Marijuana use doubles risk of dying from heart disease, large study finds
Using marijuana doubles the risk of dying from heart disease, according to a new analysis of pooled medical data involving 200 million people mostly between the ages of 19 and 59.
'What was particularly striking was that the concerned patients hospitalized for these disorders were young (and thus, not likely to have their clinical features due to tobacco smoking) and with no history of cardiovascular disorder or cardiovascular risk factors,' said senior author Émilie Jouanjus, an associate professor of pharmacology at the University of Toulouse, France, in an email.
Compared to nonusers, those who used cannabis also had a 29% higher risk for heart attacks and a 20% higher risk for stroke, according to the study published Tuesday in the journal Heart.
'This is one of the largest studies to date on the connection between marijuana and heart disease, and it raises serious questions about the assumption that cannabis imposes little cardiovascular risk,' said pediatrician Dr. Lynn Silver, a clinical professor of epidemiology and biostatistics at University of California, San Francisco.
'Getting this right is critically important because cardiovascular disease is the top cause of death both in the United States and globally,' said Silver, who is also senior adviser at the Public Health Institute, a nonprofit public health organization that analyzes marijuana policy and legalization.
Silver is the coauthor of an editorial published with the paper that calls for change in how cannabis is viewed by health professionals, regulatory bodies and the public at large.
'Clinicians need to screen people for cannabis use and educate them about its harms, the same way we do for tobacco, because in some population groups it's being used more widely than tobacco,' she said. 'Our regulatory system, which has been almost entirely focused on creating legal infrastructure and licensing legal, for-profit (cannabis) businesses, needs to focus much more strongly on health warnings that educate people about the real risks.'
The new systematic review and meta-analysis analyzed medical information from large, observational studies conducted in Australia, Egypt, Canada, France, Sweden and the US between 2016 and 2023.
Those studies did not ask people how they used cannabis — such as via smoking, vaping, dabbing, edibles, tinctures or topicals. (Dabbing involves vaporizing concentrated cannabis and inhaling the vapor.) However, 'based on epidemiological data, it is likely that cannabis was smoked in the vast majority of cases,' Jouanjus said.
Smoking tobacco is a well-known cause of heart disease — both the smoke and the chemicals in tobacco damage blood vessels and increase clotting, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Therefore, it is not surprising that smoking, vaping or dabbing cannabis could do the same, Silver said: 'Any of the many ways of inhaling cannabis are going to have risks to the user, and there's also secondhand smoke risks, which are similar to tobacco.'
The notion that smoking cannabis is less harmful because it's 'natural' is just wrong, Dr. Beth Cohen, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, told CNN in a prior interview.
'When you burn something, whether it is tobacco or cannabis, it creates toxic compounds, carcinogens, and particulate matter that are harmful to health,' Cohen said in an email.
However, edibles may also play a role in heart disease, according to a May 2025 study.
People who consumed edibles laced with tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, showed signs of early cardiovascular disease similar to tobacco smokers.
'We found that vascular function was reduced by 42% in marijuana smokers and by 56% in THC-edible users compared to nonusers,' Dr. Leila Mohammadi, an assistant researcher in cardiology at the University of California, San Francisco, told CNN in a prior interview.
None of the studies included in the new meta-analysis asked users about the potency of THC in the products they consume. Even if they had, that information would be quickly outdated, Silver said.
'The cannabis market is a moving target. It is getting more potent every day,' she said.
'What's being sold to people today in California is 510 times stronger than what it was in the 1970s. Concentrates can be 99% pure THC. Vapes are over 80% THC.
'A variety of chemically extracted cannabinoids can be almost pure THC, and all of these just have very different effects on people than smoking a joint in the 1970s.'
Higher potency weed is contributing to a host of problems, including an increase in addiction — a July 2022 study found consuming high-potency weed was linked to a fourfold increased risk of dependence.
In the United States, about 3 in 10 people who use marijuana have cannabis use disorder, the medical term for marijuana addiction, according to the CDC.
'We know that more potent cannabis makes people more likely to become addicted,' Silver said. 'We know that more potent cannabis makes people more likely to develop psychosis, seeing and hearing things that aren't there, or schizophrenia. Habitual users may also suffer from uncontrollable vomiting.'
The rise in potency is one reason that the current study may not have captured the full extent of the risk of marijuana for heart disease, Jouanjus said: 'We are afraid that the association might be even stronger than that reported.'
While science continues to study the risk, experts say it's time to think twice about the potential harms of cannabis use — especially if heart disease is a concern.
'If I was a 60-year-old person who had some heart disease risk, I would be very cautious about using cannabis,' Silver said. 'I've seen older people who are using cannabis for pain or for sleep, some of whom have significant cardiovascular risk, or who have had strokes or had heart attacks or had angina, and they have no awareness that this may be putting them at greater risk.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
13 minutes ago
- Medscape
PCPs as Frontline in Dyspnea
When a patient calls a primary care provider due to shortness of breath symptoms, recommending an in-office examination is generally warranted. Your patient may explain how they are out of breath from everyday activities like using stairs, getting winded from walking the dog, or just not being able to catch their breath. 'All new episodes of shortness of breath should be evaluated in real time by a clinician, ideally in person,' said Panagis Galiatsatos, MD, a pulmonologist and associate professor in the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore. 'The only time I can see foregoing an immediate clinic visit is if a known cardiopulmonary diagnosis exists.' For example, if a diagnosis is already known (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) and their dyspnea (shortness of breath) is in accordance with prior episodes of similar breathlessness, a phone call or virtual discussion could be enough. Such episodes could also be managed by an action plan that has already been discussed at prior clinic visits, Galiatsatos said. If a patient, already in the office for another concern, casually mentions episodes of shortness of breath, how should the primary doctor proceed? Even if dyspnea is mentioned nonchalantly, it warrants a thorough history and focused physical exam, especially if this is new or worsening. This could be an early sign of a more serious problem, according to Lijo Illipparambil, MD, a pulmonologist and assistant professor of clinical thoracic medicine and surgery at the Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University in Philadelphia. When discussing symptoms, Illipparambil recommends these questions: • Start the discussion related to context: When do episodes occur — exertion or rest? • How long have these symptoms been occurring? • Inquire about associated symptoms such as fatigue, chest tightness, wheezing, cough, or swelling. • Review exercise limitations: are they able to climb stairs, and if so, how many? Is walking across a room or doing daily chores causing them to be dyspneic? How can primary care doctors serve as frontline partners in managing patients' shortness of breath? Primary care doctors are essential in identifying early signs of cardiopulmonary disease. 'Generally, they are the first physicians who meet the patients and do most of the work-up initially,' said Illipparambil. 'They coordinate care, especially with specialists, provide lifestyle counseling, and monitor chronic conditions like COPD, asthma, and congestive heart failure.' In many ways, they are the real central component for care for patients with dyspnea, he said. 'They also have the advantage of longitudinal relationships, allowing them to notice changes over time and engage in shared decision-making to create sustainable health strategies and earlier intervention if needed,' Illipparambil explained. Assessment Protocol Usually, a thorough physical exam, including checking vital signs (especially oxygen saturation and heart rate) is next, according to Illipparambil. Additional testing should also be considered, including chest x-ray, EKG, and laboratory work-up, as well as referral to specialists if necessary. Red flags that warrant further testing include: • Dyspnea at rest: This is always a reason for further testing, according to Illipparambil. 'It is not normal to be short of breath at rest; it is most often a sign of significant impending decompensation,' he said. Worsening shortness of breath over days or weeks can demonstrate a progressive process, Illipparambil added. Difficulty walking short distances or performing basic activities (eg, walking in the supermarket, pushing a stroller), especially as a change from their baseline, can be a sign of an active problem. • Orthopnea or paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea are signs of heart failure that need further investigation. • Unilateral leg swelling should always have a differential that includes deep venous thrombosis and, when a patient is short of breath, possible pulmonary embolism, Illipparambil said. Expert Assessments and Symptoms Consider the shortness of breath assessments below, according to Galiatsatos with Johns Hopkins. Airway diseases. COPD or asthma are examples. 'I would recognize due to inability to walk incline or when holding groceries, not walking through the grocery store, but once their arms are engaged, their breathlessness is noticeable,' he said. Cardiac rhythm issues. Especially at low heart rates, most people notice this breathlessness even after walking just a few dozen feet on a flat surface, he noted. Pulmonary embolism (lung blood clot). This tends to occur more acutely, and patients often describe a heaviness and discomfort in their chest. 'This is often accompanied by something that provoked the blood clot — long hours of sitting (for example, during a long flight) — or trauma to the legs,' Galiatsatos said. Heart failure. The key symptom here is the inability to lay down flat. Patients will note having to sleep with several pillows — propping their head and upper torso in an upright position — or abandoning their bed altogether in favor of a recliner, he explained. How can a primary doctor discuss lifestyle changes, medications, or strategies to reduce shortness of breath? The key is to be empathetic, collaborative, and goal oriented. 'This is indeed a delicate yet vital conversation,' Illipparambil said. There are several causes for shortness of breath and approaching patients this way can encourage openness and discussion. One thing that helps is the use of motivational interviewing techniques. For instance, Illipparambil recommends asking permission to discuss weight, tobacco use, or other lifestyle habits that may be affecting shortness of breath. Another approach is to focus on functions, such as walking without getting winded and changing habits toward a healthy lifestyle, rather than just the number on the scale. Offering resources and referrals for issues like nutrition, sleep, and physical therapy can also go a long way, Illipparambil said. 'Medications, of course, can help, especially inhalers in COPD and asthma patients,' he said. 'Antihypertensives, other medications that help modify heart disease, and goal-directed medical therapy have been shown to improve symptoms in patients with heart failure.' How does obesity affect with shortness of breath? Obesity is often linked to cardiopulmonary deconditioning, according to Trishul Siddharthan, MD, a pulmonologist and associate professor of medicine with the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, and the University of Miami Health System. 'Extra weight is a significant cause of shortness of breath in the general population and interacts with respiratory diseases, like asthma, to worsen symptoms,' Siddharthan said. 'I think most patients understand how weight can impair respiratory status, particularly if they are having shortness of breath. Lifestyle changes and other strategies to cope are a shared decision. I ensure I address the underlying medical condition while addressing enablers and barriers to weight loss.'
Fast Company
13 minutes ago
- Fast Company
3 signs you suffer from ‘hyper-ambition' (and how to overcome it)
It's true that personal ambition fuels success. But we can reach a dangerous tipping point when healthy drive becomes 'hyper-ambition'—a compulsive cycle of excessive striving that becomes self-defeating. Unlike healthy ambition that energizes you, hyper-ambition can leave you perpetually unsatisfied, overextended, and grinding to exhaustion. The cost isn't just personal—hyper-ambition eventually undermines the very professional success it promises. Here's how to recognize if you've crossed into the danger zone—and take practical steps to realign toward healthy ambition. 1. You Feel Like You've Never Achieved Enough and Are Never Satisfied Are you on a professional achievement treadmill, immediately shifting focus to your next goal after hitting a milestone? While accomplishments and rewards can provide short-term satisfaction, the challenge to getting into such a rhythm is that you may pursue goals without considering what you truly want. This can catch up to you when you realize you've met external expectations but never connected to your internal motivation, leaving you dissatisfied. Putting all your attention against the pursuit of professional validation can also lead to ignoring key areas of one's life that affect long-term happiness and well-being, such as your personal relationships, your health, and activities that fulfill and restore you. To realign to healthy ambition, orient your goals toward internal motivation first—it's a better predictor of engagement and success. Research has shown that putting attention and focus on personal success linked to fulfillment, satisfaction, and happiness begets external success, while the opposite focus doesn't hold true. Start with your values: test if a goal is aligned with what is important and matters to you, rather than solely meeting external expectations. Academic studies have shown that aligning our goals with our values leads to more satisfaction, higher persistence, and more goal attainment. Expand your ambition to include meaningful life goals and challenge what success truly means in your life. Studies confirm that once our basic needs are met, more income, wealth, or possessions don't correlate with lifelong happiness. Plus, Gallup research finds that well-being isn't tied just to career or finances, but also encompasses physical, social, and community well-being. 2. You Feel Constantly Over-Extended and Frustrated You Can't 'Do It All' Do you say yes to every opportunity without strategic prioritization, then feel stretched thin and frustrated by your inability to pursue them all effectively? This suggests you either think more is always better, leading to overload and overwhelm, or you may not have an approach to help you choose where to put your time and attention when faced with seemingly equally valid goals. To shift toward focusing on what matters, use strategic methods to make conscious choices. Create and visualize a goal system by identifying your core priorities and mapping how other goals connect. This can reveal if you're pursuing too much, show how aligned actions serve multiple goals, and reduce perceived friction between supposedly competing goals. You can maximize goal attainment by creating these positive connections, minimizing conflicts, and better understanding trade-offs you may make. When faced with choices, apply the urgency–energy filter. Ask, 'What has urgency, and do I have energy for it?' This reveals several strategies: Prioritize: Commit to high-urgency, high-energy ambitions Reinterpret: For high-urgency, low-energy goals, find ways to achieve the same outcome with less time and effort Postpone: Back-burner lower-priority ambitions Let go: With self-compassion, release goals that no longer serve you Learn to compromise wisely by focusing on what matters at this time rather than trying to do everything. 3. You're Grinding Hard All the Time Without Recovery How often do you find yourself compulsively working, putting in excessive hours without recovery time, leaving you exhausted? Operating in a persistent high-performance mode leads to unproductive stress, causing your physical and mental health to suffer. Ironically, your productivity declines and your work suffers, too. To break this pattern, be strategic about managing your effort and prioritizing recovery. Our ambitions aren't created equal. Be discerning about the effort put against your goals by asking three key questions: Aspiration: How good do I want to be at this? Determination: What is worth the hard work? Motivation: How much effort do I want to put in and what's required? Additionally, manage perfectionism. Be conscious about where you apply excellence and give yourself permission to say 'this is good enough' for lower-stakes areas. Finally, make recovery a leadership imperative. Doris Kearns Goodwin, the celebrated presidential biographer, has said: 'The most underappreciated leadership strength is the ability to relax and replenish energy.' Research shows we paradoxically neglect recovery practices when we need them most. We need a deliberate plan to sustain ourselves for the work that matters and to prioritize time to psychologically disconnect from work. Sustainable success comes from strategic ambition, not hyper-ambition. The idea that you have to choose between being ambitious and being well is a false choice. The goal shouldn't be to eliminate ambition, but to keep it in a healthy zone where it energizes rather than depletes you—allowing you to achieve what you really want both professionally and personally.
Medscape
43 minutes ago
- Medscape
Ovarian Cancer Risk Rises Soon After IBS Diagnosis
TOPLINE: Women with a new diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have a significantly higher risk for ovarian cancer at 3 months and 6 months post-diagnosis, but this risk is no longer elevated beyond 8 months. METHODOLOGY: Ovarian cancer often presents with nonspecific symptoms overlapping those of IBS. The frequency of misdiagnosis remains unknown, and not all IBS guidelines recommend screening for ovarian cancer. Researchers conducted a retrospective cohort study using US administrative claims data to compare ovarian cancer incidence in adult women with and without a new IBS diagnosis. Diagnostic codes were used to identify cases of IBS and ovarian cancer. TAKEAWAY: The cohort comprised 9804 women with IBS and 79,804 women without IBS, identified between January 2017 and December 2020. Women with IBS had a significantly higher risk for ovarian cancer at 3 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.71; P = .02) and 6 months (HR, 1.43; P = .02), but not beyond 8 months post-diagnosis. Women with both IBS and endometriosis had an even greater risk for ovarian cancer at 3 months (HR, 4.20; P = .01), 6 months (HR, 3.52; P = .01), and after 1 year (HR, 2.67; P = .04). Increasing age was significantly associated with higher ovarian cancer incidence only in women younger than 50 years (HR, 1.07; P < .01), regardless of IBS status. IN PRACTICE: 'Identifying patient-specific risk factors, such as chronic pelvic pain or endometriosis, could help develop tailored risk profiles and improve the approach to personalized care in women with IBS-type symptoms,' the authors wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Andrea Shin, Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California, Los Angeles. It was published online in Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. LIMITATIONS: The use of diagnostic codes for identifying IBS may have led to misclassification or reflected symptoms rather than confirmed and validated diagnosis. DISCLOSURES: This study received support from the National Institutes of Health. Some authors reported serving as consultants, advisors, and/or receiving research support from pharmaceutical and healthcare companies; one author reported having stock options. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
