile striking the area of Ben-Gurion Airport in April due to a technical error.
American carriers United and Delta—both of which had only recently resumed flights to Israel—have also canceled their flights, along with France's Transavia and its Air France, Air Canada, Japan's Nippon Airways, and Spain's Air Europa.
This incident was considered one of the most serious failures in Israel's missile defense system.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I'm proud Miami Beach is standing up against anti-immigrant rhetoric
I'm proud Miami Beach is standing up against anti-immigrant rhetoric

Miami Herald

time23 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

I'm proud Miami Beach is standing up against anti-immigrant rhetoric

On Wednesday, the city of Miami Beach did something powerful. With unanimous support, the city commission adopted a resolution I sponsored condemning the use of dangerous and dehumanizing rhetoric against immigrants. This resolution doesn't concern itself with partisan politics or border policy. It doesn't call for open borders, nor does it question the need for lawful and orderly immigration. It draws a moral line — one that people of conscience, regardless of party, should be able to agree on. It says: 'The Miami Beach mayor and commission strongly oppose dehumanizing and violent rhetoric targeting immigrants, including the Alligator Alcatraz detention facility and statements by national leaders and is affirming the dignity and contributions of Hispanic and immigrant families in Miami Beach...' This resolution makes Miami Beach one of the first cities in Florida to formally oppose Alligator Alcatraz and the national political discourse that supports it. I understand the complexity of immigration in this country. And I welcome robust, even passionate debate about how to fix the system. But that debate cannot happen if we begin by stripping people of their human dignity. If we can agree to speak with respect about immigrants, we may clear away enough of the static to begin a more thoughtful, less performative conversation about real solutions. As a proud son of Cuban exiles, I grew up with a deep appreciation for the promise of this country — and I've always worn my roots with pride. But today, I meet people who feel the need to hide theirs — not out of shame, but out of fear. That fear is not a reflection of their character — it's a reflection of ours. It means the promise of America that once welcomed my family is slipping further out of reach. That promise now feels endangered by a rising tide of anti-immigrant rhetoric designed not to inform, but to inflame. Political leaders have repeatedly referred to immigrants as 'animals,' 'vermin,' 'poison' and 'parasites.' That's not just offensive — it's dangerous. We're seeing the consequences unfold. I have constituents — law-abiding immigrants — who are afraid to call 911, afraid to seek medical attention, even afraid to show up for a court hearing. Others, including TPS and DACA recipients, and young professionals like doctors with valid work permits, live in constant fear that their lives will be uprooted. Some are being held in detention facilities under conditions no American would accept for themselves or their loved ones — no access to attorneys, limited medical care, no clergy, family separation and stripped of hope. The people experiencing this are not faceless hypotheticals — and they are not all criminals, as some political rhetoric suggests. These are our neighbors. They cared for our aging loved ones, taught music to children, built our homes and contributed in countless ways to our community. Local businesses are struggling to retain talented immigrant workers. Immigrant tourists — vital to our economy — are being driven away by the growing sense that they're unwelcome. Words have real consequences. For months, I've struggled with the limits of what I can do legally. As a Hispanic elected official, I've wanted to do so much more — but the laws are real, and my fear has always been that even well-intentioned efforts could invite retaliation that harms the very people I want to protect. In the absence of stronger protections, this resolution is about doing what I still can — standing up for dignity. We are also answering the call of faith and humanity. Days ago, Miami Archbishop Thomas Wenski reminded us of Pope Francis's teaching in Fratelli Tutti — 'we belong to one another.' That truth must guide our words, especially in moments like these. In his homily, the Archbishop recalled the haunting moment when political leaders stood before cages at the makeshift detention center and made light of the fear and pain of those inside. He asked if we could truly say, in that moment, that 'we belong to one another,' that the dignity of others was being recognized. I believe that this week, Miami Beach answered that question with moral clarity. Alex Fernandez is a Miami Beach commissioner.

Inside Tesla's new retro-futuristic Supercharger diner
Inside Tesla's new retro-futuristic Supercharger diner

CNBC

time24 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Inside Tesla's new retro-futuristic Supercharger diner

Tesla has opened the doors to its first diner Supercharger station in Los Angeles. CEO Elon Musk first teased the concept of building a drive-in themed charging station in 2018. On Monday, that vision was finally realized. Tesla describes the two-story restaurant, constructed of a steel exterior inspired by the Cybertruck, as retro-futuristic. It features 80 charging stalls and two 66-foot megascreens playing a rotation of short films, feature-length movies and Tesla videos. The diner operates 24/7 serving classic American comfort food, such as burgers, grilled cheese sandwiches and milkshakes, to both electric vehicle owners charging their cars and the general public. CNBC visited the site and spoke with early patrons, who praised both the design and the food. "It's pretty cool. It has a very vintage vibe, but futuristic vibe at the same time" said Taju, who stopped by with a friend who drives a Tesla. "I would bring friends from out of town, they would be very impressed coming to a place like this" said Don, a Model 3 owner who visited with his wife and neighbor. Also on display for a limited time was Optimus, Tesla's humanoid robot, which served popcorn and interacted playfully with guests. Less than 24 hours after opening, the line to order food stretched around the block. Musk has said that if the concept proves successful, Tesla may open similar diner Supercharger stations in other major cities. Watch the video to see what it's like inside Tesla's first diner charging station.

OpenAI chairman says training your own AI model is a 'good way to burn through millions'
OpenAI chairman says training your own AI model is a 'good way to burn through millions'

Business Insider

time24 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

OpenAI chairman says training your own AI model is a 'good way to burn through millions'

There's a scene in "The Dark Knight" where the Joker sets ablaze a massive pile of money. Deciding to develop your own frontier AI model today may be a similar exercise in burning cash — just ask OpenAI chairman Bret Taylor. Taylor, who has worked for three companies that have trained LLMs, including Google, Facebook, and OpenAI, called training new AI models a "good way to burn through millions of dollars." On a recent episode of the Minus One podcast, Taylor advised AI founders to build services and use-cases, but not new frontier models entirely. "Unless you work at OpenAI or Anthropic or Google or Meta, you're probably not building one of those," said Taylor, who also cofounded Sierra AI. "It requires so much capital that it will tend towards consolidation." That high bar of capital has stopped any "indie data center market" from forming, Taylor said, because it simply costs too much. Taylor advised that founders work with the AI juggernauts instead — which, it's worth noting, is something that AI giants like OpenAI, where he's chairman, would directly benefit from. OpenAI sells "tokens" to access its API, which developers can build into their applications and programs. While the American LLM market remains largely consolidated, international players have tested Taylor's theory. In January, DeepSeek released its R1 reasoning model and a corresponding chatbot. DeepSeek used fewer, less advanced chips to build its LLM, minimizing capital costs. The Chinese AI app shot to No. 1 on the App Store charts, surpassing ChatGPT and igniting a debate in tech and on Wall Street about whether tech giants were overspending on AI model development. In his podcast interview, Taylor laid out other paths that entrepreneurs could take in the AI market, rather than training a new model. One was the "AI tools market." "This is the proverbial pickaxes in the gold rush," Taylor said. "It's a dangerous space because I think there's a lot of things that are scratching an itch today that the foundation model providers might do tomorrow." Entrepreneurs could also try to build what Taylor called an "applied AI company." "What were SaaS applications in 2010 will be agent companies in 2030, in my opinion," Taylor said. Building a model from scratch, though, is a sure-fire way to "destroy your capital," Taylor said. He called handmade models "fast-depreciating assets," and not cheap ones either, costing the builder millions of dollars.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store